US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
Feline Supremacist said:
We also have people approaching ninety years of age in Congress pushing this narrative, who came of age when making scary threats against the USSR was a good political strategy. It's like they think "Well, it worked pretty good then, if we tweak it we can make work for us again". They fail to grasp how much the world and the US electorate has changed. People don't vote a straight party line ticket anymore. They don't take network and cable news show as gospel anymore. Newspapers have gone extinct. For every shill like Brooklyn "Former Crackhead and Paid DNC Shill" Dad on Twatter there are dozens more countering his propaganda with propaganda of their own. Facebook has stifled dissent to the point people simply ignore it and moved elsewhere for political information and discourse. And for every boomer that does fall for it there is one who thinks "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me". Biggest surprise of the fall of the Berlin Wall was the USSR was on defensive mode, not offensive as the MSM and our glowies claimed all throughout the Cold War.

You have to get the people who have this retarded nostalgia for the Cold War era out of foreign and domestic policy making. They don't long for modern mid century furniture, they genuinely miss us vs them dynamic, forgetting that each side has nuclear weapons that came close to annihilating humanity, and I don't mean just the Cuban Missile Crisis, there was shit like this.
Click to expand...
The thing is, I don't think it's mainly old folks trying to get back to the good old days of the Cold War. Remember, even back then the people in charge of policy by and large understood geopolitics - Henry Kissinger would've never approved of trying to bring Ukraine into the Western sphere of influence. I think it's a situation where the people in charge of making decisions really are ignorant of history and of important concepts like spheres of influence and balance of power, and have really no idea how the "great game" is played.

Or you could be right, and the old people really have gotten less wise with age. I mean, during Desert Storm Dick Cheney said that moving towards Baghdad and removing Saddam from power would be a bad idea - and yet a decade later he was pushing for just that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Corette, Justa Grata Honoria and 13 others
MirrorNoir said:
Nassib was given the stunning and brave treatment until they started looking into him and found out that he was a conservative and suddenly everyone stopped talking about him.

Also, Nassib was a nobody; if Rogers came out while an active player, there would be all sorts of lightning storms and given that Rogers is nearing the point in his career where Brett Farve was when Aaron replaced Brett, there is the fear that the Packers would get rid of Aaron using the controversy so they could replace him with a younger quarterback. Which in turn would force Aaron to give up any chance of breaking away from the gay mafia, since they would leverage any professional backlash against Aaron by telling him he needed to double down on calling NFL fans bigots if he wants to be gainfully employed going forward, post-career since Geffen would soon as have Aaron murdered and the murder staged as a suicide caused by "homophobic NFL fans and Packers management/team rejecting Aaron" if he could use it to further his agenda.
Click to expand...
The Fudge Packers have been trying to replace him for two years now. There's literally no reason for Rodgers to hide being gay (if he really is) because he's already considered one of the greatest to ever play the game and any team would want him next year if he doesn't retire, which I think he will if he wins the Super Bowl because he'd rather be doing commercials and hosting game shows than putting up with NFL bullshit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Justa Grata Honoria, Vyse Inglebard and 5 others
make_it_so said:
The thing is, I don't think it's mainly old folks trying to get back to the good old days of the Cold War. Remember, even back then the people in charge of policy by and large understood geopolitics - Henry Kissinger would've never approved of trying to bring Ukraine into the Western sphere of influence. I think it's a situation where the people in charge of making decisions really are ignorant of history and of important concepts like spheres of influence and balance of power, and have really no idea how the "great game" is played.

Or you could be right, and the old people really have gotten less wise with age. I mean, during Desert Storm Dick Cheney said that moving towards Baghdad and removing Saddam from power would be a bad idea - and yet a decade later he was pushing for just that.
Click to expand...
Kissinger is pretty old but he warned against it when the whole Sevastopol thing happened, he's in his 90s now and probably too feeble to care. I think it's more about flexing and less about history, and also that imbecile Hillary pushing the "Russia bad" narrative because she's deluded and believes she's a foreign policy genius. Since she literally owns the DNC they all go along with it or risk getting frozen out of campaign funds and resources.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Humble Crab, CashMoney! and 12 others
Trianon said:
Like believing that men can change their sex, believing abortion isn't killing a human being is an anti-science take that is becoming more and more impossible to justify. Remember, Roe v. Wade was established before ultrasounds. A huge majority of people support hard limitations on abortion (rape, incest, life of the mother) and maybe first trimester (which is medically irrelevant, so most conservative states would probably shift to heartbeat bills or force further research into fetal pain). The Dems are losing people on this issue too, though it's sort of hidden and wrapped into a black-and-white pro-life/pro-choice frame. The Dems cannot defend "up until the moment of labor" abortions, and any change to national abortion policy would force them to do so. The people who vote for abortion rights are already locked into the Democratic party, and their current policies are too extreme to bring new people on board. So I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that this issue would hurt the GOP.

Shifting gears, I don't think it's been brought up, but the girl who was raped by a troon in Loudoun County, Virginia, has been beaten up twice in the school as a result of reporting it. The second one happened the other day and is on video.

View attachment 2911059
View attachment 2911076

Is it even possible for the Va. GOP to overreact to this?
Click to expand...
So we have a presumably well-connected boy raping a girl and getting off with a slap on the wrist after even getting him charged was an ordeal in of itself while the community attacks her out of revenge afterwards, but it's different because the boy wears a dress and calls himself a girl. Are wokists capable of building anything but pozzed and retarded versions of what they rail against?
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Zig Zag, Corette and 25 others
silverstacks said:
View attachment 2910263
Click to expand...
1642898244272.png

Wow it’s become real hehhahahha
 
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Humble Crab, Nypical Haterade Comment and 7 others
make_it_so said:
Or you could be right, and the old people really have gotten less wise with age. I mean, during Desert Storm Dick Cheney said that moving towards Baghdad and removing Saddam from power would be a bad idea - and yet a decade later he was pushing for just that.
Click to expand...
Cheney only said that publicly during Desert Storm because Bush I was utterly dead set on leaving town after Kuwait was liberated and never had any intention of going into Iraq to depose Saddam.

It's also why Cheney fucked over Bush I by getting into Bush II's ear and getting him to run in 2000; Bush I had been grooming Jeb for a Presidential run circa 2004/2008 and had no interest in having W run for President. Cheney fucked over Bush I's dynasty plans and Jeb's ambitions, because W shared Cheney's belief that the US should have invaded Iraq and overthrown Saddam with W in particular, blaming his dad's refusal to do so as one of the reasons why he lost to Clinton (IE a prolonged war and the overthrow of Saddam would have boosted his dad to victory at the polls and got him a second term).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Justa Grata Honoria and 5 others
Trianon said:
Like believing that men can change their sex, believing abortion isn't killing a human being is an anti-science take that is becoming more and more impossible to justify. Remember, Roe v. Wade was established before ultrasounds. A huge majority of people support hard limitations on abortion (rape, incest, life of the mother) and maybe first trimester (which is medically irrelevant, so most conservative states would probably shift to heartbeat bills or force further research into fetal pain). The Dems are losing people on this issue too, though it's sort of hidden and wrapped into a black-and-white pro-life/pro-choice frame. The Dems cannot defend "up until the moment of labor" abortions, and any change to national abortion policy would force them to do so. The people who vote for abortion rights are already locked into the Democratic party, and their current policies are too extreme to bring new people on board. So I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that this issue would hurt the GOP.

Shifting gears, I don't think it's been brought up, but the girl who was raped by a troon in Loudoun County, Virginia, has been beaten up twice in the school as a result of reporting it. The second one happened the other day and is on video.

View attachment 2911059
View attachment 2911076

Is it even possible for the Va. GOP to overreact to this?
Click to expand...
Getting raped and then getting assaulted twice because you reported you were raped, happening in the space of about a year. That is beyond abominable.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Zig Zag, Confused Doggo and 31 others
Trianon said:
Like believing that men can change their sex, believing abortion isn't killing a human being is an anti-science take that is becoming more and more impossible to justify. Remember, Roe v. Wade was established before ultrasounds. A huge majority of people support hard limitations on abortion (rape, incest, life of the mother) and maybe first trimester (which is medically irrelevant, so most conservative states would probably shift to heartbeat bills or force further research into fetal pain). The Dems are losing people on this issue too, though it's sort of hidden and wrapped into a black-and-white pro-life/pro-choice frame. The Dems cannot defend "up until the moment of labor" abortions, and any change to national abortion policy would force them to do so. The people who vote for abortion rights are already locked into the Democratic party, and their current policies are too extreme to bring new people on board. So I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that this issue would hurt the GOP.

Shifting gears, I don't think it's been brought up, but the girl who was raped by a troon in Loudoun County, Virginia, has been beaten up twice in the school as a result of reporting it. The second one happened the other day and is on video.

View attachment 2911059
View attachment 2911076

Is it even possible for the Va. GOP to overreact to this?
Click to expand...
Where was this back in September when the first attack happened? Why is this coming out now?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard and spiritofamermaid

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, CarlosDanger, Justa Grata Honoria and 10 others
CrippleThreat said:
So, they beat her up because her reporting helped Republicans win. And now, they think "shooting" the messenger will change course?
Click to expand...
All they had to do was say "what happened was a terrible tragedy; we hope this girl receives justice; please don't think this one violent tranny represents the T community as a whole."

But they couldn't do that because that tranny DOES represent their community as a whole. They genuinely believe that if an underage girl is raped by a tranny, the media should not cover it because it makes trannies look bad; they don't give a fuck about the raped underage girl, as you can clearly tell.

People aren't mad (mostly) because the tranny raped a girl; they are mad because the school and the Dems made it clear that the tranny is the VICTIM in this situation and parents being upset about it were the bad guys.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Donny Cheese, LurkNoMore, Zig Zag and 59 others
Trianon said:
Like believing that men can change their sex, believing abortion isn't killing a human being is an anti-science take that is becoming more and more impossible to justify. Remember, Roe v. Wade was established before ultrasounds. A huge majority of people support hard limitations on abortion (rape, incest, life of the mother) and maybe first trimester (which is medically irrelevant, so most conservative states would probably shift to heartbeat bills or force further research into fetal pain). The Dems are losing people on this issue too, though it's sort of hidden and wrapped into a black-and-white pro-life/pro-choice frame. The Dems cannot defend "up until the moment of labor" abortions, and any change to national abortion policy would force them to do so. The people who vote for abortion rights are already locked into the Democratic party, and their current policies are too extreme to bring new people on board. So I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that this issue would hurt the GOP.

Shifting gears, I don't think it's been brought up, but the girl who was raped by a troon in Loudoun County, Virginia, has been beaten up twice in the school as a result of reporting it. The second one happened the other day and is on video.

View attachment 2911059
View attachment 2911076

Is it even possible for the Va. GOP to overreact to this?
Click to expand...
She is getting beaten up by fellow zoomers for not supporting trannies, wtf is this insanity?
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Yamma Damma, Humble Crab and 19 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back