Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Useful_Mistake]

Maybe he'll try to sue them.

I hope so

 

[Andrew Neiman]

I hope so

That would be due punishment for trying to help Russ with his rapequest.

 

[AnOminous]

I read "upon" as "at the same time as," not "after," but I don't suppose it's likely to matter as long as they actually do it.

I don't think it would show up on the case itself because it's a different thing.

I read "upon" as "at the same time as," not "after," but I don't suppose it's likely to matter as long as they actually do it.

"Upon" is usually interpreted to mean a precondition or prerequisite.

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/A-Guide-to-Reading-Interpreting-and-Applying-Statutes-1.pdf

So it would seem to indicate the obligation doesn't kick in until the case is filed. Although you could always get the admission in advance, it isn't obligatory.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I don't think it would show up on the case itself because it's a different thing.

Of the handful of lawsuits I'm keeping half an eye on, Trump v. Twitter, Inc. has a bunch of pro hac vice motions that were all part of the case itself.

"Upon" is usually interpreted to mean a precondition or prerequisite.

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/A-Guide-to-Reading-Interpreting-and-Applying-Statutes-1.pdf

View attachment 2781130
So it would seem to indicate the obligation doesn't kick in until the case is filed. Although you could always get the admission in advance, it isn't obligatory.

The prerequisite is them filing a case or entering their notice of appearance, and the attorney did file a notice of appearance, so I'm not sure what he'd be waiting around for now... a personal reminder from the court?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The prerequisite is them filing a case or entering their notice of appearance, and the attorney did file a notice of appearance, so I'm not sure what he'd be waiting around for now... a personal reminder from the court?

There are payment fees to be made, as well as proper documentation to acquire



Sources:

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/clerk/2022%20FRAP%20and%20Local%20Rules.pdf

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/documents/adminltrandform2020.pdf

 

[AnOminous]

Of the handful of lawsuits I'm keeping half an eye on, Trump v. Twitter, Inc. has a bunch of pro hac vice motions that were all part of the case itself.

This is an application for admission to the Tenth Circuit Bar, not a pro hac vice motion. I'm not even sure you can practice pro hac vice in the Tenth Circuit. At least I'm not seeing a rule for it. The only rule I have seen is the rule that upon filing an appearance, one must efile an application for admission to the Tenth Circuit Bar, which you only have to do once. After that, you're admitted to practice before that court for any and all purposes.

So when you see a bunch of Circuit Court admissions on some lawyer's resume, that isn't really as impressive as it sounds. It just means you've litigated at least one case there.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Some conflicting evidence between the documents and the clerks official records:



However, it does appear that Grimm got the permission to practice in the 10th circuit from the court.

So out of the two lawyers he has, one has made an appearance and got the permission to practice, while the other did none of that.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Some conflicting evidence between the documents and the clerks official records:
View attachment 2781232
View attachment 2781229

However, it does appear that Grimm got the permission to practice in the 10th circuit from the court.

So out of the two lawyers he has, one has made an appearance and got the permission to practice, while the other did none of that.

Yeah, Gregory Keenan didn't sign the entry of appearance. I don't know if it matters, I just assumed that they'd both be involved in drafting things but it'll be Andrew Grimm's name that they actually put on it when it's filed.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Yeah, Gregory Keenan didn't sign the entry of appearance. I don't know if it matters, I just assumed that they'd both be involved in drafting things but it'll be Andrew Grimm's name that they actually put on it when it's filed.

That's probably right. Either way, now we have confirmation that one of them did apply for practice and got it granted.

 

[Margo Martindale]

RUSS GOT A TWO LAWYERS AND A LAW FIRM ON APPEAL!

View attachment 2779926
View attachment 2779925

Update:

Another Update:

Thats somewhat worrying. Dear leader wont be too happy when he hears of this

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Thats somewhat worrying. Dear leader wont be too happy when he hears of this

Skordas should probably have let him know already.

 

[JektheDumbass]

Skordas should probably have let him know already.

Assuming he didn't hand it off to the same paralegal that keeps not sending in paperwork on time.

 

[somecryptoneet]

I'm also interested to see if, after Russell continues to lose, he blames it on the DJS lawyers like he did with Songcat Studios. "My song was great and would have been a huge success, except the idiot musicians messed it up!" I wonder if this will end with, "I had a great case that the judge agreed with... unfortunately, the lawyers I had hired to help me were incompetent and messed everything up!"

Sounds like bugged judicial mechanics. This guy should star in TIHYDP real life.

 

[Cryin RN]

I'm not a law person but it seems like these guys represent a lot of nuisance lawsuits with a poor track record of winning. Fellow windmill-tilters. No wonder they feel like repping Russ. They're going to run into real trouble with his quality of evidence, namely, that he can't screencap or archive anything that would actually prove he had a case.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'm not a law person but it seems like these guys represent a lot of nuisance lawsuits with a poor track record of winning.

They barely do representation, usually they just file amicus briefs.

 

[Kugelsak Kastengrus 6th]

Maybe they lost a bet?

 

[Andrew Neiman]

Take a trip down memory lane with me. I was just rereading this Russ classic and, I have to say, I really love the phrase "you're ignoring me, but talking to sleaze dudes." It's that strange, strange thing where Russell's whole identity is based around brothels and strippers and sex, but at the same time he has a judgy and puritanical attitude toward other men.

Also, "patronize and woo." I guess he means "patronize" as in, "be a patron/supporter of you."

Some classic vaguebooking, after being socially rejected by a stripper he would later sue:

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Info about the law firm that works for him:

They are a private non-profit which may have lost their status in 2020 for failing to comply with IRS bureaucracy for three straight years.

 

[Windex]

Russell Greer, who infringed on the copyrighted photo of Kylie Jenner by placing her on the cover of his sold-for-profit book - successfully pleading his plights to an anti-Fair Use firm. Unbelievable.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

which may have lost their status in 2020 for failing to comply with IRS bureaucracy for three straight years.

Which brings up a good point. In their notice of appearance they swore to the court they were a non-profit. As far as IRS records show, that may be a lie (their status was revoked and I don't see a any IRS docs suggesting it was returned).