Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
The more I hear about this Chinkflu stuff, the less sense it makes.

So the jabs are supposed to reduce your risk of being hospitalized/dead. Cool. I think most of us are anti-death.

Therefore... why aren't they just giving it to people who are at risk of being hospitalized or killed if they catch coof? Which we already know, because we've been dealing with this shit for 2 whole years now, isn't the (vast) majority of the population, and definitely isn't kids. It's the old, the fat, the unhealthy.

If it works to lessen the severity of symptoms, but does little or nothing to reduce transmission, there's literally no good reason to try to force or blackmail it on healthy 20somethings or children, or anybody really - except the narrowly defined at-risk groups. A symptom-reducing drug isn't going to work better in grandma's bloodstream because a bunch of elementary school kids were forced to get it too.

What worries me about this part is that as far as I know (and I admittedly don't know much) there's nothing stopping NYC health commission from declaring a perpetual state of emergency. Let's say for the sake of argument that these mandates successfully achieve 100% inoculation among the Five Boroughs, clear across the board, and yet there's still infections and residents are still getting covid even with two jabs and a booster. Municipal authorities can't blame the unvaxxed anymore since they've effectively been banned from the city itself. Rather than admitting that these requirements for living are draconian and ineffective, they'll double down and just make the health emergency powers written law or something comparably horrifying.

I've thought about this scenario since July when DeBlasio announced a mandate for indoor dining, museums, theaters, etc. None of the articles I read on the matter seemed to indicate whether or not this measure was intended to be temporary, so I'm lead to believe in the absence of evidence that NYC will attempt to enforce this for as long as possible, even if infection rates go down.


Gotta love that big fat nothingburger answer. Maybe Adams will surprise us and roll back some restrictions while provisionally keeping others as new data comes in that proves the vaccines aren't curbing infections, but on the other hand, I can also see him following DeBlasio's example and enforcing mandates for as long as the masses are able to be kept in a state of fear and paranoia.

However, even if you might not see it in your boilerplate blue state metro area, people are getting fed up with the fear porn these journos are shitting out, vaccinated or not, and unless I'm completely unable to read the room, Omicron hasn't been received with the same degree of irrational terror among normies as Delta back in July. It accounts for the majority of new infections and the mortality rate is next to nonexistent. It wasn't Omicron that terrified me, but the thought of what politicians would do in response to it.
This is the state with the detention camp legislation in process, where they can lock you up with only a reasonable description should someone accuse you, yay! I've been bringing it up again and again, but it's for a good reason.

That and the "partnership" of the Norfolk Airport by NATO and shit, gets me off kilter. I also remember but can't be bothered rn to pull up an older post of mine showing an Alzheimer's med they're formulating, muy expensivo and many people intertwined at the top. Hmm, wonder what they expect to happen in the not-so-distant future?
 



Rossman is drawing his line in the sand:
 
Last edited:
This is the state with the detention camp legislation in process, where they can lock you up with only a reasonable description should someone accuse you, yay! I've been bringing it up again and again, but it's for a good reason.

That and the "partnership" of the Norfolk Airport by NATO and shit, gets me off kilter. I also remember but can't be bothered rn to pull up an older post of mine showing an Alzheimer's med they're formulating, muy expensivo and many people intertwined at the top. Hmm, wonder what they expect to happen in the not-so-distant future?

If they want to reduce life expectancy, they shouldn't invest in a disease that effects only the very old.

Or it may as well could be just rival megacorps cyberpunking it up. Come on we all know jew would do it.
Soros himself jewed out many other jews to the nazis to get his jewhands on their jewgold, would it be really surprise shoah?

"Hah we'll take all the goy money with this alcheimer med!"
"Not so fast you sheggeths, oy vey, we'll rather kill them all than let you take all their money, it is ours, oy vey!"
"Now they got all the vaccine money and we can't sell our alcheimer cure. this is anuddah shoah!"

And than the rival armies of corporate jewbots clashed epicly, and much foreskin was destroyed.

But remember folks, papers please is a good way to keep minorities down... or at least put them back in their places.
 

omfg.jpg


:story: :story:

Dutch source says almost 70 staff members, all vaxxmaxxxed and boosted
 
Yeah I know some companies who’ve been WFH for over 18 months with no indication of returning to normal. I share an office building with one of them, and when I look through the glass door of their open-plan it is always totally empty, like 10% capacity at the very most. It smells like an attempt of alienation/atomisation of the workplace to me.
Prior to all this WFH stuff, there would be office camaraderie. Firing someone is a big deal because it upsets the morale of the office. Not so if the people you work with are just voices on a conference call or a name in an email or even a screen in a zoom meeting. I'm sure they like workers being distant and not emotionally invested in their relationships with co-workers.
 
This is the state with the detention camp legislation in process, where they can lock you up with only a reasonable description should someone accuse you, yay! I've been bringing it up again and again, but it's for a good reason.
Are you referring to the State of New York? Are you saying they are are formulating legislation, right now, that would put people in detention camps if they refuse the vax? I will need a reputable citation for that and not say, some pol sperging to his hysterical Karen constituents. An actual piece of sponsored legislation.
 
Are you referring to the State of New York? Are you saying they are are formulating legislation, right now, that would put people in detention camps if they refuse the vax? I will need a reputable citation for that and not say, some pol sperging to his hysterical Karen constituents. An actual piece of sponsored legislation.
You watch. It'll come. And they will tart it up as being "for your protection".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Woe-B-Gon (TM)
You watch. It'll come. And they will tart it up as being "for your protection".
Given that NY is run by authoritarian assholes, I'm sure they would love nothing more but saying they're planing to implement their own version of Auschwitz without backing it up is just hyperbole. Even De Blasio's decree all businesses should vax or else will get tossed out, either by the new mayor (who comes in 4 days later) or the by the judicial system.
 
Given that NY is run by authoritarian assholes, I'm sure they would love nothing more but saying they're planing to implement their own version of Auschwitz without backing it up is just hyperbole. Even De Blasio's decree all businesses should vax or else will get tossed out, either by the new mayor (who comes in 4 days later) or the by the judicial system.
Probably judicial system first as soon as it's filed and Adam's team went dead silent on it when it was brought up so I am guessing they aren't going to fight it.
 
Probably judicial system first as soon as it's filed and Adam's team went dead silent on it when it was brought up so I am guessing they aren't going to fight it.
Adams is hard for me to read but I think he might be sympathetic to the prevailing attitude amongst blacks, which is that a forced mandate evokes Tuskegee and the history of unethical medical experimentation on blacks, not to mention the history of the US traveling south of the border to do the same when blacks got uppity about being guinea pigs.
 
Earlier I saw some discussion of the shifting attitudes towards cats regarding the environment

Cats may "rule" the internet, but in the real world, to an alarming number of people, cats are "second-class" pets, if that. There's somewhat of a double standard against cats in contrast with dogs, specifically.

Cats are supposed to be kept inside, never to feel the warmth of sunlight or soft grass because they kill small animals and "can wipe out ecosystems." Meanwhile everyone pretends that dogs don't do the exact same thing + more. The dog is one of the "top killers" of pets (including other dogs) and they are a top killer of livestock. Bigger dogs also have the added risk of being able to kill humans. They can also cause worse damage to property. Despite this, dogs apparently have every right to be outside but cats should be locked inside. Oh a dog killed a cat that was minding its own business on porch? Cat shouldn't have been outside! "Cats are just chew toys," "cats are vermin," "I love shooting cats," etc. Oh and cats will also eat you when you die dogs do this too.

My family's had chickens for years, and cats. I get questioned and teased about cats killing chickens, which is funny because our cats have never once bothered our chickens. Nor have the (admittedly few) neighbor cats and stray cats. However we've had entire flocks of both adults and chicks get wiped out by dogs allowed to roam freely multiple times. Money lost, eggs lost, pets lost. Pets that we bred and raised. They also rarely kill wild birds and mice. I wouldn't be shocked if cats (not the neurotic pit bulls flooding shelters) are the first to be rounded up and euthanized en masse because muh climate change.

Sorry for the rant but I don't get to talk about this a lot. Before anyone says anything, I do like dogs, I just prefer cats and get understandably incensed at the double standards.
Gotta disagree on that. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere with no predators letting your cat roam outside is inviting its early demise and/or fuck huge vet bills. I got a 15 year old cat. He is basically a pillow that eats. As long as he gets his two wets and some pets he is good.

Not to mention health effects from all the shit we dump in the environment. Like this cat rescue channel I follow. The lady has had not one. But two feral cats die of cancer/with cancer since August. Both cats lived outside all their lives. So frigging sad when something like this happens to an animal.

THEY"RE GIVING THE CATS CANCER!!!!

To keep the post related to COVID, maybe the cats lapped up a truckload of spilled vax.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back