Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Super-Chevy454 said:
And they still don't give a fuck about mask pollution.

Meanwhile, one more hidden skeleton is out of the bag.



No word about Moderna and Pfizer, talk about a coincidence.
Click to expand...
"mask pollution" is a great way to troll the population. just pass around some "your masks are killing turtles" memes around the antimasker groups witj peta watermark
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: GloJojo, Open Window Maniac, NoReturn and 9 others
Kona_A9 said:
He is literally a paid Democrat propagandist.
Click to expand...
He sure is one. A bootlicker is another word for him
Super-Chevy454 said:
He should be careful for what he wished for because the authoritarian he love will throw him under the bus when they'll have no use for him anymore.
Click to expand...
he will have none just like the poem
 
Last edited:
Meriasek said:
Germany all but eliminated the "recovered" status by reducing the time for its validity from 180 days to 90 days, further shortened by having it being valid only earliest 29 days after infection. After that, if you want to participate in life, you need to get vaccinated or a booster shot.
Click to expand...
Can one of the I Fucking Love Science types explain how your body's immune response to a COVID infection disspates after 29 days, but the immune response to the Pfizer shot lasts a lot longer? What's the difference?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GloJojo, Coral Apples, SCSI and 12 others
SCSI said:
God damn, so it really is as bad as it looks on the surface. That's horrifying. Thank you for the writeup and the nightmare fuel.


A few bits of stuff while I'm working on the OSHA ETS Sperganalysis eXtreme, both related to that subject. One is a short "now what" article from the National Law Review that has some info pertinent to the question of whether you could sue the hell out of your boss if the company mandates CoVax on their own and you get sick/crippled from it. (Archive) Their answer is: not really, but you can go for worker's comp. The immediate thought springs to mind though that this is probably going off the practices from mandating something that has gone through the full, normal clinical trial and approval processes. There might be an angle of attack based on the bizarre trajectory the existing vaccines have taken through the system, if enough lawyers were sufficiently bored and angry enough to pursue. I'd sure give it a shot at any rate.



One other especially interesting bit was actually acknowledging at least some side effects, rather than the earlier maximum shill "THEY ARE PERFECT YOU CONSPIRATARD" presentation that used to be the norm.



The other thing I have is an editorial from a law prof and former clerk for Sotomayor that, if you can wade through the insufferable tone, does raise a possible tactic the Biden admin could attempt to rescue the OSHA ETS mandate. (Archive) I don't have a strong opinion yet as to whether it'd likely fly or not, but it's worth watching out for as the circus clowns on, especially as states start setting up their own mandates -- some may try structuring them this way in the hopes of making them more likely to survive challenge.
Click to expand...
hErE’s hOw bIdEn cAn sTiLl wIn! This completely ignores the ‘OSHA doesn’t have authority over matters of public health’ part of the opinion. I can see this solely as a cope-piece for LA Times’ shrinking liberal customer base. OSHA would still have to direct this to businesses where COVID-19 is a true workplace hazard.

That said, your remark that OSHA could re-engineer the mandate to cover let’s say teachers is also a stretch. I read the court’s opinion as workplaces that have a real, tangible, and unavoidable dependence on interaction with the virus, i.e. a researcher who works with live samples of the virus. That’s a much different scenario from a teacher who might be more likely to be exposed to the virus due to their working conditions.

The opinion sounds potentially good for state mandates, too. A similar argument can be made that state mandates will have to come from the state legislatures, not as arbitrary measures from governors or departments, if vaccine mandate authority hasn’t actually been specifically granted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCSI, Larry David's Opera Cape and Shaka Brah
The Ugly One said:
Can one of the I Fucking Love Science types explain how your body's immune response to a COVID infection disspates after 29 days, but the immune response to the Pfizer shot lasts a lot longer? What's the difference?
Click to expand...
Because they changed the definition of herd immunity from a mix between natural immunity and vaccination, to just a threshold of vaccination.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Round Buns, Vic Viper T301, SCSI and 10 others
The Ugly One said:
It is really shocking to me how fast the left, all the way to red-flag-wearing "fash-bashing" commies, went from rioting against the WTO to absolute, unfailing, unquestioning trust in pharmaceutical corporations. I know that was 20 years ago, but still, it wasn't that long ago when they were all, "Down with the corporations man!" Now it's, "Pfizer would never just...manipulate us for profit! That would be wrong!"

Maybe it was when they learned that Purdue Pharma murdered hundreds of thousands of Americans...but hey, those were mostly working class whites, so fuck them, right? Maybe it was earlier. Maybe putting rainbow flags on corporate logos really did work.
Click to expand...
Oh that's only surprising if you have principles. The moment a multinational megacorporation openly climbs into bed with a leftist government, they transform into a Pure Force For Good. Remember, the left has mascots and targets. There is no grey in between, hence the jarring leap from villain to hero.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: GloJojo, The Ultimate Ramotith, Basil Julep and 7 others
1642366202740.png


1642366170244.png




 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: peetz cum sock, The Ultimate Ramotith, Confused Doggo and 20 others
The Ugly One said:
Can one of the I Fucking Love Science types explain how your body's immune response to a COVID infection disspates after 29 days, but the immune response to the Pfizer shot lasts a lot longer? What's the difference?
Click to expand...
They can't. At the moment they're trying to bring up something about "cellular immune respone" or "T-cell response" that will protect you against serious disease, and shifting the narrative towards the vaccine having always been a vaccine against the disease COVID-19 and not against the virus SARS-CoV-2 (which is true, ever noticed that? You'd think that vaccines are targeted at the viruses, but this one is against the disease). As if the immunity gained by infection is somehow worse and doesn't yield T-cell response or something. Just something I noticed the past days, lots of people suddenly talking about "cellular response" and whatnot.
The facade is crumbling.

/edit: Just read a great tip to get a safe "reinfection" every three/n month: If you had it once, keep some snot from your nose. Every three months you just gotta snort some up, the PCR test will be positive and you get your rights back.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: GloJojo, NoSpiceLife, The Ultimate Ramotith and 8 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Beer, The Spoony One X, Super-Chevy454 and 1 other person
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Spoony One X, NoReturn, SCSI and 5 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back