- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
This would be the dream scenario for the Americans. They've got C-RAM plus god knows what else and it's cheap enough to deploy.Interesting case made here: Russia doesn't move to occupy, just blasts the Ukrainian army from afar and then besieges Kiev to demand a political settlement. Avoids the costs of the western equipment that has been provided (short range anti tank missiles and MANPADS), avoids areas where insurgency would be most effective(urban), and leverages Russia's largest advantage over the ukranians (ballistic/cruise missiles and air power).
People are expecting the Russians to charge across the border like Poland 1939, they may copy the Americans and just blast the shit out of the Ukrainians for a few weeks before crossing over. Then I suspect they will see how much Ukranian resistance remains before they go for unequal peace treaty vs puppet government (the Ukranian oligarchs only interest is self interest and some may align with the Russians if that's the way the wind is blowing)
![]()
Moscow’s Compellence Strategy - Foreign Policy Research Institute
How ambitious are Russia's foreign policy objectives, and how much force does Moscow believe it must employ to achieve them? Moscow has submitted variouswww.fpri.org
No, if Russia wants to force the issue, it has to charge across the border because it's not going to win an artillery fight against US tech. And Russia knows this - "boots on the ground" has been a nightmare scenario for any US politician since 2008 and so pursuing courses that require American boots on the ground is the best way to cuck Uncle Sam out of an effective intervention.