Debate user Taarna on the ethics of child porn thread - Obvious low quality troll bait, thread is actually arguing with BoxerShorts

You fucking retard it is still child porn. Hell, even if both sender and recipient are under 18, it is still by definition child porn because it is pornography of a child, its just a legal issue more than a moral one if you're discussing two underage people exclusively because you can and will still be charged with child porn because it is still fucking pornographic content featuring a child.

Btw death to pedophiles.
 
A 14-year-old that wants your dick and sends you nude pictures of herself is not child pornography. She's not a child and it's not pornography. You guys can stop pretending like you wouldn't fuck a 14-year-old if it was legal and she was good-looking and threw herself at you. Elvis fucked Priscilla when she was 14. I rest my case.
Is it bad that I didn’t know Elvis was a pedo until you said this? 🤢

I have not, nor will I ever think “Man, I wish the age of consent was lower so I can fuck a child.” in my life. You have issues.
 
The idea that 'most 14 year old girls have been sucking cock for 3 years and already have a kid' is of course hyperbole for effect but it reveals the delusional view pedophiles have of children as hypersexual nymphos thirsting 24/7 for adult cock. They aren't. Even in the throes of puberty they aren't.
 
You fucking retard it is still child porn. Hell, even if both sender and recipient are under 18, it is still by definition child porn because it is pornography of a child, its just a legal issue more than a moral one if you're discussing two underage people exclusively because you can and will still be charged with child porn because it is still fucking pornographic content featuring a child.

Btw death to pedophiles.
The whole thing is fucked up but I personally think underage recipients should have lesser sentences compared to adults since their minds are still developing at that age and often don't realize what they are getting themselves into most of the time, Unless they knowingly download images of young kids then yeah they should go away for a long time.
 
You fucking retard it is still child porn. Hell, even if both sender and recipient are under 18, it is still by definition child porn because it is pornography of a child,
It's not child porn because child is defined as pre puberty.
Under 18 is a minor but not necessarily a child.

its just a legal issue more than a moral one if you're discussing two underage people exclusively because you can and will still be charged with child porn because it is still fucking pornographic content featuring a child.
so change the law.

The idea that 'most 14 year old girls have been sucking cock for 3 years and already have a kid' is of course hyperbole for effect but it reveals the delusional view pedophiles have of children as hypersexual nymphos thirsting 24/7 for adult cock. They aren't. Even in the throes of puberty they aren't.
The most part is hyperbole but the rest of that statement isn't untrue. Many girls are learning sexuality by late middle school if not early high school.
Sexting, sucking dick, doing drugs, that's relatively common in middle school.

Is it bad that I didn’t know Elvis was a pedo until you said this? 🤢
14 isn't pedophilia.
Traditionally (before 1880s) pedophilia is under age 11 and age of consent was 12 so Elvis didn't do anything wrong.
You're the person who has a feminized view of relationships.
 
The most part is hyperbole but the rest of that statement isn't untrue. Many girls are learning sexuality by late middle school if not early high school.
Sexting, sucking dick, doing drugs, that's relatively common in middle school.
when I was going to school there was a small group of sexually active teens and then there were the normal kids like me who had parental figures in their life.

Has something changed?

Either way these girls aren’t experimenting with the 30 year old incel next door.
 
The most part is hyperbole but the rest of that statement isn't untrue. Many girls are learning sexuality by late middle school if not early high school.
Sexting, sucking dick, doing drugs, that's relatively common in middle school.
No, it isn't, though. You have the same delusion.

The research is very clear, experimenting with sexual behavior and getting high shoots way up starting in middle school but the percentage of children doing it is in the range of 10 to 15 percent. And it isn't regular behavior, it is experimenting. It's not until you get to 16 or older that you get a large minority or majority of people who have touched someone else's junk or done a kegstand. With others of the same age. More frequently than once in a long while.

You delusional pedo.
 
@Stilgar of Troon @Pissmaster @Stardust @Marshal Mannerheim @Bunny Tracks
Boxy containment breach makes this a 2-for-1 sale at the pedo market; You guys might want to get in on this.
1641827709682.png

What made you join the farms over the christmas holidays @Taarna?
 
Last edited:
14 isn't pedophilia.
Traditionally (before 1880s) pedophilia is under age 11 and age of consent was 12 so Elvis didn't do anything wrong.
You're the person who has a feminized view of relationships.
Feminized view? I don’t know what that means. I just know a grown man fucking someone half their age is gross pedo shit, regardless of what was legal back then.
 
when I was going to school there was a small group of sexually active teens and then there were the normal kids like me who had parental figures in their life.

Has something changed?

Either way these girls aren’t experimenting with the 30 year old nicely next door.
When I was in middle school, all the popular kids with experimenting with sex and drugs.
We can debate whether these are good decisions or not but the question is whether this is a pedophilia and it's not because these people know what they're doing unlike prepub children. Maybe they'll regret their choices but that is part of life.


How would you feel if a pinoi faggot fucked your 14 year old daughter?
if he was husband material, that's fine.

No, it isn't, though. You have the same delusion.

The research is very clear, experimenting with sexual behavior and getting high shoots way up starting in middle school but the percentage of children doing it is in the range of 10 to 15 percent. It's not until you get to 16 or older that you get a large minority or majority of people who have touched someone else's junk or done a kegstand. With others of the same age.

You delusional pedo.

10-15% is a relatively high amount.
In contrast the amount was 0% in elementary school.
Age of Consent doesn't have to be age avg.
It makes more sense to set it when the youngest person is competent and if other people don't want to have sex, they can wait.

Feminized view? I don’t know what that means. I just know a grown man fucking someone half their age is gross pedo shit, regardless of what was legal back then.
Age of consent was 12 before feminists changed it to cuck men from starting families. What Elvis did (24 and 14) wasn't common but it wasn't considered immoral in the past when AoC was 12.
 
When I was in middle school, all the popular kids with experimenting with sex and drugs.
We can debate whether these are good decisions or not but the question is whether this is a pedophilia and it's not because these people know what they're doing unlike prepub children. Maybe they'll regret their choices but that is part of life.



if he was husband material, that's fine.



10-15% is a relatively high amount.
In contrast the amount was 0% in elementary school.
Age of Consent doesn't have to be age avg.
It makes more sense to set it when the youngest person is competent and if other people don't want to have sex, they can wait.


Age of consent was 12 before feminists changed it to cuck men from starting families. What Elvis did (24 and 14) wasn't common but it wasn't considered immoral in the past when AoC was 12.
Damn, I had this fairy tale in my head that the age of consent was changed because people were living longer and had made advances in science and psychology.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: args and Pee Cola
Damn, I had this fairy tale in my head that the age of consent was changed because people were living longer and had made advances in science and psychology.
Nope. AoC was raised from 12 to 18 to force women onto the education->employment pipeline rather than marriage->motherhood.

I doubt a 12 year old is exactly wife/mom material.
People use AoC as a proxy for any relationship, even non sexual. Maybe you meet a 12-15 yr old but you're nonsexual and get married in a few years. That was possible in the past but would be considered socially unacceptable today.
 
Back