- Joined
- Aug 27, 2015
It was a thing when I was like 8, definitely not a thing past there, much less in high school or wherever this weeb abomination takes place into.
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
Strawberries
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2021
I’ll keep it short to avoid derailing too much, Bob and Monet said the surgery was for nodes or polyps on the vocal chords. The way his voice sounds does not contradict this, though it could be an excuse. They did release their full thoughts on the straight contestant, Mandy Morphosis, on their Patreon (summarized on Reddit) and despite Bob’s vague tweeting neither of them seem to be upset about it the way the fans are. Both of them said they know and work with straight guys who do drag and Bob said that “when you work to break down gender roles this is the desired outcome.”
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2015
Please shop posting your dickbulges to public pages, jesus christ. I think they had a few posts talking about not liking being fetishized which is funny as fuck in comparison. Maybe don't post shit like this and have people calling you mommy.
crab hole
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
I think Bob was more likely to have vocal chord polyps or nodules removed. I didn't hear his voice as being higher, just less raspy than it used to be. Of course, he is already trans -- proudly 'nonbinary' for a couple years now -- so who knows how slippery his slope has gotten over the COVID-era. I'm tickled that he doesn't like the hetero, you'd think he'd feel kinship with another queen who also dates women.
I'm simple, I like Trixie content. But how can you mention the show without bringing up Matante Alex, the yodeler? Show hadn't even aired yet when he got #cancelled for 'abusive behavior' and worse than that, transphobia!
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
When TERFs (aka any women who disagrees with trannies) are pushed into “conservative” spaces, their ideas are just as likely to influence those spaces as vice versa. r/tumblrinaction is like 50% angry lesbians now.
But this piece of writing depicts TERFs as passive childlike beings who are swept into right-wing spaces and immediately cannot help but accept all the ideas presented to them by the conservative men, who unlike them, have their own agency and goals and beliefs that they stick to.
How feminist!
I am not talking about high school or first-year college A&P textbooks. The full vasculature and innervation of the organ was literally missing from OB/GYN books. This site does a pretty good job of documenting it (it's a Medium site and a bit out there, but the textbook stuff is all backed up and sourced with scanned images and everything). Anyway, the clitoris is just an extreme example. Most medicine has historically been based on male anatomy, and most research in the past was mostly done on male animals and male humans.
And trannies are about to make it get worse. It's striking to see this article from 2015 arguing about how "women's bodies are different at a fundamental level" and "every cell in your body is sexed." That would all be considered TERF bullshit now:
The medical research gender gap: how excluding women from clinical trials is hurting our health
When it comes to health research, large gender gaps limit how much we know about the difference between women’s health and men’s
What gets me is when women or darked-skinned people complain about lack of knowledge and representation in medicine, they're doing it because they are afraid of dying or being left horribly disabled. As in stuff like, more women dying because a heart medication was only tested on men, or black people having a skin condition or jaundice or even cyanosis missed because doctors were only trained to look for the right signs on pinkish skin. You will always have a lunatic fringe of SJWs that will want to 'decolonize patriarchal Western medicine' or whatever, but for the most part people pushing for non-white/non-male representation in medicine just don't want people to unnecessarily die.
But when troons are doing it, it's because they want shit that makes them feel better. Like a ridiculous anatomy model that helps no one but makes them feel validated, and a ban on saying "pregnant women" because it gives them "dysphoria," and for everyone to pretend that sexual dimorphism is not real anymore. Move over, people who are worried about dying: a troon's feelings are at stake! And yet because they lump themselves in with the general "diversity" movement, their presence makes everyone else look stupid as well.
troon poon
autogynephila should not be celebrated, it can be fun for some but these guys take it to the extreme. how can they be so low inhib.
derange for real.
wtf , hrt does not make you female, you are just as pig now as you were before taking hormones. and shit
have you noticed how all the male who transitioned into female or trans is white. this is a disease, they got no hobbies nor interest , just perversion.
lol at coming out at the age of 50. all those years he didnt noticed that he was a women but suddenly out of no where he is a women/trans .
nobody saw him in gay prides or lgbt prides.
Zukerburg when he took hrt lmao
ok grandpa. you are not fooling anyone jfl
this gal says its the first time wearing a skirt, literal aAUTIST
jajajajaja
Last edited by a moderator:
Sexual Chocolate
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2019
STEAL XIR LOOK! 6 TOP TRANSTASTIC STYLES
EL GOBLINO MASTURBATO
THE SPEEDRUNNER
MY PSYCHO EX-PERSONFRIEND
THE 41%er
HARRY POTTER AND THE CULT OF CLITOROMEGALY
THE GOOGLE DOODLE
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2021
I’m laughing tears at Google doodle and el goblino masturbato every name is literally so spot on
EL GOBLINO MASTURBATO
View attachment 2785998
THE SPEEDRUNNER
View attachment 2785999
MY PSYCHO EX-PERSONFRIEND
View attachment 2786000
THE 41%er
View attachment 2786002
HARRY POTTER AND THE CULT OF CLITOROMEGALY
View attachment 2786004
THE GOOGLE DOODLE
View attachment 2786006
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
I actually have a ton of stuff I'd like to post. Trying to avoid spamming the thread. In the meantime, this young woman caught my attention. She's got the ultimate not like the other girls complex. Neopronouns and micro labels. BDSM and autoandrophilic (wants a dick) shit in her profile. She's in a DDLG (daddy dom little girl) relationship with her boyfriend. She's into pain and posted about finding her boyfriend's desire to rape her while she's sleeping appealing. It's obvious her boyfriend gets off on pushing her boundaries and that she's in an abusive relationship. Why does it seem like all these feminine autoandrophilic women are such raging masochists?:
archive.md
And to balance things out. TIMs doing what they do best. Acting like incel creeps in sheep's clothing:
archive.md
archive.md
Last night i was thinking about names, Saturn was the only one that c…
archived 9 Dec 2021 10:19:13 UTC
And to balance things out. TIMs doing what they do best. Acting like incel creeps in sheep's clothing:
Trans women who pass, do you feel people are kinder and smile more to…
archived 9 Dec 2021 11:15:53 UTC
Trans women who pass, do you feel people are kinder and smile more to…
archived 9 Dec 2021 11:47:38 UTC
Last edited:
hash-slinging slasher
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 23, 2018
Considering what he did to the guy who played Cyborg despite the Snyder Cut revealing that he was the best actor in the movie, he might also really really REALLY hate black men.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2021
Professor Kathleen Stock, Philosophy PhD, who has taught philosophy for over 20 years, published in journals, edited volumes and lectured at the Aristotelian Society, is unqualified to talk about the philosophical implications of the concept of gender identity.I'm more than sure that Stock, as a professor of philosophy, combined with her lived experience as a woman and a lesbian, is more than qualified to speak about the trans topic
View attachment 2784875
This dude's fixation on breasts and how he feels the need to highlight how Stock is wrong about that, is just down right AGP creepisms
This is according to Mx. D E Anderson, MA in English and Women's Studies, a freelance journalist who writes for Cosmopolitan and who has published two books - one with an Evangelical publisher about how she got forced to make a purity pledge as a kid, and one published by the University of Nebraska exploring feminist interpretations of One Direction and Lena Dunham's girls to make the point that callout culture is bad. Oh and is coming out with another memoir about being non binary and Christian which is set to be published by a publishing house run by the Lutheran Church.
Also, just because this will especially piss her off if she stumbles across this thread, she looks like this
despite being in her 30s and according to her bio "lives with two cats", while 50 year old Kathleen Stock looks like this
has kids, and recently married her wife (who's 15 years younger than her).
Oh and the second one is literally just a philosophy student, so you know, definitely more qualified than Professor Stock.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Apologies if late, but there's a development that should make everyone MATI and IRL.
Canada's House of Commons and Senate - without debate OR public input - passed through Bill C-5, which states that ANYONE who does not affirm or willingly transition their child can face up to FIVE YEARS IN PRISON.
The Vancouver dad sent to jail for not wanting his daughter transitioned? He can see five years of prison time.
All because he didn't want to sterilize his child.
And if a parent refuses to hand out the puberty blockers the state can and will come in and sterilize them for you.
Canada's House of Commons and Senate - without debate OR public input - passed through Bill C-5, which states that ANYONE who does not affirm or willingly transition their child can face up to FIVE YEARS IN PRISON.
I have absolutely zero words. Zero. No Senator even opposed this and a majority of Canadians aren't even aware this passed.
The Vancouver dad sent to jail for not wanting his daughter transitioned? He can see five years of prison time.
All because he didn't want to sterilize his child.
And if a parent refuses to hand out the puberty blockers the state can and will come in and sterilize them for you.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
I like that fatty is obviously a woman even in the tiny profile pic that shows up on twitter posts. But she's not like the other goirls - normal lesbians would never get a haircut that ugly.
Canada is so underrated. Great Leader and most kiwis like to complain that the UK is the worst place in the world, but then absolute CHAMP Canada steps the fuck up and does something like this. You go, Canada, you're totally winning history.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Monty is still reeling from Dawkins signing that declaration. You hate to see it. He really tried to construct lists and get those women fired but the minute one of the most famous biologists and atheists signs on, there's nothing to cancel because Dawkins has a lot of Fuck You money from his book deals.
Keep seething, Monty.
This episode still triggers famous HSTS like Samantha Lux and Jessie Gender, the former who went on to say it simply wasn't acceptable and that it 'never happens'. This is the same man who can mock 'cis' people as he likes.
8k likes for that. There is some considerable pushback but the Aidens sure do love using the SEX AND GENDER AREN'T THE SAME rhetoric.
OK, then, stop getting fucked by a dick and getting pregnant.
It'll be relocated to Bad Women's Anatomy, since it's become infested with troons there.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
The University of Birmingham's (UK) LGBTQI+ society has imploded due to allegations that sexual assault was covered up by the president.
I'm having some trouble archiving the facebook post but it only serves to anonymously post this google drive document accusing the leadership of gross misconduct. The doc is written by some concerned members who also happens to be a compete spergs.
Everything unfolds as it usually does: Discord, a Troon in leadership, grooming and denial.
The leader of the society is some Troon called "Leaf", who confusingly goes by "sprout/sprouts/sproutself" pronouns because of course they do.
Leaf invited his BF to be on a sub commitee, even though the BF isn't a student and shouldn't have access to student data or be in a leadership position. He gets accused of sexual assault; leaf and another commitee member covered for him.
Brumfess is a page where people submit posts to be published anonymously. It seems like a lot of members knew what was going on, or at least had some idea that there were some people who could get away with anything because of their status.
Comments:
The Apology:
"
The apology is the classic dodge of responsibility. On the one hand we are supposed to believe that the person making the allegations is "extremely unreliable" which excuses failing to investigate the claims, While at the same time Leaf admits to being emotionally invested in the situation and unable to make the right decision. As normal troons get away with totally inapropriate actions and everyone else is just supposed to sit there and take it.
TLDR: troon LGBT soc president appoints his bf to subcomittee roles in. BF grooms someone and it is never investigated by the president for obvious reasons. Victim is dismissed as "unreliable". Other spergery on discord revealed (yeah, he's a discord mod). Turns out this stuff happens a lot. Troons grooming uni students. Many such cases.
I haven't made a long post like this on a minor happening so do tell me if anything needs clarifying.
I'm having some trouble archiving the facebook post but it only serves to anonymously post this google drive document accusing the leadership of gross misconduct. The doc is written by some concerned members who also happens to be a compete spergs.
Everything unfolds as it usually does: Discord, a Troon in leadership, grooming and denial.
The leader of the society is some Troon called "Leaf", who confusingly goes by "sprout/sprouts/sproutself" pronouns because of course they do.
In response to Leaf going off on "Mediterranean" of all people.
Leaf is apparently more racist, because he forgot to "acknowledge" black history month. Why didn't he post "muh black squares". He did howerever find the time to celebrate Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders apparently. The google doc says this is because he is perpetuating white supremacy; I like to think it was because he likes Jaki Chan movies.
Leaf would randomly ban commitee members from showing up because they might hurt his feelings. But as a sigma male, he would only tell them minutes before the meetings were to begin.
Leaf is apparently more racist, because he forgot to "acknowledge" black history month. Why didn't he post "muh black squares". He did howerever find the time to celebrate Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders apparently. The google doc says this is because he is perpetuating white supremacy; I like to think it was because he likes Jaki Chan movies.
Brumfess is a page where people submit posts to be published anonymously. It seems like a lot of members knew what was going on, or at least had some idea that there were some people who could get away with anything because of their status.
Comments:
Hi everyone,
Following the recent events regarding the open letter, we have apologies from the previous Chair and previous Publicity Officer, as well as a collective apology from the LGBTQ+ Association committee to share with you all.
From the previous Chair:
“It's been brought to committee's attention of serious allegations against a sub committee member. I was aware that these allegations existed after they were appointed the role. I wasn't aware of much details, and the source that I was hearing them from was incredibly unrealiable which is why I did not bring that to committee. However, I should have. It was my responsibility to do my due diligence as chair, and I did not. This could have resulted in harm being done to others because this person was in a position of power. I completely apologize, and I will strive as much as possible in future to ensure this does not happen again. I'd like to apologize for the delay in reply to this, and the delay was not done with malicious intent.”
From the previous Publicity Officer:
“I’m truly sorry about my part to play in the subcommittee member concern: namely, me ignoring the sincerity and severity of the claims against them and letting my own feelings get in the way of keeping our members safe.
I had no idea that the accusation was anything but a rumour, as it was relayed to me through the previous chair of the Association in a way that implied that it was just gossip. In the weeks after, both the previous chair and I got very close to the accused subcommittee member, and I was reluctant to bring up the accusation for the fear that the subcommittee member would reject me as a friend and criticise me for believing the rumour over them.
By the time the concern came through, I was very close friends with the subcommittee member, and the realisation that it wasn’t a rumour and was potentially true was incredibly traumatic for me. I had to remove myself from discussions as it was causing me to relapse in several ways, especially as close friends came out and spoke about their own experiences with SA that made them angry with how committee had treated the concern.
I handled this situation incredibly poorly - I know that the right action would have been to inform the rest of committee of the rumours rather than let it sit between me and the previous chair on the basis that I believed it to be untrue. I’m so sorry that this didn’t happen, and I take full and complete responsibility for what I didn’t say and how this negatively impacted people.
From the LGBTQ+ Association committee:
"Hello everyone,
In the last few months, many things have gone wrong with the association committee, which has led to multiple people being harmed, and many more potentially put in danger. This apology specifically concerns the issues regarding sub-committee, and a further statement will later be written, regarding the other major concerns. We apologise deeply for the delay in this response.
CW: SA for the following section.
For those unaware, a previous member of sub-committee faces sexual assault accusations and, through a combination of ignorance and inaction on those writing this apology's part, this sub-committee members was placed in a position of power over our members and, alongside other sub-committee members, had access to sensitive information which they should not have had.
We firstly and most importantly would like to apologise for the emotional distress caused by these events. Members very rightfully felt unsafe and were potentially at risk, which is unacceptable in a safe space. We particularly apologise to our already vulnerable members who have been prior survivors of SA, and should not have ever been put in this situation, and who we have failed to adequately protect.
We also apologise for the delay in responding, initially at all and then publicly to this concern. We understand that the increased time period where the sub-committee member was present in our spaces must have been an incredible source of stress, and the continued need to press committee members to deal with this issue should not have been necessary. We do however infinitely appreciate all the people who informed us of the situation at hand, and gave us their insights into the situation.
This delay was partially caused by other committee members assuring us they had context, which we should never have accepted, particularly in such an important situation, and with the history of figures of authority ignoring SA victims. Knowing that these committee members were friends with the alleged perpetrator, we should have recognised their own personal biases in the situation and taken a more objective point of view, encouraging them to do the same. The word of a committee member should never be worth more than the word of a member, particularly when they do not have sufficient context, and that their judgment is clouded.
Regarding sub-committee more generally, we should have opposed the way sub-committee was elected. Although some attempts were made to make this process fairer, it was never democratic and most attempts to fix it were not heard. Given that none of us properly knew most of the sub-committee members, we should have attempted to get to know them slightly better, and made ourselves aware of any possible risks they posed. In particular, one sub-committee member was not a University of Birmingham student or an external guild member, and therefore is not officially allowed to be a member of the association let alone help with running it. This would have been a serious issue, in the event of an incident. Even after thorough background checks, such things can still however be missed. We therefore should also have been far more responsive to concerns, and also created a safer relationship between members and committee such that others aware of the issue would have felt comfortable informing us of the allegations.
We apologise for allowing this general culture of implicit consent and decisions made without properly informing the rest of committee, particularly when these decisions involve people's sensitive personal data and serious legal consequences, to continue.
Moving forward, all of previous committee and all of new committee will carefully read/re-read the committee training, particularly the sections on GDPR and on safeguarding.
Any future sub-committees are to be elected democratically, with clear boundaries on their rights and responsibilities including no access to protected information. No one that isn't democratically chosen and aware of these boundaries is to be placed in a position of power.
We will attempt to create a culture of trust in committee such that, in future, members aware of issues feel comfortable reporting these to committee. This culture should also allow committee members themselves to speak up when they have doubts regarding any decisions made. Whenever a concern is expressed, committee members will do their best to listen, to set aside any emotional reaction to the concern (within reason), and consider where the concern is coming from, and what possible actions are needed taking forward.
We will also endeavour to respond to concerns as soon as possible, and clearly indicate when a concern has been responded to, including the creation of a new concerns responses channel.
We will attempt to educate ourselves and the committee members that have stepped down on the harm that was caused, how to avoid it happening in future, and encourage them to apologise and resolve the harm through the course of action recommended by members. This currently includes posting those committee members' apologies, and contacting the guild informing them of recent circumstances.
As the above harm resolution process was very challenging in this situation, and was not properly carried out, all committee members will familiarise themselves with transformative justice and attempt to follow its principles in the future.
Finally, a committee code of conduct is being drafted, to formalise many of the above actions and hopefully avoid or minimise future conflict.
Thank you for hearing us.”
Following the recent events regarding the open letter, we have apologies from the previous Chair and previous Publicity Officer, as well as a collective apology from the LGBTQ+ Association committee to share with you all.
From the previous Chair:
“It's been brought to committee's attention of serious allegations against a sub committee member. I was aware that these allegations existed after they were appointed the role. I wasn't aware of much details, and the source that I was hearing them from was incredibly unrealiable which is why I did not bring that to committee. However, I should have. It was my responsibility to do my due diligence as chair, and I did not. This could have resulted in harm being done to others because this person was in a position of power. I completely apologize, and I will strive as much as possible in future to ensure this does not happen again. I'd like to apologize for the delay in reply to this, and the delay was not done with malicious intent.”
From the previous Publicity Officer:
“I’m truly sorry about my part to play in the subcommittee member concern: namely, me ignoring the sincerity and severity of the claims against them and letting my own feelings get in the way of keeping our members safe.
I had no idea that the accusation was anything but a rumour, as it was relayed to me through the previous chair of the Association in a way that implied that it was just gossip. In the weeks after, both the previous chair and I got very close to the accused subcommittee member, and I was reluctant to bring up the accusation for the fear that the subcommittee member would reject me as a friend and criticise me for believing the rumour over them.
By the time the concern came through, I was very close friends with the subcommittee member, and the realisation that it wasn’t a rumour and was potentially true was incredibly traumatic for me. I had to remove myself from discussions as it was causing me to relapse in several ways, especially as close friends came out and spoke about their own experiences with SA that made them angry with how committee had treated the concern.
I handled this situation incredibly poorly - I know that the right action would have been to inform the rest of committee of the rumours rather than let it sit between me and the previous chair on the basis that I believed it to be untrue. I’m so sorry that this didn’t happen, and I take full and complete responsibility for what I didn’t say and how this negatively impacted people.
From the LGBTQ+ Association committee:
"Hello everyone,
In the last few months, many things have gone wrong with the association committee, which has led to multiple people being harmed, and many more potentially put in danger. This apology specifically concerns the issues regarding sub-committee, and a further statement will later be written, regarding the other major concerns. We apologise deeply for the delay in this response.
CW: SA for the following section.
For those unaware, a previous member of sub-committee faces sexual assault accusations and, through a combination of ignorance and inaction on those writing this apology's part, this sub-committee members was placed in a position of power over our members and, alongside other sub-committee members, had access to sensitive information which they should not have had.
We firstly and most importantly would like to apologise for the emotional distress caused by these events. Members very rightfully felt unsafe and were potentially at risk, which is unacceptable in a safe space. We particularly apologise to our already vulnerable members who have been prior survivors of SA, and should not have ever been put in this situation, and who we have failed to adequately protect.
We also apologise for the delay in responding, initially at all and then publicly to this concern. We understand that the increased time period where the sub-committee member was present in our spaces must have been an incredible source of stress, and the continued need to press committee members to deal with this issue should not have been necessary. We do however infinitely appreciate all the people who informed us of the situation at hand, and gave us their insights into the situation.
This delay was partially caused by other committee members assuring us they had context, which we should never have accepted, particularly in such an important situation, and with the history of figures of authority ignoring SA victims. Knowing that these committee members were friends with the alleged perpetrator, we should have recognised their own personal biases in the situation and taken a more objective point of view, encouraging them to do the same. The word of a committee member should never be worth more than the word of a member, particularly when they do not have sufficient context, and that their judgment is clouded.
Regarding sub-committee more generally, we should have opposed the way sub-committee was elected. Although some attempts were made to make this process fairer, it was never democratic and most attempts to fix it were not heard. Given that none of us properly knew most of the sub-committee members, we should have attempted to get to know them slightly better, and made ourselves aware of any possible risks they posed. In particular, one sub-committee member was not a University of Birmingham student or an external guild member, and therefore is not officially allowed to be a member of the association let alone help with running it. This would have been a serious issue, in the event of an incident. Even after thorough background checks, such things can still however be missed. We therefore should also have been far more responsive to concerns, and also created a safer relationship between members and committee such that others aware of the issue would have felt comfortable informing us of the allegations.
We apologise for allowing this general culture of implicit consent and decisions made without properly informing the rest of committee, particularly when these decisions involve people's sensitive personal data and serious legal consequences, to continue.
Moving forward, all of previous committee and all of new committee will carefully read/re-read the committee training, particularly the sections on GDPR and on safeguarding.
Any future sub-committees are to be elected democratically, with clear boundaries on their rights and responsibilities including no access to protected information. No one that isn't democratically chosen and aware of these boundaries is to be placed in a position of power.
We will attempt to create a culture of trust in committee such that, in future, members aware of issues feel comfortable reporting these to committee. This culture should also allow committee members themselves to speak up when they have doubts regarding any decisions made. Whenever a concern is expressed, committee members will do their best to listen, to set aside any emotional reaction to the concern (within reason), and consider where the concern is coming from, and what possible actions are needed taking forward.
We will also endeavour to respond to concerns as soon as possible, and clearly indicate when a concern has been responded to, including the creation of a new concerns responses channel.
We will attempt to educate ourselves and the committee members that have stepped down on the harm that was caused, how to avoid it happening in future, and encourage them to apologise and resolve the harm through the course of action recommended by members. This currently includes posting those committee members' apologies, and contacting the guild informing them of recent circumstances.
As the above harm resolution process was very challenging in this situation, and was not properly carried out, all committee members will familiarise themselves with transformative justice and attempt to follow its principles in the future.
Finally, a committee code of conduct is being drafted, to formalise many of the above actions and hopefully avoid or minimise future conflict.
Thank you for hearing us.”
The apology is the classic dodge of responsibility. On the one hand we are supposed to believe that the person making the allegations is "extremely unreliable" which excuses failing to investigate the claims, While at the same time Leaf admits to being emotionally invested in the situation and unable to make the right decision. As normal troons get away with totally inapropriate actions and everyone else is just supposed to sit there and take it.
TLDR: troon LGBT soc president appoints his bf to subcomittee roles in. BF grooms someone and it is never investigated by the president for obvious reasons. Victim is dismissed as "unreliable". Other spergery on discord revealed (yeah, he's a discord mod). Turns out this stuff happens a lot. Troons grooming uni students. Many such cases.
I haven't made a long post like this on a minor happening so do tell me if anything needs clarifying.
Last edited:
Dunkleosteus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
I'll never get why the female trannies have decided that the poop emoji hair cut is desirable. They probably think it's quirky and enby when they just look like fat downies with unfortunate hairlines.
The men tranny side shave comb over is also terrible and always highlights how masculine their faces are but the poop emoji cut is the one that irks me most. Like it's the least masculine hair style they could possibly pick.
The men tranny side shave comb over is also terrible and always highlights how masculine their faces are but the poop emoji cut is the one that irks me most. Like it's the least masculine hair style they could possibly pick.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Rest assured, guys like Florence Ashley and any parent who wants to transition their child are jumping for joy now.I like that fatty is obviously a woman even in the tiny profile pic that shows up on twitter posts. But she's not like the other goirls - normal lesbians would never get a haircut that ugly.
Canada is so underrated. Great Leader and most kiwis like to complain that the UK is the worst place in the world, but then absolute CHAMP Canada steps the fuck up and does something like this. You go, Canada, you're totally winning history.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
Another Treasure from Mr. Menno
Totallyunknown
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
Honestly, I don't think Bob got a medically necessary procedure but I will take it back in a few months if he remains on average his current self without any major changes to his appearance.
And he called Maddy the Nickelback of drag and said he would be performing at the nearest pub. I don't think he's okay with this but will accept it to keep his woke title.
I didn't mention Alex because I had no idea he had been cancelled so I don't think anyone really cares besides superfans. I don't know for sure, and I'm just pulling it out of my ass, but I get the feeling Montreal and Quebec being so traditional I have yet to see a transitioned queen from there. I'm sure there's a few, but they haven't made a real name for themselves.
Which leads me to the bill that passed that forces parents to transition their children - I feel I've probably outed myself as a Canadian at this point. I have never met a transgender person. I have met a handful of crossdressers, none of whom claimed to be transgender. I saw two visibly in transition MTF once in Toronto in a tattoo studio. I have had an older relative who did transition in the 90s and joined the 41% mid-00s.
I've attended Canadian schools. They now force you to announce your pronouns at the start of the semester in every class, especially in the social sciences. In the 20+ classes I've taken, no one has ever identified outside of their assigned at birth pronoun.
Canada does love to grand stand though. It will be some next level BPD asshole who legitimately uses that to punish their own parents and be disowned by their entire family so I mean, if that's the route they take, I guess that's the karma for giving birth to an exceptional individual.
I've attended Canadian schools. They now force you to announce your pronouns at the start of the semester in every class, especially in the social sciences. In the 20+ classes I've taken, no one has ever identified outside of their assigned at birth pronoun.
Canada does love to grand stand though. It will be some next level BPD asshole who legitimately uses that to punish their own parents and be disowned by their entire family so I mean, if that's the route they take, I guess that's the karma for giving birth to an exceptional individual.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2021
Alright I finished reading the TERF SCP.
Here is the author statement:
Ive summarized and commentated the first two entries while I read them, and the rest I just read as ya girl has RSI. I'll do the rest later.
I'd expect a girl to LDAR honestly.
I'm taking too long for the first paragraph.
Cut to scene in a bar
The radfems I know, and even most of the woman who aren't radfems, will drop everything to make sure a younger woman that is their mentee is okay. Female solidarity and all of that.
Anyways Theresa goes home and hops on to IRC. She tries to find more about JGT, gets nothing, but then JGTBot whispers to her and tells her to go to their website. JGTBot isnt listed on the active user list nor did it join or leave. Spooky.
Theresa finds the PO box and drives 4hrs to get there. It leads to an abandoned house. She goes to the kitchen and opens the fridge to be jumped by a swarm of pink bugs. She fights them off but passes out.
In a dream state, Theresa encounters the benefactor of JGT, Madeleine von Schaeffer. She is the encarnate of female beauty standards.
Theresa snaps out from dream state and goes back home to her apartment to find Hellen. Hellen is in her apartment because she was worried about Theresa's cat as she hasn't been returning her calls. Theresa ask Hellen if they empower people, Hellen says she hopes so. The chapter ends with Theresa not feeling empowered.
Here is the author statement:
From a horror perspective it is average but it just makes no sense. Main character is a strawman terf, her protege got exposed to a memetic hazard that makes her want to preform femininity so MC goes to the source of that. MC meets the living incarnate of the perfect 1950s housewife, is somehow convinced that forcing yourself to be feminine and straight is the same as telling trans people that they cannot physically change into a woman/man, and thus gets rid of her terf friends.
Ive summarized and commentated the first two entries while I read them, and the rest I just read as ya girl has RSI. I'll do the rest later.
I fucking wish radical feminists had underground coalitions. We would be much more organized, get more shit done, look way cooler, and men would actually be threatened by us. And no 16 year old girl is gonna be joining a radfem collective. Not only do they have school to worry about, learning about radical feminism, the true power of the patriarchy, and how much men hate women is borderline traumatic at that age, especially if you're attracted to them and even more so if you're going through puberty, another traumatic experience for girls. You start to deeply analyze how boys and men act around you. You understand why that uncle is more touchy with you and not your brothers, why your male teachers don't call on you in class, why you can't walk your dog at 5pm in the winter because it is dark already, even if you live near an elementary school, because something can happen to you. You see that male politicians are okay with men masquerading as you and taking resources set aside for you and your fellow sisters because they weren't good enough to compete against other men. You truly feel the words "You're not good enough because you're a girl". You still have your childhood innocence but your body is forcing you to be sexual, and now you know what men think of you and what men think about doing to you, and that this will happen to you for the rest of your life?
I'd expect a girl to LDAR honestly.
I'm taking too long for the first paragraph.
What kind of "women peak at age thirty" bullshit is this. Im pretty sure most of the women spearheading the terf shit are over 30, and a girl at 19 would have shit like college to worry about. Also, if El was in college, she would probably never do shit as big as painting murals as she could get caught and expelled. I know friends that put "Woman: Adult Human Female" stickers on their campuses and was VERY cautious to not get caught as each college sent mass emails about the "hate speech" and how they would investigate.
Holy FUCK any radical feminist worth their salt will tell you that trying to lose weight to look pretty is anti feminist. You are literally doing something that women are pressured to do from childhood to look conventionally attractive. For men. Goddamnit.
Haha I would do the same if my younger friend who didn't look good and said she was dieting pulled that out. Clearly it's some patriarchal shit and a bad influence on her.
Girl just eat the empanadas and be happy. You're 19 these men don't matter.
As much as radfems fight amongst each other, there is always an unwritten rule that you help any woman in need, even if you two are sworn enemies. The lack of response to your sister telling you that she's dieting dangerously (an action that is definitely influenced from the patriarchy) from someone who calls herself a radical feminist just tells me that she is not a radical feminist.
Cut to scene in a bar
We would probably say gyns instead of girls here, lmao
Strikethough isn't mine. Context is about El wanting to lose weight. Unless El is fucking obese they would say and believe that she's fine at her weight. You can't just say how they dislike the commodificaion of womanhood and how women are expected to look a certain way and then imply that they think that El needs to cut back on the empanadas. The dissonance!
These are the shittiest radfems I've seen, I'm revoking their membership.
No one says Wombyn since the fucking 90s, we all say woman because that's our word. This was written in 2021 so the author has no excuse
The radfems I know, and even most of the woman who aren't radfems, will drop everything to make sure a younger woman that is their mentee is okay. Female solidarity and all of that.
Anyways Theresa goes home and hops on to IRC. She tries to find more about JGT, gets nothing, but then JGTBot whispers to her and tells her to go to their website. JGTBot isnt listed on the active user list nor did it join or leave. Spooky.
Theresa finds the PO box and drives 4hrs to get there. It leads to an abandoned house. She goes to the kitchen and opens the fridge to be jumped by a swarm of pink bugs. She fights them off but passes out.
In a dream state, Theresa encounters the benefactor of JGT, Madeleine von Schaeffer. She is the encarnate of female beauty standards.
The magazine isn't exerting power onto it's audience. How would it be by encouraging them to diet. One can interpret the power as the control over your body, but what pushed you to diet is definitely more powerful than you. While you're making your body do what you want, societal pressure is making you do what it wants women to do. This is bullshit logic and exactly how liberal feminists use the word "empower"
Theresa snaps out from dream state and goes back home to her apartment to find Hellen. Hellen is in her apartment because she was worried about Theresa's cat as she hasn't been returning her calls. Theresa ask Hellen if they empower people, Hellen says she hopes so. The chapter ends with Theresa not feeling empowered.
Half of this part is seeing Theresa prepping for the women's march. As the days count down, we see that she's busy and also hasn't heard from El in a while. She's a bit worried but she has work to do and an elderly cat to take care of. She's got an interview with a talk show host who is sympathetic to radfems. Before she's about to go on stage she she's a woman, who is interning on the set, glaring at her and spits at her feet. Theresa clocks her as a troon, give her a rebuttal mentioning male aggression, and leaves.
The announcer for the show introduces the host. But Theresa is bamboozled! The normal host is out and his substitution is a someone who is critical of them. To make things worse, it is the same person who spit at Theresa! We then get this line:
Audience is packed with people who are Sarkites, a villianous cult in the SCP universe, and the interim host is grilling Theresa and calling the collective a hate group. Theresa tries to stand her ground and correct her.
Anyways they make Theresa and her group out to be Nazis. She gets angry and calls out the facade.
Food is thrown on her and she spots El! She leaves, taking El with her and they go to get pizza. Theresa asks where she's been but she's not really talking. El is clearly anxious about meeting up with Theresa, and Theresa being an asshole to waitstaff doesn't allievate it (they just had to do that to make terfs look bad). Theresa asks El to spill and tell her what's up. El pulls out the new copy of Just Girly Things mag. At the sight of it, Theresa immediately dips, gets in her car and sets her gps to JGT HQ with intent to burn it down.
She gets back to the abandoned house and starts to trash the place. During her destruction, plastic mannequins sneak up on and sieze Theresa. They hold he in front of a TV and make her watch some Korps like hypno video:
She sees her whole life turn pink and passes out. It ends with Ms. Schaeffer implying she'll transform Theresa:
The announcer for the show introduces the host. But Theresa is bamboozled! The normal host is out and his substitution is a someone who is critical of them. To make things worse, it is the same person who spit at Theresa! We then get this line:
I legit lost it a bit here.
Audience is packed with people who are Sarkites, a villianous cult in the SCP universe, and the interim host is grilling Theresa and calling the collective a hate group. Theresa tries to stand her ground and correct her.
This is what radfems, and most of you here on the farms, think. Transgenderism is a lucrative medical field, and it all relies in telling people that their bodies are good enough and giving them drugs and surgeries to make them patients for life.
They really only have one joke huh
Weilstedt is a fictional jewish-sarkite ethnic group that makes illegal drugs. They are canon in the SCP universe. Yes, they recognize six genders in their culture. The Daevites used to persecute the Sarkites, I'm only saying it for context.
Anyways they make Theresa and her group out to be Nazis. She gets angry and calls out the facade.
The thing is the author actually gave Theresa a valid point! A fucking intern hijacked the show so that she's now ambushed and she never gets a chance to explain herself as she is overwhelmed and not prepared for this talk. And when she gets the chance to talk, she is jeered and silenced. It mirrors actual debates about the trans topic and has callbacks to the underhanded tactics TRAs use.
Food is thrown on her and she spots El! She leaves, taking El with her and they go to get pizza. Theresa asks where she's been but she's not really talking. El is clearly anxious about meeting up with Theresa, and Theresa being an asshole to waitstaff doesn't allievate it (they just had to do that to make terfs look bad). Theresa asks El to spill and tell her what's up. El pulls out the new copy of Just Girly Things mag. At the sight of it, Theresa immediately dips, gets in her car and sets her gps to JGT HQ with intent to burn it down.
She gets back to the abandoned house and starts to trash the place. During her destruction, plastic mannequins sneak up on and sieze Theresa. They hold he in front of a TV and make her watch some Korps like hypno video:
(Each mention of pink has a font color of a different shade of pink)
She sees her whole life turn pink and passes out. It ends with Ms. Schaeffer implying she'll transform Theresa: