Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Long enough before Gunt decided to bite the hand that fed him. Now, it's fair game while Ralph flails around like some retarded underdog.LMAO WUT!?
But how long did he guard the exceptional Gunt?
This finally might be a case that Nick has live(ish) covered where the defendant might actually have done it.They are worse than that, they suck the life of a stream, Tito the bad hombre is a better guest than them.
This incel case seems to be a nice change, the political bullshit of the other ones really drag the process.
By the way, if this guy was space-x material how could he be this dumb to dispose the bodies, and of course the white girl is a true crime fan.
Edit: oh shit,nice twist, this dude really was copying falling down.
It's fascinating to see into the head of someone who probably murdered his parents and chopped them up, and how the prosecution nailed him.Honestly this case seems super interesting and great material for the panel.
"Chandler Halderson didn't murder his parents!"Jesus, as someone who worked a real job while getting a real IT degree, I'm pretty sure it was less onerous and boring than it would have been to email myself all day to build a massive house of cards like that.
I've gotta go to bed before the defense gives their side, but I'm gonna try to remember to catch it tomorrow because I really want to see what their argument against all this is.
Ronnie actually had energy, which you could frame as a man outraged that he was being falsely accused of a heinous crime.This is the hardest case to defend by far in this type of streams, even our man Roney O'nniel had a better chance with his Selfdefense+framed by the police angle.
I especially liked the "I entered law school as a person and came out as a law robot" part of her argument.Ronnie actually had energy, which you could frame as a man outraged that he was being falsely accused of a heinous crime.
This lawyer just seems... defeated.
Does anyone know why he has a burning McDonald's in the background on all his streams? Is that supposed to represent something?
The trial seems like a formality at this point. I feel the defense lawyer doesn't believe in her client's innocence either."Chandler Halderson didn't murder his parents!"
First sentence from the lawyer.
I think I'm biased already because I think this fucker did it, but the defense lawyer doesn't seem compelling. At all.
Seems that way. This would be a good case study regarding Nick's answer anytime someone asks how Defense Lawyers can defend someone they think is guilty as sin. Does she make sure the state does its job ensuring that her clients rights are protected (and by extension the rights of those who ARE innocent)? Or does she phone it in demoralized furthering the Justice Systems decline into a guilty verdict rubber stamping punishment arm of the state?The trial seems like a formality at this point. I feel the defense lawyer doesn't believe in her client's innocence either.
Don't wanna know. Would rather forget Tug and his hutt exist.He's still talking about jack Murphy? But silent about tug cuck revelations?
Because its the perfect background for Nick's show. Much better than the green puke.Does anyone know why he has a burning McDonald's in the background on all his streams? Is that supposed to represent something?