California water districts to get 0% of requested supplies in unprecedented decision


Water agencies in drought-stricken California that serve 27 million residents and 750,000 acres of farmland won’t get any of the water they have requested from the state heading into 2022 other than what’s needed for critical health and safety, state officials announced on Wednesday.
It’s the earliest date the department of water resources has issued a 0% water allocation, a milestone that reflects the dire conditions in California as drought continues to grip the nation’s most populous state and reservoirs have dropped to historically low levels.
State water officials said mandatory water restrictions could be coming and major water districts urged consumers to conserve.

“If conditions continue [to be] this dry, we will see mandatory cutbacks,” Karla Nemeth, director of DWR, told reporters.
The low allocation, while unprecedented, doesn’t mean Californians are at risk of losing water for drinking or bathing. The State Water Project is just one source of water for the 29 districts it supplies; others include the Colorado River and local storage projects.
The state will provide a small amount of water for health and safety needs to some of the districts that asked for it. But they won’t get water for any other purpose, such as irrigation, landscaping and gardening, which consume significant amounts of water.

The State Water Project is a complex system of reservoirs, canals and dams that works alongside the federal Central Valley Project to supply water up and down the state of nearly 40 million people. Lake Oroville, its largest reservoir, is only 30% full, about half of what it normally is this time of year.
Districts that rely on the state have a maximum amount they can request each year and the allocation represents how much the state can give based on available supplies.
The percentage may be adjusted in early winter and spring depending on how much snow and rainfall the state receives. Last year, the state’s second-driest on record, districts’ allocation went from 10% in December down to 5% by March. The only other time since 1996 that districts have been granted nothing was in January 2014, during the last drought.

The metropolitan water district of southern California is the state’s largest customer and it supplies water to about 19 million people. A third of its supply comes from the state. The district declared a drought emergency in November and mandated that people conserve water, a message its leaders emphasized on Wednesday. It will get some water for health and safety purposes.
“The dramatic reduction of our northern California supplies means we all must step up our conservation efforts,” Adel Hagekhalil, the district’s general manager, said in a statement. “Reduce the amount you are watering outside by a day, or two. Take shorter showers. Fix leaks. If we all do our part, we’ll get through this together.”
While the district as a whole has access to water from other sources, like the Colorado River, some of its member agencies in Los Angeles and Ventura counties rely almost exclusively on state supplies. Three of those districts issued a joint statement calling on residents to reduce the water they use on outdoor projects like landscaping.

“This certainly isn’t what anyone wanted to hear,” said Jay Lewitt, president of the Las Virgenes municipal water district, which provides water for 75,000 people.
The state water allocation typically, but not always, goes up from the first December estimate to May, after winter storms that replenish snowpack water supplies have ended. But state water officials warned that dry times will probably continue, creating a tough year ahead. The state has so far failed to meet a goal California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, set in July of a voluntary 15% reduction in water use.
Nemeth, the DWR director, said the state could set mandatory restrictions if local districts don’t set their own and if the voluntary efforts still fail to meet the goal. The state water resources control board recently proposed emergency regulations that would ban certain “wasteful” practices such as watering lawns when it’s raining or washing cars with nozzles that don’t automatically shut off.
 
I remember when Californians were "seriously" considering secession because Orange Man Bad, I was in college and I was joking with a friend about California being retarded. As an Oregonian, this is normal, but we were overheard by a Californian who lost his shit on us.

It was mostly typical soy-golem screeches, but one thing he kept repeating was how "the reservoirs are full, there is enough water for 50 years!" I wonder what that faggot is thinking about this. Doubt he's going to care, after all the MSM says things will be OK for him once he gets in the pod.
 
California produces more food than anywhere else in the US. Something to bear in mind.
California's farms are your food.
No California produces more agricultural products. That is not the same thing as food. My food comes from all over the country. Corn comes from Nebraska and Illinois. Wheat comes from Kansas and Ohio, soy comes from Iowa, beef comes from Texas and Oklahoma, potatoes come from Idaho.

California makes bullshit cash crops like almonds, oranges, grapes, pistachios, and cotton.
 
Why exactly DO they grow so many almonds in California? Something about the soil/weather? Is there not a better place to do it?
I went looking for it but there was some nice article talking about that. But from what I remember in the 1970's we had an issue with Iran which also grows almonds.

But basically the climate and water infrastructure is perfect for almonds and CA grows 80% of them in the hell hole that is the central valley.

Also A&N peeps will kvetch like hell about California's issues. one common one is electricity. Truth is California has more power generation than it needs.

PG&E is able to have the public utility commission set rates, one of the things PGE can do game the system is build new power generation and transmission lines and pass that cost on to rate payers.
 
No California produces more agricultural products. That is not the same thing as food. My food comes from all over the country. Corn comes from Nebraska and Illinois. Wheat comes from Kansas and Ohio, soy comes from Iowa, beef comes from Texas and Oklahoma, potatoes come from Idaho.

California makes bullshit cash crops like almonds, oranges, grapes, pistachios, and cotton.
I'd argue it's that California makes the most in income from Agriculture, which is what I see cited a lot. I imagine if you could dig up by tonnage of foodstuffs grown. Despite possessing three times the land area, California has only 80% of the agricultural land as Iowa and yet Iowa's grains crop is roughly equal in value to California's fruit and berries. In net profit terms, Iowa actually out produces California. Since grain crops will undeniably be cheaper/ton than fruit and berries, Iowa probably produces significantly more foodstuffs in terms of tonnage than California.

To put it perhaps slightly more in perspective, California has only the 16th largest agricultural land area of any American state yet has the highest income from agriculture. Oregon has the next largest ag-land, yet is only the 28th highest income; taking in only a little more than 10% the income of California.
 
California produces more food than anywhere else in the US. Something to bear in mind.
California's farms are your food.
Garlic comes from China now, not Gilroy. Sometimes I get berries from Watsonville except they mostly come from Mexico, as do avocados. Like @A Cardboard Box says, California is retarded and prefers to game the system by growing water hungry almonds, pistachios and the like.

Look up the history of water management in Cali, its atrocious. Polanski's Chinatown is but a peek at the crazy shit that went on.
 
My pet theory is that China is driving much of these policies so they can bankrupt people and buy everything.

I remember when Californians were "seriously" considering secession because Orange Man Bad, I was in college and I was joking with a friend about California being retarded. As an Oregonian, this is normal, but we were overheard by a Californian who lost his shit on us.

It was mostly typical soy-golem screeches, but one thing he kept repeating was how "the reservoirs are full, there is enough water for 50 years!" I wonder what that faggot is thinking about this. Doubt he's going to care, after all the MSM says things will be OK for him once he gets in the pod.
I can tell you what he's thinking: exactly what social media and his peers tell him to think. Doesn't matter if it contradicts what he said yesterday.
 
My pet theory is that China is driving much of these policies so they can bankrupt people and buy everything.

It's not a theory, they have been doing it for a long time buying up critical infrastructure (that should never be owned by ANYONE but the Government of a nation) Farmland (I think ownership of such land should be by Citizens of the nation and not some shitty Non-Dom agreement). China is playing a odd game of empire building nobody's really tried before Money not Bullets it saves all the traditional headackes of empire but causes a few more it's slower to do but it's so slow that it's not really noticeable by most people who don't even know who owns the company that makes the power work and the water flow as long as it does.
 
like actually nutritious stuff like fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc?
I'm not saying you're gonna starve if California crops fail, but prices on everything but staple crops would skyrocket.
Staple crops are staples because you need them.

Almonds are basically spices. You sprinkle it on your jew cake or if you feel fancy you put it in Supper Covfefe Orange good
 
Staple crops are staples because you need them.

Almonds are basically spices. You sprinkle it on your jew cake or if you feel fancy you put it in Supper Covfefe Orange good
Sure you can survive off a diet of rice and beans. That's how third worlders survive on $3 a day. We'll never have a shortage of that shit.
But you'll feel like shit and you'll be sick all the time. If you want an actually varied, healthy diet, you should be concerned about California's farmers.
 
Sure you can survive off a diet of rice and beans. That's how third worlders survive on $3 a day. We'll never have a shortage of that shit.
But you'll feel like shit and you'll be sick all the time. If you want an actually varied, healthy diet, you should be concerned about California's farmers.

Heh? Why should I? I already am happy with rice and irish waddymelon.

Even were I an American, changing a cake topping would not topple me.

May never a worse fate befall me.
 
True or false?
California diverts 2/3 of water into the ocean, to guarantee the survival of a fish species, by making sure the water doesn't get too salty.
A mix of both?
The controversy you're talking about here revolves around the San Francisco Bay Area Estuary. The state's two largest rivers naturally run into there but a lot of that water now gets diverted for irrigation. So it's not really that we're just taking water and dumping it. We're throttling what can be taken out of the estuary's natural supply.

Edit: there's also the Salton Sea which is a hilariously phallic shaped lake in SoCal that causes similar controversy because it's shrinking and becoming more saline as we take water from its sources.
1638524999147.png
 
I went looking for it but there was some nice article talking about that. But from what I remember in the 1970's we had an issue with Iran which also grows almonds.

But basically the climate and water infrastructure is perfect for almonds and CA grows 80% of them in the hell hole that is the central valley.

Also A&N peeps will kvetch like hell about California's issues. one common one is electricity. Truth is California has more power generation than it needs.

PG&E is able to have the public utility commission set rates, one of the things PGE can do game the system is build new power generation and transmission lines and pass that cost on to rate payers.
You're thinking pistachios. Iran still grows the best in the world and the pistachio industry is funding efforts to sanction Iran because they are fucked otherwise. California needs to decide between almonds or the life of the state and they will pick almonds.
 
True or false?
California diverts 2/3 of water into the ocean, to guarantee the survival of a fish species, by making sure the water doesn't get too salty.
A single species of fish is worth more than every Californian combined. I hope it's true.

... On second thought, I'm pretty sure @JosephStalin is stuck in California and I like his posts, so we'll say almost every Californian combined.
 
Last edited:
Back