Is Christianity the most cucked religion?

I think atheism is the most cucked to be honest. I know people like to say it isn't a religion, but it's a belief system like any other, in the sense that the status defines how you interpret events and meaning. When one derives meaning from negation of meaning rather than finding or even search for meaning as an artist might, when negation becomes the center, it's like the revolutionary; you may know that what you're rebelling against is wrong, but they rarely have a destiny, an attachment to meaning that is separate from their rebellion.

That's how you get the biggest companies apparently championing the causes of the little guy and then a whole host of little guys for whom their pet causes of diversity or trans rights or bisexual visibility are central to meaning in their lives.

It's a belief system that doesn't even have strong shared methods of condemnation and that dearth of values creates a modern type of nightmare world where anyone can pursue socially harmful behavior with little to no social repercussions.
 
It's a bit more complicated than that. The people of that time, especially religious leaders, had a nasty habit of misinterpreting and badly applying the law.

According to Torah law, the adulterous man should have been presented before Jesus as well. As such, everyone around Jesus that accused the woman was in violation against the Torah's rules, possibly on multiple counts.

The background of adultery is left ambiguous like this; it's possible that the woman was given to some guy to be raped, and then quickly taken before Jesus. I could go deep into this and other possibilities.

Plus, God never said that He never can or will waive a trespass and grant forgiveness.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Kulmeister
I think atheism is the most cucked to be honest. I know people like to say it isn't a religion, but it's a belief system like any other, in the sense that the status defines how you interpret events and meaning. When one derives meaning from negation of meaning rather than finding or even search for meaning as an artist might, when negation becomes the center, it's like the revolutionary; you may know that what you're rebelling against is wrong, but they rarely have a destiny, an attachment to meaning that is separate from their rebellion.

That's how you get the biggest companies apparently championing the causes of the little guy and then a whole host of little guys for whom their pet causes of diversity or trans rights or bisexual visibility are central to meaning in their lives.

It's a belief system that doesn't even have strong shared methods of condemnation and that dearth of values creates a modern type of nightmare world where anyone can pursue socially harmful behavior with little to no social repercussions.
I agree but specifically with the atheist that cares too much (as opposed to those that just don't give a shit about faith in general) but willingly ignore how the lack of a divinity completely obliterates the moral codes we all live by.
Also people who worship media and corporations are literally the most cucked.
 
I think atheism is the most cucked to be honest. I know people like to say it isn't a religion, but it's a belief system like any other, in the sense that the status defines how you interpret events and meaning. When one derives meaning from negation of meaning rather than finding or even search for meaning as an artist might, when negation becomes the center, it's like the revolutionary; you may know that what you're rebelling against is wrong, but they rarely have a destiny, an attachment to meaning that is separate from their rebellion.

That's how you get the biggest companies apparently championing the causes of the little guy and then a whole host of little guys for whom their pet causes of diversity or trans rights or bisexual visibility are central to meaning in their lives.

It's a belief system that doesn't even have strong shared methods of condemnation and that dearth of values creates a modern type of nightmare world where anyone can pursue socially harmful behavior with little to no social repercussions.
Atheism destroyed the West. Even if atheism true it is such a dark and terrible reality it would be better to believe in God anyways.
Plus, God never said that He never can or will waive a trespass and grant forgiveness.
Yes He did. "Go and sin no more." The OT Law forgives those who confess their sin and repent. Fedora tippers understand Christianity like Wokeists understand Western culture.
 
I agree but specifically with the atheist that cares too much (as opposed to those that just don't give a shit about faith in general) but willingly ignore how the lack of a divinity completely obliterates the moral codes we all live by.
Also people who worship media and corporations are literally the most cucked.
Well yeah, people who don't give a shit aren't atheists.
 
Well first of, there was no adultery.
Literally no other religion has this.
You can say that. If you're fucking retarded lol
Islam doesn't have this
No adultery in Islam, you say. Besides men having multiple wives who they can divorse at three waves of a hand, the practice of muta where you can get """married""" for 15 minutes for the sole purpose of fucking, besides Muhammad being repromanded by his wives for fucking slave girls, something that he then said that allah allowed only him to do, though then more he allowed his followers to also lawfully fuck slaves with no pain to any marriages they got.
Judaism doesn't have this
Correct.
Buddhism doesn't have this
You can easily say yes and no tho that lol
Get it? Yes and no? Like ying and yang? I should do a course on this kind of comparisonology.
no other religion or people have ever had a story of this kind.
Have you ever heard of the Greeks?
Or maybe Hindus?

Well yeah, people who don't give a shit aren't atheists.
They don't give a shit until their brothers communists start knocking on doors, demanding sacks of grain. Though they will not give a shit if it's not their door.
In my experience, don't give a shiters are very pragmatic assholes lol
 
1633969801076.png
no, it's Islam
 
The Abrahamic religions make no sense. Jews, Muslims, Christians, and Baháʼís often have restrictive and outdated beliefs.

Christianity has fallen apart in the West, it is either too strict or too careless. The fundamentalists isolate and practice hypocrisy. The most liberal Christians do not abide by rules and believe altruistic "feel good" nonsense. No agreements or unification. No sense of preservation and adaptation.
 
The Abrahamic religions make no sense. Jews, Muslims, Christians, and Baháʼís often have restrictive and outdated beliefs.

Christianity has fallen apart in the West, it is either too strict or too careless. The fundamentalists isolate and practice hypocrisy. The most liberal Christians do not abide by rules and believe altruistic "feel good" nonsense. No agreements or unification. No sense of preservation and adaptation.
What exactly do you think the point of Christianity, or any religion, is?
 
What exactly do you think the point of Christianity, or any religion, is?
I think it was initially a Roman-Jewish ploy at societal engineering. The Christian principals of loving your family, neighbor, and making an honest living are the only good I see not being followed. It's been tainted by both blind hatred and suicidal altruism. No one can be too sure of anything other than observable or experienced. God is not some angry skydaddy who would impregnate a woman and condemn his son/self for humanity.

Religions have different ideas of what creation, existence, and the future will bring. Whatever tenants or rules that need followed must make sense or it will die. Their main purpose seems to be enlightenment and relative peace. Some religions convolute this goal with nonsensical threats and false happenings. Corruption is also a sad reality.
 
I think it was initially a Roman-Jewish ploy at societal engineering.
I admit that did make me blink several times.

What I was getting at is do you believe religion is just, in its good form, a positive form of social control? Or is it actually an attempt to communicate with something better than humanity and this world?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zero Day Defense
I admit that did make me blink several times.

What I was getting at is do you believe religion is just, in its good form, a positive form of social control? Or is it actually an attempt to communicate with something better than humanity and this world?
I cite Caesar's Messiah as what lead me to the belief that the Roman and Jewish aristocracy colluded to create Christianity.

I believe that both of those statements are true. Religion can bend society to better performance. What values and actions that result from common teaching can be beneficial. Personally, I believe God to be a slumbering, universal being. There are rules and truths of the world. Cause and effect are their creation. Humanity has a spark of God's autonomy to judge what is best. Through trial and error, I believe we can communicate and learn from our creator's "whispers."
 
I cite Caesar's Messiah as what lead me to the belief that the Roman and Jewish aristocracy colluded to create Christianity.

I believe that both of those statements are true. Religion can bend society to better performance. What values and actions that result from common teaching can be beneficial. Personally, I believe God to be a slumbering, universal being. There are rules and truths of the world. Cause and effect are their creation. Humanity has a spark of God's autonomy to judge what is best. Through trial and error, I believe we can communicate and learn from our creator's "whispers."
What is Caesar's Messiah? How would it benefit the aristocracy when paganism already deified or revered the ruling class above the commoners on a cosmic, metaphysical scale? And the Jewish elites had thoroughly corrupted scripture to place the themselves above their peasantry? The Biblical God has so little regard for classes and stations that the Messiah incarnated as a peasant carpenter.
I believe that both of those statements are true. Religion can bend society to better performance. What values and actions that result from common teaching can be beneficial. Personally, I believe God to be a slumbering, universal being. There are rules and truths of the world. Cause and effect are their creation. Humanity has a spark of God's autonomy to judge what is best. Through trial and error, I believe we can communicate and learn from our creator's "whispers."
I'm genuinely interested in that. Would you please explain further?
 
What is Caesar's Messiah? How would it benefit the aristocracy when paganism already deified or revered the ruling class above the commoners on a cosmic, metaphysical scale? And the Jewish elites had thoroughly corrupted scripture to place the themselves above their peasantry? The Biblical God has so little regard for classes and stations that the Messiah incarnated as a peasant carpenter.

I'm genuinely interested in that. Would you please explain further?

"Caesar's Messiah" is both a book and documentary investigating Christianity's origins and connections to the Flavian dynasty.

Because Christianity and Judaism have way more rules than the Roman and Greek pantheons ever did. Jesus being born into commoner stock and gave the peasants hope of paradise. The threat of hell and punishment gave the powerful tools to pacify or silence heretics. Literacy was suppressed during the early ages of Christianity as a control tactic by leaders and the clergy. They could rally the masses to fight. It wouldn't be until the Renaissance and Protestant reformation that literacy came back to even the common woman. Hence why things are called into question, now. People can read scripture, debate it, and come to their own conclusions.

My beliefs are just my beliefs. I'm something of a Pantheist-Darwinist-Deist who believes in spiritual beings, humanity's potential, and the beauty of the world.
 
I cite Caesar's Messiah as what lead me to the belief that the Roman and Jewish aristocracy colluded to create Christianity.
The Jews and Romans then became independently disgusted with Christianity and proceeded to throw their adherents off roofs and attempt to build houses on them in a way that showed that unlike the God of their victims, they didn't know much about carpentry.
 
Last edited:
The Abrahamic religions make no sense. Jews, Muslims, Christians, and Baháʼís often have restrictive and outdated beliefs.

Christianity has fallen apart in the West, it is either too strict or too careless. The fundamentalists isolate and practice hypocrisy. The most liberal Christians do not abide by rules and believe altruistic "feel good" nonsense. No agreements or unification. No sense of preservation and adaptation.
>It's Christianity's fault that people are spoiled faggots
 
Back