Science China to Build Moon Base/Conquer Moon in 2026, While America Makes Gender-Neutral Space Suits - "We're Asians on the Moon, we carry a harpoon. But there ain't no whales so we tell tall tales and sing a whaling tune..."."

American Greatness: China to Conquer Moon in 2026 While America Makes Gender-Neutral Space Suits › American Greatness.

Brandon J. Weichert

January 3, 2022
Space is the ultimate strategic high ground. This domain is divided into various zones. First there are the orbits around the Earth: low-Earth orbit, medium-Earth orbit, and geosynchronous orbit. Ancillary to those orbits are the Lagrange points, which are the orbits separating the Earth from its moon. Next up is the Earth-Moon system. If you control the orbits around the Earth and the Lagrange points—as well as the moon itself—you effectively have total dominance over the Earth below. Today, China is poised to dominate not just the orbits around the Earth, but the entire Earth-Moon system. The Americans, despite having won the original space race with the Soviet Union, have yet to realize that another space race is at hand.
In 2018, Ye Peijian, the man charged with getting Chinese taikonauts to the moon, told audiences that China’s leaders viewed the “universe as an ocean.” Beijing believes the moon is analogous to “the South China Sea,” and Mars is akin to the Philippines. Chinese leaders, therefore, are applying classical geopolitical principles to space at a time when their space program is enjoying extraordinary success, all while the Americans remain firmly grounded (and as Washington is doing its best to complicate and stymie SpaceX through onerous regulations).

Recently, China announced it was building the rocket system that would deliver its personnel to the moon by 2026. It’s hardly a far-fetched goal; the Chinese have either hit or come very close to fulfilling their lofty space policy goals since the turn of this century.
China’s rockets are essentially as advanced as SpaceX’s rockets are. As I wrote in Winning Space: How America Remains a Superpower, China’s space program is likely to overtake the U.S. program unless Washington embraces drastic changes. Yet, NASA has already announced that its lunar return mission—originally approved by former President Donald Trump in 2018—has been pushed back to the 2030s. China announced its 2026 target shortly after NASA’s disappointing news.
U.S. space policy leaders seem unconcerned—even though China’s leaders have made clear their intention to take space before the Americans can and thereby deny us access to this critical domain.


America’s ailing space program needs clarity from the Biden Administration. Instead, it’s getting more confusion. It took almost
an entire year, for example, for Kamala Harris to convene a meeting of the White House Space Council. In early December, Harris finally led her first meeting of this important group of space leaders, wherein she vowed that the nation’s space program would focus on stopping global warming and cooperating more with other countries in space.

Further, in Washington, where “personnel is policy,” it should be noted that NASA Director Bill Nelson, a former astronaut and long-time Democratic Party senator from Florida, has a long history of advocating joint space missions with China. But America doesn’t need greater cooperation with China in space. It needs to beat China in the new space race while it still can.



While NASA is dithering on its moon mission, the agency did take the time to blow almost $200 million since 2009 on new spacesuit development intended to ensure women could use the spacesuits . . . and it is unlikely that these spacesuits will ever be built beyond the initial prototype!

What could China’s space program build with $200 million? They certainly wouldn’t waste a decade building a gender-neutral space suit!

Many Americans forget that geopolitics plays heavily into space development. The Left is certainly in denial about this fact. But geopolitics is essential in space development. Toward that end, the Chinese are now happily taking Russia along with them to the stars. And a Sino-Russian entente in space development could easily knock the Americans down from our precarious perch in orbit.

Technically the second most dominant space power, Russia’s space program, Roscosmos, has recently fallen on hard times. In fact, last year reports surfaced that Roscosmos was broke. Despite this, Russia has a suite of systems and decades of experience in space that China could benefit from if Beijing and Moscow were partnered in space. China, too, has boatloads of cash. Russian space tech and knowledge would be invaluable to China’s growing interest in dominating space before the Americans can.

Stronger ties between Russia and China in space—including a proposed jointly operated lunar base—is cause for worry. On Earth, the two autocratic powers are moving closer together to form an anti-American bridgehead in Eurasia. This newfound
, growing partnership on Earth would have powerful results for the autocrats in space.
Once ensconced on the Moon, with Americans below still trying to build the perfect gender-accomodating space suit, the Sino-Russian alliance could establish weapons systems designed to hold the United States hostage from above. The Eurasian alliance could also begin mining the moon for lucrative rare earth minerals—a potential trillion-dollar industry. Imagine if China and Russia got the almighty first-mover advantage. All these things are possible if China can conquer the moon before the Americans—which Beijing is currently poised to do.
America is currently losing the new space race to China and possibly Russia. Should America lose the new space race, it will lose the Earth. It’s about time that our leaders recognize this and take the necessary actions to prevent a total defeat in the new space race.
 
I read somewhere (I wish I could find where) that for every .7 cent spent on NASA and space tech, it was $1.50 back in innovations and profit from utilizing the technology.

Tubular aluminum? NASA.

Still, they decided that they were going to take that fat black woman's sign serious and devote all the money to more vote buying projects than spending it on space because going to space might mean that the plebes get a luxury or two.
 
View attachment 2859017
By your logic, we had the technology to go into space the moment we created forged steel and airtight oilcloth, and refined oils and alcohols for fuel. There should have been Knights wandering around the moon in 1657, probably looking like the pre-modern low plastic British suit above. There was no need to improve on anything that came after, so that's how it would be today.
Some of the greatest discoveries ever have been improvements on a previous concept or product. Edison didn't invent the lightbulb, he just invented a practical version of it that was useful.

As a recent example, SpaceX has figured out which varieties and manufacturing of stainless steel make the best pressure containers while working on Starship. This research will almost immediately lead to cheaper and more reliable pressure tanks for everything from gasoline to scuba gear.
You are correct it would have been a lot better if we had space knights on the moon.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pwnest injun
But will they drop moon rocks on us??!

In the past 18 years China has managed to put 13 people in space but yeah, sure, they are just five away from a moon base. Whatever.
Yep, it's surely nothing but propaganda to shit on an already weakened America, not that I think America will do it any time soon.

I honestly see Japan doing it before China.
 
I guess a new space race is on. If NASA can get itself together which is too much to ask for.

Fuck it, if the chinese are actually going to space and doing cool shit like that, I'm fucking defecting.

Our Pro PRC YouTuber friend believes they will be the future


By the way I am disappointed no one referenced this yet

 
Reads like a demoralization piece lol. Sure, China might be able to build a few things, but given their quality of things like steel and the popular business practice of cutting corners to maximize profit, I don’t think it will go as well. Won’t stop Global Times from calling it the greatest in the world though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Turd Cow
We've already invented all the stuff we need to get to and survive in outer space. At this point, you're not proving anything, just refining existing things.
Yes, I am sure that the consistent refining of automobile design has had zero payoffs in terms of body count when it comes to car crashes. You're far more likely to avoid a grisly death in a modern sedan than a 1950's Bel Air.
tbh that sounds a lot like those "for every $1 in stimulus the economy generates $5" type Keynsian projections that politicians love to justify pork.
Is and isn't. Project Pluto, one of the most ridiculous things you will ever hear of, has had massive knock-on effects from the R&D necessary to get a nuclear ramjet engine running. And not in the air, but on the ground, using solely externally-supplied high pressure air. In 1964 we managed to have an engine running for five minutes, and somehow not melting down despite the fact it was a nuclear reactor cooled only by how much air we could blow into it.
The principle behind the nuclear ramjet was relatively simple: motion of the vehicle pushed air in through the front of the vehicle (ram effect), a nuclear reactor heated the air, and then the hot air expanded at high speed out through a nozzle at the back, providing thrust.

The notion of using a nuclear reactor to heat the air was fundamentally new. Unlike commercial reactors, which are surrounded by concrete, the Pluto reactor had to be small and compact enough to fly, but durable enough to survive a 7,000-mile (11,000 km) trip to a potential target. The nuclear engine could, in principle, operate for months, so a Pluto cruise missile could be left airborne for a prolonged time before being directed to carry out its attack.[

The success of this project would depend upon a series of technological advances in metallurgy and materials science. Pneumatic motors necessary to control the reactor in flight had to operate while red-hot and in the presence of intense radiation. The need to maintain supersonic speed at low altitude and in all kinds of weather meant that the reactor, code-named "Tory", had to survive high temperatures and conditions that would melt the metals used in most jet and rocket engines. Ceramic fuel elements would have to be used; the contract to manufacture the 500,000 pencil-sized elements was given to the Coors Porcelain Company.
I guarantee you the advancements there have had massive dividends in your daily life. They're just quiet and behind the scenes.
 
Yes, I am sure that the consistent refining of automobile design has had zero payoffs in terms of body count when it comes to car crashes. You're far more likely to avoid a grisly death in a modern sedan than a 1950's Bel Air.
My point is it's a matter of diminishing returns. When you are first innovating for a novel problem, you come up with lots of new ideas. As the problems get older and more well known, the flow of innovation trends downward. Also Chinese aren't great at coming up with novel ideas, historically. It's not their game. Their game is taking something that already exists and cutting as many corners as possible.
 
My point is it's a matter of diminishing returns. When you are first innovating for a novel problem, you come up with lots of new ideas. As the problems get older and more well known, the flow of innovation trends downward. Also Chinese aren't great at coming up with novel ideas, historically. It's not their game. Their game is taking something that already exists and cutting as many corners as possible.
Nobody's disputing the Chinese being the Chinese. But its what @The Lizard Queen is talking about that I'm focused on. Things like industrial metallurgy are shockingly in their infancy, believe it or not. We've only been making proper nickel-alloyed steel ever since what, the 1880's? Same with aluminum with the Hall-Heroult process dating to 1886. Talk all you want about diminishing returns but IMO things are just getting started.
 
Investment in materials science is boss, but since we're talking CCP, I expect they'll just cause a Kessler Event from being some sort of trash villain straight out of Captain Planet.
Absolutely. But since the lizard boobs and I are talking about what SpaceX has worked on, not sure how their fucking up contradicts any of the points we've made. Aside from the almost-inevitable Kessler Event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Somchai
Absolutely. But since the lizard boobs and I are talking about what SpaceX has worked on, not sure how their fucking up contradicts any of the points we've made. Aside from the almost-inevitable Kessler Event.
I said,
This is going to cost them a lot of money for no real benefit, probably.
And I was never not talking about China. So, I'm not sure where SpaceX comes into it?
 
So communists are finally trying to escape to the one place not yet corrupted by capitalism....
 
China isn't building shit on the moon until they can figure out how to make an aircraft carrier that doesn't sit at the water line.
 
I said,

And I was never not talking about China. So, I'm not sure where SpaceX comes into it?
As a recent example, SpaceX has figured out which varieties and manufacturing of stainless steel make the best pressure containers while working on Starship. This research will almost immediately lead to cheaper and more reliable pressure tanks for everything from gasoline to scuba gear.
There. A bit odd to bitch about China when Elon Musk of all people is doing good stuff.
(I can't believe I just said something good about him, please kill me.)
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vesperus
Me Chinese me play prank
Me take shit in o2 tank

I think the Chinese are the worst interstellar ambassadors for the human race. There's a decent chance they'll eat whoever we make first contact with.
Somehow, we found someone worse than the Indians. At least they'd merely shit all over the alien emissaries.
 
Back