Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Stepping Down, Report Says

Null said:
View attachment 2759973

if you're not on the fediverse and still actively use twitter i hate you

kiwifarms.cc (weirdos)
poa.st (channers, anime)
freespeechextremist.com (shitposters)
gameliberty.club (gamers+lolicon)
outerheaven.club (gamers-lolicon)
noagendasocial.com (centre left)
leafposter.club (canadians)
spinster.xyz (feminists/terfs)
gleasonator.com (normies)
letsalllovela.in (weebs)
social.anthro.cc (furries) - Known to have manual approvals for bot mitigation.
bitcoinhackers.org (bitcoin maxis)
collapsitarian.io (Anarchists)


View attachment 2759977
Click to expand...
We love you too Josh.

Now, what's the fediverse for artists?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVB, CeleryBread, Judge Dredd and 1 other person
Letora said:
Dorsey only eats twice a week and looks like a sweaty wrinkle with a long neckbeard. He aged terribly, considering he looked like a normal guy when Twitter started, so I'm assuming he's on drugs.
Click to expand...
Chances then he might also drink as well but Dorsey is too old to join the "27 club" where Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin and Kurt Cobain all died at the age of 27.:story:
AnOminous said:
Swim around in his safe full of money like Scrooge McDuck and do yoga.
Click to expand...
That's if he didn't spended his money like a crazy guy and the money pool is empty. On the other hand, even if the money pool is full, Dorsey might hurt himself like Peter Griffin.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Iwasamwillbe, TVB, From The Uncanny Valley and 7 others
Emperor Percival Tachyon said:
I'm well aware of the existance of gatekeepy and SJW instances on the Fediverse, but I don't particularly think they are a problem. The distinction here is they only control their little clique or instance, not the protocol itself. In a decentralized internet I think any place has a right to moderate (or "censor" if you prefer that word in this context) itself as it sees fit. Hell, even Kiwifarms has moderators and rules to follow. It would only become a problem if they had control over the entire protocol itself, and the whole design of it is to prevent a single group from gaining that power. They can go huddle in their safe spaces for all I care, as long as more free speech instances still exist, it's fine, I wouldn't WANT those types on a free internet anyway.
Click to expand...
Pretty much my opinion spot on. Glad to see like minds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVB, Basic Bleach, From The Uncanny Valley and 1 other person
1638282534624.png


We will always try to assess the context in which the content is shared and, in such cases, we may allow the images or videos to remain on the service. For instance, we would take into consideration whether the image is publicly available and/or is being covered by mainstream/traditional media (newspapers, TV channels, online news sites), or if a particular image and the accompanying tweet text adds value to the public discourse, is being shared in public interest, or is relevant to the community.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Yeeted Teet, Donny Cheese, Dededon't and 40 others
Out of curiosity is there an actual good Twitter alternative that isn't Gab nor GETTR? It seems like every single alternative of both Twitter and YouTube become echo chambers for the opposing side of the political spectrum. Although, I would most likely also pin this on Twitter/YouTube taking down/censoring anything that isn't moderately left wing. Odysee seems like a decent alternative to YT for now but I just can't seem to find one for Twitter that isn't shit in some way.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Iwasamwillbe, Cowboy Kim, TVB and 5 others
Terrifik said:
View attachment 2762616
Click to expand...

Andy Ngo.

The first thing the streetshitter did once he got power was ban Andy Ngo embarrassing the fuck out of Antifa.

Edit: And any nigger chimping out in public. The phrasing betrays the intent: "The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities."

Holy shit. They're literally trying to cover up mass chimpouts, blacks performing niggercrime, and Andy Ngo exposing Antifa.

Edit: As before, this can be abused. For example, if I was one of those Charlottesville trolls, I'd be filing privacy complaints every time someone posted an image from it.

Hell, you don't even need to be one of the people in the photo. It's free game reporting literally every photo of a human being on the platform now. Flood the fuckers with reports. ACCELLERATE. FASTER KIWI! KILL! KILL!
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Meiwaku, Leaf Wage Slave, Rivalo and 27 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
Andy Ngo.

The first thing the streetshitter did once he got power was ban Andy Ngo embarrassing the fuck out of Antifa.

Edit: And any nigger chimping out in public. The phrasing betrays the intent: "The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities."

Holy shit. They're literally trying to cover up mass chimpouts, blacks performing niggercrime, and Andy Ngo exposing Antifa.

Edit: As before, this can be abused. For example, if I was one of those Charlottesville trolls, I'd be filing privacy complaints every time someone posted an image from it.
Click to expand...
He's not banned yet but if that rule is snuck into the terms of service, it'll come pretty quick.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Meiwaku, TVB, GenericReviewerDraco and 1 other person
registered 2 hide avatars said:
Is there any evidence that Mr. Pajeet "holds open contempt for US standards for speech"? All I've seen in this thread is that one tweet from 11 years ago, and even that would be quite a stretch.
Click to expand...
just base corpo speak on twitter & mad peole caught him on past tweet .
his state of mindd is corpo.
he will push the terrible pollicy of twitter to the public that jack did not want to do.
he same as sussan wakajijsi at google face for the policy but no way to help the issue.
true people in charge is tranny worker working in the machine & higher up.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, TVB, Pampered Degenerate and 3 others
Terrifik said:
View attachment 2762616
Click to expand...
blog.twitter.com

Expanding our private information policy to include media

As part of our ongoing efforts to build tools with privacy and security at the core, we’re updating our existing private information policy and expanding its scope to include private media.
blog.twitter.com blog.twitter.com
archive.md

Expanding our private information policy to include media

archived 30 Nov 2021 14:09:33 UTC
archive.md archive.md

Company​

Expanding our private information policy to include media​

By Twitter Safety
Tuesday, 30 November 2021

As part of our ongoing efforts to build tools with privacy and security at the core, we’re updating our existing private information policy and expanding its scope to include “private media.” Under our existing policy, publishing other people's private information, such as phone numbers, addresses, and IDs, is already not allowed on Twitter. This includes threatening to expose private information or incentivizing others to do so.
There are growing concerns about the misuse of media and information that is not available elsewhere online as a tool to harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of individuals. Sharing personal media, such as images or videos, can potentially violate a person’s privacy, and may lead to emotional or physical harm. The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities. When we receive a report that a Tweet contains unauthorized private media, we will now take action in line with our range of enforcement options.
While our existing policies and Twitter Rules cover explicit instances of abusive behavior, this update will allow us to take action on media that is shared without any explicit abusive content, provided it’s posted without the consent of the person depicted. This is a part of our ongoing work to align our safety policies with human rights standards, and it will be enforced globally starting today.
What is in violation of this policy?
Under our private information policy, you can’t share the following types of private information or media, without the permission of the person who it belongs to:
  • home address or physical location information, including street addresses, GPS coordinates or other identifying information related to locations that are considered private;
  • identity documents, including government-issued IDs and social security or other national identity numbers – note: we may make limited exceptions in regions where this information is not considered to be private;
  • contact information, including non-public personal phone numbers or email addresses;
  • financial account information, including bank account and credit card details; and
  • other private information, including biometric data or medical records.
  • NEW: media of private individuals without the permission of the person(s) depicted.
The following behaviors are also not permitted:
  • threatening to publicly expose someone’s private information;
  • sharing information that would enable individuals to hack or gain access to someone’s private information without their consent,e.g., sharing sign-in credentials for online banking services;
  • asking for or offering a bounty or financial reward in exchange for posting someone’s private information;
  • asking for a bounty or financial reward in exchange for not posting someone’s private information, sometimes referred to as blackmail.
When private information or media has been shared on Twitter, we need a first-person report or a report from an authorized representative in order to make the determination that the image or video has been shared without their permission. Learn more about reporting on Twitter.
Sharing private media
When we are notified by individuals depicted, or by an authorized representative, that they did not consent to having their private image or video shared, we will remove it. This policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.
However, if the purpose of the dissemination of private images of public figures or individuals who are part of public conversations is to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence them, we may remove the content in line with our policy against abusive behavior.. Similarly, private nude images of public individuals will continue to be actioned under our non-consensual nudity policy.
We recognize that there are instances where account holders may share images or videos of private individuals in an effort to help someone involved in a crisis situation, such as in the aftermath of a violent event, or as part of a newsworthy event due to public interest value, and this might outweigh the safety risks to a person.
We will always try to assess the context in which the content is shared and, in such cases, we may allow the images or videos to remain on the service. For instance, we would take into consideration whether the image is publicly available and/or is being covered by mainstream/traditional media (newspapers, TV channels, online news sites), or if a particular image and the accompanying tweet text adds value to the public discourse, is being shared in public interest, or is relevant to the community.
Feeling safe on Twitter is different for everyone, and our teams are constantly working to understand and address these needs. We know our work will never be done, and we will continue to invest in making our product and policies more robust and transparent to continue to earn the trust of the people using our service.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: TVB, From The Uncanny Valley, Alter Ego and 2 others
Oh shit.

Project Veritas.

This isn't Andy Ngo, although Antifa will use it against him. This is meant to destroy Project Veritas's reach. All of the Veritas videos would be against this new rule, every single last one.. They banned them from the platform but Veritas has a Telegram thing setup, and whenever they have a new video drop they ask everyone to crowdsource posting it to twitter. This gets around that by just banning the content from the TOS directly.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Meiwaku, Rivalo, Bananadana and 18 others
theshitposter said:
'agrawals' aren't brahmins, they're baniya
Click to expand...
Oogga or Booga, they're all streetshitting idiots taking up a chair at the table actual qualified IT people could take instead.

Just remember, like the UK and Muslims, eventually these people will have to be physically removed. They aren't going back to India voluntarily.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Bananadana, Iwasamwillbe, Cowboy Kim and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back