Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

I don't know why anybody thinks Adam green is intelligent he literally had such a stupid in the standing of Christianity it's laughable he literally thinks that Hitler was a Zionist
And that the Nazis will completely under the control of Jews he is f****** retarded
Yep Adam green gets his talking points from kooks like Christopher John Bjerknes.

Myles Poland was correct, he is just a sperg and unable to articulate his positions as well as Green.
 
What a repulsive scumbag, I truly have zero sympathy for this closeted freak and his family would be much better off if Nick cut all contact from them for life. Nick should restore some honor in his family and change his name.
I wouldn't put all the blame on Nickers for this one. His manchild retardation aside, I am still floored by the fact that he went public with his mother's cancer and even more so that she couldn't help but remind everyone as well. Surely in no small part to help square away the absolute state of the moobment and any kind of recent mishaps by begging for sympathy and consequently pity superchats.

PPP only alluded to it but he was more than right, this shit is fucked beyond words. He could've said his family was going through a difficult time and left it at that but no, literally anything that helps keep the superchats flowing.

I have to conclude with PPP that it's very likely his entire family is one of bona fide psychopaths grooming him for this shit from an early age, nigga desperately needs some Molyneux in his life.

You just wonder who will have the epic betrayal (not just simple betrayals like Peter rejecting Christ’s resurrection 3 times before he gives in) but the real betrayal for 30 pieces of silver.

My money is on Beardson being the Judas of the Groyper Generals
Breadsoy is less than nothing without the spic so no chances of that happening whatsoever, he'll bend over whichever way necessary come hell or high water. It was obvious the Sweat would go down the drain without Shawn because Beardsoy is nothing but a scheming leech whose only original contribution to all this is unbeliveably fake and gay drama. Much like his spic king, who does the same thing fundamentally but on a whole other scale.

Besides those you've listed there's also a bunch more like Millennial Matt who keep out of public but have been playing a role in all this from very early on, more so than the worthless retards like Frannsen all too happy to put their faces out there. Although still unlikely, if anyone is going to defect and spill the beans my money is on one of them.
 
Myles Poland could lose an argument about the sky being blue because he's just that fucking insufferable and smug. I do like Adam Green as a person and wish he would stop listening to Christopher John Bjerknes because that guy is literally insane. Adam is just an autistic guy that says some interesting things and has his heart in the right place.
 
First off, as any 'Catholic theologian' should know, not everything the Saints have ever said is 100% correct. Augustine himself stated some things that are wrong according to the Church today. However, none of them ever said 'women should be completely subjugated by men and have no rights.'
The big problem with the idea that we should go to some sort of Taliban-like state of womens' rights is that in the time of Jesus women had far more rights than they do according to the Taliban today, even in Jewish society. Not to mention the rights they had under Rome, which Paul would have been very familiar with considering he himself was a Roman citizen. Why would the Apostles/Saints of the early Church have wanted to restrict womens' rights even more than they were at the time?

Another major issue with this line of thinking is simply, why would God have created women if they are 'all like that' and 'having sex is gay'? Women and men are designed to be together, as God intended, and Adam and Eve is actually one of the primary examples to use in defense of traditional marriage. Not to bring up the examples Paul gave of the relationship between husband and wife being like between Christ and the Church. The husband (Christ) has headship over the wife (Church) but it is not a relationship of total domination and subjugation, but of cooperation and 'delegated responsibilities' in a way. Christ set up the Church to accomplish His mission on Earth, and He effectively set up the Church to be able to accomplish His goals. How could this be done if the Church was weak and basically powerless? To bring this back around, in a marriage relationship, why would a man marry a weak woman, who is basically useless, when he also wants that woman to help run his house, and raise his children into the proper God-fearing adults they should be? More importantly, why wouldn't he want a woman that was capable of actually assisting him in a partnership that will accomplish his life goals? A weak woman is useless in this respect. Basically the best situation is to have a strong, capable woman willingly submit to your headship, and you to love her as your own body in response to her willing submit to you. That is a tremendous responsibility.
I think a big issue is that to have a woman willingly submit to your authority in a marriage is a tremendous gift, but also a tremendous responsibility. Since Nick and co. are children mentally, they can't handle that responsibility, so they wish for a society that will enforce their childlike view of a marriage relationship so they won't have to shoulder the responsibility to lead a woman and family themselves.

Also this theist guy seems like someone who had a previous belief in how things should be, and simply decided Catholicism most closely resembled what he wanted to believe, so he simply adopted it. Rather than someone who sought truth itself and found it in the Church.
 
Whether or not you think Fuentes is a federal informant, a grifter, controlled opposition, irony-poisoned, a manchild, or some unholy amalgamation of all of those things, you can never take anything he says at face value. I don't know if his mom really has cancer, but I would not put it past him to lie about it(or literally anything else). I've stopped trying to figure out where the truth ends and where the lies start with him. He's in a death spiral, and the only thing left to do is point and laugh at him on his way down.
Also this theist guy seems like someone who had a previous belief in how things should be, and simply decided Catholicism most closely resembled what he wanted to believe, so he simply adopted it. Rather than someone who sought truth itself and found it in the Church.
"Hey, I've seen this one... this is a classic!"
 
I didn't see this posted yet. But lol if true. Screenshot_20220104-044033~2.png
 
First off, as any 'Catholic theologian' should know, not everything the Saints have ever said is 100% correct. Augustine himself stated some things that are wrong according to the Church today. However, none of them ever said 'women should be completely subjugated by men and have no rights.'
The big problem with the idea that we should go to some sort of Taliban-like state of womens' rights is that in the time of Jesus women had far more rights than they do according to the Taliban today, even in Jewish society. Not to mention the rights they had under Rome, which Paul would have been very familiar with considering he himself was a Roman citizen. Why would the Apostles/Saints of the early Church have wanted to restrict womens' rights even more than they were at the time?

Another major issue with this line of thinking is simply, why would God have created women if they are 'all like that' and 'having sex is gay'? Women and men are designed to be together, as God intended, and Adam and Eve is actually one of the primary examples to use in defense of traditional marriage. Not to bring up the examples Paul gave of the relationship between husband and wife being like between Christ and the Church. The husband (Christ) has headship over the wife (Church) but it is not a relationship of total domination and subjugation, but of cooperation and 'delegated responsibilities' in a way. Christ set up the Church to accomplish His mission on Earth, and He effectively set up the Church to be able to accomplish His goals. How could this be done if the Church was weak and basically powerless? To bring this back around, in a marriage relationship, why would a man marry a weak woman, who is basically useless, when he also wants that woman to help run his house, and raise his children into the proper God-fearing adults they should be? More importantly, why wouldn't he want a woman that was capable of actually assisting him in a partnership that will accomplish his life goals? A weak woman is useless in this respect. Basically the best situation is to have a strong, capable woman willingly submit to your headship, and you to love her as your own body in response to her willing submit to you. That is a tremendous responsibility.
I think a big issue is that to have a woman willingly submit to your authority in a marriage is a tremendous gift, but also a tremendous responsibility. Since Nick and co. are children mentally, they can't handle that responsibility, so they wish for a society that will enforce their childlike view of a marriage relationship so they won't have to shoulder the responsibility to lead a woman and family themselves.

Also this theist guy seems like someone who had a previous belief in how things should be, and simply decided Catholicism most closely resembled what he wanted to believe, so he simply adopted it. Rather than someone who sought truth itself and found it in the Church.
Nick is a short man that is very insecure and no woman is intimidated by him. Also, not a high earner, not physically attractive, he even makes fun of people who go to gyms out of envy.
Knowing this, Nick wants authoritarian rule over women, to beat them if he needs to, all while using Christianity as a shield.

That's what makes him such a big lolcow.
 
If Nick and the groypers would just go outside, meet real people and act normal, they'd be so much better off. The whole point of optics is to avoid people saying "what the fuck". That's why the alt right fell apart, with all the Hyperborea pagan esoteric stiff, as well as being far too willing to dress like Nazis. Nick rejecting that is what let him succeed where the wignats didn't.
But now he's doing a lot of the same. Wether it's his big ego, his love of Kanye West, the incel things, whatever he keeps doing is driving people away. He's failed to learn his own lesson.
It's not unrecoverable. Not yet. But he needs to go out and spend time with regular people outside of politics, outside of his movement. You'd think the holidays would be a great time to do exactly that but he's too much of a sperg.
The other solution is for him to set his movement on stone. Write a book or a manifesto or something. Then you'd have a central reference point to work from, so that it can be said exactly what is and is not part of the movement.
you're assuming it's a sincere and genuine movement built on sincere and genuine ideas/principles. They can make whatever copes they want but at the end of the day the revealed preference of america first and the groyper army is that they have for years refused to put out a positive, constructive ideology or even any core principles whatsoever other than unapologetically fellating nick and hating women. You will never see a manifesto or anything similar because that would force them to actually conceptualize and articulate something beyond petty grudges, tactical contrarianism, and generic women hatred. It's the same reason why other terms like "wignat" and "optics" are left as vague abstractions and never given hard and fast definitions. Once you define them, you no longer have this catch-all bludgeon to beat people you don't like for whatever reason you can't properly articulate over the head with.

I didn't see this posted yet. But lol if true. View attachment 2856294
huh. Who does this remind you of? "OH GUAWD THOSE EVIL MEAN INTOLERANT GOYIM HAVE KICKED US OUT OF SO MANY COUNTRIES FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON!! THEY JUST HATE US SO MUCH!! WHY ARE WE PERSECUTED SO!!!"
"the groyper will tell you he is hated, the groyper will tell you he has been kicked off of 109 platforms, but the groyper will never tell you about the part where as soon as he shows up somewhere, he attempts a hostile takeover and antagonize literally anyone else they run into."

fuckin' retards.
 
Sydney Watson was on Red Ice and seemed like she didn't support white genocide. I don't know if she has changed her beliefs. With that said, it does sound like she still has residual feminist beliefs.

The radical feminist belief that the Taliban are a bit harsh towards women. Come on now.

Fuentes just hates women and any woman would get defensive when some midget nerd with a squeaky voice starts telling her about how she needs to submit to him.
 
Besides those you've listed there's also a bunch more like Millennial Matt who keep out of public but have been playing a role in all this from very early on, more so than the worthless retards like Frannsen all too happy to put their faces out there. Although still unlikely, if anyone is going to defect and spill the beans my money is on one of them.
If I remember correctly, Millennial Matt was a part of the alt-right/TRS-adjacent crowd and was good friends with Baked Alaska during Charlottesville. Matt's connection with Nick makes Nick's consistent allegiance with that embodiment of white trash make a little more sense. From what I've seen of him years ago, he's a lot more well spoken and competent than post-groyper war Nick so I wouldn't be surprised if he was planning and distancing himself ,possibly along with others in the AF figurehead group, after Nick became completely retarded in 2020/2021 and particularly after the last CPAC fiasco.
 
Last edited:
If Nick and the groypers would just go outside, meet real people and act normal, they'd be so much better off. The whole point of optics is to avoid people saying "what the fuck". That's why the alt right fell apart, with all the Hyperborea pagan esoteric stiff, as well as being far too willing to dress like Nazis. Nick rejecting that is what let him succeed where the wignats didn't.
But now he's doing a lot of the same. Wether it's his big ego, his love of Kanye West, the incel things, whatever he keeps doing is driving people away. He's failed to learn his own lesson.
It's not unrecoverable. Not yet. But he needs to go out and spend time with regular people outside of politics, outside of his movement. You'd think the holidays would be a great time to do exactly that but he's too much of a sperg.
The other solution is for him to set his movement on stone. Write a book or a manifesto or something. Then you'd have a central reference point to work from, so that it can be said exactly what is and is not part of the movement.
"It's not unrecoverable. Not yet" This is the only part I disagree with in this post.. Nick is not a good leader, charismatic and assertive (his short stature and smug faggotry take away from these traits) yes, but he is too narcissistic for his own good, few other than 60 IQ autists, senile BQQMers, and grifters waiting for a shekel are willing to give him the time of day. He could purge every mutt, kike, and pedo from his movement and it still wouldn't be halfway decent. More concerned with women, unfunny inside jokes, and driving people ideologically similar away than actually challenging the "establishment" or advocating for an "America First" or actual right wing policy.

I suppose he can make a decent income by continuing to let Mexican band kids orbit him, at least until the 2024 election when he's clinging onto his relevancy harder than Dicky Spencer (assuming he's not already near that point).
 
I find it odd that Nick and his cult aren't gleefully joining the dogpile on John "Jack Murphy" Goldman when it's such low-hanging fruit. I thought he wanted to take out Conservative Inc? Something tells me he'd rather not, out of fear that the similarities between him and Goldman might become all too clear to anyone actually paying attention.
 
I find it odd that Nick and his cult aren't gleefully joining the dogpile on John "Jack Murphy" Goldman when it's such low-hanging fruit. I thought he wanted to take out Conservative Inc? Something tells me he'd rather not, out of fear that the similarities between him and Goldman might become all too clear to anyone actually paying attention.
Goldman was the B story of a recent show, but their main focus is Gettr and Steve Bannon at the moment.
 
Little Nicky Fuentes spent his entire stream tonight getting banned from GETTR over and over again. He sniffled frequently. His throat was full of phlegm and slobber, and he loudly cleared it into the mic on numerous occasions. His homosexuality is worsening.

I find it odd that Nick and his cult aren't gleefully joining the dogpile on John "Jack Murphy" Goldman when it's such low-hanging fruit. I thought he wanted to take out Conservative Inc? Something tells me he'd rather not, out of fear that the similarities between him and Goldman might become all too clear to anyone actually paying attention.
They did on yesterday's show.
 
If Nick and the groypers would just go outside, meet real people and act normal, they'd be so much better off. The whole point of optics is to avoid people saying "what the fuck". That's why the alt right fell apart, with all the Hyperborea pagan esoteric stiff, as well as being far too willing to dress like Nazis. Nick rejecting that is what let him succeed where the wignats didn't.
But now he's doing a lot of the same. Wether it's his big ego, his love of Kanye West, the incel things, whatever he keeps doing is driving people away. He's failed to learn his own lesson.
It's not unrecoverable. Not yet. But he needs to go out and spend time with regular people outside of politics, outside of his movement. You'd think the holidays would be a great time to do exactly that but he's too much of a sperg.
The other solution is for him to set his movement on stone. Write a book or a manifesto or something. Then you'd have a central reference point to work from, so that it can be said exactly what is and is not part of the movement.
Such a stupid take. Yeah, trust a bunch of fourteen year olds with negative life experience, incels with zero human interactions outside of Groyper Inc. and morons who either flunked out of Uni or didn’t have an education to begin with write a manifesto. They can’t even cook themselves a proper dinner, bro. America First is worse than Alt-right, because while the latter was stillborn from the start, this one was not only stillborn, but created simply for grifting purposes.

Nick thought he could become a new Ben Shapiro, or at least dethrone Charlie Kirk. But Ben is a Harvard educated lawyer, who either already had or made the necessary connections to get in life. Kirk wasn’t smart enough, but he has been in the grift since junior High School, volunteering and working for senators and writing all sorts of rubbish that get republicans hard. Nickles on the other hand, has zero social skills and repulses people, either through his words, his actions, or the timbre of his voice, the lack of his height and his appearance.

charismatic and assertive
He’s a scrawny midget who has never been intimate with a woman, you have to be fucking retarded to consider him either. Men laugh at him, women are repulsed by him, Nick only attracts same sorts of losers. At least Richard Spencer is physically attractive, holds a PhD and actually fathered children. Nick is just a failure all around.
 
Last edited:
I find it odd that Nick and his cult aren't gleefully joining the dogpile on John "Jack Murphy" Goldman when it's such low-hanging fruit. I thought he wanted to take out Conservative Inc? Something tells me he'd rather not, out of fear that the similarities between him and Goldman might become all too clear to anyone actually paying attention.
my guess would be its not something he can make about himself so he's not gonna go full into it.

Little Nicky Fuentes spent his entire stream tonight getting banned from GETTR over and over again. He sniffled frequently. His throat was full of phlegm and slobber, and he loudly cleared it into the mic on numerous occasions. His homosexuality is worsening.
you know, this is something that's been brought up pretty consistently throughout this thread, his weird sniffling shit. Never really payed it much mind before but I'm starting to wonder what's up with that. Maybe its just allergies?

Such a stupid take. Yeah, trust a bunch of fourteen year olds with negative life experience, incels with zero human interactions outside of Groyper Inc. and morons who either flunked out of Uni or didn’t have an education to begin with write a manifesto. They can’t even cook themselves a proper dinner, bro. America First is worse than Alt-right, because while the latter was stillborn from the start, this one was not only stillborn, but created simply for grifting purposes.
as far as I know most of the major figures that used to make up the "alt-right" have all either dedicated a lot of time to bootstrapping an actual fully-formed from the ground up ideology instead of just staying trapped in 2016 trying to do the same shit that didn't work then. Granted th results have been mixed, but at least they're actually doing some kind of introspection and idea forming, which is more than can be said for amnats. Any time I've seen one of them break orthodoxy, even if to just try something out, it seems to universally result in getting excommunicated.

Nick thought he could become a new Ben Shapiro, or at least dethrone Charlie Kirk. But Ben is a Harvard educated lawyer, who either already had or made the necessary connections to get in life. Kirk wasn’t smart enough, but he has been in the grift since junior High School, volunteering and working for senators and writing all sorts of rubbish that get republicans hard. Nickles on the other hand, has zero social skills and repulses people, either through his words, his actions, or the timbre of his voice, the lack of his height and his appearance.
He's a manchild who wants his cake and the ability to eat it too. He wants to be the star speaker at CPAC while also being an edgy online "dissident" who spends more time antagonizing the establishment he so desperately wants to be at the helm of.

On another note, haven't heard from the NIDF in a hot minute. @Gaston LaNoir , yo buddy, still alive?
 
Back