US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
lol really? DEI racket sure is lucrative

1641467045481.png



1641467073203.png


 
Happy 1/6 everybody. Call in sick if you have to recognize this tragic day. Mourn if you have to. Nancy Pelosi's life was at stake you guyz! She was afraid for her life. Worse than 9/11, WW2, the Holocaust, etc.
God this day is gonna be a long one.
 
From Axios as well I also saw some GOP staffer claim there's unnamed other Democrats who oppose removing the filibuster as well. Matches with what we've already heard/know, probably fellow moderates within the Blue Dog Caucus. I wonder if the Dems will eventually cave and chop BBB up into a bunch of seperate bills Manchin can veto at will, or if they would legitimately rather just do nothing and lose.
Do nothing and lose. BBB in pieces would make it too obvious what they were trying to do. Better to lose than have everyone know they sold out their base.
 
Act all stern and deebly goncerned on television about muh honor muh principles muh procedure while spending unfathomable sums of money on garbage.
So long as they throw this shit
lol really? DEI racket sure is lucrative

View attachment 2863642



View attachment 2863643


in the trash, they can stuff a few million up their yacht club frat boy asses for all I care. This shit is poison and it needs gone, immediately. Money and debt don't matter for shit when people that we are required to rely on are dying of brain GRIDS.
 
Axios is reporting Sinema told Democrat leaders at lunch yesterday she will not support removing the filibuster.
Must really suck knowing you rigged an election just to have one (if not two) of your own periodically not fall in line.

it would be over in a few weeks
It would be over in a few hours assuming we decide A) not to literally nuke Canada and B) we don't immediately scramble every jet to bomb Canada as soon as their troops attempt to break out of the border. Some of the skirmishes the Indians and Chinese have had lasted about as long.

Say the GOP take over the House as projection, what's their game plan? Or is it just a reaction to the DNC train to insanity?
Effectively the same thing as they did with Obama. Strangle and delay everything the Left wants done unless they give them bigger scraps to eat.
 
Last edited:
I don't even say this with my typical Murican bravado, I'm being entirely realistic - it would be over in a few weeks, with Canada seeing such significant losses they either lost their functional military or saw so many deaths they sued for peace.

There are a lot of reasons this would take place but the most important is that, even in the midst of a civil insurrection scenario, most Americans wouldn't actually want to shoot other Americans, and the leafs would still be the foreign force invading, so wouldn't pose the same moral quandary. Any burgers who didn't want to end up shooting someone they used to play CoD on LAN with, would opt to go fight the invaders instead. It would also result in people who didn't even want to have anything to do with the civil war shit jumping in because, invaders.

And this isn't even going into, well, the Canadian military of today is a joke. I will give credit where credit is due, they were important allies in WW2 especially in forming the FSSF. But modern Canadian military could probably be defeated by a determined enough herd of wildlife, a la Aussies vs Emus.
All I can envision is the Canadian army trying to invade Detroit and failing because the black residents have more firepower.
 
In regards to the January Unscheduled Tour 2020 and the crime of vandalism, let's compare this to Burn Loot Murder's treatment of a state capitol.

BLM: Went into the state capitol, utterly destroyed everything in there. Anything of value was trashed and/or stolen. Acted like maniacs.

Result: Nothing. Police didn't do a damn thing.

JUT tour: Went Let inside, walked around, took photos with officers, some exceptional people acted exceptional, someone took Pelosi's computer or something (also heard someone took a shit on her desk).

Result: Everyone who was there imprisoned in solitary confinement for over a year. No lawyers, no rights, no phone calls, nothing.

There is no equivalence here.
I think you're missing the point: in a just world, both would be prosecuted and incarcerated, because both violated the law, and BLM would've gotten more than a slap on the wrist because of their greater damage and resulting deaths. Literally no one was arguing that only the qanon larpers should be penalized
 
I know today is going to be a lot of sperging but look on the bright side, tomorrow the 6-3 majority "conservative" court is going to let OSHA force a mandate on vaccines, so in less than 24 hours we'll have the conservatives throwing even bigger shitfits.
Did they signal this?
 
I know today is going to be a lot of sperging but look on the bright side, tomorrow the 6-3 majority "conservative" court is going to let OSHA force a mandate on vaccines, so in less than 24 hours we'll have the conservatives throwing even bigger shitfits.
wasn't the supreme court thing saturday
nevermind its friday
The Supreme Court on Friday will review two challenges to the administration’s vaccine policies affecting nearly 100 million workers. Most already have made the choice to be vaccinated, but Biden has said the numbers are not good enough.

One measure requires large private companies to implement a vaccination requirement or impose a masking and weekly testing regime. The second applies to health-care workers at facilities that receive certain federal funding.

Together, the cases test a signature aspect of the White House’s response to the pandemic that has killed more than 800,000 people in the United States.

The Supreme Court must decide whether to block the requirements while legal battles continue, or to let them be implemented during that time. Here’s an overview of the cases, the history and the issues the justices will consider Friday:
 
Last edited:
I know today is going to be a lot of sperging but look on the bright side, tomorrow the 6-3 majority "conservative" court is going to let OSHA force a mandate on vaccines, so in less than 24 hours we'll have the conservatives throwing even bigger shitfits.
if that actually happens, Im going to read the opinion after work to see what sort of mental gymnastics Roberts goes through to argue that it's constitutional. if he cucks on Commerce Clause, he will officially be an absolute cuck
 
It's amazing listening to people say "the vaccines only help with the severity!" when that's NOT what we were told nine months ago. "The science changed."

It's also amazing listening to people say that there are triple vaxxed, don't even have the antibodies, and STILL everyone needs to get vaxxed and masked for safety.

I'll admit that I have confirmation bias, but there is literally no piece of evidence these people will accept that the vaccines don't work the way scientists "thought" they would. Hell, if anything, these record highs are proof in their minds that we need EVEN MORE vaccines.
 
I'll admit that I have confirmation bias, but there is literally no piece of evidence these people will accept that the vaccines don't work the way scientists "thought" they would. Hell, if anything, these record highs are proof in their minds that we need EVEN MORE vaccines.
Hey, science changes.
 
if that actually happens, Im going to read the opinion after work to see what sort of mental gymnastics Roberts goes through to argue that it's constitutional. if he cucks on Commerce Clause, he will officially be an absolute cuck
look at your avi, you should have realized a decade ago what he would do. for fucks sake name me a single time in the last a century and a half of case law that the supreme court sided with the "based"
Did they signal this?
yes right around november of 2020 when biden was elected and suddenly we started getting a lot of 9-0 decisions. As far as Roberts is concerned, one fuck up against the left and he's suddenly packed out of existence. imagine a thousand person supreme court, made up of every lawyer in the country (of the proper politics), turns out pulling yourself by your bootstraps can mean destroying the country and rationalizing it to yourselves.
 
The pearls are going to be crushed today with how hard they are going to be clutched.

If they are unironically going to try to make this 9/11, prepare for the most emotionally charged manipulative bullshit ever to demand us to give them power to "save democracy" by purging political prisoners. They'd never overreach on the issue and abuse it, its not like the Patriot Act or other times. They've changed!

At this point if the hyperbole was even halfway close to reality, I wonder how effective the "Insurrection" would've been. We might've seen the Boomenreich in the US.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back