Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Isn't it nice how those comments prove the point. Every wish they make for harm, death and/or rejection is why this writing does tell why people around them won't be honest, for now. When the tode turn they have made multiple enemies that have had time take distance or really get angry.
 
The OP is right though, taking transgenderism off the mental illness lists just gave the powerless weirdos a weapon to threaten people into accepting them!
 
edit: dug into the trans hijab I spotted
It's the second time I see a white muslim tranny. Of course they live in the u.s. or england, they never come from the middle east.
If I were a tranny I would larp as a muslim as well. Think about it, you only have to cover yourself from head to toes and slap some makeup on your face. Low-effort crossdressing. You could even wear a burka and nobody would know there's a man under it.
 
It's the second time I see a white muslim tranny. Of course they live in the u.s. or england, they never come from the middle east.
If I were a tranny I would larp as a muslim as well. Think about it, you only have to cover yourself from head to toes and slap some makeup on your face. Low-effort crossdressing. You could even wear a burka and nobody would know there's a man under it.
Until they start talking at least, that is always a dead giveaway
 
The Canadian teacher who was removed from the school board meeting for raising concerns about books with tranny sexual content has released a statement

View attachment 2909620

This was the incident - https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/wrdsb-...omments-deemed-transphobic-by-chair-1.5745069

This was content from one of the books she was referring to

View attachment 2909930
Good for her. I would love to hear her "transphobic" speech where she states that blatant references to sex probably shouldn't be in books for children.
In typical troon style they completely justify everything that was said and are completely oblivious to it.
 
It's a detransitioner's post but oof

1642879489976.png



 
Nice

View attachment 2910178





I don't know how exactly the OP of this tweet then goes on to say research is scant because the side effects of say Lupron are well known in adults. They absolutely know it's dangerous and that some people who've used it have long term terrible side effects when it's used for actual diseases. The idea that anyone prescribing it is unaware that a toxic medication used to treat cancer normally would not be healthy to prescribe off-label for a child who is physically healthy but mentally unhinged is laughable. Just the same as it's laughable that anyone with a medical license could say 'Yea. Stalling your child from undergoing the natural process that humans have gone through since we became modern humans that matures them mentally, physically, and emotionally into an adult is totally fine. Nothing bad could possibly happen.' Who needs puberty! It's not important at all! What is important is the feelings of your emotionally immature child! who cannot legally make any other life decisions for themselves as the law recognizes them as incapable due to their age and a scientific understanding that they lack the cognitive maturity.

Anyone. Any. Single. Person. Whose in the medical field that prescribed these drugs to a child who did not genuinely have an issue, like precocious puberty at an unreasonably young age, should lose their license because they absolutely know it's not good or healthy.

This also isn't Federal Prosecutors but an independent law firm, sadly. Hopefully it's another sign of the pendulum swinging back to facts over feelings though.
 
Last edited:
I don't know how exactly the OP of this tweet then goes on to say research is scant because the side effects of say Lupron are well known in adults. They absolutely know it's dangerous and that some people who've used it have long term terrible side effects when it's used for actual diseases. The idea that anyone prescribing it is unaware that a toxic medication used to treat cancer normally would not be healthy to prescribe off-label for a child who is physically healthy but mentally unhinged is laughable. Just the same as it's laughable that anyone with a medical license could say 'Yea. Stalling your child from undergoing the natural process that humans have gone through since we became modern humans that matures them mentally, physically, and emotionally into an adult is totally fine. Nothing bad could possibly happen.' Who needs puberty! It's not important at all! What is important is the feelings of your emotionally immature child! who cannot legally make any other life decisions for themselves as the law recognizes them as incapable due to their age and a scientific understanding that they lack the cognitive maturity.

Anyone. Any. Single. Person. Whose in the medical field that prescribed these drugs to a child who did not genuinely have an issue, like precocious puberty at an unreasonably young age, should lose their license because they absolutely know it's not good or healthy.

This also isn't Federal Prosecutors but an independent law firm, sadly. Hopefully it's another sign of the pendulum swinging back to facts over feelings though.

I took another look at the law firm and they seem to have quite the track record and have successfully won in other pharma cases: https://www.girardsharp.com/work-results
 
I took another look at the law firm and they seem to have quite the track record and have successfully won in other pharma cases: https://www.girardsharp.com/work-results

I'm not saying it's not good because they're a law firm but pointing out there's a difference between federal persecutors and a layman's law firm taking up the case/cause.
 
The Canadian teacher who was removed from the school board meeting for raising concerns about books with tranny sexual content has released a statement

View attachment 2909620

This was the incident - https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/wrdsb-...omments-deemed-transphobic-by-chair-1.5745069

This was content from one of the books she was referring to

View attachment 2909930
So, for quoting out of books that are already available in school, this teacher was
-assigned to home and cannot go to school
-made "pending for formal investigation"
-banned from contacting colleagues and students

All that for saying that maybe grade 3 kids are normal for not thinking about sex 24/7
Something's fishy in the administration
 
Last edited:

"I'd rather you just hate crime me" "I can't stand the thought of people thinking like this" THEN WHY DO YOU MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BE HONEST?

You can't threaten/prosecute/ban/harass/stalk anyone who says it out loud, and then complain they're not saying it out loud. Well, I guess you can, but you can't then expect us not to laugh at you about it.

The guy who said that he wanted his friends to be hit by a bus if they secretly disagree with him probably also whines about all his non-trans friends ghosting him.
 
View attachment 2909956
And all this supposedly happened at the tender ages of 2, 3 and 5...

Oddly enough, the only baby pics he could supply have him wearing normal baby clothes.
View attachment 2909962

It just gets worse.
View attachment 2909967
This was a gay kid who got fucked up by his family. There have been plenty of studies, including prospective ones (that checked for gender variance first, then followed up later to see about homosexuality) that show a link between behavior exactly as this dude describes and growing up gay. With trans homosexuals like him, the thing that drives the trooning out is usually repression and being told that their behaviors makes them the wrong gender. Gender variant behavior in childhood is much, much more predictive of homosexuality than it is transitioning. It's obviously not a 1:1 thing, there are plenty of straight (maybe bi) dudes and ladies that had some gender variance/gender discomfort as kids. But, essentially, the entire trans narrative is built on society misunderstanding gay kids and fucking them up, and having that identity taken up by Autogynephiles and Yaoi fetishists.

For boys and girls, exposure to androgens in the womb seems to have some predictive effect in terms of homosexuality, which is why you see things like birth order affecting it, because the number of children, especially male children that a woman has had, affects the hormonal environment that subsequent children experience. But, the interactions here appear to be extremely complex, and it's not a guarantee one way or the other. The important thing to realize is that gender variance in childhood is a normal variance that is observed across cultures, and appears as early as 8-9 months. And that it is associated with homosexuality, not with the mystical concept of "gender identity". And it leads to people misusing science:
So, for quoting out of books that are already available in school, this teacher was
-assigned to home and cannot go to school
-made "pending for formal investigation"
-banned from contacting collegues and students

All that for saying that maybe grade 3 kids are normal for not thinking about sex 24/7
Something's fishy in the administration
I'm not saying that there is not a pedo angle to this, because I'm beyond believing that there aren't predators everywhere in society, but one of things that get me when you try to talk to people about what actual science shows in terms of gendered behavior in humans is that they are super resistant to the idea of homosexuality being really a spectrum of different behavioral traits related to typical gendered behavior. People in progressive circles do not want to admit that men and women show innate differences in behavior, even though that's really not in question scientifically. Tiny rant about gendered behavior here:

The existence of gendered behavior doesn't mean that you have to treat the sexes unequally, in fact I would argue that part of the problem with the way feminism has evolved is that it has specifically undervalue female behaviors in an effort to bring the sexes equal on male terms. The fact that women are literally the more necessary sex when it comes to reproduction ( just ask yourself which population will grow faster: 10 men with 100 women, or 100 men with 10 women) should be something that we should incorporate into a theories of social structure. In fact, one of the things I find so telling about the way AGP men fetishize womanhood is that almost always they don't fetishize pregnancy or childbirth, because that's not part of their weird lolita complex they have about "growing up a girl". Somehow their female brains don't care about one of the central defining features of womanhood, even though biological woman who are told that there are infertile often struggle with the knowledge. Somehow slumber parties with girlfriends and wearing makeup is something coded into your neurons, but pregnancy is not. If you spend even one second thinking about it you realize how impossible it is for a trans identity to have a biological origin.

If you ask gay people when they knew they were gay, they will tell you that they felt different from others early on even when they could not articulate why. You figure it out once you start hitting puberty, like normal straight people do. But prior to that your behavior will be different enough that if you have parents wanted a manly man or a girly girl, they will start trying to correct you before you know what you are. In fact it used to be the theory that homosexuals had inverted genders, that they were essentially trans. One of the earliest term for homosexuals was actually "sexual inverts", from the late 19th century. But now, because so much effort has been put into the narrative that gender variant behavior means that you are "trans", people are misinterpreting what gender variant behavior means exactly like it was in the 1890s: it means that they are something else "on the inside". So in terms of trying to define being gay to a kid, the only thing that they can reference is sexuality, when that's not actually part of being a gay kid! For all their claims about being science based, progressive have twisted themselves into pretzels to ignore data when it's inconvenient to them.

Enough :politisperg::
Clipboard Image (1).jpg
Clipboard Image.jpg
Clipboard Image (2).jpg


I like watching the movement eat itself. I feel like the truscum/tucute divide might actually be what explodes the whole thing. If these non-mentally ill (in the sense that they aren't experiencing extreme distress) people start surgically altering themselves in large numbers, there's going to be a lot of 30 somethings looking back on their youth with regret and wanting answers.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Loki's sex was listed as "fluid" on his file in the Loki show.

82qc35ns17471.jpeg


This set off a wave of press calling him "genderfluid" because the ability to shapeshift into a body of either sex is apparently the same as the feeling of swinging between feminine and masculine spirits. Regardless, it was the only reference to Loki's sex/gender/whatever, and he didn't even shift into a woman at any point in his show.

Have you watched Eternals? There's a character in there that is bewilderingly terrible, called sprite, that I feel was some sort of ham-fisted metaphor for being trans. She's eternally a 14 year old girl, because the Eternals are weird not-robots from a space god, and she has a big rant about how she has the wrong body and can't have Richard Madden love her because of it. It was skeevy as hell, and I'm glad I did not pay to see that movie.

the transmascs have claimed her
 
It's a detransitioner's post but oof

View attachment 2910413


Sorry for the dumb/TMI question but this has to be just an effect of T or an emotional/medication issue right? Men don't always just feel the effects of orgasm in their genitals like she describes right? This is scaring me.

Loki's sex was listed as "fluid" on his file in the Loki show.

View attachment 2910835

This set off a wave of press calling him "genderfluid" because the ability to shapeshift into a body of either sex is apparently the same as the feeling of swinging between feminine and masculine spirits. Regardless, it was the only reference to Loki's sex/gender/whatever, and he didn't even shift into a woman at any point in his show.



the transmascs have claimed her
Well, I mean, "genderfluid" might not be real in humans, but it's definitely true of the original Loki. Dude got pregnant and gave birth to a horse and everything. And Loki does change sex a lot in the comics.

That's very on brand for Disney though... putting a blink-and-you-miss-it reference in there that they know the devoted fans will go wild about, while not actually committing to anything in the show's plot that might make a main character seem to non-hetero.
 
For anyone who finds Hunter Schafer attractive (just because he's more passable than most troons, especially in the voice department, for what little that means)...

Watch him enter the stage for this interview.

That is a male body. Very clearly male. A male frame in a dress. And it looks hideous.

 
Back