Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
I will powerlevel with dates got mine in 1999 and had to outprocess a couple of (smarter than me) jarheads who refused it. Clinton ordered all troops to be vaccinated or be processed for discharge. So not sure if you are lying or sadly misinformed. As the AVIP (anthrax vaccine immunization program) was officialy started on December 15th 1997. I was a Lance Corporal with 2 years and a month of time in service at the time.






Well, I can say for sure that things had definitely changed post Y2K. My experience was completely different.
 
It's worse than that. "Hey we're now using genetic editing on live human beings this is great maybe we can edit away the aging process, fat cell creation, and like, emotions and stuff."
I mean, they've managed to force the experimental vax on the military against current law. Might as well go for supersoldier serum.
 
It's worse than that. "Hey we're now using genetic editing on live human beings this is great maybe we can edit away the aging process, fat cell creation, and like, emotions and stuff."
Uncle Ted said it best, yeah. I've never been a fan of the idea of gene editing. Even as a little kid it all sounded wrong, but as a young adult it sounds outright evil when that kind of power is given to a small handful of leaders with interests against the people they're meant to govern. mRNA technology sets a dangerous precedent for what governments and humanity as a whole are allowed to do to each other.

I'd rather suffer through grief, feel genuine joy, grow old and die, all on my own terms. There is rest in the grave.
 
Well, I can say for sure that things had definitely changed post Y2K. My experience was completely different.
I know it was stopped for a couple of years and then reinstitituted. I don't remember if it was stopped in 2004 or restarted. But I got out in May of 01 and it was still going on then......was part of the 13th MEU at the time and with being "the tip of the spear" we had to be up to date with what ever the dod decided we needed. I then didn't think about it until about 5-6 years ago, when the shot caught up to me and destroyed my life.
 
It's the surveillance data compiled by Pfizer and the FDA (separate from VAERS) from when the vaccines were rolled out to Feb 2020, so 3 months.

These are the no shit definitely caused by the vaccine numbers. A 3% mortality rate from reported adverse events is crazy and would have led to the immediate pulling of any other drug or vaccine
Is this data really such a smoking gun?

If that Twitter post someone posted a few pages ago is true, from Dec 2020 to Feb 2021 (the time of the Pfizer trial) about 27 Million people were vaccinated in the U.S. Considering a large part of vaccinations were either Moderna and Pfizer, it's safe to say at least 10 Million of people got the Pfizer vaxx during this clinical trial (I'm pulling this estimate out of my ass so feel free to correct me if you have the actual numbers - as stated already, in the actual document from the Pfizer trial, the number of people who received it is retracted for some reason).

So it's 42'000 VAERS reports out of 10 Million, so 0.42%. 1'000 deaths means a 0.01% mortality of vaccinated during this 3 months period.

I have no idea if this is bad or not. How does a 0.01% mortality compare to clinical trials for other drugs and vaccines?
 
Uncle Ted said it best, yeah. I've never been a fan of the idea of gene editing. Even as a little kid it all sounded wrong, but as a young adult it sounds outright evil when that kind of power is given to a small handful of leaders with interests against the people they're meant to govern. mRNA technology sets a dangerous precedent for what governments and humanity as a whole are allowed to do to each other.

I'd rather suffer through grief, feel genuine joy, grow old and die, all on my own terms. There is rest in the grave.
I agree wholeheartedly. When has playing God ever worked out instead of resulting in horrific unintended consequences?
 
The relationship between Pfizer and the MSM is much more incestuous than we suspected.
Media corruption continues to be exposed. James C. Smith, the chairman, and former Chief Executive Officer of the Reuters news agency is a Pfizer investor and board member.

Reuters has written over 22,000 articles mentioning Pfizer.
They only wrote 8,191 on Moderna and 18,000 related to Johnson & Johnson.

NEW – Reuters Chairman is a Pfizer investor and board member. In the last year alone, Reuters has published more than 22,000 articles mentioning Pfizer.https://t.co/YMWGwVvUNj
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) December 2, 2021

From The National Pulse:

The chairman and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Reuters news agency – James C. Smith – is a top investor and board member for pharmaceuticals giant Pfizer. He was elected to the board in 2014, as well as joining Pfizer’s Corporate Governance and Science and Technology Committees. The news raises serious conflict of interest concerns as corporate media outlets such as Reuters continue to promote Pfizer products, defend pharmaceuticals companies from criticism, and move to silence skeptics.
Smith is currently the Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the London-based charity known for providing news and information to billions of readers. He was also the President, Chief Executive Officer, and on the Board of Director of Reuters from 2012 until his retirement in 2020.
He has worked with the organization since 1987, when they were known as the Thomson Newspaper group. He has also served as the CEO of the professional division, overseeing legal, tax and accounting, and intellectual property and science businesses. Later, he went on to lead the North America operations for the news organization.
In an official statement at the time, Ian Read, Pfizer’s chairman and CEO said: “We are pleased to have Jim Smith join Pfizer’s Board of Directors. He brings leadership and operational and international business experience to Pfizer’s Board, and will be an excellent asset to the company. The addition of Jim to our Board helps ensure that Pfizer will continue to benefit from a breadth and variety of experience.”
In the last year alone, Reuters has published more than 22,000 articles mentioning Pfizer. The company has only published 8,191 articles related to Moderna, and 18,000 related to Johnson & Johnson. Many of the articles about Johnson & Johnson were negative in sentiment, unlike their Pfizer reporting.
No wonder the media won’t let you question Pfizer.

Reminder:

Pfizer held vaccine news until after the election.
 
The other day I had to pick someone up inside the airport, which in my city is alongside the hospital the only place with a mask mandate. Everybody inside wore masks besides me. Not a single person said anything to me and I just walked around like a chad. I'm fairly positive the only people who care are the TSA goons and maybe the people at the ticket counter. I didn't go near either, although off-duty TSA people didn't seem to give a fuck (half of them wear it pulled down).

I strongly recommend ignoring mask mandates until someone official-looking demands you wear it. And even then you should probably argue with them until you're told to wear it or leave (unless it's the police, TSA, etc.). The really bad guys (the police enforcing this) can't be everywhere at once. If more people realized this shit was toothless, governments would stop imposing it.
Krauts have embraced their Seig Heil roots and just openly decided to punish the unvaccinated. Let's see if the German nigger cattle do anything.
I thought "lockdowns for the unvaccinated only" was supposed to start in Canada according to that supposed document last year? The scary new variant kinda matches COVID-21 though.
 
The relationship between Pfizer and the MSM is much more incestuous than we suspected.
I like that nobody finds it suspicious that Pfizer got FDA approval like five months ago, and Moderna and J&J still haven't. Then if you bring up that Pfizer and the FDA have, let's say a "conflict of interest", then YOU are the conspiracy theorist.
 
A 35 y.o woman I work with got her booster yesterday morning and she's been under the weather since. We were in the office today and throughout the day she would say "Every bone in my body is aching" "My son has football tonight I don't know how i'm going to stay awake" "That vaccine knocked me on my ass" etc. Idk it didn't sound like her at all.
 
I mean, they've managed to force the experimental vax on the military against current law. Might as well go for supersoldier serum.
It's like the other ways to get superpowers but in real life.
Get bitten by a spider, and it either hurts or you get poisoned.
Get exposed to lots of radiation, get cancer.
Get supersoldier serum, get blood clots and heart attacks.
 
A 35 y.o woman I work with got her booster yesterday morning and she's been under the weather since. We were in the office today and throughout the day she would say "Every bone in my body is aching" "My son has football tonight I don't know how i'm going to stay awake" "That vaccine knocked me on my ass" etc. Idk it didn't sound like her at all.
Never a bad time to get more allies, IMO.

A few seeds of truth & questioning spread early can provide a bountiful harvest down the road.
 
So it's 42'000 VAERS reports out of 10 Million, so 0.42%. 1'000 deaths means a 0.01% mortality of vaccinated during this 3 months period.

I have no idea if this is bad or not. How does a 0.01% mortality compare to clinical trials for other drugs and vaccines?
VAERS is voluntary and incomplete.

Which means you generally need to move the decimal over at least 1 to start to arrive at numbers that reflect reality.

.01% ? Probably right in line with other trials.

.1% ? That is a different story.
 
I have been national socialist for 10 years now. Before I was 20. I guess they say I got no heart, but I do. It is full of delicious racism and white power.
I knew you were an exceptional individual but this is rich.
Humans are just organic machines, and darkies are badly designed and malfunctioning ones.
Wrong: Animals are organic machines, your body is an organic machine. You, your human experience, that unexplainable yet very tangible experience of being an entity that exists inhabiting and controlling your body is not a machine. People have still had conscious experiences and brought back vivid memories from periods of literally 0 brain activity during events where they nearly died but were able to be resuscitated. (These events in question fascinatingly (and consistently) ranging from visions of their own body, seeing the things happening around their body (like whatever medical procedure is being done on their body), experiences into an afterlife (usually that lines up with their own religious beliefs, and whos exact details consistently vary from culture to culture.), and even blind people, both from birth and just visually impaired being able to see clearly during these periods (Though while this happens in the majority of blind people's NDEs, it's not 100% consistent, perhaps implying in the same way that the varying afterlives vary that it's subjective? I.E. if you've always wanted to your vision back then you'll have it back but perhaps there's a minority that didn't desire sight in the same way and thus didn't get it in their brush with death?). Near Death Experiences, it's a fascinating topic and one I recommend all examine in these trying times. It really gives a lot of insight as to exactly what you are, separate from your body. As well as what the afterlife could be or how it works.
 
Last edited:
VAERS is voluntary and incomplete.

Which means you generally need to move the decimal over at least 1 to start to arrive at numbers that reflect reality.

.01% ? Probably right in line with other trials.

.1% ? That is a different story.
But you can use that same argument to claim it's skewed in the other sense. What if most of the VAERS reports were submitted by people who regret taking the vaccine soon after taking it?
Like say they happily agreed to take part in the trials in Dec 2020 but within a month or two (while the trial is still running) they talked to their conspiratard relative who managed to convince them that vaccines will be exploited politically? They would start submitting fraudulent VAERS reports.
So maybe the true number is closer to 0.001% :smug:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back