Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger

[neverendingmidi]

Girls don't wear fucking clothes pins in our hair either. No one does. Your mother stopped you from looking like a lunatic you ungrateful twit.

 

[AnOminous]

In honor of Hallowe'en, Labelle has given us a maudlin little sob story.

It's actually pretty good for a change.

 

[女鬼]

It's actually pretty good for a change.

It would be if not for that hideous art. Why does she draw everyone with chipmunk teeth?

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

It would be if not for that hideous art. Why does she draw everyone with chipmunk teeth?

They're Timmy Turner-kin.

 

[Count groudon]

In honor of Hallowe'en, Labelle has given us a maudlin little sob story.
View attachment 56721
View attachment 56722
View attachment 56728
View attachment 56725
View attachment 56726
View attachment 56723
View attachment 56727
View attachment 56724

All pages have been individually archived.

Yknow, usually I actually like these little personal comics Sophie makes. They give a sympathetic view into her life and makes her seem more relatable and human. But this is just kinda dumb. "A boy was being picked on for dressing like a girl, and I was just waiting for a chance to put this clothes pin in my hair."

 

[Phil Ken Sebben]

I'm sorry , I know it's a little late to go back to the "gay party" post, but there were enough crazy comments that I felt justified in making a compilation of the homopobic hypocrisy Sophie's fans say.

If they're also trans-loving SJW'S then sure, but any other bi person is going to run for the hills when they find out you support Sophie and her comic guilting straight/gay people into having sex. Trust me.

To wrap this up I'm going to let "blue" speak for me on how I feel about that comic and it's comments.
View attachment 56665

Sorry, I'm not really up on this other than it's an SJW comic about a little boy who feels like a little girl and this is used as a platform for the author to soapbox their gender issues. I get that part, the part that I'm having trouble with is this:

her comic guilting straight/gay people into having sex. Trust me.

Is this a thing now in the SJW community? Or is it more along the lines of people's genitals not matching who they are inside?

I mean in these people's minds if a lesbian meets OPL and because she has really low standards thinks he's cute and for some reason she thinks Chris is a real woman is she then obligated to have sex with him because it's what inside that counts? Or would she be justified in telling him to get lost? And would the situation be treated the same if for some reason Chris actually did get the surgery done?

Yeah I know I'm trying to inject logic into SJW affairs and that never works but I'm really curious as to what all this means.

 

[AnOminous]

Or is it more along the lines of people's genitals not matching who they are inside?

That would be something someone could sympathize with.

Instead it's about thinking you're entitled to sex from the world even from people who don't want to give it to you and shaming them and telling them they're bad people if they don't.

Sluthate logic, basically.

 

[Ho Mo for Women]

That would be something someone could sympathize with.

Instead it's about thinking you're entitled to sex from the world even from people who don't want to give it to you and shaming them and telling them they're bad people if they don't.

Sluthate logic, basically.

: I'm entitled to sex with women! Women are discriminating against me by not having sex with me!
Tumblr: OMG!!! FUCKING NECKBEARD DUDEBROS! THIS IS RAPE CULTURE! THIS IS WHY I NEED FEMINISM!
Tumblr: I'm entitled to sex with gay men! Gay men are discriminating against me by not having sex with me!

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Yknow, usually I actually like these little personal comics Sophie makes. They give a sympathetic view into her life and makes her seem more relatable and human. But this is just kinda dumb. "A boy was being picked on for dressing like a girl, and I was just waiting for a chance to put this clothes pin in my hair."

He should've put them on his face and fingers like a normal child.

 

[Anarchaprincess]

Who the fuck put clothespin in their hair?

 

[Trombonista]

Girls don't wear fucking clothes pins in our hair either. No one does. Your mother stopped you from looking like a lunatic you ungrateful twit.

To be fair, if her only sibling was her brother, she probably didn't have barrettes or scrunchies. On the other hand, she clearly didn't know how to apply them to her hair.

 

[Chubby_Penguin]

Sorry, I'm not really up on this other than it's an SJW comic about a little boy who feels like a little girl and this is used as a platform for the author to soapbox their gender issues. I get that part, the part that I'm having trouble with is this:
Is this a thing now in the SJW community? Or is it more along the lines of people's genitals not matching who they are inside?

I mean in these people's minds if a lesbian meets OPL and because she has really low standards thinks he's cute and for some reason she thinks Chris is a real woman is she then obligated to have sex with him because it's what inside that counts? Or would she be justified in telling him to get lost? And would the situation be treated the same if for some reason Chris actually did get the surgery done?

Yeah I know I'm trying to inject logic into SJW affairs and that never works but I'm really curious as to what all this means.

From what I understand they aren't saying you have to have sex with a trans person (or anyone), but you are still a transphobe if you don't just because you're not into dick/vag or surgically altered genitalia because that's saying you don't truly view them as the gender they identify as.

Basically they aren't going to support a trans person actually forceably raping someone who rejects them (unless they're even crazier than most tucutes), but they'll still guilt someone for not being into transwomen's dicks or transmen's vulvas.

 

[AnOminous]

Basically they aren't going to support a trans person actually forceably raping someone who rejects them (unless they're even crazier than most tucutes), but they'll still guilt someone for not being into transwomen's dicks or transmen's vulvas.

Plenty of them have said it's literally not rape if one of them rapes someone, because only white males can rape people.

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

Yknow, usually I actually like these little personal comics Sophie makes. They give a sympathetic view into her life and makes her seem more relatable and human. But this is just kinda dumb. "A boy was being picked on for dressing like a girl, and I was just waiting for a chance to put this clothes pin in my hair."

The likability of the comic is due in part that it's a believable situation, unlike everything Stephie does and says.

 

[Observatory]

In honor of Hallowe'en, Labelle has given us a maudlin little sob story.
View attachment 56721
View attachment 56722
View attachment 56728
View attachment 56725
View attachment 56726
View attachment 56723
View attachment 56727
View attachment 56724

All pages have been individually archived.

What I get from this, is that LaBelle seems to believe that the kid who dressed up as a girl might have been showing some super secret wish to be a girl and they got teased for it, showing how society is opressive to trans people and those wanting to be different. And that LaBelle himself did not have the "courage" to go through with it themself because of it.

Showing just how warped his perception is. If anything around LaBelle was normal, this kid probably thought it was a funny idea to dress up as a girl and the bullies just jumped on it. And LaBelle looked like a loon with cloth pins in his hair. He is putting way to much meaning into some small issue that happend to him as a child.
Though I will admit, that this comic was still better than anything that has Stephie in it.

 

[yeast god]

I think I found nude minors in his likes on tumblr. I really need to learn not to go through his likes; it makes me violently ill. I wish I could say, "Well at least he was smart enough to not reblog it."

Is there a way to contact his internet service provider to get them to turn off his internet or something? Is child porn a violation of the terms and conditions of service?

Spoiler: A little off topic

Ok so I was looking through his YouTube account and I found a video in which he describes how he was the person who inspired some sort of candy bar for Hershey's or something (honestly he's describing a fucking payday bar) and apparently this video is his "patent" for it.

He goes on to describe how he sent them an email with the "inspiration" and that he wanted to be in the test trials or whatever. He keeps repeating the date (and getting it wrong) in which he made the video.

He clearly has absolutely no understanding of the legal system, criminal or not.

Anyway, if you want a laugh,

 

[AnOminous]

I think I found nude minors in his likes on tumblr.

Obviously, as you didn't, nobody should post links to that shit here.

But there are a number of places you should.

http://www.missingkids.com/CyberTipline
http://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/report-violations
https://report.cybertip.org/

Use 7 proxies or whatever if you feel the need to remain anonymous.

There are a ton of others, too.

 

[Pickle Inspector]

Sorry, I'm not really up on this other than it's an SJW comic about a little boy who feels like a little girl and this is used as a platform for the author to soapbox their gender issues. I get that part, the part that I'm having trouble with is this:
Is this a thing now in the SJW community? Or is it more along the lines of people's genitals not matching who they are inside?

I mean in these people's minds if a lesbian meets OPL and because she has really low standards thinks he's cute and for some reason she thinks Chris is a real woman is she then obligated to have sex with him because it's what inside that counts? Or would she be justified in telling him to get lost? And would the situation be treated the same if for some reason Chris actually did get the surgery done?

Yeah I know I'm trying to inject logic into SJW affairs and that never works but I'm really curious as to what all this means.

Sophie and co think "Male vagina" and "Female penis" are legitimate terms that everyone should just accept as a non issue otherwise they are obsessing over genitals and are truscum or something.

 

[Positron]

It is hard not to feel guilty when everybody keeps telling you to check your privilege.

In Tumblr maybe; normal people aren't so easily guilt-tripped.

99% a cisgendered person has no relevant experience to what a transgendered person goes through

100% Monsieur Labelle has no relevant experience to what a doctor goes through. That hardly prevented him from opening his stupid mouth though.

 

[BILLY MAYS]

Heh, so apparently James' reddit account has been banned or something: This returns "user not found".
In the meantime, anyone interested to dig up his reddit account should go here. He'll make a new account probably.