Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Mematic_20211216_064921.jpg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: ATaleOfSofa, gcthrowaway2019, Buck Breaker of BUcha and 29 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Piss Bear, Great Monkey King, Sailor Kim Jong Moon and 33 others
UselessIdiot said:
A lesbian couple pretending to be a gay male couple? I want off this damn ride.

I can't imagine actual gay men accepting them as their own, but then again, many gay men are really woke and PC these days -- especially younger generations.

They look so off-putting and unnatural in a way that's totally different from male troons.
Click to expand...
I almost sort of think they're sweet, in a completely batshit, please-don't-try-to-tell-me-about-your-lives kind of way. Like when you find two hamplanets that orbit each other, or two people who both obsessively collect the same kind of baseball card or whatever. They're incredibly weird, but it looks like they're not shoving themselves on other people (Unless I am totally missing something) so it's just... Odd.

EDIT- Took me a second to realise why my reaction to them was "Aww" not "Aaaargh" - They say "Transsexual" in one of their usernames (Can't work out if the longhair or the bald one) - Which is the kind of tranny that troons hate, because they're too willing to admit that they're man-made-men rather than some sort of natural genderspecial magic.
Notorious AGP said:
This is normal. Totally not a body modification cult!:

View attachment 2804645
Click to expand...
Amazed that she's not being totally disowned for being a white skinhead that's got what look like Inuit facial tattoos (Her lip, chin and nose bridge).. But hey, troonery goes straight to the top of the hierarchy, this is like when the white nationalist troons had a shitfit about the other ones calling them white nationalists.
Notorious AGP said:
archive.md

Day one of my transition FtNGC, pre HRT. I'm so excited y'all. I got …

archived 16 Dec 2021 05:14:06 UTC
archive.md archive.md
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Muskcarpone, Notorious AGP, HissingBastard and 7 others
 

Attachments

  • 1639671674036.png
    1639671674036.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 242
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Ballsack Pussylips, November Golf, NSJAP and 43 others
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Casca Enjoyed It, chickenbutt, Oh piss off! and 17 others
Garbage.Theory said:
Do 3 year olds even act like “boys or girls” yet? I’ve seen older kids play/act differently but toddlers always seemed pretty homogenous to me.
Click to expand...

Sort of. Little girls are smarter than little boys (learn how to talk at an earlier age, and gain social skills faster) and often show an early interest in roleplaying family settings with dollies and whatnot. Boys are usually less verbal but more physical and more interested in cars and big noisy trucks (garbage men are heroes to boy toddlers across the world). Babies are pretty homogeneous (they just eat, sleep, cry and poop), but toddlers aren't.

Both sexes have no idea what the hell "transgender" is aged 3, and it's perfectly normal for girls to want to play with trucks or boys to play house, or for either sex to pretend to be something they're not, it's just part of what tiny humans do when they're starting to figure out the world.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Azovka, EliteBolete, November Golf and 40 others
yikes
Elite Winsor Girls School In Boston Moving Away From Calling Girls “Girls”

“Empowering girls to lead lives of purpose” is featured on The Winsor School home page.

The elite Boston private school is a mainstay atop of national rankings. Almost one-third of Winsor graduates go on to attend Ivy League universities. Tuition is $53,900 per year.

The slide show on the home page begins showing pictures of girls in grades 5-12 walking around Winsor’s beautiful and cozy Boston campus. Another picture displays a young girl reading material from her MacBook in an academic lounge and continues with pictures of a few girls studying in classrooms or working in what appears to be a science lab.

There’s a picture showing the recently crowned 2021 New England championship winning field hockey team. Everything about Winsor’s website presentation is embodied in that homepage message, “Empowering girls to lead lives of purpose.”

Winsor is an all-girls school. Why? The answer is found in the school’s Strategic Vision: “The Winsor School’s mission is to educate girls to be intellectually curious, motivated, and generous-minded.” Mary Pickard Winsor started the private all-girls Boston school in 1886. She wrote the message in the school’s graduate directory, “if women are in these days to be self-respecting they must also have it within their power to be self-supporting.” Her vision was pure and logical. The purpose of all-girls education is, and has always been, to raise women to be self-sustaining while also allowing themselves to become confident in who they are as women.

The efficacy of Miss Winsor’s vision has been asserted by a variety of studies. UCLA social scientist Linda Sax writes that a “majority of girls’ school grads report higher self-confidence over their coed peers.” They also transform into competitive, confident human beings that are comfortable using their femininity to lead in prestigious careers. The Goodman Research Group, a Boston consulting group, found that “Girls’ school grads are 6 times more likely to consider majoring in math, science, and technology compared to girls who attend coed schools.”

Now that pragmatic and confident vision for girls is under threat by language in The Winsor School’s DEI Plan, “Lift Every Voice,” released this past fall:

“Although Winsor remains in its mission a school for “young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world,” the school recognizes the importance of inclusive language.”

The plan goes on to say that “[e]xternal publications and communications have moved away from using “she, her, hers’’ and “your daughter,” replacing the former with “they, them, theirs” and the latter with “student” (emphasis added):

Although Winsor remains in its mission a school for “young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world,” the school recognizes the importance of inclusive language. Winsor has, for example, adopted changes to its use of gendered language and pronouns to be more inclusive. External publications and communications have moved away from using “she, her, hers’’ and “your daughter,” replacing the former with “they, them, theirs” and the latter with “student.” Sensitivity is also paid to family structure. In Admission, for example, interviews are now called the “Adult family member interview” instead of the “Parent/guardian interview.” Faculty and staff are discouraged from addressing groups of students as “girls” and “ladies,”and teachers address students by their preferred pronouns.

*For a specific example of how a specific department is addressing inclusive language, consult the appendices.
Click to expand...

1639674361457.png

The referenced Appendix C provides specific examples of how degendered language already is in use and being implemented at Winsor (emphasis added):

Faculty and staff are discouraged from addressing groups of students as “girls” and “ladies,” and teachers are more regularly in the practice of asking students privately about their preferred pronouns. The Athletics department is revising its handbook to instruct coaches to avoid addressing student athletes in gender binary ways.

Departments have worked together to ensure that inclusive language exists in course materials created by the teacher. The English Department has agreed to a policy that prohibits the use of hateful language in any context. As stated in the Class I course description, “At times, our texts may contain racialized or hurtful language towards particular marginalized groups. Even if it is printed in our texts, we will not speak any hateful language in our classroom. Discussions are planned carefully, with a focus on understanding historical context and the role of antiracism, and they are handled in developmentally appropriate ways.”

The department has also decide change the grammar curriculum and writing assessment criteria to accept “they” as a singular pronoun.

As another example, the science department lab and eye safety letter was updated to include nongendered language. All science faculty are encouraged to do so in course policies and expectations as well as any other course documents.

In Advancement, every publication is considered through a DEI lens. A few examples include sensitivity and understanding around marketing materials, posters, website images, publications like the Bulletin, donor appeals, volunteer handbooks, event invitations, etc.
Click to expand...

1639674380714.png


Consistent with the DEI Plan, in recent school communications I obtained, the school avoids calling girls ‘girls’, instead calling them ‘students’ or ‘children.’

On its website, however, Winsor continues to promote the school as for “girls,” showing that the school still wants the reputational benefits of being labeled an “all-girls” school, as internally it seeks to do away with “girls” as a term.

There are many issues with trying to degender the language used at Winsor, starting with the fact that it now undermines the very point of an all-girls’ school.

Forget, for a moment, the obvious question about whether the use of inclusive language, including transgender pronouns, logically means the school should start admitting biological men (other “all-girls” institutions have now done just that). We don’t have to even go that far to see where this road towards “inclusivity” will likely lead.

Let’s talk about the building of self-confidence of girls as girls. One of the motivations of Mary Pickard Winsor to start an all-girls’ school was the feeling that women needed to find an environment independent of the prejudice and condescension of female talents that had pervaded her time. That motivation is carried over today, with the current President Sarah Pelmas noting that “We’re in a world where girls and women are still fighting for so many things.”

Instead of trying to make a murky mess of “de-gendering” Winsor, why not draw upon the vast literature of social science that has studied girls’ achievement and teaching practices related specifically to the needs of women and implement those practices instead?

Winsor School’s DEI Plan and determination to blur the school’s central mission should raise concern for every reasonable parent who wishes to send their daughter to a school truly committed to engendering the kind of self-respecting, empowered woman they hope to raise at an all-girls school. The school’s Board should consider long and hard whether they truly want the school to go in this direction.
Click to expand...

legalinsurrection.com

Elite Winsor Girls School In Boston Moving Away From Calling Girls “Girls”

Winsor DEI Plan: "External publications and communications have moved away from using 'she, her, hers’' and 'your daughter,' replacing the former with 'they, them, theirs' and the latter with 'student' .... Faculty and staff are discouraged from addressing groups of students as 'girls' and...
legalinsurrection.com legalinsurrection.com

 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Azovka, EliteBolete, November Golf and 29 others
@chiobu because I can't quote your post
The plan goes on to say that “[e]xternal publications and communications have moved away from using “she, her, hers’’ and “your daughter,” replacing the former with “they, them, theirs” and the latter with “student” (emphasis added):
Click to expand...
I forsee a Loudon County tranny bathroon rape saga in this school's future.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: November Golf, Oh piss off!, ApeBass and 13 others
  • Like
Reactions: nekrataal, Aunt Carol and skirtgospinny
chiobu said:
Sensitivity is also paid to family structure. In Admission, for example, interviews are now called the “Adult family member interview” instead of the “Parent/guardian interview.”
Click to expand...
Ignoring all the gender bullshit, I don't even understand how "Adult family member" is supposed to be more sensitive than "Parent/guardian". If anything it's less inclusive since some guardians aren't family (either in blood or legally). I literally can't see any advantage to this other than undermining the relationship between children and their parents (or guardians) by reducing them to just a family member who happens to be older rather than a person who takes care of and has authority over their child.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: November Golf, mama Lazarou, chickenbutt and 18 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back