Snowflake Pokimane / Pokimanelol / Imane Anys / OfflineTV - Abuses men for social climbing, hypocrite with double standards, doesn't own up to mistakes, lies about relationships, 'not like the other girls'

Umaibae said:
Can a straight man explain to me why this is appealing? This is the most unsexy shit.
Click to expand...
I think it’s just that it’s a girl providing positive attention in your general direction and maybe even saying your name with a smile if you pay her enough makes a weird parasocial bond with these simps who have nothing else going for them. They get invested enough and so even an unflattering gesture like that seems attractive to them. It’s not just a coomer of the penis thing it’s a coomer of the soul thing.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Ihascat, PetiteFeet, Melonie and 52 others
The whole monetization system on most platforms are fucked due to clunky laws. For example you can have a video on youtube that is DMCA'd and demonetized but can then be reacted to on twitch with ads being played. Basically the whole system needs to be rebuilt and new well thought out laws that are air tight need to be made for it to work (LOL not gonna happen). It gets further complicated with it being a global platform where countries have different laws that can conflict with other countries laws. The only solution is to simply allow copyright infringement wholesale or ban it all.

How it should be.
v13131.PNG


How it actually is.

v1311b.PNG
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: JOHN SHRIMP DOE, Character from a movie, Keavy Rain and 9 others
Cherenkovblue said:
Yeah, um, no. There's a few reasons we can all have a polite chuckle at Lil Miss 2/10's latest fuckup...

  1. She literally just exposed herself to millions of dollars worth of liabilities to Shub-Viacom/CBS.
  2. Not only that, she potentially just exposed Twitch to those same liabilities if Viacom/CBS subpoenas their internal emails and discovers they had red flag knowledge that she was actively engaging in copyright infringement as this would completely nullify any protection they otherwise qualified for under OCILLA (the provision of the DMCA that protects third parties from liability for copyright infringements committed by their users).
  3. Moreover, if Viacom/CBS wants to get REALLY nasty they can argue that she's acting as an agent of Twitch and thus, through agency theory, impute her actions to Twitch itself, and thereby bypass OCILLA's protections yet again.
So while her tard-wrangler may've told her she's only getting a 48 hour ban out of this, that's probably not what's going to happen. You don't expose your business partners to millions of dollars in potential liabilities and get to just giggle, squeal "omeggylol, subscribe to keemstar!", and walk away. Her pretending she can just walk away and take her simp brigade over to Youtube is peak ethot delusion. Exactly how this will shake out is anyone's guess because this all depends on just how Viacom wants to let this play out. They have to be fully aware of the Twitch meta of ethots illegally streaming copyrighted content, and what better way to nip that shit then to target the biggest ethot they can find and mop the floor with her.

At a guess: Twitch decides to give her a week-long ban and uses this as leverage to try to renegotiate their split with her, clawing back more of the money because of the business risk she poses. She, in a huff, terminates their contract and decides to leave for Youtube. Viacom decides to make an example out of her and subpoenas records from Twitch to see just how many people were watching her streams when she was willfully committing copyright infringement, and how much money was made by all sources. Thanks to their recent falling out Twitch, rather than opposing this measure, cooperates fully. Viacom thus has access to all the information it needs to seek actual damages under the law and decides to prosecute. An offer of settlement is made which she promptly rejects. The case goes to trial. She loses and winds up spending a few million in legal fees, plus paying damages and court costs for Viacom. By the time the dust settles... she's lost virtually everything she earned and forced to start from nearly square one on Youtube.

Note that none of the preceding requires anything too out of the ordinary for her or anyone else involved. It's perfectly plausible. All it requires is for her to remain just as narcissistic and retarded as she's been for the last umpteen years running, and for Viacom to decide she's a good test case to put a stop to streamers making money off their stuff by targeting the streaming platforms they use for liability.

And to think... it all was made possible by the fact that Twitch is run by thirsty fucks who let ethots do whatever they want. Meditate on that.
Click to expand...
How is Viacom when compared to the house of mouse when it comes to protecting their copyright?
I'm amazed that twitch hasn't gotten bent over by any of the big media companies yet, didnt they just recently start going after people over copyright music? I remember some chimpouts about music recently.Having such a big name streamer brazenly stream content will draw attention and while I won't hold my breath on anything happening to her I could see them implementing content ID similar to youtube soon.
 
Captain Ahab said:
I hope those degenerates burn down their entire platform and lose all of their money to lawsuits. The fact that some of them believe they should be able to stream entire Hollywood movies shows what kind of entitled douchebags they are.

I can’t believe we’re living in a world where a NEET can make more money than a neurosurgeon by watching old YouTube clips.
Click to expand...
DSP and Low Tier God are still free men. Until that bar is cleared, we will not see a just world, let alone right this particular wrong.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Flag Waving Moron, malapropism and Escalating Violence
PyrrhicRustle said:
I think it’s just that it’s a girl providing positive attention in your general direction and maybe even saying your name with a smile if you pay her enough makes a weird parasocial bond with these simps who have nothing else going for them. They get invested enough and so even an unflattering gesture like that seems attractive to them. It’s not just a coomer of the penis thing it’s a coomer of the soul thing.
Click to expand...
I'm a reverse simp, women simp for me
(underage ones)

jk.

anyways look, the fact of the matter is that young and old men alike send money to these retarded women because they're lonely, that's a by-product of the industrial revolution and the internet, or something
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: metroid_fetish
What a fucking idiot. She's become so lazy that she's resorted to just watching cartoons. What's extra stupid is she could of specifically watched Avatar without a problem like last month or so. It had been free with Amazon Prime meaning you could have a watch party on Twitch with it. 2/10.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WonderWino
Slurgle said:
It's amazing people have forgotten how Viacom basically changed the face of YouTube back in the day because of their brutality.
Click to expand...
Viacom is the only company to ever send me a cease and desist letter for torrenting one of their shows when I forgot to put up my VPN.
They have super Jew lawyers.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Character from a movie, Colloid, Wright and 6 others
Cherenkovblue said:
Yeah, um, no. There's a few reasons we can all have a polite chuckle at Lil Miss 2/10's latest fuckup...

  1. She literally just exposed herself to millions of dollars worth of liabilities to Shub-Viacom/CBS.
  2. Not only that, she potentially just exposed Twitch to those same liabilities if Viacom/CBS subpoenas their internal emails and discovers they had red flag knowledge that she was actively engaging in copyright infringement as this would completely nullify any protection they otherwise qualified for under OCILLA (the provision of the DMCA that protects third parties from liability for copyright infringements committed by their users).
  3. Moreover, if Viacom/CBS wants to get REALLY nasty they can argue that she's acting as an agent of Twitch and thus, through agency theory, impute her actions to Twitch itself, and thereby bypass OCILLA's protections yet again.
So while her tard-wrangler may've told her she's only getting a 48 hour ban out of this, that's probably not what's going to happen. You don't expose your business partners to millions of dollars in potential liabilities and get to just giggle, squeal "omeggylol, subscribe to keemstar!", and walk away. Her pretending she can just walk away and take her simp brigade over to Youtube is peak ethot delusion. Exactly how this will shake out is anyone's guess because this all depends on just how Viacom wants to let this play out. They have to be fully aware of the Twitch meta of ethots illegally streaming copyrighted content, and what better way to nip that shit then to target the biggest ethot they can find and mop the floor with her.

At a guess: Twitch decides to give her a week-long ban and uses this as leverage to try to renegotiate their split with her, clawing back more of the money because of the business risk she poses. She, in a huff, terminates their contract and decides to leave for Youtube. Viacom decides to make an example out of her and subpoenas records from Twitch to see just how many people were watching her streams when she was willfully committing copyright infringement, and how much money was made by all sources. Thanks to their recent falling out Twitch, rather than opposing this measure, cooperates fully. Viacom thus has access to all the information it needs to seek actual damages under the law and decides to prosecute. An offer of settlement is made which she promptly rejects. The case goes to trial. She loses and winds up spending a few million in legal fees, plus paying damages and court costs for Viacom. By the time the dust settles... she's lost virtually everything she earned and forced to start from nearly square one on Youtube.

Note that none of the preceding requires anything too out of the ordinary for her or anyone else involved. It's perfectly plausible. All it requires is for her to remain just as narcissistic and retarded as she's been for the last umpteen years running, and for Viacom to decide she's a good test case to put a stop to streamers making money off their stuff by targeting the streaming platforms they use for liability.

And to think... it all was made possible by the fact that Twitch is run by thirsty fucks who let ethots do whatever they want. Meditate on that.
Click to expand...
I would very much like for this to be true, but I really doubt that anything truly drastic like this happens to Pokimane, e-celebs that aren't true lolcows tend to be pretty good at just dodging consequences. Also, even if it does happen, there's just way too many people exactly like her that will instantly just fill the void. If she gets banned or has her career ruined, the archetype of person she is or her ideals don't just suddenly disappear

Hate to be a buzzkill but damn. I think she's back on Twitch within a week, company simps way too hard for them to actually do anything to risk her leaving the platform. She's quite literally the face of Twitch and their relationship between creator and brand, I don't think they'd risk that
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: JOHN SHRIMP DOE, Colloid, FAQnews Correspondent and 3 others
Matt Damon said:
Wait, what'd DSP ever do that imprisonment is warranted?

Dude is just an annoying asshole on the internet and profligate with his money - he might deserve to be in a breadline, but not in jail.
Click to expand...
The tax fraud. The 5000$ he claimed as "Business expenses" that was never justified or explained.
 
  • Informative
  • Political Sperging
  • Like
Reactions: Flag Waving Moron, Kosher Salt, R00T and 1 other person
biozeminadae1 said:
The Western ideal of individual freedoms, individual choices, individual lives, individual, individual, individual, individual.
Collective bad, we're all individuals. Streamers too.
Click to expand...
Nobody wants to be held back by losers who can’t hack it—until they can’t hack it themselves.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: biozeminadae1
Is anybody at Twitch proud of what their company does? For all the criticism Facebook and Instagram get for damaging people socially, Twitch is by far the worst social media platform. The business model is predicated on losers spending money so that someone of higher status than them will 'notice' them. It's fucking sad.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WonderWino
Here's hoping she gets sued but we know that'll never happen to an egirl
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back