Did You Know. . .

[Jimmy Olsen]

i love fan fiction of fetishistic fascist furry faggot fucktards.

Try saying that five times fast.

 

[Uncle Buck]

What you have to understand @I am vomit is that Thomas is very selective about when he accepts legal/clinical definitions of words or terms and how they're applied in common, everyday language.

"Child", for instance, is a word that, in everyday use and under traditional dictionary/textbook/legal definitions, denotes a person younger than eighteen years old/the local age of majority.

In recent decades, some "authorities" have pushed "person up to the age of puberty" as the preferred clinical definition of "child", though most resources still use the term under its traditional definition,. and most people in everyday language use the word for any person who hasn't yet turned eighteen.

Thomas only accepts the strict-cutoff included in the more recent clinical definition. He seems to believe that the term "child molestation" as used in US law is somehow invalid because it doesn't adhere to his preferred definition that strictly limits "childhood" to the onset of pubery - generally thirteen - and because he doesn't accept the legal concept that minors cannot, by definition, consent and he doesn't personally accept that "molestation" can occur if there isn't what he accepts as "abuse" [which, legally, denotes a pattern of acts, as opposed to "molestation", which refers to a single act] or "rape" [which, much like "abuse" (in common language), suggests some exertion of force or infliction of physical harm on a less than willing participant].

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

So basically "it wasn't child abuse, it was ephebo-molestation"

 

[Tragi-Chan]

What you have to understand @I am vomit is that Thomas is very selective about when he accepts legal/clinical definitions of words or terms and how they're applied in common, everyday language.

"Child", for instance, is a word that, in everyday use and under traditional dictionary/textbook/legal definitions, denotes a person younger than eighteen years old/the local age of majority.

In recent decades, some "authorities" have pushed "person up to the age of puberty" as the preferred clinical definition of "child", though most resources still use the term under its traditional definition,. and most people in everyday language use the word for any person who hasn't yet turned eighteen.

Thomas only accepts the strict-cutoff included in the more recent clinical definition. He seems to believe that the term "child molestation" as used in US law is somehow invalid because it doesn't adhere to his preferred definition that strictly limits "childhood" to the onset of pubery - generally thirteen - and because he doesn't accept the legal concept that minors cannot, by definition, consent and he doesn't personally accept that "molestation" can occur if there isn't what he accepts as "abuse" [which, legally, denotes a pattern of acts, as opposed to "molestation", which refers to a single act] or "rape" [which, much like "abuse" (in common language), suggests some exertion of force or infliction of physical harm on a less than willing participant].

He hasn’t yet answered the question of whether Sabrina was underage the influence of any substances or was coerced.

 

[The Southwest Strangla]

He hasn’t yet answered the question of whether Sabrina was underage the influence of any substances or was coerced.

he won't. he never answers these questions. he's a pussy bitch tranny

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Dumb ass, you said in the past that you touched a 15 year old. Stfu tranny

and no other reason? that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent. it doesn't qualify as hebephilia either because it only happened once.

try again, son.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

and no other reason? that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent. it doesn't qualify as hebephilia either because it only happened once.

try again, son.

OK fine. You're a serial molester. Two incidents of molestation, one of a dog, one of an underaged girl. Therefore, Thomas J Wasserberg is a serial molester.

 

[The Southwest Strangla]

and no other reason? that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent. it doesn't qualify as hebephilia either because it only happened once.

try again, son.

you're a pedo. she was underage. you're a nonce, get over it.

 

[draggs]

Holy shit, is there a goddamn Globalist conspiracy of troon dog-fucking pedo sleeper agents or something?

This is what the Hoffman Group is fighting the good fight to stop, the global ring of dogfucking pedo troons

 

[Psychotron]

I did not get banned from wal-mart, unfortunately they've made the General Manager as punishment.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Try saying that five times fast.

let me hear you say it once slow.

That's the most retarded post I've seen all day, damn.

here's something more retarded:

won't you look stupid around this time next year? real things has existed for over 35 years. did you know you were born 50 years to the day after the gestapo? delicious irony, you fascist fucktard.

Congratulations. Someone showed you an archive from when I had my birthdate show on my KF profile. Want a cookie you fat piece of shit?

no thanks, I'm dieting. am i to understand that you're confirming the information to be accurate?

Who showed it to you?

somehow , i can't see rational people lending any credence to the assessments of my reality by a cretin , son.



how's gramps?

caps lock broken , douche canoe? i'm hiring a general counsel who's the senior partner of a medium sized firm. he's not going to recommend litigating anything he's not confident of winning. it's not like i've had any terrific successes. why would i argue with him if i'm paying for his expertise?

stop being a fat faggot and tell me who showed you the archive? I don't give a shit if you know when I was born or not. It just proves you don't know shit about me when you say that we are all children here.

what's mom getting you for christmas this year, mikey?

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

you're a pedo. she was underage. you're a nonce, get over it.

you don't know what a pedo is. you're an intellectually incompetent imbecile too stupid to argue with me rationally. insult me some more, genius. keep wallpapering your broken brain with hatred for me, fool.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

let me hear you say it once slow.

here's something more retarded:

Congratulations. Someone showed you an archive from when I had my birthdate show on my KF profile. Want a cookie you fat piece of shit?

Who showed it to you?

stop being a fat faggot and tell me who showed you the archive? I don't give a shit if you know when I was born or not. It just proves you don't know shit about me when you say that we are all children here.

what's mom getting you for christmas this year, mikey?

Lmao, your quotes go back to random posts in 2015. Lern2Format.

 

[draggs]

Tom how are you going to sustain a lolsuit for libel against you when you are incessantly conveying vicious insults to random people? Courts do not like a plaintiff who does what he accuses the defendant of doing

 

[The Southwest Strangla]

Tom how are you going to sustain a lolsuit for libel against you when you are incessantly conveying vicious insults to random people? Courts do not like a plaintiff who does what he accuses the defendant of doing

I think grandpa needs to stop smoking weed. He fried all his brain cells.

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

you're all too mentally stable argue with me irrationally.

FTFY

 

[Tragi-Chan]

and no other reason? that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent. it doesn't qualify as hebephilia either because it only happened once.

try again, son.

Were you aware that she was below the age of consent when you attempted sex with her?

 

[Abu Muslim]

you don't know what a pedo is. you're an intellectually incompetent imbecile too stupid to argue with me rationally. insult me some more, genius. keep wallpapering your broken brain with hatred for me, fool.

Argumentum ad hominem.
Why don't you try to try to argue the fact that you feel sexual attraction instead of claiming your detractors are untermensh?
Resorting to logical fallacies is a sign of a MAN losing an argument.

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

So I say this:

So basically "it wasn't child abuse, it was ephebo-molestation"

As a joke, only for you to come in a actually say

and no other reason? that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent. it doesn't qualify as hebephilia either because it only happened once.

try again, son.

Literally, literally making the exact joke, only you actually mean it seriously, and you used more words. Tom, the fact that you're so fucking predictable is sad. You aren't a person anymore, just a loose blob of weed fried neurons firing off in the same loop over and over again.

Also, only pedophiles use the words hebephile or ephebophile. You fucking pedophile.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Were you aware that she was below the age of consent when you attempted sex with her?

According to this, he "knew that she was underage" from the time he met her when he and his buddy were "playing backup" in "Raven" the "punk rocker's" group which Sabrina was supposedly involved with. He wobbles on this, however, having previously said, "...i didn't know she was only 14 until her 15th birthday. i thought it was going to be her 19th".