Again, if it had nothing to do with me being trans, it wouldn't keep coming up. A disproportionate amount of your lol cows wouldn't be trans. Do I think I got this thread because they wanted a random trans person to beat on? No, but it's a huge factor for why creepers and assholes like you guys have given such disproportionate focus on me throughout the years. And I wouldn't get into a lot of the situations you love to rag on me for if I wasn't trans. I wouldn't have had a pre-transition avatar locked to me because there would be no pre-transition picture.
There is really nothing more to add to this argument. It is not my fault you've internalised this shit and refuse to admit that's even a thing that can happen.
I posted this last time you were here, the data is a few months old but the points stand:
@ScarletJusticeWitch For someone who prides himself on logic and rhetoric you don't seem very good at either. The central consistent accusation you throw at us and your claimed reason for posting here through the night (I'm ignoring that you claimed to be too bored to do anything else, as at 3am too bored to sleep is absurd. too bothered to sleep on the other hand is probable ) is that we mock trans people for being trans.
Now as you pride yourself on
logic and
statistics I propose we examine the statistics and draw a
logical conclusion. This forum has some 5000ish members with 4-500 online at any one time. Being a honeypot of autists our forum discussion is deeper than it is broad so compiling simple stats on why we mock the lolcows we do should be simple enough. I propose looking at each of the threads focussed on a Transperson and examining if they are being mocked primarily for being trans or some other trait. we will discount single posts that do not follow the general pattern of a thread as outliers and judge each thread as to its general content to get a general view of the forum. As this is a discussion forum you will no doubt agree this is logical as in discussion there are naturally dissenting opinions and so the forum's view as a body politic cannot be upheld or cast down by a single post.
Christian Weston Chandler:
mocked for atrocious art, strange mannerisms, delusional world view, obsession over childrens toys and cartoons,extremely poor social skills, poor personal health and hygiene and lack of complex thought leading to outlandish opinions and views. overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Briana Wu:
mocked for terrible game design, entitlement complex, hypocrisy, perceived professional victimhood, lying for attention, endless twitter drama, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Ahuviya Harel:
mocked for horrible tattoos, outlandish dress sense, delusional world view, outlandish politics, suicide baiting, lying for attention, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Alyssa:
mocked for suicide baiting, literal god complex, made up genders, gross fetish, self dx mental illnesses for attention, fake headmates, belligerent hypocrisy, pushing her bf into suicide, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Idislikecispeople:
Hypocritical worldview, literal god complex, extreme opinion of transmen, extreme political opinion, e begging, fake mental illness, self dx, lying about ethnicity and mental illness for attention, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
SpringTrap:
3edgy5me posting for attention, made up genders, literal god complex, absurd headmates, self dx, weird edgy fetish, hypocrisy, lying for attention, paedophilia, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Kayla Waller:
hypocritical whining, made up genders, literal god complex, e begging, condescending tone, suicide baiting, self dx, absurd headmates, cry typing, attention seeking, listening to paedophilia, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Kinsey Hope:
defending drunk driving, weird fetish, hypocrisy, extreme opinion of transmen, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Ska:
hypocritical whining, made up genders, literal god complex, e begging, condescending tone, suicide baiting, self dx, absurd headmates, cry typing, attention seeking, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Chloe sagal:
suicide baiting, hypocrisy, belligerent attitude, attention seeking, professional victim, scam artist, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
Rani:
defending chloe's behaviour, hypocrisy, belligerent attitude, overreacting to strangers on the internet.
It's pretty clear what the connecting factor common to all those threads is- its either being trans or overreacting to strangers on the internet. The Leanne Cox thread showed that it cannot be being trans as the forum widely condemned that post, explicitely because being trans is not inherently to be a lolcow and Cox does not overreact to strangers on the internet.
Logically then, based on the above
statistics where all 12 were trans and 11/12 are considered lolcows and mocked by the farms and that 11 all share a trait that is missing in the thread which the farm rejected the farms primarily laughs at people for that shared quality ie overreacting on the internet and not for the universally shared quality of being trans.
What you're doing is a variation of the no true scotsman fallacy- dismissing trans people who disagree with you as 'uncle toms'. No logic or statistics there I'm afraid. The individual insults you keep quoting are evidence only of individuals behaviour and do not necessarily represent the forum as a whole, your chronic autism also means you are completely unable to distinguish genuine insults from goads placed to promote an
overreaction to strangers on the internet. In order to deduce that the forum is transphobic from these statements you would need to compare all content from said posters to establish a common line and crossreference as evidence of forum culture. You would also need to do these analytics without the autism capable of getting you banned from a sonic the hedgehog forum from blinding you to sarcasm, memeic trolling and in jokes. Things which are hard enough to detect through the internet for the best of us.
As to the whole lutherean german thing- if disadvantage comes from her being from a traditional family then it comes from her parents being german lutherans not being roma. She mentions that ethnicity in particular to associate with the ill fortune suffered by the romani community in europe and its highly disingenuous to suggest otherwise. You are no doubt aware that the vast majority of romani have always been catholic, orthodox or islamic and that the reformation never swayed large numbers of romani. You will no doubt be further aware that the lutherean German population of romani is vanishingly small due to an small incident during the 40's where an Austrian gentlemen with questionable facial hair divided the population on the basis of ethnicity rather than religion and then wiped out as many roma as possible, in the process effectively annihilating the already very small lutheran population.
and with that I'm off to bed
