Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

The whole 'laughing at man dressed as woman' thing makes no sense. As far as I can recall nearly any media that involves this does this at a comedic level; for example Mrs. Doubtfire is all about a man so desperate to spend time with his children that he becomes a nanny and then there's a series of hijinks and jokes. You don't find the humor is Robin Williams disguised as an octogenarian; it's what he does while he's pretending to be a nanny. Setting his costume on fire, pissing standing up, getting hit on...the film even ends with him turning his character into a childrens show.

I want to know what mysterious show LaSmelle is referring to but I'm sure that it's just another false flag to hate on something.
Probably Monty Python, Lily Savage or Les Dawson.

Again, it's what these guys are doing dressed as women that's funny.
 
Repost
Screenshot 2022-01-13 at 18-24-11 Assigned Male Comics.png

FI_0xD3XoAMMB14.jpg

https://twitter.com/AssignedMale/status/1481671970936737793 https://archive.ph/RpNsG
https://www.facebook.com/assignedmale/posts/324914879644557
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=324914732977905&set=a.121655759970471

Screenshot 2022-01-13 at 18-26-47 Assignée Garçon BD.png

20220113.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/assigneegarcon/posts/482413063248034
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=482412953248045&set=a.207328270756516
Screenshot 2022-01-13 at 18-27-42 Assignée Garçon BD.png
 

hmm, In being oh so snide and ironic, Sophie has defeated his own argument.


IF he is using the cartoon as an inversion of "transphobia", saying these justifications are invalid, then he can, validly, be labelled "cisphobic"

IF he is claiming he is not "cisphobic", then the similar justifications would apply to "transphobia"

Sophie is really not very good at this - he should probably stick to animal tracings dressed in ridiculous outfits just babbling slogans
 
Last edited:
Leave it to troons to see laughter as a form of persecution.
Given how ridiculous most troons are (case in point: the obese man in his thirties who tries to act like a teenage girl and dress like a toddler), I can see why they might be offended by cross-dressing played for laughs. It must be kind of galling when you just posted a cute selfie and then a comedian pulls it off better than you.
 
Notice the weird almost angelic glow emanating from (NOT reflecting off of) the feet here. I think I am going to have to agree with the prior post some pages back where I remember someone noticing the loving extra detail then applied to Ciel's socked feet as growing evidence of yet another fetish this author might traffic in. Its always on this character too.
 
Notice the weird almost angelic glow emanating from (NOT reflecting off of) the feet here. I think I am going to have to agree with the prior post some pages back where I remember someone noticing the loving extra detail then applied to Ciel's socked feet as growing evidence of yet another fetish this author might traffic in. Its always on this character too.
How can one man have so many embarrassing fetishes?
 
It makes sense why Billy's going into this stupid, bloated journey into linguistics. That's all troons really have. Biology disagrees with them, medical science disagrees with them, so all of their arguments lie in latin/germanic/english language conventions to try and force a wedge between sex and gender through as much linguistic pendantry possible. They can't deal with physical reality, so why not pick apart the arbitrary mouth sounds human beings make to communicate with each other to try and finagle your way into feeling valid or legitimate?

Too bad for him that this shit entirely falls apart when you aren't playing around latin-based languages. Not that it really had any real legs to stand on regardless.
This is what makes the name of his comic so non-sensical. It's not "Assigned Boy" or "Assigned Man" or even "Assigned G.I. Joes, pants and the Color Blue"
Assigned Male implies that Sophie was assigned a biological male (XY). So if social gender and biological sex are so different, then wouldn't it still be accurate to say that Sophie is still a male? Sure "Sophie" might be a "lady" or a "woman" or a "girl" but biologically speaking they are still a male, and calling them as such is accurate.
 
Back