Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,454 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,603
I don't think Russ is the only person who's tried to pull a stunt like this. I think Freemantle is the sort to crush people who bring lawsuits against them, as a warning to other would-be litigants.
Can the mediator force him to pay Freemantle's legal fees and arbitration costs? That would be glorious. I hope they don't grant any of his demands, and tell him his act didn't meet their standards, they decide who's on the show, fuck off and leave us alone.
 
Second, being declared vexatious in one state doesn't carry over to another, meaning if Russ is declared vexatious in Nevada, he can move to another state and continue (the Mountain Jews threatened to do exactly that, as I recall.)
It's pretty likely that if one state were to declare him vexatious, other states he'd move to would also do it upon request. The courts inherent power to prevent its own abuse is not limited to the court it happened in, but can reach beyond. While a court in say California would not necessarily be bound by the determination of vexatiousness another court in say Texas had found, nevertheless it is within their power to apply the same punishment, especially if the underlying conditions behind the punishment (say frivilous filings) are still present. Courts have a big interest in preventing its own abuse, and so I am rather sure that it would not be so easy to escape its wrath. That being said, I will admit to not knowing any specific caselaw that deals with it. Rather I relied on the inherent powers (of courts) the Supreme Court found in Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991)
Can the mediator force him to pay Freemantle's legal fees and arbitration costs?
According to Fremantle's chosen Arbitration team, yeah, unless it's specifically forbiden by Fremantle's contract with Russ
 
The reason he can sue Null so often is because he is a sped with a small grasp of the legal process, just knowing how to serve Null and file informa paupis is enough knowledge for him to abuse the legal system for free forever.
Russ is a broke bitch so trying to get fees out of him is like squeezing blood from a stone, even the $1500 penalty from the Ariana trial was paid in installments of $50 per month, Nulls fees must be close to 10x that penalty by now.
Russ still files income taxes, if he gets a return, or a stimulus check, those can be garnished. I'm pretty sure UI and disability payments can be garnished as well. If Russell wins over a certain amount in the casinos, or a lottery ticket, Null can get those also.

Taking Russell's money is the only way to stop his ridiculous lawsuits.
 
I am pretty sure you can't garnish that (unless you are the Gov)

You can garnish this.

Pretty sure you can't garnish those (unless you are the Gov)
I do know a few people that had taxes and wages garnished from car accidents and such, if you get a legal judgment against a person.
But that happened in California, I have no idea about other states.
 
I do know a few people that had taxes and wages garnished from car accidents and such, if you get a legal judgment against a person.
But that happened in California, I have no idea about other states.
You can get wages garnished. I'm pretty sure you can only garnish tax refunds if you owe a debt to the government, although this rule tends to start to disappear when the return gets deposited to your bank account after which it becomes a fair game. You might have been thinking of this
 
I dunno if Freemantle is of the "give the idiots some money so he'll go away" school of frivolous lawsuits, or the "fight tooth and nail to avoid developing a reputation for paying out for settling frivolous lawsuits" line of thinking.
O'Melveny & Myers is one of the most high-powered white-shoe firms in the business. They certainly aren't some cheap in-house legal team. Russ is headed for a curb stomping even if they don't bother pursuing actual sanctions.
 
O'Melveny & Myers is one of the most high-powered white-shoe firms in the business. They certainly aren't some cheap in-house legal team. Russ is headed for a curb stomping even if they don't bother pursuing actual sanctions.
I notice they assigned a woman to deal with him. Dunno if she's a lawyer, paralegal, secretary or what, but you know Russ will address her by her first name and be very condescending. I hope whatever her position in the firm, they give her a bonus for dealing with Russ. Nobody should have to deal with him, least of all women since he views them as inferior to himself and treats even women with advanced degrees as beneath him. Let us hope they stomp him down good to discourage him from trying again. He expects to be handed what other people have put time and real effort into, and it's an insult to everyone who spend their days improving their act so they could be on the show.
 
I notice they assigned a woman to deal with him. Dunno if she's a lawyer, paralegal, secretary or what,
She's a Partner in the firm:
Molly M. Lens is Co-Head of O'Melveny's Entertainment, Sports, and Media Industry Group and a member of the firm’s Policy Committee. Molly is a versatile and accomplished lawyer with a broad litigation practice that spans a variety of areas, including entertainment, employment, intellectual property, business torts, and unfair competition. Clients routinely turn to Molly to represent them in high-profile litigation and advise them on sensitive internal matters, including allegations of misconduct and discrimination. Molly also devotes significant time to pro bono matters.
Molly has been recognized as a leading entertainment litigator by The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, Law360, and The Legal 500. She has also been named among the “Most Influential Women Lawyers” in Los Angeles by The Los Angeles Business Journal.
Fresh new trauma lumps are a-comin'.
 
Meet Molly Lens. She’s not quite young enough to receive a life altering DM or to get Venmo’d a dollar


eta…ninja’d, D’oh…
Not nearly toothy enough for our boy.

Screenshot_20220112-172333_Brave.jpg
 
Not nearly toothy enough for our boy.

View attachment 2881819
She's not a 9 or 10, so she's safe from wooing, since Russ judges women solely by their looks, but you can lay money on him being a condescending little shit towards her. All he has is his false sense of superiority towards women and since (in Russ's mind) she's in a position to give him what he wants, he has to make sure she understands he's in charge(he's not, and I hope she has fun cutting him down to size when he gets uppity.)
 
He expects to be handed what other people have put time and real effort into, and it's an insult to everyone who spend their days improving their act so they could be on the show.
They might have even deliberately chosen a woman specifically because it will get Russ to show his misogyny.
 
They might have even deliberately chosen a woman specifically because it will get Russ to show his misogyny.
That would help bolster their decision to not let him on. If they can prove he view women with contempt (he does) they can argue he would have been a danger to the female judges, staff and other contestants. I mean, his whole act is hitting on Heidi Klum, a woman is who is married. To a black man. They seem to have done their research on Russ, so I think you're right, this is a calculated move to give him a chance to show his true colors. They wouldn't have to prove shit in arbitration, his own words could be used against him.

Under her experience:
”Obtained dismissal for Fox Broadcasting, FremantleMedia, CORE Media Group, and others of a putative class action complaint brought by former African-American male contestants who had been disqualified from American Idol”

ruh roh,
Russell
The lawsuit was filed by nine black men who had been disqualified from the show for various reasons, chiefly among them failing to disclose arrests. One guy was spiked because he was contractually tied to a band at the time, and there were some legal issues regarding that and Fox didn't want the hassle. This was nine years ago, and Fox pointed out at the time that three of the winners from previous seasons were black, and they've had other winners who were black since then. Russ doesn't stand a snowball's chance in a blast furnace against Ms. Lens.
 
Last edited:
This article has the decision at the end.
Idol has spiked white people for criminal histories. Even in 2013, racism was a big deal, and there's no way a network like Fox would open itself up to lawsuits that had a chance by spiking people just because they were black. As has been said, they've had black winners. However, I'll bet Russ seizes on this as somehow being proof they do discriminate, so he should get on the show, win and be given money because they hurt his feelings. He can't realistically evaluate himself, so he thinks he actually stands a chance against one of the top entertainment law firms in the country.
 
O'Melveny & Myers is one of the most high-powered white-shoe firms in the business. They certainly aren't some cheap in-house legal team. Russ is headed for a curb stomping even if they don't bother pursuing actual sanctions.
Imagine someone actually trying to curb stomp Russell...

"What the fuck he looks the same!"
 
You can get wages garnished. I'm pretty sure you can only garnish tax refunds if you owe a debt to the government, although this rule tends to start to disappear when the return gets deposited to your bank account after which it becomes a fair game. You might have been thinking of this
I have a question in regards to all this. Is it at all possible that the nonsense with Fremantle could somehow speed past his case against Null, leading to the possibility that they win a legal fee judgment against him before Dear Leader even gets to pick at his bones? (:_(
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Clovis and Pee Cola
I have a question in regards to all this. Is it at all possible that the nonsense with Fremantle could somehow speed past his case against Null, leading to the possibility that they win a legal fee judgment against him before Dear Leader even gets to pick at his bones? (:_(
Yes.
 
Back