Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

chew on this, you disgusting fascist fool
. a fellow with an unhealthy attraction to minors downloaded some pictures of naked kids. he never raped anybody, but he was given 300 years sentence for those pictures in his computer.
Which fellow? You keep talking about these “cases,” but you never have specific information. I’m going to say that to get 300 years, there must be a lot more that you aren’t telling us. Did he get those images by abusing a position of authority? Was grooming involved? Did he buy them from shady dudes in Russia? How did the children feel about all this?

One that recognizes that their urges are unhealthy who do nothing to harm children. most pedophiles should be treated as a behavioral health, not a criminal issue. the criminals are the traffickers making the CP and arranging live dates. those are the people who need to be prosecuted. the ones actually hurting kids.


Approximately 1 to 5% of the male population is estimated to have pedophilia [1,2,3], that is, a sexual interest in children [4]. Despite common misperceptions, pedophilia is neither a necessary nor sufficient precondition for sexual offending against children [5]. In fact, an unknown, but most likely substantial number of people with a sexual preference for children never commit sexual offenses [6], and an estimated 40–60 percent of sexual offenses against children are not committed by people with pedophilic interests [5,7,8,9]. Nevertheless, research has shown that people from the general public have extremely negative feelings and attitudes with regard to people with pedophilia, including the ones that do not offend [10]. Accordingly, people with pedophilia have to fear being shamed, threatened, and cut off from sources of social support, if their sexual interests are discovered [6], which may in turn increase the risk of sexual offending and barriers to seeking therapy.

So what should be done about people who do molest children under the age of consent, like you did?
let's really get real, you sanctimonious pseudo-intellectual poser who injects a whole lot of his own peculiar sexuality into things i say that simply don't apply to me. this is what you punk ass bitches are about. dishing out pain to cover up your self loathing for the self esteem boost you get from the schadenfreude rush of making others unhappy. most people grow out of that sort of bullying by the time they're 12 or so. .

https://medium.com/@rebeccaleesloan...h-the-lens-of-hitchcocks-vertigo-5aa00354f1d8

If you can’t take it, just say.
Well, spoke too soon. He is a MAP faggot just without a Twitter account. Good call on that one @RadioactiveMonkeyMan.

History repeats itself, Thomas. Especially with pedophiles. It doesn't matter if one never harms a child, there's always the risk that they will regardless of whatever therapeutic dampeners they've attempted to put in place to prevent it.

People with pedophilia SHOULD BE afraid. It's not a sexual preference or orientation like this garbage tries to peddle to you. At best it's a birth defect when it's not a result of cyclical abuse. There is only one surefire preventative measure to take that doesn't require a bullet in the head and that's pure social isolation. So go get a padded room, Thomas. Not like it'll be any less lonely.
Ultimately it’s a fetish. But even if we were to argue that it’s a sexuality, the big difference between this and other once-shunned orientations is that this is not a zero-sum game. A gay man can fuck another gay man and that is not harmful. But a pedo can only indulge their “sexuality” by causing harm, whether directly or by stoking the demand for exploitative material.
 
chew on this, you disgusting fascist fool
. a fellow with an unhealthy attraction to minors downloaded some pictures of naked kids. he never raped anybody, but he was given 300 years sentence for those pictures in his computer.

One that recognizes that their urges are unhealthy who do nothing to harm children. most pedophiles should be treated as a behavioral health, not a criminal issue. the criminals are the traffickers making the CP and arranging live dates. those are the people who need to be prosecuted. the ones actually hurting kids.


Approximately 1 to 5% of the male population is estimated to have pedophilia [1,2,3], that is, a sexual interest in children [4]. Despite common misperceptions, pedophilia is neither a necessary nor sufficient precondition for sexual offending against children [5]. In fact, an unknown, but most likely substantial number of people with a sexual preference for children never commit sexual offenses [6], and an estimated 40–60 percent of sexual offenses against children are not committed by people with pedophilic interests [5,7,8,9]. Nevertheless, research has shown that people from the general public have extremely negative feelings and attitudes with regard to people with pedophilia, including the ones that do not offend [10]. Accordingly, people with pedophilia have to fear being shamed, threatened, and cut off from sources of social support, if their sexual interests are discovered [6], which may in turn increase the risk of sexual offending and barriers to seeking therapy.

So the citations given all lead to Google Scholar articles that have very limited number of participents in the research. Such great sources Thomas! You're as bad as David when trying to find shit that agrees with you. One the guy who originally thought it was 5% who did that "research".

The figure was based on surveys conducted in Germany, Norway and Finland in which men were asked whether they had ever had sexual thoughts or fantasies about children or engaged in sexual activity with children.
But Seto stresses that 5% was an upper estimate, and that the studies were limited in what they revealed.
"What those surveys don't include are questions on the intensity of those thoughts and fantasies, whether they were repeated or not. Someone might say 'Yes' because they once had a fantasy but our understanding of paedophilia would be that that person recurringly had sexual thoughts and fantasies about children."
Now, with more data and better methodology, he has revised his figure down to about 1% of the population, though he makes clear this is still only an educated guess.
An educated guess? So no actual science behind it. Just guess work because they asked a few men a question which seemed to be without any context.
 
Approximately 1 to 5% of the male population is estimated to have pedophilia [1,2,3], that is, a sexual interest in children [4]. Despite common misperceptions, pedophilia is neither a necessary nor sufficient precondition for sexual offending against children [5]. In fact, an unknown, but most likely substantial number of people with a sexual preference for children never commit sexual offenses [6], and an estimated 40–60 percent of sexual offenses against children are not committed by people with pedophilic interests [5,7,8,9]. Nevertheless, research has shown that people from the general public have extremely negative feelings and attitudes with regard to people with pedophilia, including the ones that do not offend [10]. Accordingly, people with pedophilia have to fear being shamed, threatened, and cut off from sources of social support, if their sexual interests are discovered [6], which may in turn increase the risk of sexual offending and barriers to seeking therapy.
This is a constant recurrence of pedo's; always moralfagging to the extreme trying to push the agenda of there supposed 'oppression'. The general public (as in normal fucking people) have negative feelings towards pedo's because they prey on there children for sexual gratification you fucking troon.

Plus what do Pedo's use for there sexual gratification, child porn you stupid fuck. So the only time a Pedo can be caught out is when they've done something morally reprehensible and illegal. Or in you're case just casually sexually assaulting a minor with the intent to rape her.
 
This is a constant recurrence of pedo's; always moralfagging to the extreme trying to push the agenda of there supposed 'oppression'. The general public (as in normal fucking people) have negative feelings towards pedo's because they prey on there children for sexual gratification you fucking troon.

Plus what do Pedo's use for there sexual gratification, child porn you stupid fuck. So the only time a Pedo can be caught out is when they've done something morally reprehensible and illegal. Or in you're case just casually sexually assaulting a minor with the intent to rape her.
that's a lot of words to say that you're a sanctimonious hypocritical social justice warrior with your head up your ass, believing a lot of fables and draws conclusions missing a lot of data.
 
@TheSockiestSock no thank you. i don't dialog with people like you. you don't live in the same world as me and you despicable angry autistic assholes have invaded mine with your fucking sanctimonious hypocritical virtue signaling about your oh so privileged selves who would never eat "literal trash" when you live on virtual trash. .
 
@TheSockiestSock no thank you. i don't dialog with people like you. you don't live in the same world as me and you despicable angry autistic assholes have invaded mine
He said, posting on Kiwi Farms.
with your fucking sanctimonious hypocritical virtue signaling about your oh so privileged selves who would never eat "literal trash" when you live on virtual trash. .
I’m fine with that. I’ve never been shot in the spleen while browsing this forum.
 
Well I tried ya burnt out hippie. I’m sure you think you’re still that young crazy counter culture warrior taking it to the man but sorry faggot I grew up in bread basket of Caesar Chavez, reading Grapes of Wrath, and learning about Upton Sinclair and I have done liberal shit too. I have organized protests and fought for the downtrodden and you claim to have done that too but again all we see of you is the pot smoking and the sex mania. And that’s your legacy if you’re too proud to take some goddamned advice. You think Rosa Parks spent most of her time getting high instead or advocating? You’re not counter anything but putting in effort into other people but you sure expect them to invest in you.

The dialogue offer was genuine but hey you’re too woke for that shit so at least take the advice and try to get something other than pathetic pleas for sex and the idealized memory of attempted child molestation to leave behind. For those who will want to remember you fondly if they even matter beyond your base desires. I am gonna go read some Henry Miller and probably be back when someone BTFOs your insanity again.
 
@TheSockiestSock no thank you. i don't dialog with people like you. you don't live in the same world as me and you despicable angry autistic assholes have invaded mine with your fucking sanctimonious hypocritical virtue signaling about your oh so privileged selves who would never eat "literal trash" when you live on virtual trash. .

Just admit you only want to "dialog" with people who lick your undescended balls and kiss your ass.

Oh right, you can't even do that if even if you paid them. :story:
 
All of you guys that keep saying that no one wants to fuck Tom keep forgetting that there's plenty of potential sexual partners for him:
Burnt out, aging, decrepit drug addicts
Insane, mentally unstable homeless people
Packs of wild dogs (ala Rickety Cricket)
Ousted sexual predators
Desperate tranny trainwrecks
And don't forget; the lack of consent is consent in Tom's book so there's:
Corpses
Roofied children
Family members
His hand
Tom's even had so many potential lovers that just couldn't handle his affection; like the time some limp dick faggot pussied out on leaving his wife, the trans teen he wanted to 'adopt' and cuddle with like a mommy or his Kurdish prince who lost a sexual dynamo just because he didn't like Tom trying on his ex wife's clothes or attempting to move in...Tom even skipped his Dad's funeral to get laid...and that's dedication.
 
I’m sure you think you’re still that young crazy counter culture warrior taking it to the man..
Still? He never was a "counter-culture warrior", nor did he ever "take it to" the so-called man. He has never been anything more than a try-hard blowhard with, in his own words, delusions of adequacy and importance.
 
Still? He never was a "counter-culture warrior", nor did he ever "take it to" the so-called man. He has never been anything more than a try-hard blowhard with, in his own words, delusions of adequacy and importance.
I agree I was only referencing how he saw himself and trying to impress the fact that if there was some grand figure of hippie history that he was at some point, literally no actual evidence of that exists in all the years he has been sperging about it. And yeah he claims it’s all been ‘disappeared’ by the man which persuades nobody when you have people who have been literally killed by the man and their history is still easily searchable.

I mean his rainbow friends disown him, his native friends disown him, his local hangout banned him, he is not welcome at gem shows, all he relies on are the homeless people he feeds dumpster trash and the few people that will indulge a hanger on who talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk. If I am wrong Tommie, prove it. Like I said at least so those who bother to like you have something positive to remember about you.
 
Last edited:
@TheSockiestSock no thank you. i don't dialog with people like you. you don't live in the same world as me and you despicable angry autistic assholes have invaded mine with your fucking sanctimonious hypocritical virtue signaling about your oh so privileged selves who would never eat "literal trash" when you live on virtual trash. .
Have you ever bothered to look up the words you use?
 
This dog fucker sent me a PM a few days ago. I never replied to him.

View attachment 2831184

Here is my reply:

View attachment 2831186

Also.. he Edited his original message to that, from : "If you're going to use my ID, use the most current one... blah...blah.... blah..."

EDIT: Correction.

"if you want to post my ID , you need to use something current, retard"​

View attachment 2831193
I can't decide if that's the most disturbing thing I have seen all day, or the funniest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soggy london
I realize that this is a little but of an unfair things to say, given how much we post and that he is an old MAN, so there's a limit to how much he can respond. But man the posts Tom decides to respond to, and the ones he decides to ignore, sure are telling.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tragi-Chan
Back