Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
When around did homo sapiens stop being generally collectively based and start becoming such huge fucking pussies?
2008

Oh yes, whisky being my go to favourite.

Sadly they are just scale models, a spergy hobby of mine. But if it wasn't for that and the whisky getting me through the last 2 years, I would have suck started a shotgun at the start of all this mess.
Ah, BJDs. Gotchya.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: PurpleEater
Good news, even with Omicron being so mild that it doesn't lead to hospitalisations the Branch Covidian consensus is that it'll lead to total collapse because so many will be forced into quarantine with it.
WELL MAYBE DON'T FORCE PEOPLE INTO A TWO WEEK QUARANTINE OVER A LITTLE COLD THEN.
 
So I've been hearing the old '90% of people in hospital are unvaccinated" since Omicron became a thing and they really, really want to give out boosters.

1639985670560.png


52% of all hospitalisations are double or triple vaxxed

Ah but it's the really sick coof patients that haven't taken the holy jab!

1639985791577.png

73% of all deaths are among the double or triple vaxxed

Now that's the absolute best case for the vaccines. Assuming they aren't fucking with the data (they are) and assuming they aren't counting incidental non jabbed hospital positive patients as "serious Covid" (they are).
 
Well of women do not have to carry a kid. They got a nanny or a well off kid cart.

Which rules out tradwives and trophy wives.

Babuskas of course get muscled and all downhill, as husband usually is a wreck by 40 and they need to take over his chores as his body is busted by heavy labour.

I have no illusions I can get a good looking waifu, I am not rich enough. Well that is what viagra is for!
 
It has fully solidified for me at this point that this shit is never going to end. If the powers that be wanted to seize it; Omicron would serve as a perfect oppurtunity to take the exit ramp and go back to normal.

"Well guys almost everyone was vaccinated and we had many lockdowns and bullshit BUT the dominant strain has become so mild its mostly asymptomatic and we can live with it.

Just another flu now, lockdowns over, pat each other on the ass for a job well done and fuck off."

NOPE. Doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Fear porn everywhere, 90-98% vaxxed countries straight back into lockdown. Imagine unironically believing this is about the virus anymore.
The vaccine mandates begin in January (Greece) and February (Austria). Can't end the "pandemic" before everyone is jabbed.
 
Health secretary in the UK (iirc, i heard it on the radio while at work), says that she expects OMicron and its' effects to last until spring 2022. That will be 2 full years since the start of this shit show.

Labour and tories are calling for more restrictions to go in to force before xmas, including a full lockdown and limiting how many people can come to your xmas dinner.

Huge push for boosters in the UK, one radio advert from the NHS said "Every adult must get the booster", yes it said must. The ad also says "Double vaccines don't offer enough protection from omicron, and the booster is needed to keep you safe and protected". Openly admitting the jabs are shit, so get more jabs! :story:
 
Local Omicron persei news:
-Just as deadly as before, so every 4th person will die. (Old point reiterated.)
-Nigh on unstoppable.
-Prepare for a bloodbath.
-Thanks America. China at best was a deceived middle man.
-Covid destroys all your organs, not just the lungs. (Old point reiterated.)
-Celebrites and retired athletes keep up dying.
 
Is it possible to get such a mild case of myocarditis/perycarditis after the vaccination that you don't notice it at all (even when you have zero side effects in general), but if you live a very active lifestyle (heavy physical activity or sports at least three times a week) it can get worse and worse and only be noticable several months later?
If that could be, it might be an explanation why athletes suddenly keel over presumably months after their jabs, and why the recorded heart problem incidence after vaccination is so low despite a surge in heart problems especially in young people being apparent all of a sudden.
The waivers here don't really tell you not to do any sports for a few days after injection, but the Twitteria claims that it's common knowledge and all the recorded myocarditis cases are probably at fault themselves.
I have no idea how any of this works, but it might be that the impact of the vaccine on the heart is vastly underreported, and the effect really is something you only see after several months of close study, and not something you can just bypass with a bigger sample size as the Branch Covidians like to claim.
However, I doubt it would ever be made public if it turned out to be the case, the scandal would be too big to be allowed.
 
Is it possible to get such a mild case of myocarditis/perycarditis after the vaccination that you don't notice it at all (even when you have zero side effects in general), but if you live a very active lifestyle (heavy physical activity or sports at least three times a week) it can get worse and worse and only be noticable several months later?
If that could be, it might be an explanation why athletes suddenly keel over presumably months after their jabs, and why the recorded heart problem incidence after vaccination is so low despite a surge in heart problems especially in young people being apparent all of a sudden.
The waivers here don't really tell you not to do any sports for a few days after injection, but the Twitteria claims that it's common knowledge and all the recorded myocarditis cases are probably at fault themselves.
I have no idea how any of this works, but it might be that the impact of the vaccine on the heart is vastly underreported, and the effect really is something you only see after several months of close study, and not something you can just bypass with a bigger sample size as the Branch Covidians like to claim.
However, I doubt it would ever be made public if it turned out to be the case, the scandal would be too big to be allowed.
If the inflammation persists at a low level, which is entirely predictable given how long the spike remains circulating and expressing in the body, it will cause damage to the heart. The link between chronic inflammation and heart failure is well known.

When a heart attack or other issue damages the heart and leaves it unable to pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs, the heart tries to compensate by pumping faster. The cardiac muscle cells have to work harder and this stress causes them to release molecules known as reactive oxygen species.

Looking at the hearts of mice, the researchers determined that products of these reactive oxygen species modify proteins in the heart so that the immune system views them as a potential threat.

“The formation of these new targets is what we found that our T cells are robustly responding to,” says Jay Ngwenyama, GBS20, the lead author on the study. “And this ultimately leads to inflammation that affects the heart.”

The researchers confirmed that these modified proteins also appeared in the cardiac tissue of human patients whose hearts were failing.

Chronic inflammation can cause structural changes to the heart—the muscle can become enlarged or develop fibrous tissue, impeding its ability to pump blood efficiently and leading to further deterioration. But anti-inflammatory treatments or attempts to broadly target reactive oxygen species have yet to be successful, Ngwenyama says. They often end up interfering with other aspects of the immune system or necessary physiological processes.
tl;dr, heart inflammation (which is a response to injury to the heart) can prompt an auto-immune response, causing more and more damage and perpetuating the inflammation, at least according to this paper. This is probably something an autist like @Drain Todger would be more suited to digging into.
 
If the inflammation persists at a low level, which is entirely predictable given how long the spike remains circulating and expressing in the body, it will cause damage to the heart. The link between chronic inflammation and heart failure is well known.


tl;dr, heart inflammation (which is a response to injury to the heart) can prompt an auto-immune response, causing more and more damage and perpetuating the inflammation, at least according to this paper. This is probably something an autist like @Drain Todger would be more suited to digging into.
The biochemical pathways of SARS-CoV-2’s proteins, especially the Spike, aggressively promote endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress, in itself, can promote autoimmunity, because the immune system starts recognizing oxidized molecules as “non-self”.


Basically everything from lupus to atherosclerosis involves unregulated oxidative stress.
 
The biochemical pathways of SARS-CoV-2’s proteins, especially the Spike, aggressively promote endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress, in itself, can promote autoimmunity, because the immune system starts recognizing oxidized molecules as “non-self”.


Basically everything from lupus to atherosclerosis involves unregulated oxidative stress.

That definitely sounds like something one would want to be injected with on a bimonthly basis, anything to save grandma after all.
 
That definitely sounds like something one would want to be injected with on a bimonthly basis, anything to save grandma after all.
The obsession with injected vaccines is where they went wrong, I think. If they'd come up with something to boost or support the immune response in the lungs, there wouldn't be a problem - or not the same problem. Maybe some sort of nebulised protease inhibitor. All of the nasty outcomes of covid and the vaccines come from damage to the circulatory system, so if it can't get into the circulatory system, then by definition it's going to do less damage.

Meanwhile, Boris is meeting his cabinet later today, to decide "further measures" for dealing with omnomcrom. We have "no guarantees" (o) over a christmas lockdown from Raab, and a clamour for lockdowns NOW from media talking heads.

I'm going to put some champers in the fridge, so I can toast the insanity when it happens.

The duality of man:

1640002551462.png
 
Last edited:
IMPACT WITH OUTLINING, DAMN YOU

Shit, can't say no to the Vince McMahon, I don't want to end up in Hell In A Cell with the Undertaker.

FauciAckshuallyForVince.png



It's the weekend so not much legal excitement happening, but there are two things. One, following after Heritage and possibly at least one other private group, a small team of familiar evangelical orgs is jumping in on filing for a new emergency stay on the OSHA federal vaccine mandate. (Archive)

Three religious organizations on Saturday asked the Supreme Court to grant an emergency stay over the Biden administration's vaccine mandate for businesses with at least 100 workers.

Why it matters: The challenge, filed by the American Family Association, Answers in Genesis and Daystar Television Network, comes days after the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati reinstated the mandate.

Yep, the Clown World legal circus now has a classic lolcow trotting into the ring. In other news, Ken Ham's somehow not dead. I attached their filing for anyone bored/curious. The very first page makes me want to ask so many questions:

1640000732663.png


What's under the redaction? Is it Rusty Shackleford working alongside Kelly?

On an actually not-retarded note, 27 states and counting have already filed for an emergency stay to put the OSHA mandate back on hold. (Archive) Of particular interest is which Supreme Court justice will be the one catching this petition -- it's going to be Kavanaugh this time. Cross your fingers that he's friendlier to this than Sotomayor and Barrett have been.

Emergency appeals, such as the request for a stay of a ruling by a Circuit Court, go directly to a justice assigned to that Circuit — in this case, to Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who is assigned to the Sixth Circuit. The assigned justice may distribute the application to the full court to consider or decide the request on their own.

OSHA's already announced that they're slightly delaying going after employers for noncompliance.

OSHA quickly announced that it will not issue citations for noncompliance before January 10, 2022. The agency also stated it will exercise its discretion and not issue citations for noncompliance with testing requirements under the ETS before February 9, 2022, if an employer is exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the standard.

Bonus insanity -- this hasn't changed the fact that a number of states have already passed their own regs shitting upon the OSHA mandate, trying to defang it. As if that weren't funny and chaotic enough, some of these states have put their attempts to castrate the federal mandate into their own emergency state-level OSHA plans. Malicious compliance at its best! And since the 6th Circuit didn't address the actual merits of the case, the question about whether these incompatible state ETSes have been preempted by feds or not is still up in the air. Honk, honk!

Employers in states and localities that prohibit or restrict vaccination or face covering requirements must be mindful of state and local laws, ordinances, and executive orders that might limit the employer’s ability to require vaccination or otherwise conflict with ETS requirements, particularly if an employer opts for the ETS’s mandatory vaccination policy. While the Sixth Circuit lifted the stay, it has yet to decide the case on the merits, including arguments over whether the ETS overrides state or local laws due to federal preemption. Significantly, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia have enacted measures that would restrict or impact vaccination requirements. Some of these states are OSHA State Plans and some are actually federal OSHA jurisdictions, creating additional compliance confusion.
 

Attachments

Is it possible to get such a mild case of myocarditis/perycarditis after the vaccination that you don't notice it at all (even when you have zero side effects in general), but if you live a very active lifestyle (heavy physical activity or sports at least three times a week) it can get worse and worse and only be noticable several months later?
If that could be, it might be an explanation why athletes suddenly keel over presumably months after their jabs, and why the recorded heart problem incidence after vaccination is so low despite a surge in heart problems especially in young people being apparent all of a sudden.
The waivers here don't really tell you not to do any sports for a few days after injection, but the Twitteria claims that it's common knowledge and all the recorded myocarditis cases are probably at fault themselves.
I have no idea how any of this works, but it might be that the impact of the vaccine on the heart is vastly underreported, and the effect really is something you only see after several months of close study, and not something you can just bypass with a bigger sample size as the Branch Covidians like to claim.
However, I doubt it would ever be made public if it turned out to be the case, the scandal would be too big to be allowed.

Speaking of myocarditis/perycarditis, I spotted this article about some pharma scientists who talk about blood clots.
December 20, 2021

Pharma scientists admit the COVID vaccines can cause blood clots​

By Vasko Kohlmayer

“AstraZeneca uncovers what's triggering blood clots after its jab” reads a recent headline from Mail Online.
“Oh, oh, oh!” one feels like exclaiming. So, it is true, after all. After nearly one year of stonewalling and denials, they officially admit that the Covid vaccines can, in fact, cause blood clots.
This will undoubtedly come as a great shock to those who believe the mainstream media narratives where all talk of vaccine injury has been hitherto dismissed as “misinformation” by those right wing anti-vaxxers.
We have been repeatedly told that only crazy people would believe that the Covid vaccines could be dangerous. After all, scientists and public health officials have always reassured us that these vaccines are “completely safe and effective.”
It turns out, however, that the mantra “completely safe and effective” is not true, since those crack scientists who devised these vaccines now admit that their product can also generate blood clots.
But we should not worry too much about it, because they also helpfully inform us that they may have discovered what in their vaccines causes these deadly side effects:
“They found that the shell of the vector vaccine — the weakened cold virus used to teach cells how to neutralise Covid — sometimes acts like a magnet and attracts platelets, a protein found in the blood. For reasons the scientists are still probing, the body then mistakes these platelets as a threat and produces antibodies to fight them. The combination of the platelets and the antibodies clumping together leads to the formation of dangerous blood clots.” [emphasis added]
Congratulations on that discovery, but it comes a little late in the game after hundreds of millions of doses of AstraZeneca have been injected into people’s bodies world-wide.
To forestall such unpleasant situations from arising, vaccines are normally required to undergo extensive testing, which is a process that usually take several years.
Such bothersome procedures, however, were largely jettisoned when it came to the Covid vaccines, which underwent only a few months’ worth of testing before they were rolled out. Only phase 1 and 2 of the trials could be said to have been completed – and that hastily – before emergency authorization was given to start mass administration. At this time, the public is forced to participate in phase 3 and 4 of the trials and, unsurprisingly, people are suffering all kinds of “unforeseen” side effects.
One only wonders what other deadly side effects we will discover in the months and years ahead.

One thing seems quite certain at this point: these vaccines are not nearly as safe as originally advertised.
Consider the chart below which expresses data in the VAERS database. As you may know, VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which is a US government-run facility that collects information about vaccine side effects.
The chart depicts the number of yearly death reports following vaccination for the last thirty years. It shows that the numbers held relatively steady from 1990 until 2020 and were generally under 500 cases per year. This changed dramatically toward the end of 2020 when the Covid vaccines were introduced. At that point, we see a rapid explosion of death reports. So exponential is the increase that the graph line shoots up almost vertically.
234620_5_.jpg

You can see the source of the chart here.
It should be a matter of grave concern that in the last 12 months there were more reports of vaccine-related deaths than in the previous 29 years combined.
In light of this, how can anybody in their right mind claim that these vaccines are “perfectly safe”?
In the past, vaccines used to be recalled if a few dozen deaths were shown to have been caused directly by the vaccine.
In the UK alone 73 deaths have already been linked directly to vaccine produced clots. This, however, is a gross understatement of reality as most vaccine deaths are not reported as such and fewer still are properly investigated. The 73 figure only represents the uppermost tip of the iceberg.
The question is why these vaccines are still being mass administered given what we know of the dangers they pose.
Even more astonishingly, why are we vaccinating children given that the risk to healthy children of severe Covid is virtually zero.

A large German study has recently found that in the first 15 months of the pandemic, not one healthy child in the 5-18 demographic died of Covid.
Even before the German study came out, the New York Times observed that for children “the danger of severe Covid is so low as to be difficult to quantify.”
Why, then, are we exposing children to the risk of blood clots and other serious conditions – such myocarditis and pericarditis – given that they are at negligible peril of serious Covid?
Vaccinating children becomes even more nonsensical, since we now know that the vaccines do not protect against infection.
What we are doing to our children by injecting them with these unsafe substances is simply unconscionable.
“Yes,” Mabel, “these vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. And they are good for children as well.”
To believe this, you must either be from Mars or listen to the mainstream media.
Blood clots, anyone?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back