Pictures on the Internet that have made you laugh hysterically - We have a funny videos thread in Multimedia

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Israel's only a duchy?
Speaking of weird CK2 stuff:

Simeon is definitely a great champion of the Slavic faith.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

 

[The Ugly One]

With no underlying condition, men have a total 95% chance to survive COVID. That roughly translates to 19 in 20 men survive COVID and 1 in 20 men die from it. By comparison, 4% of the Furry fandom are spergs which translates to 1 in 25 while in the general population 1.8% of kids are diagnosed autistic which means 9 in 500 kids are autistic. As for the women, they prolly die less because they stay in the kitchen like the good housewives that they are.

Obligatory TL;DR
1 in 20 men with no underlying condition die from COVID based on the chart above.

That picture says it's a one in 27 chance for men with no underlying condition if they are *over 80 years old*. If you're under 50, your chances of dying are one in 285 or less. Where are you getting 1 in 20 for men as a whole? Am I just retarded?

 

[0 0]

View attachment 2835069

View attachment 2835065

Time to bring out ol' reliable.

 

[The Ugly One]

If someone got me a new vacuum I would be happy, those things can be expensive as fuck. Practical gifts that you can actually use are god tier.

I got my mother a very nice Shark vacuum for her birthday; she says it's the best thing she ever got from me. Best thing I ever got my wife was a Ninja blender...she wasn't thrilled at first, but it took her about 3 uses to decide it was one of her favorite gifts from me.

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

That picture says it's a one in 27 chance for men with no underlying condition if they are *over 80 years old*. If you're under 50, your chances of dying are one in 285 or less. Where are you getting 1 in 20 for men as a whole? Am I just retarded?

You're probably right on the 1 in 27 number for men who are 80+, but I meant in a cumulative way every single men no matter their age, what are their chances of dying from COVID. I added up each statistic which led to an approximately 95% rate total across all ages, and then I put the resulting percentage on an online calculator, see below.

It would have been better if the statistics sheet also included an all ages total, so that I wouldn't have to calculate it myself.
I'll also add that the 1 in 285 for people aged 50 and below is not good, this is comparable to the autism birth rates which are at 9 in 500 per birth.

 

[Titos]

View attachment 2834234
The joke is that this isn't a joke. (Archive: https://archive.md/Ysn8Y)

Well, I'm waiting for the IRS to give all the money it has stolen from me back.........

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Well, I'm waiting for the IRS to give all the money it has stolen from me back.........
View attachment 2835192

The gubment passes laws against crime to protect its existing monopoly on crime.

Tax:

 

[The Ugly One]

You're probably right on the 1 in 27 number for men who are 80+, but I meant in a cumulative way every single men no matter their age, what are their chances of dying from COVID. I added up each statistic which led to an approximately 95% rate total across all ages, and then I put the resulting percentage on an online calculator, see below.
View attachment 2835170
It would have been better if the statistics sheet also included an all ages total, so that I wouldn't have to calculate it myself.
I'll also add that the 1 in 285 for people aged 50 and below is not good, this is comparable to the autism birth rates which are at 9 in 500 per birth.

You can't add up a bunch of probabilities that are all higher than 96% and end up with 95%. Your math is wrong somewhere. You need to compute a weighted average of probabilities...if you post your numbers, I can probably fix it.

I messed up my math, too (forgot to convert the % to decimal). It's not a 1 in 285 case fatality rate for the 40-49 age bracket, it's a 1 in 28,500 case fatality rate. It's actually less dangerous than the flu if you're young and healthy.

 

[Bass]

View attachment 2834234
The joke is that this isn't a joke. (Archive: https://archive.md/Ysn8Y)

Yeah, that's how they used to get mobsters for tax evasion when they couldn't get anything else to stick back in the day.

 

[Neo-Holstien]

Did somebody say IRS?

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

You can't add up a bunch of probabilities that are all higher than 96% and end up with 95%. Your math is wrong somewhere. You need to compute a weighted average of probabilities...

Well, tell them they're wrong then: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2334923/how-to-calculate-the-probability-of-percentage

if you post your numbers, I can probably fix it.

Hey sperg, the numbers are the chart, I didn't invent them.
Here's my process inspired by the webpage I linked: (99.99996/100)*((99.99996)/(100))*((99.9997)/(100))*((99.9986)/(100))*((99.9965)/(100))*((99.9815)/(100))*((99.8895)/(100))*((99.5245)/(100))*((96.331/(100))*100=95.74502922295006

Also it'd be better to take that somewhere else, there's already people annoyed (not explicitly) about this off-topic posting.

Image tax:

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

View attachment 2835555

Hmm, the hardwood floors were covered with linoleum. I wonder why?

Hmm, could it be that the hardwood was more difficult to clean, given the finish used at the time? Could it be that hardwood floors were seen as "poor" where linoleum was seen as more 'modern' as well as easier to clean and safer? Could it be they weren't childless weirdos working safe clean jobs and the stains and wear on the wood floor from having 2-5 kids, a family that moves around more than from the bed to the computer, could have caused damage to the wood floor that made it look bad and thus is was more economically feasible to use linoleum rather than replace the floor?

Could it have been actually preferred by home owners insurance? Could it have actually increased the value of a modern home? Could it have actually been better for heating or cooling?

Could there have been actual reasons to do so?

No. They were just all stupid.

Faggots.

 

[LolRaccoon]

 

[Neo-Holstien]

Hmm, the hardwood floors were covered with linoleum. I wonder why?

Hmm, could it be that the hardwood was more difficult to clean, given the finish used at the time? Could it be that hardwood floors were seen as "poor" where linoleum was seen as more 'modern' as well as easier to clean and safer? Could it be they weren't childless weirdos working safe clean jobs and the stains and wear on the wood floor from having 2-5 kids, a family that moves around more than from the bed to the computer, could have caused damage to the wood floor that made it look bad and thus is was more economically feasible to use linoleum rather than replace the floor?

Could it have been actually preferred by home owners insurance? Could it have actually increased the value of a modern home? Could it have actually been better for heating or cooling?

Could there have been actual reasons to do so?

No. They were just all stupid.

Faggots.

View attachment 2835612

Every time I moved as a youth, my Mother would make me rip out the Carpet and Linoleum, I genuinely now just fucking hate Carpet and Linoleum. I wonder if I had a more conventional relationship with the stuff if I would have such a hate boner

Spoiler: image tax

 

[Monkey Shoulder]

View attachment 2835558

Industrial revolution *

Tax

 

[Kabuki Actor]

View attachment 2835069

This is the worst one of these that I have ever read.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Gynn's really smart usually, but he's wrong on this one.

Just because we can produce food doesn't mean we will produce food. Famine is coming. Maybe not soon, but it is coming.

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

God bless Null for publicly showing the join date of users.

Also why are all of them True and Honest Fans?

And here's some beetlejuicing I found in the wild.

 

[JektheDumbass]

Hmm, the hardwood floors were covered with linoleum. I wonder why?

Hmm, could it be that the hardwood was more difficult to clean, given the finish used at the time? Could it be that hardwood floors were seen as "poor" where linoleum was seen as more 'modern' as well as easier to clean and safer? Could it be they weren't childless weirdos working safe clean jobs and the stains and wear on the wood floor from having 2-5 kids, a family that moves around more than from the bed to the computer, could have caused damage to the wood floor that made it look bad and thus is was more economically feasible to use linoleum rather than replace the floor?

Could it have been actually preferred by home owners insurance? Could it have actually increased the value of a modern home? Could it have actually been better for heating or cooling?

Could there have been actual reasons to do so?

No. They were just all stupid.

Faggots.

View attachment 2835612

Also that's vinyl, not linoleum. Linoleum is fucking indestructible. Dumbass kids don't know their plastics.