Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Stepping Down, Report Says

  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Meiwaku, Iwasamwillbe, Dork Of Ages and 6 others
Terrifik said:
View attachment 2762616
Click to expand...

The new rule is so obviously unworkable in allowing virtually ANY photo or video of a person that it becomes clear to have only been conceive for the purpose of selective enforcement, and given the flavorful language throughout Twitter's official announcement, it's easy to figure out who the intended target of selective enforcement is:
The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities.
Click to expand...
This policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.
Click to expand...
We recognize that there are instances where account holders may share images or videos of private individuals in an effort to help someone involved in a crisis situation, such as in the aftermath of a violent event, or as part of a newsworthy event due to public interest value, and this might outweigh the safety risks to a person.
Click to expand...
We will always try to assess the context in which the content is shared and, in such cases, we may allow the images or videos to remain on the service. For instance, we would take into consideration whether the image is publicly available and/or is being covered by mainstream/traditional media (newspapers, TV channels, online news sites), or if a particular image and the accompanying tweet text adds value to the public discourse, is being shared in public interest, or is relevant to the community.
Click to expand...

Now here's some fun thought experiments regarding the new rule:

What becomes of all media that was posted preceding this announcement? Must they all be deleted if they have real-life people? Will they only be deleted if a featured person demands it? Will deletion also be coupled with punishment towards the original poster?

What exactly constitutes a public figure who is automatically exempt from the rule? A politician? A school board member from one of the most prominent counties on the US? A city council member from Nowhere, Nebraska? A CEO? A small business owner? A customer-facing service worker? A PR rep? A police officer? A public school teacher? A Hollywood actor? A small-town theater actor? A street protester? A convicted murderer? A convicted serial petty criminal? An arrested criminal suspect? An acquitted former criminal suspect? A Youtuber/streamer with 10k followers? A person who once appeared in news or "viral" media?

If the only "mainstream/traditional media" to cover a piece of media content is Fox News, is the content fair game for everyone else to post? What about The Daily Wire? What about Breitbart? What about The Post Millennial?

How exactly does the mandatory permission for media work? Consider a video of Person A that's posted by Person B:
  • How does Person B demonstrate that he got permission from Person A to post the video?
  • What if Person A retroactively withdraws consent? Will the video be deleted? Will Person B be punished?
  • Does permission for the video also apply automatically to other media derived from the same real event, such as individual screenshots of the video, a higher-quality version of the video, an embarrassing video edit, or an entirely different video that shows the event at a different angle?
  • Can Person A give permission to Person B to post the video, but simultaneously deny permission for Person C to do the same?
  • Can Person A give permission for anyone to post the video EXCEPT Person B?
  • If Person A posted the video first, does that automatically give Person B permission to do the same? What if Person A later deletes his post?
Of course, all of the above questions are moot when the whole point of the new rule is selective enforcement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Dededon't, Ashen One and 41 others
karz said:
twitter will never collapse lol it's too big to fail
Click to expand...

Agree, but not necessarily because it is too big; it is too useful to a particular group of people to fail.

It's the ultimate disinformation machine, with only FB possibly coming close to it, and it's entirely in the control of the very rich, very globalist left. Who do you think funds Twitter over and over again, despite it losing money for a very long time and often failing to profit much (if any) now? Until it loses relevance as an exteremely useful spreader of narrative and propaganda, it will continue existing no matter how ridiculous it seems to anyone paying attention.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Iwasamwillbe, TVB, karz and 9 others
karz said:
twitter will never collapse lol it's too big to fail
Click to expand...
Something I've always found fascinating is just how small Twitter is, and transparently so. Only 25% of Americans even use it, and out of that 25% only 3% are actually consistently vocal or even participants of twitter.
This is information you can just go look up.
So all of these companies catering to, and caving into Twitter mobs are doing so at the behest of a fraction of a handful of angry niggers that are one of the tiniest most meaningless vocal minorities. Yet we live in a world where the blue bird of Twitter is slapped onto everything in our daily life and we all treat it like it's normal and don't question why such a small amount of people with obviously biased political leanings is given such power.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Iwasamwillbe, TVB, karz and 11 others
Catch The Rainbow said:
So Indian Jews
Click to expand...
but they dont have the fountain of sympathy - the Holocaust™️ to cash in. still shrewd af
idiots here confuse the poor telemarketers/scammers with the rich emigrants who had the means and the vision to branch out before everyone else. they'll swipe the rug under you before you notice

and no, they aren't after white women as the memes suggest, most of them marry within their caste
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: TVB, Emperor Augustus, Dork Of Ages and 4 others
20211129_152853.jpg


The last Aryan Tech CEO
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: TVB, Dork Of Ages, Residential Glowie and 1 other person
...probably a coincidence, but...
On the FIRST day of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial
The CEO of Twitter resigned
The CEO of Walmart resigned
The CEO of CNBC resigned
Click to expand...

Katie Hopkins (@Hellohowru12345)

On the FIRST day of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial The CEO of Twitter resigned The CEO of Walmart resigned The CEO of CNBC resigned https://twitter.com/LWPhototherapy/status/1465530251438551042/photo/1
nitter.namazso.eu nitter.namazso.eu
archive.ph

Katie Hopkins (@Hellohowru12345): "On the FIRST day of the Ghislaine …

archived 30 Nov 2021 18:43:44 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Rivalo, Iwasamwillbe, TVB and 16 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back