Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
I don't have the heart in me to meme on these guys because they're having to deal with Russell, and that's enough to destroy anyone emotionally. Can lawyers sue their clients for pain & suffering?
I think we'd probably all be glad to forget about the fugitive Nazi war criminals known as Gregory Keenan, Andrew Grimm and James David Banker if they ceased their misguided support for Russell.
 
You can get their cases easily without using their website so I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve.

James David Banker:

Wrote for Wrong Think Purveying Quillette (archive)
- Says he was in the Special Forces. Can anyone double-check on this?
Has a twitter full of mid-level wrong think.
Facebook, all nice and open like a boomer
A grown man wanted to be represented by this picture.
pirate.jpg

69807592_10214738418838262_5987841957232115712_n.jpg
Stanford Academic Profile (archive)
- includes an anti-Critical Race Theory essay


Mr. Banker is awfully strange bedfellows for Mr. Grimm:
But they're Facebook friends
 
I found an additional photo!

9276e97e-020d-4a6c-beca-6e556ae12e92.jpg

Andrew Grimm, also known as the "Dark Angel of Dachau," tours an extermination camp accompanied by Heinrich Himmler and other Gestapo officials. (photo undated)

I have to admit, that wins some points with me. On the other hand, I'm not sure how exactly how that meshes with helping corporations gain a legal footing to behave even more intrusively.
 
Hi new attorney friends, just for your information your new poster child for no bullies online has stated publically that he believes it should be legally okay for disabled men to rape women. And if the women do not like that, they should just close their eyes until it's over. When called out on that horrifying statement he even doubled down.

So, you know, great job attaching your names to that.
 
Everyone say hi to Keenan and Grimm!

:cunningpepe:
Hi! You guys should've done your due diligence before taking this case. You two really shat the bed on this one, bruh. Have fun working with someone who's twice the egotistical narc failure than the both of you combined.

Oh, Keenan and Grimm, I'm really looking forward to your very own thread here.

Welcome to the Orchards.
 
Oh, Keenan and Grimm, I'm really looking forward to your very own thread here.
Threads are not punishment for people KF doesn't like. They're just documentary evidence that someone is a weirdo. These guys are self-interested, but in a pretty normie way. They'd never make it out of Proving Grounds unless they start moonlighting as literal clowns. What I'm saying is don't threaten randoms with things that don't make sense and they might take seriously. This thread attracts a lot of newbies and lurkers so it helps to make basics like this really clear.
 
Threads are not punishment for people KF doesn't like. They're just documentary evidence that someone is a weirdo. These guys are self-interested, but in a pretty normie way. They'd never make it out of Proving Grounds unless they start moonlighting as literal clowns. What I'm saying is don't threaten randoms with things that don't make sense and they might take seriously. This thread attracts a lot of newbies and lurkers so it helps to make basics like this really clear.
Look at this face and tell me he's not a lolcow.

2787450-1a0f5a4623162ca75f08c2f1b747619b.jpg
 
Look at this face and tell me he's not a lolcow.

View attachment 2788009
He's a silly lookin fucker but plenty of people would say that you look like a cow just based on your face, even though to my knowledge you've done nothing cowish. Deeds define the cow, not just their silly lookin faces.

God he's got a silly mug though holy shit, shave that fucking thing off guy
 
Hi! You guys should've done your due diligence before taking this case. You two really shat the bed on this one, bruh. Have fun working with someone who's twice the egotistical narc failure than the both of you combined.

Oh, Keenan and Grimm, I'm really looking forward to your very own thread here.

Welcome to the Orchards.
If they're half as smart as they think they are, they're probably realizing Russ has gotten them to kick a hornet's nest and are considering exit strategies.
 
I dunno. But not getting all the facts before they took the case will bite them in the ass. I wonder they could get excused by claiming they relied on Russ's representations that this was a copyright infringement suit and not a psychotic screed meant to guilt a judge into making us stop being mean to him.
If only they'd just asked Russhole to explain...
Look at this face and tell me he's not a lolcow.

View attachment 2788009
As I alluded to a few pages back, I sense a bit of a David Cross vibe going on there. Some people reckon that Cross is a bit of a lolcow, is that close enough?
Hi! You guys should've done your due diligence before taking this case. You two really shat the bed on this one, bruh. Have fun working with someone who's twice the egotistical narc failure than the both of you combined.
While you're here... quick question for Grimm: Did you write Russhole's latest filing, or did he write it for you?
A grown man wanted to be represented by this picture.
View attachment 2787881
View attachment 2787884
He doesn't really look like a Banker, does he?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Un-Clit
Meh. Get over it and start sending a monthly check. If Null was going to compromise the identities of his private donors, he'd have done it by now.

I'm not as worried about my anonymity anymore when it comes to free speech and my willingness to financially support it. Assholes of every flavor take advantage of that fear of being identified to make supporting sites like this virtually impossible. "Oh no, it would be humiliating to be caught donating to KF!" To whom? Nobody that matters to me gives a shit, and I'm stubborn and grumpy enough to go hard after anybody that tries to fuck with me over it.

Pony up, lads. This stuff matters, and they can't shoot all of us at once.
A gift card, plain and simple. Just about all countries have them, you pay in cash, no trace to you, take pic of back and front and send to Null.
Maximum anonymity
*The End*
 
You can get their cases easily without using their website so I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve.

James David Banker:

Wrote for Wrong Think Purveying Quillette (archive)
- Says he was in the Special Forces. Can anyone double-check on this?
Has a twitter full of mid-level wrong think.
Facebook, all nice and open like a boomer
A grown man wanted to be represented by this picture.
View attachment 2787881
View attachment 2787884
Stanford Academic Profile (archive)
- includes an anti-Critical Race Theory essay


Mr. Banker is awfully strange bedfellows for Mr. Grimm:
But they're Facebook friends
It's dumb to hide it, but comparing the two pages from a professional standpoint, the new page is a significant improvement over the old page.

However, removing everyone from the About Us page is pointless and dumb, but it tells me that they are clearly lurking. Updating the litigation page alone could be a coincidence, because the old litigation page was terrible. There is no way that removing their personal profiles is a coincidence, because lawyers will want their personal profiles up on their firm page. Usually they'll even ask to keep them up on an old firm page until they move to a new firm. It makes their About Us page look even worse.
 
I have to admit, that wins some points with me. On the other hand, I'm not sure how exactly how that meshes with helping corporations gain a legal footing to behave even more intrusively.
Same, I'm at least willing to listen to someone who's willing to entertain Quillette, because it demonstrates they're willing to consider unpopular ideas.

I'm guessing this guy might be on the more libertarian end of the spectrum, but makes the juvenile mistake that anything touching money is good because yay capitalism, so he goes full dicksucker for corporations regarding copyright.

The problem is that copyright is not the same thing as genuine, tangible property. "Intellectual property" is a retarded concept, specifically invented for propaganda purposes.

Copyright is not a right and it's not property. It's an artificial privilege granted and backed up by state force. Like a royal grant. Maybe it has a net benefit to society? Certainly possible, it's worth discussing.

But it can't exist without lots of intrusive state force controlling things you do privately, in your own home, with your real property. Any libertarian minded person needs to keep this in mind. (again, maybe worth it in the end, but it's not something to accept uncritically because yay capitalism)
 
Same, I'm at least willing to listen to someone who's willing to entertain Quillette, because it demonstrates they're willing to consider unpopular ideas.

I'm guessing this guy might be on the more libertarian end of the spectrum, but makes the juvenile mistake that anything touching money is good because yay capitalism, so he goes full dicksucker for corporations regarding copyright.

The problem is that copyright is not the same thing as genuine, tangible property. "Intellectual property" is a retarded concept, specifically invented for propaganda purposes.

Copyright is not a right and it's not property. It's an artificial privilege granted and backed up by state force. Like a royal grant. Maybe it has a net benefit to society? Certainly possible, it's worth discussing.

But it can't exist without lots of intrusive state force controlling things you do privately, in your own home, with your real property. Any libertarian minded person needs to keep this in mind. (again, maybe worth it in the end, but it's not something to accept uncritically because yay capitalism)
And let's not forget that sometimes the cowbyss gazes back into you.

Isabella Janke was just some dumb, edgy college slut until she engaged with... all that. Janke just got overconfident in her gayops. These guys -- alleged professionals -- willingly sought out and took a case from Russell Greer.

Either they're dumb-ish normies who got incredibly unlucky, or there's some reckless arrogance at play that hints at something greater and cowier than first meets the eye. Either way, they're worth scrutinizing and they definitely deserve to be linked to Russ "It's not rape if they close their eyes" Greer.
 
I found an additional photo!
I have to admit, that wins some points with me. On the other hand, I'm not sure how exactly how that meshes with helping corporations gain a legal footing to behave even more intrusively.
James David Banker seems easily like the best of the bunch, but it's mystifying why he has any association with the other two. He has an extensive history of Thoughtcrime and Wrongthink. Andrew Grimm is a standard virtue signaler and the Jain Foundation, where Keenan has a position, is one tiny step to the right of Occupy Democrats. Normally people like Grimm and Keenan don't speak to people like Banker, let alone go into practice with them. The Amicus briefs that Grimm and Keenan have filed have all been the two of them, with no byline for Banker.

Banker worked with Grimm and Keenan in the Fischer case (the guy who said that the honey catalogue was using his property by lifting a phrase from his ad for some type of beehive product). Banker is on the Netflix class action.

Banker is a special forces guy who writes for Quillette and is very proud of it. Grimm is a man-child who leaves his car in a paid parking spot for seven days and then goes to the Circuit Court of Appeal when he gets towed. Must be some interesting conversations around the ol' water cooler.
 
Back