- Joined
- May 30, 2020
Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging
- Thread starter José Mourinho
- Start date
- Joined
- May 30, 2020
Attachments
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
ShortBusDriver
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2018
Sarcasm is really hard for some people to detect.
You know, like this patrickdurbin faggot.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
"Woman."
Allegedly a teacher in Nevada, posting this dumbfuckery.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
Currently trending on twitter. I assume it's all about how voice changers and mocap avatars are keeping people from clocking the troons as enormous, hairy, corpulent incels.
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
Tell me you're a dumbass without telling me you're a dumbass.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
Sounds like the answer would be to imprison these felons, but that's not a great solution now, would it?
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
Just send these fucks to a prison in Montenegro.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Are there even that many big-name troon VTubers? I know about Zentraya, but I do believe that Hololive at the least uses real women for their talent.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
Funny how they only want more and more privileges but once you give them a taste of real equality they suddenly whine and don't want it.
reason.com
Women Are on the Verge of Being Forced Into Military Conscription Due to a Perverse Notion of 'Equality'
Expanding government-imposed burdens to new classes of people is a bad idea, unless the goal is equality of immiseration.
reason.com
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
Well, liberal faggots who would call John Brown a Nazi, if he were alive today, are sucking his dick again...
Depriving a worker of his wages is theft you fucking idiot. God. Its like they can't even put two and two together. At all!
Slavery is at its basic level theft of labour. Its not even a sin.
He objectively was bad. A lot of these idiots say slavery could have only been ended by a war, failing to take in the very trajectory of the nation. Eventually there would have been to much pressure via legislation and simple economics to support slavery. No one actually had to die.
Calls the constitution a "pact with hell". So in other words your a traitor as well.
I'd hardly call a war where the south nearly won on multiple occasions as a "suicide by cop." Of course this implies you have the slightest bit of knowledge on the matter. Something beyond the scope of the average twitter poster.
>tries to spark a slave rebellion/race war
>fails to do so
Just how "vice-like" was that grip if they failed to prevent the election of Lincoln?
He literally thought he had been put on this earth by god to end slavery. If that isn't nuts, then I don't know what is.
And to be so arrogant as to think he lead to emancipation, instead of being one of the most dangerous stepping stones. Rebellions have a bad habit of turning in revolutions and revolution always eats its child. As with the Haiti revolution, Brown's little raid could have exploded into a full on, genocidal race war. One which would have likely lead to the mass killing of blacks in retaliation for their own pogroms.
"I am a atheist" is in other words, an enemy of Brown. Your a person he would have shot after you refused to find god. Namely his god.
Always funny when people with the names of dictators speak about freedom and liberty. Yet another person John Brown would have most definitely shot.
Attempting to overthrow the government of the people is treason, actually. Oh and 100 says this person is a troon and yet another person the highly religious John Brown would have shot.
The Haitian revolution quite literally became a race war from day one. Just cause a white guy was leading the initial action doesn't mean it couldn't and wouldn't turn into one.
What is there even to say? Man attempts to overthrow the government, yet somehow he isn't a traitor to that government?
During slavery america was a democracy, namely a republic. The existence of slaves in no way prevents one from being a democracy, otherwise all the great democracies of history wouldn't be so.
"Revision" is when you correctly point out a raving lunatic is in fact a raving lunatic.
Of course this idiot sounds exactly like a lunatic as well. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that they aren't all that rational.
But he was a traitor who had no problem burning down the nation to get his way.
Weather or not you think slavery is wrong or not. Attempting to cause a revolution in your homeland does in fact make you a traitor.
Most union boys don't typically consider someone who sought to throw down the union as a hero. Every single person John Brown fought during the rebellion was a union boy. Every single one he and his supporters killed was a union boy. The confederacy wouldn't exist for another what, two and a half years. That makes your hero a traitor to the glorious Union.
First tweet fails to grasp John Brown was doing more then killing slave owners.
Second tweet has problems grasping the difference between an attempted rebellion against legitimate authority and an attempt by a people to throw out their conquerors. Both are quite clear. The first is treason, the second is isn't.
Brown was a man of strong religious beliefs who saught to end slavery because he thought the Christian god said it was immoral. He no doubt thought that every group that now composes the left to be sinners who deserve to burn in hell. And probably would do his best to send them there. One wonders how he would see abortion clinics. To think the modern left holds him up as some shining example is well, insane.
Depriving a worker of his wages is theft you fucking idiot. God. Its like they can't even put two and two together. At all!
Slavery is at its basic level theft of labour. Its not even a sin.
He objectively was bad. A lot of these idiots say slavery could have only been ended by a war, failing to take in the very trajectory of the nation. Eventually there would have been to much pressure via legislation and simple economics to support slavery. No one actually had to die.
Calls the constitution a "pact with hell". So in other words your a traitor as well.
I'd hardly call a war where the south nearly won on multiple occasions as a "suicide by cop." Of course this implies you have the slightest bit of knowledge on the matter. Something beyond the scope of the average twitter poster.
>tries to spark a slave rebellion/race war
>fails to do so
Just how "vice-like" was that grip if they failed to prevent the election of Lincoln?
He literally thought he had been put on this earth by god to end slavery. If that isn't nuts, then I don't know what is.
And to be so arrogant as to think he lead to emancipation, instead of being one of the most dangerous stepping stones. Rebellions have a bad habit of turning in revolutions and revolution always eats its child. As with the Haiti revolution, Brown's little raid could have exploded into a full on, genocidal race war. One which would have likely lead to the mass killing of blacks in retaliation for their own pogroms.
"I am a atheist" is in other words, an enemy of Brown. Your a person he would have shot after you refused to find god. Namely his god.
Always funny when people with the names of dictators speak about freedom and liberty. Yet another person John Brown would have most definitely shot.
Attempting to overthrow the government of the people is treason, actually. Oh and 100 says this person is a troon and yet another person the highly religious John Brown would have shot.
The Haitian revolution quite literally became a race war from day one. Just cause a white guy was leading the initial action doesn't mean it couldn't and wouldn't turn into one.
What is there even to say? Man attempts to overthrow the government, yet somehow he isn't a traitor to that government?
During slavery america was a democracy, namely a republic. The existence of slaves in no way prevents one from being a democracy, otherwise all the great democracies of history wouldn't be so.
"Revision" is when you correctly point out a raving lunatic is in fact a raving lunatic.
Of course this idiot sounds exactly like a lunatic as well. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that they aren't all that rational.
But he was a traitor who had no problem burning down the nation to get his way.
Weather or not you think slavery is wrong or not. Attempting to cause a revolution in your homeland does in fact make you a traitor.
Most union boys don't typically consider someone who sought to throw down the union as a hero. Every single person John Brown fought during the rebellion was a union boy. Every single one he and his supporters killed was a union boy. The confederacy wouldn't exist for another what, two and a half years. That makes your hero a traitor to the glorious Union.
First tweet fails to grasp John Brown was doing more then killing slave owners.
Second tweet has problems grasping the difference between an attempted rebellion against legitimate authority and an attempt by a people to throw out their conquerors. Both are quite clear. The first is treason, the second is isn't.
Brown was a man of strong religious beliefs who saught to end slavery because he thought the Christian god said it was immoral. He no doubt thought that every group that now composes the left to be sinners who deserve to burn in hell. And probably would do his best to send them there. One wonders how he would see abortion clinics. To think the modern left holds him up as some shining example is well, insane.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Look, I'm on the side that thinks John Brown is great historical figure and should definitely be taught more. But the idea he wasn't a crazy and violent man who never planned shit is ahistorical. Most of his actions in Kansas had nothing to do with abolition they were just a murderous gang riding in a circle killing anyone they came across they decided was for the pro-slavery constitution. Brown himself, later, distanced himself from the Pottawatomie killings because it was nothing but straight up brutal murder and had nothing to do with fighting slavery. The Raid on Harper's Ferry was based on the absurd belief that it would create a mass national slave uprising. Frederick Douglass told him he was "fucking insane" (in 1850s terms) and that it would never happen. Douglass was so concerned that he warned blacks not to join with the "dangerous" man. The raid accomplished literally nothing but getting all of his allies killed. Basically no abolitionists outside of Brown's circle support him in anything he did.
have you tried being an individual with a personality?
lmao at how many group descriptors they put after "Imagine me:"
have you tried being an individual with a personality?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Remember that the first person to die at the Harpers Ferry Raid was a black freedman that was shot in the back simply because he didn't roll over and surrender to the raiders.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
So they admit BLM have been rioting?
There's only one great solution:
Sex Cannon Lupa
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
Is it time to cancel Keira Knightley? It couldn't happen to a more insane wokester. She claimed to have witnessed women being assaulted on multiple film sets. Well why didn't you do anything from your white wealthy position of privilege, Keira? Were some of those victims women of color? I'll bet they were.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
"Slavery denies the very imago dei."Lurk No More said:
Slavery is at its basic level theft of labour. Its not even a sin.
Even God's chosen people fell into slavery over and over again. Did God deny their imago dei? No, He didn't even erase His covenent with them.
The notion that slavery is somehow desanctifying also makes nonsense of Paul, who states that slaves are fully capable of Christianhood.