- Joined
- Mar 11, 2021
To be fair it was part of the RP process. Had she known the people better or a "no-shitposting" rule would have been better enforced she would've probably been a bit more serious with it. She says she wants to continue doing this once a week so im guessing she will be back. All chat's gotta do is to convince her to roleplay as someone less autistic than Chris-chan and see if she can actually be more extroverted during the RP.Why does any pippa colab degenerate into pure tism energy? She is normalish with tenma.
She should roleplay as Lia.
The Berne Convention and Anglosphere law oblige music publishers to offer a "compulsory license" for all the songs they own. It means anyone can cover or karaoke almost any song—as long as they don't re-release a label-owned sound recording for profit. Publishers/labels/etc. are striking songs they have no lawful right to strike, and YouTube/Google goes along with it because it hurts their competition more than it hurts them. A company that can afford to fight wrongful strikes, e.g. Cover/Holo, needs to stand up and say "Fuck off." Judicial precedent exists and is very clear. It just has to be re-enforced against YouTube's collusion with unlawful copyright claims.
I think there is an issue with Cover doing this (other than the obvious, Japanese company wont do shit). The girls sing karaoke and stream it, they can claim its fair use but the girls still get revenue from Ads and in the form of Superchats. Music labels can just argue that they are technically profiting from the song. While a wedding or small band can also do the same, its not as easy to track as it literally being right there on the internet for everyone else to see in video form.
Last edited: