Debate user Taarna on the ethics of child porn thread - Obvious low quality troll bait, thread is actually arguing with BoxerShorts

Humans determine morality, not god.
The fact that person felt guilt for their action means they didn't believe they were moral.
You use your feelings and desires as justification for your actions. You know less then nothing about morals. Why else become an atheist if not to live out your own twisted pleasures without reproach? (If your a person of faith my apologies, but I cannot see any true person of faith saying those words.)

You seriously think humanity was super moral and just in the years B.C? With your logic, morals are meaningless.
 
You use your feelings and desires as justification for your actions. You know less then nothing about morals. Why else become an atheist if not to live out your own twisted pleasures without reproach? (If your a person of faith my apologies, but I cannot see any true person of faith saying those words.)

You seriously think humanity was super moral and just in the years B.C? With your logic, morals are meaningless.
what is morality/ethics?
 
what is ethics?
There you go buddy.

Also pornography is fantasy, just like erotica. Not everyone who has a daddy fetish wants to fuck their dad.
 

Attachments

  • B72D5151-F9F7-4821-AA9F-71228038A7F6.jpeg
    B72D5151-F9F7-4821-AA9F-71228038A7F6.jpeg
    276 KB · Views: 32
There you go buddy.

Also pornography is fantasy, just like erotica. Not everyone who has a daddy fetish wants to fuck their dad.

1. Whoever wrote that didn't understand that Greek:ethics = Latin:morality so you can't use morality to describe ethics as they're the same word.
2. "Principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity." Okay fine, so what determines those principles or rules?
 
Boxy and Taarna tard rage about all these little girls running around, fucking and sucking everybody... except them.

Even in their perversely retarded fantasies, they get rejected by these insatiable minors. How pathetic, to be cucked by your own imagination.
No, that's BS. I asked you for nudes so I'm getting cucked by you, not my imagination.
 
1. Whoever wrote that didn't understand that Greek:ethics = Latin:morality so you can't use morality to describe ethics as they're the same word.
2. "Principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity." Okay fine, so what determines those principles or rules?
I’m not derailing this thread arguing semantics. I want to see more people roast you for being so adamant about not being a pedo for wanting to fuck underaged girls. Which is exactly what being a pedo is.

I’ve entertained you enough. Have this terribly outdated meme instead.

1641834534991.png
 
if he was husband material, that's fine
But you know deep down that no man pursuing a child who is half his age would make a good husband. It shows a lack of development that the only woman female since children are not women he can attempt to interact with sexually has no sexual experience or understanding. Any one trying to take advantage of a child like this regardless of their sex is a monster and should be locked away.
 
But you know deep down that no man pursuing a child who is half his age would make a good husband. It shows a lack of development that the only woman female since children are not women he can attempt to interact with sexually has no sexual experience or understanding. Any one trying to take advantage of a child like this regardless of their sex is a monster and should be locked away.
That's not true.
Different strokes for different folks.
Most people will marry someone of similar age but not everyone.
14 yr olds have sexual understanding that's why they sext.
 
Here's a much better question. Is there a socially respectable kind of person to kill? and if so is it moral in gods eyes?

Because really the only thing holding us back from stringing every dam one of them up is modern kindness and morals. I heard of someone who did the deed (killing a pedo) and they felt guilt. I understood, but I could not condemn them.


I understand the desire for a better way, a more moral way. But... has a pedo honestly ever been rabilitated? EVER? I can only see someone who's never acted upon such a thing having hope for salvation.
Well morality is all relative made up shit and based entirely on what the majority think, so yeah fuck it wanton murdering pedos is moral.

That's not true.
Different strokes for different folks.
Most people will marry someone of similar age but not everyone.
14 yr olds have sexual understanding that's why they sext.
The only stroke suitable for you is one that leaves you in a morgue.
 
That's not true.
Different strokes for different folks.
Most people will marry someone of similar age but not everyone.
14 yr olds have sexual understanding that's why they sext.
You hide behind rules, behind vague definitions you can change to suit your own viewpoint. You want to know what ethics is? It's a line in the sand you NEVER cross or bend.

Tell me, do you even have such a thing? In your pursuit of pleasure, is there anything you wont do?
 
Well morality is all relative made up shit and based entirely on what the majority think, so yeah fuck it wanton murdering pedos is moral.
EXACTLY.
So if we change what the majority thinks then what I'm saying is moral else it'll continue to be immoral.

You hide behind rules, behind vague definitions you can change to suit your own viewpoint. You want to know what ethics is? It's a line in the sand you NEVER cross or bend.

Tell me, do you even have such a thing? In your pursuit of pleasure, is there anything you wont do?
Morality is just the rules people use to interact with each other and they're 100% relative/subjective/arbitrary.

idk.
 
EXACTLY.
So if we change what the majority thinks then what I'm saying is moral else it'll continue to be immoral.
I was making fun of you you fucking idiot. Morality has objective roots and the only people who argue otherwise are people who want to do things that are universibly reprehensible like raping children.
 
I was making fun of you you fucking idiot. Morality has objective roots and the only people who argue otherwise are people who want to do things that are universibly reprehensible like raping children.
Nope. You were right the 1st time.
People like you are the reason conservatives lost the culture war. Conservatives thought their moral codes could never change and were shocked to see everyone around them change their moral beliefs.
 
EXACTLY.
So if we change what the majority thinks then what I'm saying is moral else it'll continue to be immoral.


Morality is just the rules people use to interact with each other and they're 100% relative/subjective/arbitrary.

idk.
..... You are the very definition of this quote.


“When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.”​


― G.K. Chesterton


Repent, find god before it's too late. I say this with no hate or malice. Lord knows you need it. At the very least give this man's literary work some consideration.
 
Nope. You were right the 1st time.
People like you are the reason conservatives lost the culture war. Conservatives thought their moral codes could never change and were shocked to see everyone around them change their moral beliefs.
There is a middle ground between objective and subjective you Neanderthal. Morality is based in objective things but interpreted by people. That's why there are core values almost every single civilization across time and geography has shared. Just because some morals change over time doesn't mean they are all completely baseless and arbitrary.

Kill yourself you mentally stunted degenrate.
 
..... You are the very definition of this quote.


“When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.”​


― G.K. Chesterton


Repent, find god before it's too late. I say this with no hate or malice. Lord knows you need it. At the very least give this man's literary work some consideration.
people invented morality and they invented god.
why do you personally need god and do you follow the Christian god?

That's why there are core values almost every single civilization across time and geography has shared. Just because some morals change over time doesn't mean they are all completely baseless and arbitrary.
That is inductive reasoning and it doesn't prove your judgement.
 
Back