To me 19 to 17 is not particularly bad, neither is let's say 16 to 18.
what do you mean not particularly bad?? that's completely normal. See you're already subverted because you're viewing normal relationships as deviant.
Your example though, is where we have to draw that line. Sure, it WAS normal, but not anymore.
why not? how have humans evolved in the last ~140 years aka 2 human lifetimes that completely change our biology?
Being sexually abused or mistreated (forced intercourse, disturbed sexual development) while young is one of the most damaging things that can probably happen to you as a person, and that's why one of the reasons why the AoC exists.
WRONG. This is a bad faith argument and you're grasping at straws to reinforce the status quo. AoC doesn't stop 14 yrs from getting into abusive relationships or being pressured to "put out" because most states have romeo and juilet loopholes that allow sex within a certain age gap. In other words AoC was a total disaster, people broke it regularly and it had to be partially repealed through these loopholes.
Besides, the women who were courted back then at 12-14 literally didnt even have rights, and that's why they were married off so young. To be essentially sextoys.
Feminist bullshit. Being a mother is the nature job of a women, There is nothing wrong with that and normal women view raising kids as more rewarding than working a corporate job.
Ok, but considering the current way America is moving, wouldn't our race relations and "incorporation" become easier? We're all becoming mutts, there will be no concept of race. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that I want the white/black/ or any race to just disappear into mutt blobs, but it would solve the issue that seems to be of importance to you? It also seems like the easier solution too. Rather than having all these people become us, it seems that instead we're all going to just meet in the middle eventually.
1. If your argument is we need to genocide every race through race mixing than you've already contradicted yourself. If the argument against "racism" is it can lead to genocide and your solution is geocoding every race into mixed mutts then wtf??? That's not a solution.
2. No one has voted on this race mix experiment. It's been forced through coercion, esp. attacking people as racists. You're "authoritarian tyrants" right?
3. The end result of mixed race mutt experiment will be a lower IQ population that is more violent. You can look at black and Hispanic communities. You can look at Latin American nations like Brazil. The end result of your utopia will be a 3rd world shithole.
4. What about the US foreign policy? Obvipously you need to spread your anti racism religion across the planet to achieve your goal of world peace through race mixing. You gonna attack every ally (e.g. Hungry, Poland, Korea, Japan, etc.) as "racist" and "xenophobic" for not wanting to destroy their people. When the rest of the world realizes you're just trying to destroy their people, you'll be viewed as the "new communists" for spreading these retardation across the planet.
5. Mixed race mutts can't get organ transplants because their DNA is too dissimilar from other people.
What you're promoting is insane. People view communists as the lunatics of the 20th century and people will view neo-liberals as the lunatics of the 21st century. There is no post racial utopia. You're just destroying your people and turning your nation into a 3rd world shithole. Equality and anti racism is the most disgusting ideology / neo-religion.
Fuck outta here, you gibbering retard.
