- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
I believe the Gulf of Tonkin incident was faked to get the USA into the Vietnam War.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a fact not a theory.I believe the Gulf of Tonkin incident was faked to get the USA into the Vietnam War.
Yeah, and I remember when the government finally admitted it made the whole thing up four decades later. It's the thing I always keep in mind when people do that FACT CHECK NO EVIDENCE EXPERTS AGREE SOCIAL MEDIA TOS VIOLATION thing these days.That's a fact not a theory.
Ever notice how much they push for a one world government as being an "enlightened" thing? They like to push "divided into countries" as a "bad" or "primitive" thing. Star Trek is a big example of that kind of globalist propaganda.
If evil managed to make a one-world tyranny, seeking asylum in other countries would no longer be possible on this planet, as the dictatorship would be global.
Like I said, hopefully one day none will live in a dystopia.
Unless FTL is invented or it's a last resort, that seems to be a bad idea due to multiple risk factors and the much vaster distance.*"migrate towards stars"
Traveling to the stars, by contrast, suffers from no such ambiguities or uncertainty. Indeed, it is a special case of manned spaceflight, more daunting than near-Earth spaceflight by many orders of magnitude. Star travel in fact occupies a special niche in the long career of human aspiration and desire. But although one of the most commonly expressed motivations for “going to the stars” is to perpetuate the human race, it is far more likely that an interstellar voyage would mean not the survival but rather the death of its crew.
Unless FTL is invented or it's a last resort, that seems to be a bad idea due to multiple risk factors and the much vaster distance.*
Only one government on the planet may not be always bad, but it's the nature of Earthlings that the corrupt like positions of power.
(Interstellar Travel as Delusional Fantasy [Excerpt] - Scientific American)
My theory: Pizzagate is a real-world demonstration of "accelerationism" being a viable coverup strategy. What do you do when you can't get in front of the exposure of your glowie shenanigans? Someone made the call that the horse was already gone and closing the barn doors would be ineffective. Instead you start to "yes, and" everything like it is an improv class. True, false, incomprehensible, it doesn't matter. Eventually they get so extreme and so numerous that someone is going to do something foolish enough to discredit the entire movement. As long as it's not extremely early in the process these people will be unsuccessful because scrubbing evidence is these people's core competency. I also don't think this was their first time running this strategy. If you apply the same critical analysis to events like the "Satanic Panic" and the finders you'll realize this has been part of the playbook for a while.pizzagate is grounded in reality,and i'm sick of these retards pretending it's not. just because Qoomers subverted it doesn't mean it's suddenly not real.
I've read science fiction stories where people are able to preserve their egos in computerized form, and turn them 'on' or 'off' during the course of the journey. Still a long ways off to say the least, but you could hypothetically have something like this without violating the laws of relativity. Not that I'd think most people would actually want to do something like this, or that the whole idea of 'digitized consciousness' doesn't lend itself to all sorts of horrifying consequences. On topic, I think that computer brain interfaces of this type are not as far fetched as they might seem at first, and there have been some serious efforts in the past at making them viable."towards the stars" was poetic embellishment. Interstellar travel is still just a pipe dream(even FTL would need to be extremely much faster than light to work), but the space exploration I described, happening within this solar system, is quite near in the potential future.
I think a more accurate statement would be that a demonic spirit tainted pre-schism Christianity. It exists in the Eastern Orthodoxy as well as the Roman Catholic Church. Given the Protestant's origin and nature, similar evil making its way into institutions is inevitable. There's actually a fair argument to be made that a large part of the salvation offered from Christ is rescue from the contemporary Jewish institutions that had perverted the religion already.3. There is a demonic spirit in certain Protestant denominations.
1) I agree with the posts over the last several pages about ancient history being unknown and/or intentionally distorted. I have a theory along those lines.I believe that an ancient advanced civilization existed in Europe that predates Micenaens and Greeks. In fact it predates Indo-European migrations. Lurk cucuteni-trypillian culture. They built cities. Not just cities, but very large ones.
Also lurk for tartaria tablets. It clearly shows that someone in Europe at this time had some primitive writing system.
You may believe that so-called Old Europe was primitive because we don't have any archeological data to prove that they had civilization. But think about it. We know about Sumerians only because they left stone architecture. Why don't Old Europeans built with stone? Not because they were primitive, but because they had wood in abundance. Why you need to import stone from afar when you can just walk out of your village and there a forest just in front of you? And here's a problem: unlike stone, wood degrades with time and after thousands of years you just wouldn't be able to find any of it in the ground.
And concerning writing. We know about Near Eastern writing systems only because they wrote on clay tablets and stone. Egyptians also wrote on papyrus but it gets destroyed with time. We can assume that Europeans wrote on tree bark. After all, we know that it's how Medieval Russians wrote everything down. Again, paper/stone is expensive, trees are everywhere. See a pattern here?
Of course, I don't actually believe in WE WUZ KUNGS N SHIET but for white people... But what I actually believe is that we know very little about our history.
John Wayne Gacy and Deal Corll were linked
One was in Chicago one was near Dallas, both cities have been linked as centers of a nationwide child sex trafficking ring
One had accomplices convicted and sentenced to life in prisn (Corll) Gacy's accomplices lawyered up however. \
Gacy learned his famous hand cuff trick from Corll
Philip Paske, a man linked to the head pedo of the operation John David Norman were both mentioned by Gacy in an interview and Paske worked for him
Both were connected businessmen who hired a suspicious amount of young men and hung out with them all the time
I feel like Gacy killed a good deal of the 33 men and boys, but some I feel were just dumped there by his "people" and others he may have violated and had others kill. That is not even to mention jeff rignall's story
yeah Jeff Rignall. Gacy was fat and gay, and thats literally the worst combination.I remember once reading about a gay dude that Gacy picked up and drugged for rape and torture, one of the few known survivors. He said that he came to at one point, and he was definitely being abused by two men, not just one. That piece of testimony always stuck with me.
Hidden landmasses? And I thought 'rape islands' were just a meme.The most fringe but also the most interesting explanation is that there are islands and small continents that exist but aren't on official maps because they are intentionally hidden. Maybe for elites to live on. And that they don't want people trying to verify the shape of the Earth by sending up cameras themselves because then they would see these islands/continents.
The most fringe but also the most interesting explanation is that there are islands and small continents that exist but aren't on official maps because they are intentionally hidden. Maybe for elites to live on. And that they don't want people trying to verify the shape of the Earth by sending up cameras themselves because then they would see these islands/continents.
Why were all ancient civs obsessed with astronomy? B/c they knew and predicted the cycles to save themselves
A lot of air traffic restricts itself to a handful of routes (as with sea traffic). Not because of a conspiracy but simply because a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. Look at a map of global air traffic and you will see lots of large gaps.@Certified_Autist said:
While there could theoretically be some small islands "hidden" somewhere in the world(very unlikely, considering how much air-traffic we have nowadays),
I think you misread my comment or maybe I mistyped. They don't care about people trying to verify the shape of the earth for its own sake. They care about people trying to verify the shape of the earth, because one of the most common ways flat earthers do it is to send up a high altitude camera and release the unedited footage, and a lot of people independently sending up cameras over bodies of water might cause them to see the landmasses that are supposedly being hidden.what do you mean by saying that someone doesn't want people to try verify the shape of the Earth? Absolutely no-one is going to stop you from buying a hot-air balloon for example, or even your own fucking airplane if you've enough money.
A lot of air traffic restricts itself to a handful of routes (as with sea traffic). Not because of a conspiracy but simply because a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. Look at a map of global air traffic and you will see lots of large gaps.
I think you misread my comment or maybe I mistyped. They don't care about people trying to verify the shape of the earth for its own sake. They care about people trying to verify the shape of the earth, because one of the most common ways flat earthers do it is to send up a high altitude camera and release the unedited footage, and a lot of people independently sending up cameras over bodies of water might cause them to see the landmasses that are supposedly being hidden.
Not saying that's neccesarily true, that's just one of the theories.
I literally explained why, twice. Because normally nobody has a reason to fly a plane off the charted route, or to send up a high altiude camera. But if they start researching flat earth and become curious, they may do those things, which will lead them to possibly discover the lands they don't want to be found.Yeees, but what I was saying is that no-one is stopping you from getting those high-altitude cameras, or like buying your own airplane, so why are you claiming that "they" would care about that?
I don’t necessarily have a problem with global government as a concept. Eventually we will probably need to be unified at that level to accomplish all of the things we’re capable of accomplishing, like space travel (as you mentioned). My problem is with the malicious actors involved in trying to create the world government right now. The “you will own nothing, have no privacy, and be happier than ever” type niggaz. They seem evil to me. Unfortunately it is infinitely more likely to be a dystopic hellscape than a Star Trek style utopia.Have you ever considered that perhaps, for several reasons, one-world-government is quite inevitable in the near future? You see, we as a species are on the brink of real space exploration. It's not quite there yet, but in some form it will be reality within the next century. When humanity starts to "migrate towards stars", at some point we will have a situation where there are several colonies of considerable size in this solar system alone. At that point, having a united planetary government is basically a must if you think about it.
You see, only a very few countries, even in the West, have capabilities of commisioning and maintaining their own space technology. Currently it's basically USA, Russia, China and Japan which have their own space capabilities. There are handful of others, like India and the joint space operation of EU, but these are in their babysteps in comparison to the "big four". On top of that, we have two private companies, both in the USA, which work in this type of technology.
What I'm getting at here is that when the space exploration and especially resource harvesting really starts to become a viable option, most likely sometime in the next century, a lot of countries and consequently lots of people will become second-class IF they don't form some kind of governmental alliance with the nations that have space-faring capabilities. At this point I'm quite sure that United Nations, or something akin to it, will become much more formal and powerful entity, as most smaller nation states simply hand it the authority in governmental matters in exhange of getting their piece of the space-pie.
There are other reasons also which contribute to the development towards one-planet-government, but I believe that this one will be the most pressing one when such decisions are made in the future.