What you think defines me as a pedo, at worst, if it had been prosecuted , would have been a class C misdemeanor for non-coital sexual contact with a minor over fourteen.
Any sexual contact between you and another party is "non-coital", at least for the other party.
As for the deviancy you've
admitted to engaging in -
a CA Penal Code Section 288(c)(1) violation; I have no idea where you're getting this "class C misdemeanor" nonsense- it could have been charged as
either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances - chief among them your criminal history and your propensity to re-offend. Obviously you've never actually been convicted of a similar offense, which would be in your favor, though as you didn't and don't believe you did anything wrong and that it's the law that's wrong and she was "fully developed/mature" etc, etc, there would seem to be just as much chance of you being charged with a felony.
As you've
gleefully admitted your behavior, there's no reason to believe you would not have been convicted; conviction even of a misdemeanor under CA 288(c)(1) carries the additional penalty of being listed for some amount of time on the CA sex offender registry.
So, you can continue to downplay the severity of what you did, pretend you did nothing wrong, pretend it was okay because you imagine she was "mature" or "fully developed", that she'd "chosen" to "give herself" to others or that you were one of only three ostensibly mature adults having sexual engagement with a minor child, or pretend that she's not a "child" - by your twisted definition - or that such ugly deviancy is "common on the 'outskirts' of the music industry" [whatever that nonsense is supposed to mean; you're nothing but a wannabe as far as being a musician or being "in" the music industry. In fact, you're a horrible saxophone player] or whatever other sick fantasy you can come up with and you can continue to smear those people who have properly called you out for being a despicable, sexually dysfunctional freak, but the facts are the facts, and will never be anything but the facts no matter how often you attempt to obfuscate or deny.
Furthermore, insofar as you've admitted to the act(s), you are not "innocent". You are a creep with a foul mind who thinks sexual activity between adults of nearly thirty years of age and minor fifteen year old children is somehow okay, regardless of whether the act itself was oral sex or simply fondling.
Even if - as I suspect - you've done nothing but claim that you've done the things you've claimed to do online, and didn't actually do them IRL, you'd still be an irredeemable creep simply for fantasizing about such things and publishing it.
Assuming there is some version of your disgusting story out there that's true, that what you did may have done might not technically constitute "pedophilia" or that you may not have admitted to a pattern of behaviors such that the term "predator" would be appropriate, what you actually did would be no less of an offense and no amount of puffery on your part makes it any less perverse, regardless of how much time had passed.
You're still talking about it years later as though you'd done some great thing, describing it as a "very beautiful moment" between the two of you. Based on your description it sounds more like a "sticky fumbling" than anything else, and it's hard to fathom that a girl such as you describe "Sabrina" to have been would have wanted an ugly hobo like yourself touching her, but whatever... You've at best referred to the act as "inappropriate" - likely because it generated a crap ton of negative responses when you first made the statement online in 2012 rather than the locker-room-talk 'high-fiving' you expected. You've backtracked on that since the initial comment, acting as though your critics are somehow the ones in the wrong.
Noticeably, "Sabrina" herself has never appeared to defend you, nor have any of your so-called "friends" - aside from your fellow cretin Jacob Sockpuppet.
_____
From the second link above:
It is a crime under California Penal Code 288(c)(1) to commit
a lewd act against a 14 or 15-year-old child if the defendant was at least 10 years older at the time. Penal Code 288(c)(1) is what’s known as a “wobbler” offense in California. A wobbler is an offense that prosecutors can charge as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Prosecutors normally decide which to charge based on:
- The facts of the case, and
- The defendant’s prior criminal history (if any).
As a misdemeanor, a lewd act against a 14 or 15-year-old can be punished by up to one (1) year in county jail.
And
even as a misdemeanor, a violation of Penal Code 288 requires the defendant to register as a California sex offender.
...and, with regard to what constitutes a "lewd or lascivious act":
What constitutes a lewd act with a minor?
Criminal prosecutions for lewd acts with a minor typically involve accusations that (a) the child was touched or fondled on a sexual organ, or (2) an overt
act of child molestation took place.
But a defendant can be charged with lewd acts even if:
- The touching was not on a sexual organ,
- The touching was done over the child’s clothes (rather than on the bare skin), or
- The child was the one doing the touching (if at the defendant’s urging).
Note that
it is the defendant’s intent to arouse him- or herself, the child or another person that makes the touching a crime. Actual arousal is not required.
Examples of lewd acts on a child
- Dennis places the hand of his 8-year-old step-daughter on the crotch of his pants.
- Sam, a 9th-grade teacher, gropes a student’s breasts through her clothes,
- Ruby kisses the inner thighs of a child she is babysitting for the purpose of causing herself sexual arousal.
