Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

What caused the massive shift in what progressive people preach? I recall the argument pre 2011 being “guys can have long hair, wear makeup, and put on dresses. It doesn’t mean they are men” to the post 2011 “if you are a man and you like pink you must be trans and just not know it yet?” Or that anyone that doesn’t rigidly adhere to sex stereotypes must be the cool and trendy ‘third gender’ of non-binary.

People were making a lot of progress with breaking down sex-based roles and promoting self-expression. Now, people are preaching the opposite. How did we get here?

I am still awestruck by the whole “non-binary/they them” mystical idiocy. I cannot even fathom how untethered that concept is from biological reality and it is incredible that the MSM is lending that nonsense any credence.
Social media+coomers.

I think you would be really hardpressed to find a "lesbian" trans women in any of the genderbending scenes in previous decades. The trans women who were there were all attracted to men, so they were gender variant dudes. Same thing for the few trans men that existed (they were always much rarer until recently), they were almost all lesbians. But modern discourse, especially powered by shit like twitter and tumblr, flattens nuance and reduces everything down to buzzwords. So you have these men, who are in some ways the literal opposite of flamboyant gay men, who fetishize elements of female socialization as literally embodying women, and they become the dominant voice in the community. Kinky straight people in general actually have fucked up a lot of this. There are people who go into "queer" spaces arguing that liking having your ball stepped on by a woman makes you not a straight man. If you're into sissy porn then you must be genderqueer! The gay community did a bad job of turning these people out, because being judged on sex was such a big part of gay oppression. Lines should have been drawn. As much as gay politics are partially about sex, they are (as corny as it sounds) really about love. But there's a lot of people who define themselves as "radical queers" now who don't have partners or have opposite sex partners, and their queerness is as made up as a trans person's transness is. They aren't interested in living a normal life, they want the label as a way of proving how cool they are.
 
Last edited:
One of the things that's comical about the modern trans movement is that it is literally trying to box everyone in to a specific label, when the whole point of the Rocky Horror/Ballroom genderbending scene in the 70s and 80s was about how meaningless these surface level things like clothes and makeup were.
I was just thinking about how RuPaul used to say "You can call me he, you can call me she, you can call me Regis and Kathy Lee!" God do I miss that kind of attitude.
 
What caused the massive shift in what progressive people preach? I recall the argument pre 2011 being “guys can have long hair, wear makeup, and put on dresses. It doesn’t mean they are men” to the post 2011 “if you are a man and you like pink you must be trans and just not know it yet?” Or that anyone that doesn’t rigidly adhere to sex stereotypes must be the cool and trendy ‘third gender’ of non-binary.

People were making a lot of progress with breaking down sex-based roles and promoting self-expression. Now, people are preaching the opposite. How did we get here?

I am still awestruck by the whole “non-binary/they them” mystical idiocy. I cannot even fathom how untethered that concept is from biological reality and it is incredible that the MSM is lending that nonsense any credence.
The pharmaceutical industry and autistic tech coomers joining forces to use the left’s own idpol oppression point system against itself to turn once hated mega corporations and rich white men into woke icons immune to criticism
 
I was just thinking about how RuPaul used to say "You can call me he, you can call me she, you can call me Regis and Kathy Lee!" God do I miss that kind of attitude.
When your politics are purely based on retweets and saying the right shibboleths, you don't notice when the actual underlying ideas shift radically. This isn't just the left, the right does this too, but lefty idpol is an excellent example of it. A decade and a half ago, people on the left wrote critiques of things like privilege theory as being anti-solidarity, because it focused on separating people into groups and treating those groups as immutable. Now you have "radical communists" saying that questioning the privilege of poor white people in Appalachia is tantamount to being a Nazi. Someone like Fred Hampton, who literally went and reached out to poor white southerners in the Young Patriots, would be declared a collaborationist today.

I mean, could you imagine any of the leftist bread tube people talking about white poverty today? Even thought statistically there are more poor whites in total than black and latino poor people combined, purely because of population? Same thing with trans women, who's "mental anguish" apparently matters more than men's even though, since men commit suicide at 4 times the rate women do and there are a shit ton more men than trans women, way more men will kill themselves in a given year than trans women will.

E: There's obviously a danger of whattaboutism, since different groups do experience things like poverty and suicide at different rates and for different reasons, but things like poor white people or male mental health are treated like punchlines in the modern online left. They are treated as unimportant and a joke. This is where the claims of "compassion" on the part of twitter leftists is such a joke. They dehumanize just as many people as a hardcore Nation of Islam member, they just pretend its about human rights.
 
Last edited:
Malevolent Grimace said:
the way AGP men fetishize womanhood is that almost always they don't fetishize pregnancy or childbirth, because that's not part of their weird lolita complex
But some do. When uterus transplant was in the news many troons, such as Jake Alley, counted on being the recipient one day. Particularly sick ones even fantasized getting pregnant on a dead woman's womb just so they could abort the baby. Nowadays you often hear trannies hoping for artificial wombs through tissue engineering. The pregnacy fetish is linked to masochism, which is almost universal among TiMs.

this beautiful non-binary couple was recently on the tv show Dr Phil. They were asked to define what a woman is, and both answered that they couldn't, because they weren't women
But I thought gender is a social construct? Which means every member of a society should at least have some idea what a "woman" is, regardless whether he or she is a woman or not?
 
But some do. When uterus transplant was in the news many troons, such as Jake Alley, counted on being the recipient one day. Particularly sick ones even fantasized getting pregnant on a dead woman's womb just so they could abort the baby. Nowadays you often hear trannies hoping for artificial wombs through tissue engineering. The pregnacy fetish is linked to masochism, which is almost universal among TiMs.
Yeah, this is probably part of the horrible sissy, subservience fetish so many of them have. The bolded line in particular made my skin crawl though, what a fucked up thing to imagine doing.

E: To make up for my troon political spergin, I went and looked up Christine McConnell, who was mentioned a few pages back:

Christine-McConnell-Instagram.jpg
Clipboard Image (3).jpg

He looks like a fake person, literally like a male mannequin dressed up like a woman in a department store window.
 
Last edited:
Andrea James' Kickstarter project to dox all transphobes had an update:
Thank you for your continued support! I have a couple of interesting updates on The Transphobia Project, which is starting to get granular enough to reveal some of the less obvious media gatekeepers at the heart of the anti-transgender movement in the English-speaking world.

I have been writing a ton of profiles of the key people, which I plan to connect to the interactive chart. It's a few hundred people causing ~95% of the problems, but that is still a LOT of people to research and profile.

The most difficult part is that I want this project to be dynamic, but the number of variables is mind-boggling. For now, I am using data snapshots to test a few things. I am also trying to plan for people gaming the system.

Above is an example of what I'm calling a layer of nodes. Eventually, each layer will affect the topmost layer, kind of like having a document with multiple sheets in Excel or other spreadsheet programs. Using a little Jaccard index wizardry, I am looking into reddit at the moment. It was the service of choice for anti-trans trolls for years before the company finally cracked down on hate groups after the murder of George Floyd. That led to the creation of reddit alternatives like Ovarit and SaidIt. Because SaidIt is relatively low volume and indexes very high for anti-trans users and content, I started with them to sample where anti-trans hate went on reddit after the big anti-trans groups were banned.

Participants on the SaidIt subreddit accrete into five reddit community clusters:

  • reddit critics
  • conspiracists
  • anti-porn / separatist lesbians
  • substance use / dependence
  • Axis/Nazi fans
  • 'Blocked & Reported' fans
'Blocked & Reported' is a podcast created since the start of this project. It is a "drama channel" (a lucrative kind of media that traffics in outrage) hosted by culture critics Katie Herzog and Jesse Singal. For those who are unfamiliar, I have profiled both of them on Transgender Map.

https://www.transgendermap.com/politics/media/saidit/

I am very grateful for your continued patience as I work on this extremely complex project. I can assure you that this will be worth the wait, but if you feel I have not met your expectations, please let me know. COVID completely shut down production for a while and delayed the completion of two of my feature films, forcing me to change how I cover my living expenses.

My best to you for 2022, and I will update you again in the fulness of time.
 
Holy shit, he's a nigra AND a AGP.
Interestingly enough I’ve noticed that the antisocial AGP/geeky programmer/gamer troons are almost always white. Black and latino MtFs seem to be overwhelmingly HSTS (a la the transsexual hookers outside Samantha Jones’ apartment in SATC)
 
Last edited:
Andrea James' Kickstarter project to dox all transphobes had an update:

giphy.gif


If you wrote the lyrics of this song out, it would be fucking incomprehensible to anyone not part of online troon culture. Just vague threats of violence and made up words like "cisbian".

I feel bad for lesbians. At least with gay men, FTMs don't have a physical advantage. You have these supposed women literally making threats of punching "cisbians" as a joke. That's fucked up.
 
Yet another “transbian”
46F62144-9A08-46EC-96F9-ADE4C215972D.jpeg
No, “ Nelly_Bean”, online spaces that are heavily infiltrated by troons masquerading as lesbians will never be representative of actual lesbian spaces.15CA3359-F096-4DE0-BC5E-DC3AC0AC8731.jpeg
Yes, you are reading this correctly. Lesbians, you’re sexuality is nothing more than an extension of your trauma.0F434588-1CA1-4793-A958-CC852D81494A.jpeg
This person actually believes this. And yes he identifies as a “transbian”.39BF7D69-E1DC-4E85-A45D-5FE712C83863.jpeg
Here, he is complaining about real life lesbian spaces again. Then states again that lesbians want nothing to do with him due to trauma. Of course, he has heard complaints from the “gay” trans guys who try to do exactly what he tries to do.
91150EA5-7640-4737-BBBA-8BE949AF0E19.jpeg
Feminism has taught lesbians to not find men sexually attractive.55B0B105-D63F-4EEB-883F-7715C351E0EA.jpeg
Exactly how it should be. Date/fuck each other.
694C611B-E8DA-4C43-B6D4-1F00DD3B8D53.jpeg
Just to reiterate for the final time, you’re sexual orientation = trauma/fear
7C8490C6-1008-4513-A171-F5777A918D08.jpeg
 
I didn't notice it until someone pointed it out but yeah, trannies really DO have a habit of posting selfies for no fucking reason in random groupchats. Like for a long time I was all "yeah ok" because it's a free form groupchat where anything goes, but now its been brought to my attention, they really do be wanting validation at every waking moment of the day.
 
Yet another “transbian”
View attachment 2911717
No, “ Nelly_Bean”, online spaces that are heavily infiltrated by troons masquerading as lesbians will never be representative of actual lesbian spaces.View attachment 2911719
Yes, you are reading this correctly. Lesbians, you’re sexuality is nothing more than an extension of your trauma.View attachment 2911726
This person actually believes this. And yes he identifies as a “transbian”.View attachment 2911728
Here, he is complaining about real life lesbian spaces again. Then states again that lesbians want nothing to do with him due to trauma. Of course, he has heard complaints from the “gay” trans guys who try to do exactly what he tries to do.
View attachment 2911731
Feminism has taught lesbians to not find men sexually attractive.View attachment 2911727
Exactly how it should be. Date/fuck each other.
View attachment 2911730
Just to reiterate for the final time, you’re sexual orientation = trauma/fear
View attachment 2911729

Looking like a woman is super important, the physical body is all that matters, saying someone is still a man even if they have boobs installed is transphobic.

For the act of sex however, focusing on the physical in any way is transphobic. How dare you care about the actual physical genitals you want to have sex with.
 
For anyone who finds Hunter Schafer attractive (just because he's more passable than most troons, especially in the voice department, for what little that means)...

Watch him enter the stage for this interview.

That is a male body. Very clearly male. A male frame in a dress. And it looks hideous.

Wow, that’s uncanny. To me he does pass when he’s sitting down (although I don’t consider myself that good at clocking MtFs) but as soon as he’s on his feet my brain just switches to “man in a dress.”

It’s not the height. I met a woman in a professional setting this week who was easily 6’4. The type you have to crane your neck up to talk to. But she just looked like a tall woman. Nothing would have signaled “male” even if you saw her from a distance. It's not the height or even just the broadness, it's everything together.

While googling the actor I found this:


An insider told pop culture site Deuxmoi that Barbie isn't "vibing" with the director.

"New season of Euphoria is going to be real DARK," the tipster revealed. "So much so that some actors, especially Barbie Ferreira, were not vibing with the director's vision."

Sounds like the male showrunner wants a bunch of graphic rape scenes. He also apparently directed a movie recently with a scene where his self-insert character (who he made black, hilariously) calls out a female reviewer who dared to give his last movie a bad review:


As Malcolm & Marie unfurls, Levinson shifts Malcolm’s voice from a black one, to the white director’s own. Suddenly, Malcolm isn’t decrying white critics any more. He is denouncing a white female critic. Emphasis on female. If Malcolm were a white man, such as Levinson, a critique Levinson anticipates when he employs Malcolm to censure pundits who play into identity politics with regard to film criticism, he would possess far less leeway to flog a female journalist to this degree. But through the mouth of a black man like Malcolm, a character who carries the weight of systematic oppression, even if he arises from a well-to-do background, such lines of attack are fair game. Even when they are in fact ambushes.

And here's his movie before that:

"Billed as a ‘satirical teen thriller’, Levinson’s film focuses heavily on the texts, sexts and salacious selfies that – according to mass media – are integral parts of the teen experience. Black humour hints at Heathers as an inspiration, but the aesthetic seems closer to Zack Snyder’s misguided 2011 thriller Sucker Punch."​

In other words, the creator is a spoiled rich white guy (he is the son of the guy who directer Rain Man) who consistently hides behind "minority representation" to communicate how much he loves scantily clad teenagers and hates uppity females who disagree with him. I'm shocked, shocked, that the same showrunner would be into platforming a trans actor.

Can we get a betting pool going on how long until he troons out himself?

What caused the massive shift in what progressive people preach? I recall the argument pre 2011 being “guys can have long hair, wear makeup, and put on dresses. It doesn’t mean they are men” to the post 2011 “if you are a man and you like pink you must be trans and just not know it yet?” Or that anyone that doesn’t rigidly adhere to sex stereotypes must be the cool and trendy ‘third gender’ of non-binary.

People were making a lot of progress with breaking down sex-based roles and promoting self-expression. Now, people are preaching the opposite. How did we get here?

I am still awestruck by the whole “non-binary/they them” mystical idiocy. I cannot even fathom how untethered that concept is from biological reality and it is incredible that the MSM is lending that nonsense any credence.
lol you can’t make money telling people to accept who they are. Where’s the profit in that?

This guy says it well:

The nature of advertising has to be understood. Advertising is not the neutral act of informing market participants of the qualities of the products that might be available to them, as economists would like to think it is. Instead, advertising and its related activities of marketing and market research create the opportunity to sell those things for which need (let alone desire) does not exist. As such advertising is not a response to the market; advertising is instead the force that creates markets.
In this case advertising provides biased information that is in very many cases targeted very specifically at audiences whose vulnerability has been profoundly understood by the advertiser. The whole purpose of advertising ... is not to inform, but to spread dissatisfaction. Its intention is to make the person who is the target of the advertising campaign feel that their current consumption is inadequate and that they must have the item being promoted to achieve a proper sense of well-being. Advertising, therefore, is not an action designed to promote the benefits of ownership of the product it refers to; instead advertising is deliberately designed to make a person feel their current position is inadequate but that this current state would be remedied if only they consumed more of a particular item.


Transgenderism is an ad campaign to create new consumers.
 
Back