Mr. Garza makes several assumptions: that voter suppression and disinformation are nuanced topics that don’t resonate with Latinos; that Democrats aren’t fighting for policies that will make our lives better; and that Republicans are the only party that supports growth and families.
Every time I see this sort of thinking from democrats, I consistently see a failure to understand that their beliefs are not facts. The idea that "democrats aren't fighting for policies that will make our lives better" isn't something in the voters mind that's rooted in fact, its rooted in perception and conclusions. You can't just assert to them that CRT will make their lives better and expect them to believe it, you have to make an actual argument for it. And when they do make arguments for it, it fails to stick.
Telling people "I'll build up jobs and spend taxes better to improve your lives" is the sort of immediate, simple train of thought that anyone can understand - I will have more money, therefore can afford more things to improve life. Telling people "I'll fight for diversity and equity to improve your life" is too ambiguous to stick for anyone who's not already a believer in the dogma - Nobody can adequately explain how more shades of skin will let me upgrade from a one bedroom apartment to a two bedroom apartment. Pushes for government provided free 'X' fail with anyone who understands how taxes work, and anyone who has pride and doesn't
want to be on government dependent programs. These sorts of pitches only work with ideologues who've already drunk the kool-aid, and thats not the group they need to be reaching now. But appealing to them gets them twitter likes and media attention, which they either seem to massively overvalue, or mistakenly believe that exclusively appealing to their ideologues will lead to some sort of voter agenesis, spontaneously birthing more of them from the fabric of reality. I guess immigration's as close as they'll get on that front.
You can see the same thing in left wing online arguments - Everything starts from fundamentally flawed initial premises built off assumptions of consensus regarding the potential results of an action. They can't fathom different results, and keep bashing the same thing louder because to them, you're being deliberately ignorant by not sharing the same mindspace as them at all times.