Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Caster doesn't even have complete CAIS, he should never have been allowed to compete with the women. Most comprehensive source here about his biography and the conditions around him that enabled this.
Poor boy who could run somewhat faster than most and then gladly took the hand the SA sports officials extended to him. His whole participation in any international sports event is part of a con. He was running with the boys when he was a child, his teachers used male pronouns for him, he played like a boy and even went through an icky girls phase.
40 years before Caster, there was a skier who was diagnosed with the same. Caster was put on a cringy PR campaign and everyone cried he was a real woman:
View attachment 2907680
The skier from 40 years ago? He was stripped of his medals, decided to undergo surgery to "pull out his buried penis", changed his name from Erika to Erik and became a ski instructor when he was prevented from participating with the men.
And even men with complete CAIS still have the advantage of male pelvis positioning, male extremities proportions, male response times, male spacial perception and male muscles, like Maria Rodriguez Patino. I really feel for these people as individuals. But they aren't women. They are men with some funky DNA. And women who have higher testosterone and have no issues from it shouldn't be made to lower it.
@Marvin And people with actual CAIS like Dalea Rundblad or other intersex conditions can be women or whatever. The mentioned athletes aren't.

I wonder what he is on:)

Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
CAIS is by far one of the most complex DSD because it involves both the Y and SRY gene. They all belong under the AIS umbrella. CAIS, despite the presence of the Y and SRY gene, does not lead to masculinization or Wolffian structures. If there are testes, they do not produce sperm, are undescended, and generally become tumorous. Like De La Chapelle syndrome, who can have fallopian tubes or even a uterus, those are males as they do not produce eggs and generally do not have Mullerian structures.

Those who suffer from CAIS will develop a clitoris, a labia, and a shallow vagina, but they do not have ovaries. These undescended testicles, suffering from androgen insensitivity, do not develop normally. So they are, in effect, just blobs of flesh. As a result, all CAIS sufferers are infertile.

CAIS and AIS are differentiated by the degree of masculinization. If you have PAIS, you will have functional testes and will produce sperm, and a tiny but workable penis. MAIS leads to normal male development.

CAIS sufferers do not develop Mullerian structures either, and where the uterus and fallopian tubes would be are empty pouches. However, since androgen receptors basically don't work, they are technically female despite the XY there. If the SRY is defective or does not work, then it still leads to feminization.

So I would have to say that CAIS leads to women, PAIS leads to males, and MAIS leads to males.
No, they do produce sperm, it just doesn't mature beyond first stage so isn't anyway viable and just get reabsorbed. So they are sterile but that sperm production is still kinda there.
They are fully infertile; they produce neither eggs or sperm. Their undescended testes will become atrophic as they are present in a 'female' body. They must be removed or else they will become cancerous.
Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.

We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.

In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.


The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.

I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologically female is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
As said above, CAIS is really complicated. But from looking at the range of AIS, CAIS does seem to lead to females despite the presence of the Y and SRY. The SRY lead to those testes and AMH did not lead to fallopian tubes or other female anatomy but they have no prostate and no other male anatomy is present. They develop female bodies and do have higher-than-average testosterone.
I covered this troon, he was the one holding the rifle to the mirror. As predicted, that icon is heavily Photoshopped. He looks like your average male twink in untouched photos.
 
Wow, I think I've found the lowest effort troon so far in VRChat. This dude goes by the name "Serena" and he doesn't even remotely try sounding like a waman. His VRC+ profile picture is literally the troon flag with She/Her text on it. Makes me think if he's just a troll.
Also, I noticed that a vast majority of troons in VRChat are Americans. There's one Dutch troon that I know, who has questionable priorities and his troonery is questionable as well, but other than him, all Americans.

*Edit*: Oh god! I later found out that the lobby was relatively filled with troons, somehow! One of them even knowing some VTuber apparently. And before you ask, this was the first time I saw so many troons in one place in VRChat!
 
Last edited:
Found a Google Doc that was recommended on Reddit. The author, Luke Fawcett, has entire sections on how puberty blockers are safe and if you get trans kids young, they can't desist at all:

This myth is based off of the faulty assumption that transgender youth under the age of 12 get some or any form of gender confirming surgery or hormone therapy. This is simply untrue. Common headlines like “4 year old youngest sex change” are masked in false claims and conflate social transition with surgery and hormones. The standard age for hormone therapy is 16 (Endocrine Society, Family court lawyers indicate that hormone therapy is typically attained at age 16, and the NHS recommends starting at 16 years of age). Research into ages of teens that being hormone therapy indicated a median age of 17.9 and 17.3 ranging from 13.3 to 22.3 years at one clinic and another clinic in Holland had mean age of initation of 16.4-16.7, with minimum ages ranging from 13.9-14.9. The typical minimum for GCS is 18 years of age (WPATH page 60, Unicare, and the ICD-10) and the lowest reported case is Kim Petras at 16. For chest reconstructive surgery, the mean age of surgery was 17.2, and only 3 patients were under 16 years of age. Kids simply aren’t being rushed into transitioning.
"Kids aren't being transitioned"
> Has clinics where the average age is THIRTEEN YEARS OLD

For the 'trans people in history' it falsely claims Marsha Johnson was at the Stonewall riots (he and Sylvia Rivera arrived after the riots were over), and there's a mention of Chevalier d'Eon.

d'Eon was a male who had fully developed breasts. He petitioned the Royal Court to get female documents and was granted that request, in 1774. It is likely he had Klinefelter Syndrome, as he had rounder limbs, and was rounder in the face.

There is even a study on how Stumpdicks lead to greater sexual satisfaction. Also says hormone therapy doesn't increase cancer risk, but the cross sex hormones invariably do, such as thrombolysis and heart attacks.

Here is the puberty blocker section:

This just simply isn't supported by the evidence. They are safe and not harmful to bone growth, and don't affect greater brain function. The few negative effects of puberty blockers do not change children's minds. Puberty blockers are also easily and permanently reversible, and this has happened successfully in the past before. No clinically significant effects on physiologic parameters were noted. Both the Endocrine Society and WPATH recommend puberty suppression for transgender children.Important evidence to consider is the evidence of the efficacy and safety of puberty blockers to treat children with precocious puberty. GnRH is safe in children with precocious puberty. There is no negative impact on bone mineral density or reproductive function and the treatment did not cause or aggravate obesity. Two years after therapy, bone mineral density and BMD scores for bone age and chronological age were normal, and percentage body fat reached normative values one year after treatment. Menstrual pattern was normal, BMD was normal after treatment, and hormonal values, ovarian and uterine dimensions were normal after treatment. Long-term leuprorelin treatment had no effect on reproductive function. There is little to no evidence of long-term changes resulting from GnRH agonists. Psychosocial problems are improved with puberty blockers, as well as a reduction in loneliness and behavioral problems. Treatment has no effect on BMI. There is significant evidence that puberty blockers can improve children’s quality of life and in some cases, save children’s lives. A common argument about puberty blockers comes from TERFs and “GC” types, and sometimes from the right-wing (oh wait I already talked about them 😏) is that puberty blockers cause infertility. There is no risk of fertility from puberty blockers. If a child goes directly from puberty blockers to hormone therapy without going through ‘normal puberty’, that’s when it causes infertility. Puberty blockers themself cannot cause infertility.
One of the articles argues that puberty should outright be stopped in 'trans' kids. Because it'll 'save their lives'. Many studies contradict each other, with one arguing BMI increase to another saying it never increased. We also know Lupron is indeed dangerous and it took until 2019 for the truth to come to light.

Despite GnRH analogue treatment being used in precocious puberty for more than 20 years, there are no randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of GnRHa on a final height compared with untreated controls. The majority of studies compare pretreatment predicted final height data with final attained adult height. The effectiveness of GnRHa treatment can probably only be evaluated by comparing final height data in current treated cohorts with historical data from untreated patients

(...)
More than 20 years of experience with GnRHa treatment in CPP has provided important data on outcome regarding reproduction, body mass index and bone mineral density. There is reassuring evidence that gonadal function is reactivated soon after cessation of treatment. Again, the information is confined mainly to females. Mean time to menarche post-treatment is 16 months with normal pattern of menses; reproductive potential appears normal in young adulthood with healthy offspring of those who became pregnant (31, 35). There appears to be no increased risk of ovulatory dysfunction associated with factors such as hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome, and GnRHa treatment per se does not lead to obesity. However, fat mass is increased at the start of and during early treatment, but normalizes thereafter (36). Similarly, increased bone mineral density at the outset had normalized for both bone age and chronological age within 2 years of treatment cessation.

While there is evidence that early puberty can be associated with aberrant sexual activities and antisocial behaviour in late adolescence, there are no data on the effects of any treatment intervention on longer term outcome with respect to any psychopathologies. Embarking on treatment for the individual child with CPP is not underpinned by any comprehensive evaluation of the long-term outcome data at a population level.
Yeah *cough* that's reassuring.
 
Oh they wouldn't dare shut down rape shelters
Oh they wouldn't dare send rape threats to victims of rape
Oh they wouldn't dare post porn on JRK twitter threads where she reviews art from children
Oh they wouldn't dare get academics fired for investigating the long term effects of transgender medicine.


I'm pretty sure these people are not above sending rape and death threats to older black women. How many times have you seen a "black trans lives matter" sign at a blm rally. Sure they may support BLM, but only if they can pump their agenda into it. I really think they would dare to do this.
That's the logical thought process. But these people aren't logical. Most of those women in those situations haven't been black. Maybe it's because theres less black women in those fields, but we know that black people as a whole do not care for the troon shit compared to white people and there hasn't been a mass "black people need to accept the girldick/boipussy" campaign but there sure has for lesbians and white gay men. TRAs love to call radfeminism "white feminism" when radfeminism is probably the most popular among countries outside of the west. They do chant black trans lives matter, but attacking black people would leave them without a huge platform to piggyback on since TRAs rely on BLM activists. I think they would only be comfortable with turning against black people when BLM becomes cancelled, and I don't see that coming anytime soon.
 
Marsha P Johnson specifically identified as a transvestite, and is on the record as saying she would not surgically transition. That was firmly part of the genderfuck type of outward presentation that gay men adopted at the time, since their manhood was dismissed and criminalized by mainstream society. There has never been any evidence that Marsha or Sylvia experienced "Gender Dysphoria", and neither surgically transitioned or took hormones (except for Sylvia near the very end of her life). The fluidity of their presentation and even what they identified as (which like Rupaul was very much a "who cares what you call me" attitude) was specifically about pushing back against the strict gender roles of American society at the time.

Essentially, modern trans activists are doing the same thing as they did with the other gender role breaking figures of history, they are misinterpreting the historical context of even the recent past to argue for a conception of gender that is entirely new and alien.
 
Marsha P Johnson specifically identified as a transvestite, and is on the record as saying she would not surgically transition. That was firmly part of the genderfuck type of outward presentation that gay men adopted at the time, since their manhood was dismissed and criminalized by mainstream society. There has never been any evidence that Marsha or Sylvia experienced "Gender Dysphoria", and neither surgically transitioned or took hormones (except for Sylvia near the very end of her life). The fluidity of their presentation and even what they identified as (which like Rupaul was very much a "who cares what you call me" attitude) was specifically about pushing back against the strict gender roles of American society at the time.

Essentially, modern trans activists are doing the same thing as they did with the other gender role breaking figures of history, they are misinterpreting the historical context of even the recent past to argue for a conception of gender that is entirely new and alien.
I also think Johnson was slow AF.
 
“I masturbated, but couldn’t get off! I’m a real girl now! That’s a chick thing, right? I know none of the chicks i had sex with got off so… i guess it is”

I mean that person agreed to a date in the first place, how messed up/ desperate were they?
Probably responded to a heavily photoshopped pfp, and didn’t dive into his social media until later.
 
What's with the troon fixation on "existing"? Apparently not indulging in a fantasy-fetish is the same as pretending someone isn't human? In that case, do troons "exist" at all outside of preaching girldick online?
This question just started my brain spinning:

For a woman, or man, gay or straight, if they were alone on an island, you could still observe them and determine what they are based on appearance and behavior (let's say there's porn available). For a troon, what they look like doesn't indicate their gender, what they act like doesn't indicate their gender, what their genitals are (or and other biological marker) doesn't indicate their gender. The only thing that seems to confirm their gender exists is the act of someone else acknowledging it. Without that, their own definition states that their gender identity is unknowable externally. In a sense, it doesn't exist until they get someone else to say it does.

I'm tired and I'm not sure I'm making sense, but like, none of the groups they compare themselves to relies on this acknowledgment by others to confirm its existence.
 
This question just started my brain spinning:

For a woman, or man, gay or straight, if they were alone on an island, you could still observe them and determine what they are based on appearance and behavior (let's say there's porn available). For a troon, what they look like doesn't indicate their gender, what they act like doesn't indicate their gender, what their genitals are (or and other biological marker) doesn't indicate their gender. The only thing that seems to confirm their gender exists is the act of someone else acknowledging it. Without that, their own definition states that their gender identity is unknowable externally. In a sense, it doesn't exist until they get someone else to say it does.

I'm tired and I'm not sure I'm making sense, but like, none of the groups they compare themselves to relies on this acknowledgment by others to confirm its existence.
Hisentroon uncertainty principle. Alternatively troon quantum theory.
 
Essentially, modern trans activists are doing the same thing as they did with the other gender role breaking figures of history, they are misinterpreting the historical context of even the recent past to argue for a conception of gender that is entirely new and alien.
They are so desperate for an Alan Turing or a Oliver Sacks.

Are there any Troons out there who actually accomplished anything historically? I know Buffalo Bill made a belt out of women's nipples.
 
You will not take our First Ammendment right to speak out against your degenerate cult, troon. Bug off and jack off in your skirt and thigh highs: "The right to gender and self expression should be added to the US Constitution in either a new amendment or to the first amendment.":

Screenshot_20220124-021707_Reddit.jpg
j115op1g9kd81.jpg


(same user) And the right to castrate yourself. Still cis tho!: 😜

Screenshot_20211211-101154_Boost.jpg


Are there any Troons out there who actually accomplished anything historically? I know Buffalo Bill made a belt out of women's nipples.

There was a recent 4chan LGBT thread where the transcels were boasting about how superior they were to the cisbiofoids. They kept repeating that women haven't contributed anything in tech. You could just as easily turn that around on them. I can't think of a single troon who contributed anything significant in tech after trooning out, lmao. It's even more remarkable when you consider troons in tech are the peak of male privilege. Even the TIM who designed the ARM architecture did it a decade before trooning out.


 
Last edited:
That's the logical thought process. But these people aren't logical. Most of those women in those situations haven't been black. Maybe it's because theres less black women in those fields, but we know that black people as a whole do not care for the troon shit compared to white people and there hasn't been a mass "black people need to accept the girldick/boipussy" campaign but there sure has for lesbians and white gay men. TRAs love to call radfeminism "white feminism" when radfeminism is probably the most popular among countries outside of the west. They do chant black trans lives matter, but attacking black people would leave them without a huge platform to piggyback on since TRAs rely on BLM activists. I think they would only be comfortable with turning against black people when BLM becomes cancelled, and I don't see that coming anytime soon.
The founder of the UK LGB Alliance is a black lesbian called Allison Bailey. She was hounded out of Stonewall and when that wasn't enough to shut her up, Stonewall demanded she be investigated by her chambers for hate speech in an attempt to have her barred from practising law. She is currently suing them. Bailey is considered a top Terf in the UK over her role in the LGB Alliance, being labled and auntie Tom. There is literally no one these people won't harrass. They are men afterall.

Edit: the trans community have also demonized valid black women like Rachel Dolezal just for being transracial.
 
Last edited:
There was a recent 4chan LGBT thread where the transcels were boasting about how superior they were to the cisbiofoids. They kept repeating that women haven't contributed anything in tech. You could just as easily turn that around on them. I can't think of a single troon who contributed anything in tech after trooning out, lmao. It's even more remarkable when you consider troons in tech are the peak of male privilege.


I really hope they're just being edgy because that thread is seriously revolting.
 
The founder of the UK LGB Alliance is a black lesbian called Allison Bailey. She was hounded out of Stonewall and when that wasn't enough to shut her up, Stonewall demanded she be investigated by her chambers for hate speech in an attempt to have her barred from practising law. She is currently suing them. Bailey is considered a top Terf in the UK over her role in the LGB Alliance, being labled and auntie Tom. There is literally no one these people won't harrass. They are men afterall.
Yea, thats a good point. My thought process was focused on the behavior of American Troonery. Americans probably view black people as a protected class more than the British do. Either way, I stand corrected.
 
/r/detrans is living proof that the problem doesn't go away when these folks come off hormones. A particularly interesting post caught my eye about how an FTM was mad that they were allowed to get their tits lobbed off at the age of 18.

View attachment 2914142

While there is an element of trannies getting pushed in that general direction, I noticed a bunch of red flags that popped up that indicate that the user is still sipping the narcissist juice: They essentially say they are physically repulsed by their body and are feeling suicidal over it and then merely seconds later whine about how they shouldn't have gotten surgery while suicidal and how they could have probably came to terms with them. No matter how horrifying the body horror is in this rant, there's one major thing that pulses throughout it "It wasn't my fault". It's the tranny doctrine of wanting two completely polar opposite things and then getting confused when told it's impossible.

Ultimately it's up to THEM to decide whether or not they should get the incredibly risky surgery, and when given all the options to and essentially screaming into therapists pillows about how without it they'd be dead... they're amazed that doctors think that the surgery should go ahead? This emotionally manipulative piece of shit that's BEGGING for surgery?

I fully expect them to REtrans at some point because they will have zero quality of life no matter what body they end up with. And probably neckrope. I'm sure if they could, they'd find a way of blaming death for not being what they expected either.
Yeah but to be fair, if you want to learn to deal with something bothering you often the first step is naming everything you hate and feel bad about it. No matter how dumb, unfair, selfish or shortsighted those thoughts are. When you put it in words, more detail the better, it stops being just this bad messy lump of feelings that nags in a background. It's now a much more concrete problem that you have much easier time finding solutions for. Often saying it all aloud points out that what you have been worrying isn't the actual problem, it sounds so shallow and stupid when it's not just in your head. It was all a cover for your actual issues that you can see now more clearly and go on solving.

Like she said this wasn't something she had do before getting her tits cut off. She only had say "I just don't like them okey?" rather than articulate why she didn't like them. Her saying now in detail why she hates her flatness can be a good sign, as long as she doesn't stop there. She still needs acceptance of her bad choices and find peace with her regrets, make the best out of the bad situation. She was a dumb kid with issues, she needed more protection and was able to do more damage because lack of it, but it was still her choice. The best she can do now is learn from it. Next time she is feeling bad, she should look deeper rather than do something drastic without reflection.
 
Last edited:
How can we get these losers and society at large to stop calling us 'cisgender'?
What really baffles me is terms like "cis lesbian" and "cis gay". Five years ago it would be an absolute glibberish, but since opression olympics demand them to have more and more opressed groups, they just keep splintering lol. Waiting for the "cis trans" or maybe it is already there lol
 
/r/detrans is living proof that the problem doesn't go away when these folks come off hormones. A particularly interesting post caught my eye about how an FTM was mad that they were allowed to get their tits lobbed off at the age of 18.

View attachment 2914142

While there is an element of trannies getting pushed in that general direction, I noticed a bunch of red flags that popped up that indicate that the user is still sipping the narcissist juice: They essentially say they are physically repulsed by their body and are feeling suicidal over it and then merely seconds later whine about how they shouldn't have gotten surgery while suicidal and how they could have probably came to terms with them. No matter how horrifying the body horror is in this rant, there's one major thing that pulses throughout it "It wasn't my fault". It's the tranny doctrine of wanting two completely polar opposite things and then getting confused when told it's impossible.

Ultimately it's up to THEM to decide whether or not they should get the incredibly risky surgery, and when given all the options to and essentially screaming into therapists pillows about how without it they'd be dead... they're amazed that doctors think that the surgery should go ahead? This emotionally manipulative piece of shit that's BEGGING for surgery?

I fully expect them to REtrans at some point because they will have zero quality of life no matter what body they end up with. And probably neckrope. I'm sure if they could, they'd find a way of blaming death for not being what they expected either.

Why was I allowed to do this?????


Bitch you know why, if anyone tried to say anything about how this maybe wasn't a good idea you would have thrown a fucking fit and labelled them bigots. If she claims otherwise she is a straight up liar.
 
I also think Johnson was slow AF.
I swear a few years ago there was a study posted that showed that black male HSTS/drag queen types were the lowest IQ alphabet people. I know it sounds unbelievable that such a study would be allowed, but I *know* I saw it. Of course cannot find it now, but maybe someone else also has a memory of this?
 
Back