What is all this bullshit about judges and legality? There's no court here except the court of YT. AF is under no obligation to keep private either emails or DMs sent to them unsolicited. There's also no harassment in making them public, for the same reason: they have no agreement with Big Al that they will in fact keep them private, and since "the public" is not the entity that will be deciding anything, it doesn't hurt AF's case to make them public. It's as stupid as those people with the idiotic "this email is confidential and may not be disseminated" crap in their signatures. You cannot preemptively demand people keep whatever shit you're sending confidential.
If this were real life and not online, sure. But this is not a legal court of law, and a demonstration of fair use is all that is required by AF. They've made that assertion previously, and YT very clearly agreed with them. One you've established a history of appealing wrongfully sent claims, guess who gets more of the benefit of the doubt moving forward? Not the claimee, that's for sure. Get enough of your shit claims tossed, and then you're looking at having your own channel nuked, and I guarantee you Big Al would heave her ass up and escort whoever the fuck is living with her and giving her this advice to the door for real before she allowed her one and only possible source of income dry up and blow away.