YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

1639290640065.png

1639290646829.png


Kraut comments on Jim and celebrates CancerAids


If I had cynical as my history professor or had to read one of his papers I think I'd drop the course.
Isn't the Cynical Historian training to be a University Professor? I'm not sure what Potental History does in real life.
Apparently he does the
1639290338570.png
thing in class. He's going for being a history professor, and studies American violence. He seems to be pro-political violence because of his studies.

1639290455625.png

With the recent talk about Japan in World War II, might I suggest we create a History discussion thread on KiwiFarms?
Since this thread is more about the people who talk about history than history itself. I think we might be better off having a separate thread to talk and vent out our unpopular opinions and debates.
This is not the first time that I suggested this idea.
Having one thread seems silly, but ideally it would be in Deep thoughts. It would probably be better to just give each historical topic its own thread in Deep Thoughts though.
 
View attachment 2793981
View attachment 2793982

Kraut comments on Jim and celebrates CancerAids




Apparently he does the View attachment 2793957 thing in class. He's going for being a history professor, and studies American violence. He seems to be pro-political violence because of his studies.

View attachment 2793970

Having one thread seems silly, but ideally it would be in Deep thoughts. It would probably be better to just give each historical topic its own thread in Deep Thoughts though.
Ah Kraut you are still excomunicated by all sides of Political YouTube .Your old fans gone. There is still info about how shit and degenerate person you are on the internet everyone can see it when they do background check. Your old "career" is dead .


American violence... right so he probably just took some Soviet related lessons. And now claims to be expert on topic because he studied it on university.
That would make sense , considering his tendency of saying technically true statement, but leaving out important details that completely change context.
 
View attachment 2793981
View attachment 2793982

Kraut comments on Jim and celebrates CancerAids

It's always good to see the electric nipple clamp guy never getting over his own self humiliation. 2017 was the high of his life and now what is he?
At least you can say Metokur's voice is actually real and not some fake prep accent.

Apparently he does the
1639290338570.png
thing in class. He's going for being a history professor, and studies American violence. He seems to be pro-political violence because of his studies.

1639290455625.png

Having one thread seems silly, but ideally it would be in Deep thoughts. It would probably be better to just give each historical topic its own thread in Deep Thoughts though.
Does the Cynical historian realize a well organized uprising in the US is a very difficult task? You have to deal with the feds, glowies, you hope your movement doesn't get co-oped by them, Not to mention you get to make sure their isn't any hidden cabals of leadership that makes you a puppet of the elite ruling class. You also have to deal with an enemy propaganda smear campaign from the media. You may keep telling your self "No one trusts the media" but man a lot of people still are under there influence.
I could go on and on.
Historians cannot say X thing good/bad, unless utility or practicality is considered good, the history permits judgment
Basically: "I can justify/demonize anything because I am a winner that writes the history books. There is no such thing as objective morallity because I determind what is good and what is bad."
 
Last edited:
He's going for being a history professor, and studies American violence. He seems to be pro-political violence because of his studies.
He really shouldn't be posting what looks to be a dumbed down manifesto on useful political terrorism and intimidation on fucking Twitter.
Does the Cynical historian realize a well organized uprising in the US is a very difficult task? You have to deal with the feds, glowies, you hope your movement doesn't get co=oped by them, Not to mention you get to make sure their isn't any hidden cabals of leadership that makes you a puppet of the elite ruling class. You also have to deal with an enemy propaganda smear campaign from the media. You may keep telling your self "No one trusts the media" but man a lot of people still are under there influence.
I could go on and on.
I am willing to bet he is one of those clowns who thinks all of this is a right wing conspiracy theory and that the Deep state, TPTB, glowies being glowies is just right wing fear mongering. I assume the guy is rabidly pro Rona vaccine despite the four companies making them having abominable track records as well.
 
American violence... right so he probably just took some Soviet related lessons. And now claims to be expert on topic because he studied it on university.
That would make sense , considering his tendency of saying technically true statement, but leaving out important details that completely change context.
American violence? You really can waste your time studying such crap at American colleges? Seems as "useful" as college degrees in American victim studies or lesbian dance theory.
 
Does TIMELINE count? They're getting millions of views and just reuploading old documentaries
 
Does TIMELINE count? They're getting millions of views and just reuploading old documentaries
Not really if all they do is upload documentaries, far as I'm concerned.
 
They got away with murder is a historytuber who seems to be an actual historical conspiracy theorist that believes that King George V of Britain was murdered.
The King's death from euthanasia seems like a complex event and he is not the only one that thinks this. So it could be possible.
He has other murder mystery videos as well. He has that classy old British man voice that can help either enthuse you or put you to sleep.
So yes, I do recommend They got away with murder.
 
Last edited:
They got away with murder is a historytuber who seems to be an actual historical conspiracy theorist that believes that King George V of Britain was murdered.
The King's death from euthanasia seems like a complex event and he is not the only one that thinks this. So it could be possible.
He has other murder mystery videos as well. He has that classy old British man voice that can help either enthuse you or put you to sleep.
So yes, I do recommend They got away with murder.
Even a quick glance at Wikipedia gives credence to this guy: euthanasia would require the consent of the dying and/or their family, and none of them were given any input on whether to OD George so that he would “die with dignity” rather than letting him go on God's terms as his own wife would have wanted. What happened to George was quite bluntly a physician arrogantly killing a King because he thought it would do better to hasten death than risk letting the process draw out and have to announce his passing in the evening papers (the horror!).
 
Even a quick glance at Wikipedia gives credence to this guy: euthanasia would require the consent of the dying and/or their family, and none of them were given any input on whether to OD George so that he would “die with dignity” rather than letting him go on God's terms as his own wife would have wanted. What happened to George was quite bluntly a physician arrogantly killing a King because he thought it would do better to hasten death than risk letting the process draw out and have to announce his passing in the evening papers (the horror!).
To add to this there is some thought that the Abdication Crisis of his son wasn't due so much to his marriage choice, but Edward VIII not being as apolitical as the British establishment would've preferred from the monarch.
 
To add to this there is some thought that the Abdication Crisis of his son wasn't due so much to his marriage choice, but Edward VIII not being as apolitical as the British establishment would've preferred from the monarch.
You don’t say. Eddie likely wanted to restore some of the monarchy's power and was sympathetic of that Austro-German with the funny mustache, so he had to go. Wallis Simpson was just an excuse to get rid of him, and yet the Windsors once more discovered that marrying a multi-divorced actress was a bad idea.
 
So, I am going to give a recommendation for the Channel Warhawk. The channel focuses on civil war battles, and generally seems to do a good job avoiding sperging about politics. The presentation can be slightly rough, but that is a small price to pay to avoid the woke narrative that has dominated CivWar documentarians brains as of late.

The other Operations Room, another Youtube war documentation, but he has a much more eclectic taste. Very well presented, seems well researched, avoids politics.
 
You don’t say. Eddie likely wanted to restore some of the monarchy's power and was sympathetic of that Austro-German with the funny mustache, so he had to go. Wallis Simpson was just an excuse to get rid of him, and yet the Windsors once more discovered that marrying a multi-divorced actress was a bad idea.
I do agree that his sympathies with the austro-german funny mustache man did him in more so then wanting to marry Wallis. The british monarchy had a lot of secrets hidden under the rug back then and with the recent stuff with Andrew and Epstein definitely today. Hopefully all the contents of the Royal archives will be opened one day.
 
I know potential failure was talked about couple pages back, but this video of his was recomended today to me by YouTube.
So leťs look at his arguments

As always he gets some things right, but lot of stuff wrong.
1) There are works and books written where you from the start have theory and find sources that back up your theory.
It often happens where there is debate. To explain your stance, convince others.

2) Entire 19 th and part of 20th century there was dominant "school of historical thought" called positivism .
And to explain in short positivists goal was to provide historical facts and let reader come to his own conclusion

3) And here is big thing sources. Victor gets option to just dont release stuff to public that makes them look bad leťs imagine situation you are historian in UK in 1950s and want to write book about Allied War crimes do you think you get access to sources from same people who are responsible for warcrimes?
Another problem is even if things are going downhill we still today live in relative free society luxury most didnt have in past so dont expect books talking about things rulling class didnt want in past.
Another problem is many historians are one way or the other employees of state and enjoy eating like everyone else so they usually avoid "controversial" topics.

Lastly state controls education so it can shape public perception of events.

Enough ranting.

Tldr: While not always true : History is written by winners. Winner usually have ability to shape how events are remembered.
Late, but I want to say that the ones that write history are the survivors, not the winners or losers. A group might get nearly extinct from another group, but if they outlast them then that other group was full of evil sodomites.
Also I wouldn't put something as history until everybody involved with the event are long dead.
 
Back