US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[X Prime]

You're not able to actually challenge what I said on the facts of it because you know I'm completely correct.

The only thing Betty White did with that was contribute to destroying America.

 

[Back me up!]

They switched to offering people in the control groups the real vaccine after it became more apparent that the existence of a control group would show that the vaccine caused vascular damage. They've done pretty much everything they can to eliminate control groups. Unfortunately for Pfizer and Moderna, Florida still exists.

Not even Florida, the Amish are still bouncing around. Some enterprising researcher is gonna go out and start interviewing the Amish and find out how COVID hit them (not hard) and how their not taking any vaccine or limiting their lives didn't affect them all.

I know there was a new reporter in PA that was interviewing a couple of Amish people and not only did make it through COVID fine they didn't change any of their Catholics practices (Sharing of wine during mass being a big COVID spreader). COVID hit, it burned through them, they dealt with it like a bad Flu, and everyone now has natural immunity.

 

[The Last Stand]

You're not able to actually challenge what I said on the facts of it because I'm misrepresenting the facts and history in hand for a motive.

Fixed it for you. Why didn't you say Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, even 2Pac?

Tell me this, how had YOU handled the rising race tensions in 20th century America without the likes of MLK Jr.?

Black people need to be honest about ONE thing: Hillary Clinton was absolutely correct in her assertion with superpredators ruining American cities.

 

[X Prime]

Pathetic. We're already back to MLK Jr.

A proven plagarist whose likely motivation for engaging in the movement was so that he could gain the clout needed to cheat on his wife with as many bitches as he wanted. Who cares what he thinks?

What I would have done is utterly irrelevant. Face it, the much-vaunted Civil Rights Movement was just a prototype for BLM in 2020.

 

[The Last Stand]

A proven plagarist whose likely motivation for engaging in the movement was so that he could gain the clout needed to cheat on his wife with as many bitches as he wanted. Who cares what he thinks?

So did a lot of people.

What I would have done is utterly irrelevant. Face it, the much-vaunted Civil Rights Movement was just a prototype for BLM in 2020.

No, it's not. You're dismissing Civil Rights as a grift while ignoring American corruption that has contemned equality since its inception. See, I can do that too.

 

[Blackhole]

Guys,guys,you're both annoying niggers. Let's stop derailing the thread.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

One thing has become very apparent in the last 60 years: black women now hate black men. Listen to damn near ANY black woman talking about a black man, and it's open disrespect and hatred. I've listened to black women say that smiling is offensive to them. They say that all black men are cheaters and woman beaters when men and women cheat at roughly the same rate (25%) and even the CDC states that women commit more domestic violence BECAUSE they know men won't hit them back. I've seen black women laugh at black men with the typical cubicle office job, calling them sell-outs, then date the Pookies and Ray-Ray drug dealers because they get the fast money, then act bitter because no shit the drug dealers are going to pump and dump them? 50% of black men are single and childless, another 30-40% are married or divorced, yet SEVENTY percent of children are raised by single mothers?

I see you too watched Aydin Paladin's latest Video.

 

[Oxous]

This is what happens when you don't let Trump win, people. CNN's gonna have to become a full-time political analysis think tank if they want to survive at this rate

LOL: CNN Lost ANOTHER 38% Of Viewers in 2021​

Spoiler: Full Article

(article)
Barely anyone left watching the pedo scandal hit network

CNN managed a remarkable feat in 2021. The network, currently reeling from a spate of pedophilia related allegations among its staff, succeeded in losing ANOTHER 38 percent of its viewership.

According to Nielsen data, CNN saw the massive drop in weekday prime-time viewership, while MSNBC saw a 25 percent drop in viewership for the same time slots.

The data shows that on average there are 919,000 Americans watching MSNBC, while only 787,000 are still watching CNN.

At this rate the networks will soon be out of business.

At this point, anyone still watching CNN has to be either completely brainwashed or brain dead. The network is now desperately attempting to corral these zombies into paying for its services with subscriptions.

Howard Stern recently posited the question “who the hell’s gonna pay for CNN+?” noting that “people don’t want CNN. I mean are they outta their minds?”

Fox News also saw a decline of 34 percent, but still has vastly more viewers with an average of 2.3 million during prime time hours.

Network news channels also saw significant declines in viewership, with NBC “Nightly News” registering a 14% decline, and both ABC’s “World News Tonight” and the “CBS Evening News” seeing 12% drops in viewership.

The data also revealed that visits to mainstream media news websites plummeted, with unique visitors to the Washington Post’s website dropping by an staggering 44% between November 2020 and 2021, and the New York Times registering a 34% decline in unique visitors.

While analysts claim the decline is due to President Trump leaving office, one might posit that it has more to do with the torrent of bullshit pouring out the mouths of every anchor and talking head visible on the networks, and practically every ‘journalist’ woefully attempting to disguise their opinions as real news in the Post and the Times.

 

[The Last Stand]

This is what happens when you don't let Trump win, people. CNN's gonna have to become a full-time political analysis think tank if they want to survive at this rate

LOL: CNN Lost ANOTHER 38% Of Viewers in 2021​

And here's a more comprehensive article.

NEW YORK (AP) — The presidential election, pandemic and racial reckoning were stories that drove intense interest and engagement to news outlets in 2020. To a large degree, 2021 represented the inevitable hangover.

Various metrics illustrate the dwindling popularity of news content.

Cable news networks were the main form of evening entertainment for millions of Americans last year. In 2021, weekday prime-time viewership dropped 38% at CNN, 34% at Fox News Channel and 25% at MSNBC, according to the Nielsen company.

The decline was less steep but still significant at broadcast television evening newscasts: 12% at ABC’s “World News Tonight” and the “CBS Evening News;” 14% at NBC’s “Nightly News,” Nielsen said.

The Trump era saw explosive subscriber growth for some digital news sites like The New York Times and Washington Post. Yet readers aren’t spending as much time there; Comscore said the number of unique visitors to the Post’s site was down 44% in November compared to November 2020, and down 34% at the Times.

While a Dec. 23 headline on the Los Angeles Times front page — “How Much More Can We Take?” — referred to COVID-19, it could easily be applied to the news appetite in general.

​

For the most part, smart news executives knew the peaks of 2020 were not sustainable.

“It was entirely predictable,” said news media analyst Ken Doctor.

Perhaps that was most obvious at the cable news networks. They built a prime-time model almost entirely focused on political combat during the Trump years, which made it difficult for them to pivot to something different, said Tom Rosenstiel, a journalism professor at the University of Maryland.

“You become, to some extent, a prisoner of the audience you built,” Rosenstiel said.

Those networks remain focused on politics even as viewership interest wanes. The media monitoring company NewsWhip looked at 14 million political articles online last year and found they had an average of 924 engagements, or social media interactions. The 13.5 million articles NewsWhip has traced in 2021 had an average of 321 engagements.

To a certain extent, these outlets have turned elsewhere for revenue opportunities, Doctor said. CNN is preparing to debut a new streaming service early next year, and recently poached Fox News’ Chris Wallace to join that effort.

Fox News, while doubling down on conservative commentary following perceived threats from outlets like Newsmax and OANN, directed fans to its Fox Nation streaming service. Arguably Fox’s most attention-getting programming of the year was a documentary on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by Tucker Carlson, that asserted it was an effort to silence Trump supporters.

Both CNN and MSNBC face key programming decisions in the new year. CNN must replace its most popular host, Chris Cuomo, who was fired after it was revealed how he helped his brother through a political scandal. MSNBC must replace Brian Williams in its lineup and will most likely see its most popular personality, Rachel Maddow, cut back on her hours.

Although usage of the Times’ digital site is down, the company passed 8 million subscriptions and is on pace to grow further. Doctor said the Times has done an effective job of diversifying beyond politics, most notably with its Wirecutter service of consumer recommendations.

Leaders at the Post have wrestled with how to deal their readers’ dependence on political fare, according to the Wall Street Journal. The company is looking internationally for growth opportunities, Doctor said, a focus that plays to the strength of its new executive editor, Sally Buzbee.

“People to some degree have focused inward,” Rosenstiel said. “They’re getting the news that they need but it’s not as much news as it was a year ago.”

Particularly for the national news outlets, Rosenstiel said 2021 may best be remembered as a transitional year away from the frenzied news pace of the Trump years.

He sees the effect of those years in the intensity with which the media has covered every twist and turn of legislative negotiations over President Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better” bill. Like most work in Congress, it’s slow-moving and filled with incremental developments.

He’s concerned that concentration on this story has distracted from other priorities, including focusing on local efforts to restrict voting rights, ultimately a more important story.

Some 100 to 120 local newspapers shut down in 2021, a number that is on pace with the declines of the past two decades, said Penelope Muse Abernathy, a professor at Northwestern University.

Yet local news outlets are also expected to have their smallest number of job cuts in 14 years, according to the research firm Challenger Gray & Christmas. That comes after 2020 saw the biggest number of lost newsroom jobs since 2008.

“What we’re seeing this year is kind of a watershed moment in the pivot from a print business model that is diminishing to a digital model that is beginning to take shape,” said Timothy Franklin, Abernathy’s colleague at Northwestern.

He cited the Boston Globe and Minneapolis Star-Tribune as two newspapers that are succeeding in the transition.

Local news outlets saw a boost in digital subscriptions as people sought information in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. While interest in pandemic news has waned, Abernathy said she believes the outlets have done well in keeping many of those new subscribers.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Stuff about black families

I've said it before and I'll say it again; if you want to stop 13% of the population doing 50% of the crime, the solution is to give that 13% the same family and social structures that the other 87% have.

Ban divorce completely, or failing that, ban no-fault divorce. Criminalise adultery. Strongly encourage people to get married, by providing loans and government benefits to married couples. Make being a thug (yes, I know that's a pretty loaded term, but you know what I mean) socially unacceptable and help encourage poor people, both black and white, to start their own businesses. Go to black churches, help them remove pozzed priests and ministers, and give them money to set up parochial schools. Make churches (ideally "the Church", but I'm not naive enough to expect millions of black Americans to convert to Catholicism overnight) a pillar of black communities.

Would this require getting rid of the seperation of church and state, making a very conservative moral code law, and carrying out what lots of people would consider government overreach? Yes. Would it be worth it? Absolutely.

 

[The Ugly One]

The reason MLK Jr is revered is because he died before it was obvious to everyone what a slimebag he was. Jesse Jackson inherited work and was cut from the same cloth.

I've said it before and I'll say it again; if you want to stop 13% of the population doing 50% of the crime, the solution is to give that 13% the same family and social structures that the other 87% have.

Ban divorce completely, or failing that, ban no-fault divorce. Criminalise adultery. Strongly encourage people to get married, by providing loans and government benefits to married couples. Make being a thug (yes, I know that's a pretty loaded term, but you know what I mean) socially unacceptable and help encourage poor people, both black and white, to start their own businesses. Go to black churches, help them remove pozzed priests and ministers, and give them money to set up parochial schools. Make churches (ideally "the Church", but I'm not naive enough to expect millions of black Americans to convert to Catholicism overnight) a pillar of black communities.

Would this require getting rid of the seperation of church and state, making a very conservative moral code law, and carrying out what lots of people would consider government overreach? Yes. Would it be worth it? Absolutely.

Bring back aggressive application of the death penalty. Criminality is strongly heritable, and there's significant evidence that a massive increase in application of the death penalty from the 13th century onward weeded the worst northern Europeans out of the gene pool completely. Call it whatever you want; evolution is real, and our brains and endocrine systems are biological organs.

 

[The Last Stand]

Ban divorce completely, or failing that, ban no-fault divorce. Criminalise adultery. Strongly encourage people to get married, by providing loans and government benefits to married couples. Make being a thug (yes, I know that's a pretty loaded term, but you know what I mean) socially unacceptable and help encourage poor people, both black and white, to start their own businesses.

All of that doesn't mean anything if we ourselves don't hold ourselves accountable to tomfoolery and thuggery.

How did the Italians and Irish get to recover from being bottom of the barrel in the turn of Ellis Island immigration?

The reason MLK Jr is revered is because he died before it was obvious to everyone what a slimebag he was. Jesse Jackson inherited work and was cut from the same cloth.

You're blaming opportunists for good-willed people.

 

[Garm]

This is a stupid question, but I'm just curious.

Why can't Biden just throw the army/National Guard at this problem, like the Dems do everything else?

Isn't the main problem that there just isn't enough manpower to get the containers unloaded? Is there a deeper problem that I'm sure I'm missing long-term, but short term might at least fix something?

I'm not saying it's a GOOD plan, but a bad plan is better than NO plan at this point, isn't it? Is there a variable that I'm missing besides manpower.

Then again, maybe COVID showed that a bad plan isn't exactly better than no plan.

Not really sure. "Become a long haul trucker" might be a stretch even for Democrats to deploy the national guard. "Disrupt your life for the foreseeable future" is not a good way to keep guardsman.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I've said it before and I'll say it again; if you want to stop 13% of the population doing 50% of the crime, the solution is to give that 13% the same family and social structures that the other 87% have.

Ban divorce completely, or failing that, ban no-fault divorce. Criminalise adultery. Strongly encourage people to get married, by providing loans and government benefits to married couples. Make being a thug (yes, I know that's a pretty loaded term, but you know what I mean) socially unacceptable and help encourage poor people, both black and white, to start their own businesses. Go to black churches, help them remove pozzed priests and ministers, and give them money to set up parochial schools. Make churches (ideally "the Church", but I'm not naive enough to expect millions of black Americans to convert to Catholicism overnight) a pillar of black communities.

Would this require getting rid of the seperation of church and state, making a very conservative moral code law, and carrying out what lots of people would consider government overreach? Yes. Would it be worth it? Absolutely.

There is one problem.

If you do all that, the niggers won't need Gibs, and if you don't need Gibs the Government doesn't control you.

 

[The Last Stand]

This is a stupid question, but I'm just curious.

Why can't Biden just throw the army/National Guard at this problem, like the Dems do everything else?

Isn't the main problem that there just isn't enough manpower to get the containers unloaded? Is there a deeper problem that I'm sure I'm missing long-term, but short term might at least fix something?

You have to GIVE the illusion that everything is under control. Why fix something that's broken?

 

[The Ugly One]

This is a stupid question, but I'm just curious.

Why can't Biden just throw the army/National Guard at this problem, like the Dems do everything else?

Isn't the main problem that there just isn't enough manpower to get the containers unloaded? Is there a deeper problem that I'm sure I'm missing long-term, but short term might at least fix something?

I'm not saying it's a GOOD plan, but a bad plan is better than NO plan at this point, isn't it? Is there a variable that I'm missing besides manpower.

Then again, maybe COVID showed that a bad plan isn't exactly better than no plan.

I highly recommend this article by a 20-year trucking veteran on the problem:

I’m A Twenty Year Truck Driver, I Will Tell You Why America’s “Shipping Crisis” Will Not End

I have a simple question for every ‘expert’ who thinks they understand the root causes of the shipping crisis:

medium.com

Here's the TL;DR - trucking is actually a surprisingly complex system of men, machines, and warehouses, and it has been fucked up from front to back by COVID panic policies.

 

[The Last Stand]

Here's the TL;DR - trucking is actually a surprisingly complex system of men, machines, and warehouses, and it has been fucked up from front to back by COVID panic policies.

Why do truckers need to practice social distancing when the job itself entails that responsibility?

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I highly recommend this article by a 20-year trucking veteran on the problem:

I’m A Twenty Year Truck Driver, I Will Tell You Why America’s “Shipping Crisis” Will Not End

I have a simple question for every ‘expert’ who thinks they understand the root causes of the shipping crisis:

medium.com

Here's the TL;DR - trucking is actually a surprisingly complex system of men, machines, and warehouses, and it has been fucked up from front to back by COVID panic policies.

If only we had some sort of..house to store wares in to keep an amount of product on hand in the event of emergencies instead of relying on everything "Arriving Just in time."

 

[The Last Stand]

I think Pelosi is over 80, or at least thereabouts

Still an old, bitter hag.

If only we had some sort of..house to store wares in to keep an amount of product on hand in the event of emergencies instead of relying on everything "Arriving Just in time."

What would we call such an concept? The house of wares.

 

[CrippleThreat]

Ban divorce completely, or failing that, ban no-fault divorce. Criminalise adultery. Strongly encourage people to get married, by providing loans and government benefits to married couples. Make being a thug (yes, I know that's a pretty loaded term, but you know what I mean) socially unacceptable and help encourage poor people, both black and white, to start their own businesses. Go to black churches, help them remove pozzed priests and ministers, and give them money to set up parochial schools. Make churches (ideally "the Church", but I'm not naive enough to expect millions of black Americans to convert to Catholicism overnight) a pillar of black communities.

I see you too have read some of Patrick J. Buchanan.

Everything you mentioned was within our power to obtain, but lasting effects —Earl Warren, LBJ and the progressive's permanent anchorage on the country, and that Nixon and Reagan's Justices were frauds and/or can-kickers— are the reason we'll never be able to make that rightful change occur.

With SCOTUS being the power that it is and has been (45 and 37 were similar; relied on courts that shat on their agendas every time), in order to get anything out of them, you would have to do some redacted shit (a la Obama and Scalia), or just be the Executive for once and challenge their asses.