US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Yeah, let's assume that this is what they wanted. Let me outline their plan:
1. Defund the police!
2. Crime surges, to nobody's surprise
3. Refund the police!
4. ???

They stand NOTHING to gain from temporarily implementing their retarded policies, being shown to be categorical failures, and then rolling back the original police budget, unless this is a 5D multiversal chess move by moderate Democrats to discredit the fringe.
The point is to replace the police with ideologically aligned allies. Ie, fill it with woke progressive extremists. Fire the police, refund the police, pretend to hire diverse and anti racist police, in reality hire woke police. They stand to gain a woke police force. No 5d chess required.
 
Biden just called Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear to "express his condolences" for last night's tornado outbreak. No word yet on what sort of relief the federal government is going to provide to Kentucky and other states, but they're going to need to provide a lot of it. Here's Dawson Springs, KY. Just one of many towns ravaged by the tornadoes.

If I was a crazy dictator I'd view the tornados as a really convenient way to deplay FEMA camps that require forced vaccinations in order to provide relief.

The point is to replace the police with ideologically aligned allies. Ie, fill it with woke progressive extremists. Fire the police, refund the police, pretend to hire diverse and anti racist police, in reality hire woke police. They stand to gain a woke police force. No 5d chess required.

This is far more complicated than it needs to be, considering that the vast majority of police will follow their orders regardless because they value their pension over anything else. You don't need to defund the entire police force to get woke police. You don't even need to instill woke leadership as corrupt police chiefs/commissioners/Superintendents will defer to mayors and councils who are already pushing woke shit.

Source: Summer 2020, where many metro police were literally washing nigger feet and bending the knee to leftist terrorists as the city burned around them.
 
If I was a crazy dictator I'd view the tornados as a really convenient way to deplay FEMA camps that require forced vaccinations in order to provide relief.



This is far more complicated than it needs to be, considering that the vast majority of police will follow their orders regardless because they value their pension over anything else. You don't need to defund the entire police force to get woke police. You don't even need to instill woke leadership for the most part as police leadership will defer to mayors and councils who are already pushing woke shit.

Source: Summer 2020, where many metro police were literally washing nigger feet and bending the knee to leftist terrorists as the city burned around them.
Do you think it's plausible these local governors and mayors are going to push for hiring police with a progressive bent? I don't think it'd be terrible complicated at all. As for defunding the entire police force yeah that's stupid. But it's not like progressives are particularly amicable to critique of their ideas.

One of the earlier suggestions during the 2020 riots were to replace the police with community activists. As for washing feet and shit, that's a good way to take people who aren't into bending down for the woke quit.

Progressivism always push for a dogmatic culture. They do this automatically, it's a direct consequence of the ideology. It's how they take over institutions.
 
As it stands currently, any Democrat doing anything for 2022 in Florida is an actual grifter.

They have no platform other than "Ron DeSantis sucks, and we should remove him!" Any increase in Democrats there from northeastern or other blue transplants are likely matched or surpassed by Republicans from blue shitholes.

Charlie Crist, Nikki Fried, and/or any other Democrats are literally hyping up their demise every day, and taking money from Blue-believing suckers who would be better off saving it, given the current economic climate.
Even "the Ron deStanis sucks line" won't even work considering he's very popular in Florida
 
Do you think it's plausible these local governors and mayors are going to push for hiring police with a progressive bent? I don't think it'd be terrible complicated at all. As for defunding the entire police force yeah that's stupid. But it's not like progressives are particularly amicable to critique of their ideas.

One of the earlier suggestions during the 2020 riots were to replace the police with community activists. As for washing feet and shit, that's a good way to take people who aren't into bending down for the woke quit.

Progressivism always push for a dogmatic culture. They do this automatically, it's a direct consequence of the ideology. It's how they take over institutions.

I'm pretty sure that they already are pushing to hire police with a progressive bent. They already do it in the military.

But "they" already control major law enforcement. It isn't an institution needing taking over. And it especially didn't need to defund entire police forces in order to do it. Unless, of course, you looking to federalize/privatize.

I'm telling you, it's all a move to circumvent civil liberties more so than pushing any "woke" agenda. Progressivism isn't something the ruling politicians actually believe, it's just bullshit certain ones need to push to maintain power.
 
View attachment 2793642
Not sure if this is accurate, but pretty interesting if so. But the dems will probably come crawling back to BLM in 2024 to cause a ruckus.
BLM will inevitably become a key talking in 2024 because it's so obviously a political tool of the dnc to increase black and danger hair voter turnout. If anyone in 2024 still believes that blm isn't just agitprop run by race hustlers, then they are both blind and retarded.
 
The problem with "they want a woke police force" as theory is that you need woke laws to enforce, and the problem with that is you can't implement neo-Marxist concepts of law and justice without throwing out every single amendment in the Constitution even marginally related to people's rights.

Woke law would mean things like punishing any white person who isn't working daily to fight racism, since merely not being personally racist means you're standing by while systemic racism literally kills black-bodied people of color every day, making you a participant in murder. It means withholding due process rights from rape defendants, since the nature of the crime means upholding the rights of the accused perpetuates societal structures of inequality.

They can't do any of this. They really do believe the cause of black social inequality is white people putting them in jail for the crimes they do, and if we just stop doing that, they'll start behaving more like we do.
 
I have never understood this line of thinking of suing the gun manufacturers because some mass shooters use them, to me it's like suing Toyota because some schizo incel used one of their cars to run over people, the manufacturer isn't responsable about what people do with their product right? So what even is the logic behind this?
I've talked to people on the left about this very thing. Their argument is that a person running over people with a car is not using the car properly so the manufacturer is not to blame. They argue that a person killing people with a gun is using the gun exactly as the manufacturer intended.

I don't agree with that logic but in my experience, that does seem to be the logic that most of them use.
 
I've talked to people on the left about this very thing. Their argument is that a person running over people with a car is not using the car properly so the manufacturer is not to blame. They argue that a person killing people with a gun is using the gun exactly as the manufacturer intended.

I don't agree with that logic but in my experience, that does seem to be the logic that most of them use.
You should tell someone what would happen if a women didn't have a gun and she was about to be rape by a rapist?
 
The problem with "they want a woke police force" as theory is that you need woke laws to enforce, and the problem with that is you can't implement neo-Marxist concepts of law and justice without throwing out every single amendment in the Constitution even marginally related to people's rights.
[...]

They can't do any of this. They really do believe the cause of black social inequality is white people putting them in jail for the crimes they do, and if we just stop doing that, they'll start behaving more like we do.
You say that like the laws on the books is what matters. No, their enforcement is what matters and that is why, for all intents and purposes, rehiring police force with DIE principles first and foremost will do suitable work.

There is an actual precedent for that, it's called South Africa. What currently happens in places like Portland or Twin Cities looks to me like an attempt to recreate South African model of anti-apartheidism, that resulted in blatant anti-white institutionalized racism.
They argue that a person killing people with a gun is using the gun exactly as the manufacturer intended.
Ignoring for a moment that the whole premise is ridiculous, nothing says "made to kill" more than the "sporting" part of a "sporting rifle".
 
BLM will inevitably become a key talking in 2024 because it's so obviously a political tool of the dnc to increase black and danger hair voter turnout. If anyone in 2024 still believes that blm isn't just agitprop run by race hustlers, then they are both blind and retarded.
Trump may be running for the House in 2022. There's a new House seat opening up in Florida, he has a place there, he will 100% win that election and bring a ton of Republican voters out so they will want him to run.

His plan may be to oust Mitch as Speaker of the House, then impeach, delay, and subpoena Biden and Kamala at once. If they're both out, he's next in line to be President. If he becomes President with less than 2 years left in his term, it doesn't count as a full term.

I wish he had done this in 2016 and 2020, as backup should his Presidential elections fail.
 
I have never understood this line of thinking of suing the gun manufacturers because some mass shooters use them, to me it's like suing Toyota because some schizo incel used one of their cars to run over people, the manufacturer isn't responsable about what people do with their product right? So what even is the logic behind this?
Their logic is that cars have a legitimate purpose but that guns do not. At least, outside the hands of the government. That's it in essence. It's not hypocrisy so much as it is an incompatible premise. People should not be able to defend themselves, the state should do it.

Honestly, that's the root of a lot of leftist thinking, much like kids in a classroom who run to teacher or lie to teacher to get her on their side or anything else - it's nearly all rooted in a belief in Authority. I recall a communist Antifa remarking in my presence one time: "Individualists are so funny."
 
Ignoring for a moment that the whole premise is ridiculous, nothing says "made to kill" more than the "sporting" part of a "sporting rifle".

Condoms are made for sex. So if a rapist wears a condom, can the victim sue the manufacturer? Same logic.

His plan may be to oust Mitch as Speaker of the House, then impeach, delay, and subpoena Biden and Kamala at once.

Mitch is in the Senate. Kevin McCarthy would be Speaker if the GOP takes the House back.

Their logic is that cars have a legitimate purpose but that guns do not. At least, outside the hands of the government. That's it in essence. It's not hypocrisy so much as it is an incompatible premise. People should not be able to defend themselves, the state should do it.

Bingo. The left doesn't believe you own your life. You belong to the state, and the state is responsible for deciding whether circumstances warrant your life being defended or not. If a black-bodied person of color happens to want to redress historic social injustices by relieving you of your life, well, the state's decided that is fine. The fact that you currently have a say really upsets them.
 
The problem with "they want a woke police force" as theory is that you need woke laws to enforce, and the problem with that is you can't implement neo-Marxist concepts of law and justice without throwing out every single amendment in the Constitution even marginally related to people's rights.
You don't need "woke" laws. Not wholly. You need selective enforcement. Look at Rittenhouse - did nothing wrong, State twists every truth they can into a pretzel trying to convict him. Hell, outright lying. An arsonist setting fire to buildings, even children's homes, don't prosecute. Release with a warning or on trivial bail. There's all sorts of things that can be done without needing to explicitly contradict the Constitution. For example, make an institution dependent on Federal funding (e.g. schools) and then threaten to withdraw it if they don't comply.

The primary motivation in "defund the police" is to backdoor in federal law enforcement. Like O'Brien said in 1984: "Power is the goal".

The Constitution still requires people to defend it. And I'm not talking people's militias (yet) but DAs, judges, congress people, school boards... That has to be taken back. If you're not involved in local politics, get involved. The time is now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back