- Joined
- Apr 15, 2021
(link | archive)
lol
Ah, ranting and raving: always a sound legal strategy. A member of Haydur Nation? Engaging in harassment? Nooooo. Surely not. It's not like that's their whole raison d'être.
"Mr. Roskam may believe his behaviour is warranted. It is not." Story of HN's life, tbh.
I wonder: does the above mention of a video mean that Roskam sued for a YouTube video that this "Ironside" person directed at him? Wonder if he'd be cool with Chantal responding to his videos in kind? (Not that I'm saying she has a case, I'm just pointing out that he probably wouldn't accept the justice of his own claims in taking action against Ironside if the tables were turned).
So another broke leech on the system, larping as right-wing to make himself feel like a bigger man than he'll ever be.
And with that segue:
Imagine larping as "right-wing," then inveighing wildly against "neoliberals" (neoliberalism is a right-wing political economic ideology and system adhered to by conservatives and right-libertarians).
Seems like it would be a good idea to get clear on the terminology before making political polemics your new bag - and if you want to larp as right-wing, also a good idea not to be steadfastly unemployed and grifting disability (on this one, Nova (although being sarcastic) was right: "Where are those boot straps?"), not bitching about idpol while constantly indulging in idpol yourself and not using the language of politics just to try to draw more universal support to your entirely personal, individual grievances.
Imagine being an actual Trump supporter and finding out that these missives against Belinda aren't really about politics but are about one guy's petty, personal internet drama that's grown out of fat bitch retardation and that he's trying to reframe as political in an attempt to get others to validate his personal grievances. Holy shit. Talk about seeking aSsPaTs AnD dOpAmInE in all the wrong ways. DC Mediacrone is exactly the same way, of course, so they're well-met on that point too. There's literally nothing outside of personal grievance for these people — so much so that they inflate their grievances in the private sphere to encompass the public sphere and everyone else is expected to drop everything and care deeply about Negz and Clara's butthurt. Absolute fucking navel-gazing dunces.
Also, repeating variations on a simple "Fuck you, [insert politifag's name here]!" will definitely win AsSpAtS aNd DoPaMiNe from whatever choir you're preaching to but doesn't offer remotely enough substantial commentary on politics or policy to hold anyone's attention (beyond the smallest and most braindead of audiences). You can be an inflammatory, rage-baiting polemicist and still offer some substantial commentary. Like Negz (and DC Mediacrone, for that matter) most YouTube polemicists can't, don't and won't read actual policy. They inject substance into their commentary by crudely applying general political principles to some immediate current event to give their audiences some meat to chew on. That sad little shred of meat is generally enough to build an audience — you really only have to be a little smarter than the lowest common denominator — if you're an entertaining enough polemicist, but you need to move beyond simple rage-baiting and spouting variations of "Fuck you, maaaaan" over and over. (Although, really, "Fuck you, maaaaaan" isn't even rage-baiting; it's just raving).
I agree but there's no way that navel-gazing about his personal feuds and grievances is going to appeal to a broad enough audience to improve his fortunes either. Apart from the small gaggle of thirsty middle-aged women and one geriatric who want him to rail them, his personal grievances hold no broad appeal and no broad appeal means he's going to stay locked in his tiny little cul-de-sac forever. So, in theory, I agree that branching out to more popular content would be best for his channel.
Problem is, well...he's going to have to find something he's good at and willing to be consistent about. Politics isn't it. Seems like music would be his strength but for some reason he doesn't want to do that either.
Man. For Silvana's own sake, she'd better hope she didn't send him nudes.
But if Silvana did and he released them (no doubt pleading the whole time that his BPD and PTSD done made him do the scumbag thing, guv!), I have a feeling that DC Mediacrone's concern about revenge porn (i.e., the premise upon which she platformed Shanny for Christ so Shanny could accuse Negz of being a purveyor of revenge porn) would suddenly dissipate even faster than it did when she decided to make common cause with him. (A closet pedophile! A dangerous anti-Semite who was threatening to kill her! A racist! A purveyor of revenge porn! But he hates GG now? That's all cool, then).
Last edited:
That's the sort of shit you'd see in the troon threads too. They all age-regress and turn into fat old doods larping as stereotypical six year old girls drenched in pink everything, glitter and unicorns. Does it end at being a closeted fag or is FBRC the next 
And Sandy and Ang have promise rings!
