Manosphere Jack Murphy / John Murphy Goldman / Bigbadbeard1000 / Jacked Brunch / Liminal Order - Bearded grifter of the Manosphere and an actual cuck

According to this process server:
About 5’10” to 6”
Capital One has been trying to serve his fiancée for a couple years on her 1700$ debt.

Re:BeardbeardsService.pdf


John must have learned after he defaulted on his own 4,078$ claim by Capital One:

Re:JohnIsABadJew.pdf


Thanks to Capital One we can confirm John has no military service

Re:JohnaLackofService(MilitaryAtLeast).pdf

John was sued by his own Dad (step dad?) for failure to pay him back 240,000$

Re: GoldmanComplaint.pdf and GoldmanSettlement.pdf

Outstanding work! Really.

So, each year he has to reveal his certified IRS income statement to his own father or Brother (assumed as same last name so must be his true father) - by October 15th each year or he is in default. And payments until a balloon in 2030 of $100,000.

I'm going to have to try and figure out how he has been paid for all his "Liminal Order" and "Brunches" fees - my guess, Crypto. Or cash. If he hasn't recorded the payments, he not only is guilty of a Federal Crime, but also posting falsely attested certifications via US mail to his father/Brother in a court matter in Washingto C.C. which caries stricter penalties.

No doubt the FBI is giving the Liminal Order a good looking into (they already were before the shooting). My bet he is in court soon or jail within 18 months.

1357 Hamilton Street N.W. Washington D.C. is his address at the time of service.
 
I get you guys have your opinion about this guy, but he's at least contributing something in that he's attended these events before and can offer a first hand account of how they went down. Maybe he's autistic and paying for brunch events is gay or whatever but I'd rather not have the thread (or KF in general I suppose) turn into dunking on primary sources who are at least contributing to a thread topic lest future potential sources be scared off. I only ask for some prudence because this is a new, evolving situation and there was another guy talking about trying to get someone who was actually in the Ligma Order group chats here to offer some of the stuff he saw as well and it would be kind of shitty to have him try to contribute and have 3 or 4 guys trying to epically own him instead of letting him give us more information.
 
They're trying to go fishing on the one on one ten thousand chance it's the big man himself of someone else who could be of note in all of this, if I'm reading it right. Could you imagine how fun that would be?
I don't know if it is actually him. Would be hilarious if it was, but I am more inclined to think it is some weird white knight of his. Maybe someone who gave a bit too much info to the LO. Or it has been floated on this thread before he was a complete glowop.
 
I'm going to have to try and figure out how he has been paid for all his "Liminal Order" and "Brunches" fees - my guess, Crypto. Or cash. If he hasn't recorded the payments, he not only is guilty of a Federal Crime, but also posting falsely attested certifications via US mail to his father/Brother in a court matter in Washingto C.C. which caries stricter penalties.
It's probably set up as an S-Corp or LLC or something. Money goes into that, and then he would issue disbursements to himself or spend the money for business expenses (i.e. travel, running events) which would have nothing to do with his personal taxes. The company could be taking in a lot, he could be living it up, and only showing a small personal income.
 
It was $245k! He had to make a lump sum payment of $140k back to dad then make monthly installment payments that dad required be by auto ACH debit every month plus he has to submit his tax return to him every year until the debt is paid in full.

John grifted his own fucking family bad enough they sued him and kicked his chad ass in court.
It's weird. The papers have some parts where the numbers don't add up. Either there are some mistakes or I'm retarded. Anyway I think the total loaned was around 240k, and he paid back around 105 k of that, leaving 135 k. If I read the settlement correctly, he's gonna have to pay 145 k in total by March 2030.

They're trying to go fishing on the one on one ten thousand chance it's the big man himself of someone else who could be of note in all of this, if I'm reading it right. Could you imagine how fun that would be?
It's obviously not him.
 
It's weird. The papers have some parts where the numbers don't add up. Either there are some mistakes or I'm retarded. Anyway I think the total loaned was around 240k, and he paid back around 105 k of that, leaving 135 k. If I read the settlement correctly, he's gonna have to pay 145 k in total by March 2030.

Attorney fees?
 
Attorney fees?
No, don't think so. This is the part that confuses me.

1641080843833.png
 
No, don't think so. This is the part that confuses me.

View attachment 2849032

Hmm. Maybe there's an accrued interest lever that can be used? We'd have to find somebody that understands DC law. I know where I live, if my biz has to sue a client for non-payment, I'm allowed to tack on 9% interest after the judgment, but it varies from state to state. It's the only thing I can think of. I really wish all the state/district courts just rolled their shit into PACER at the federal level so these types of cases were easier to look up. If I could look at the complete history of filed documents, I could probably find the answer.

Though that gives me an idea. Back in 10, checking PACER to see if there's any federal court filings with this guy's name. Re-Edit: Nothing there, though there's a John A Goldman in Spokane Washington that looks like he's spent 90% of his life in court. Jesus, he's got like 75 cases.
 
Last edited:
Hmm. Maybe there's an accrued interest lever that can be used? We'd have to find somebody that understands DC law. I know where I live, if my biz has to sue a client for non-payment, I'm allowed to tack on 9% interest after the judgment, but it varies from state to state. It's the only thing I can think of.

Pretty sure since this is a settlement which is just an agreement between two parties they can settle it for however much they want based on what they agree upon - doesn't have to reflect the original amount. Probably represents legal fees, hassle, possibly other things.
 
Hmm. Maybe there's an accrued interest lever that can be used? We'd have to find somebody that understands DC law. I know where I live, if my biz has to sue a client for non-payment, I'm allowed to tack on 9% interest after the judgment, but it varies from state to state. It's the only thing I can think of.
I think at the end the settlement was like 145 k to be paid, while the amount owed was around 135 k. So 7 % interest after 25 years if I got ot right. Very reasonable.
 
Looks like Jack forgot to protect the backend of his website. If you use this URL but add a year and a month after it you can access some files. for example "2021/12/" leads to https://jackmurphylive.com/liminal-order/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/
You don't even have to go that far, just go here (found it by clicking on links in archives) https://jackmurphylive.com/2017/01/ and play with the date codes in the URL, or just keep searching the random sites he used. Medium is where I found his article about being on TRT and roids.
 
According to this process server:
About 5’10” to 6”
Capital One has been trying to serve his fiancée for a couple years on her 1700$ debt.

Re:BeardbeardsService.pdf


John must have learned after he defaulted on his own 4,078$ claim by Capital One:

Re:JohnIsABadJew.pdf


Thanks to Capital One we can confirm John has no military service

Re:JohnaLackofService(MilitaryAtLeast).pdf

John was sued by his own Dad (step dad?) for failure to pay him back 240,000$

Re: GoldmanComplaint.pdf and GoldmanSettlement.pdf

That form with the SCRA verification only is if the member is CURRENTLY a member of the military. Anyone who is doing a seizure or anything must check with SCRA first if the person is currently serving on active duty (Title 10) orders (doesn't work for National Guardsmen / Title 42) as of the date they're serving a legal action on. SCRA is only useful to check if someone had served in the military or currently serving in the military.
 
Back