That the most confusing aspect about his art, it only works at being competent in this narrow field of 1960's - 1970's super hero comic book aesthetic and only when drawing human characters. That in itself is not necessarily bad, it narrows its appeal but it could find a niche audience and only so long it is done in black and white. Which is why it is so baffling to me that the hill he has chosen to die on is a comic with anthro characters he draw like uncanny abominations and done in color. The moment he puts color to his work it doesn't just "brings it down a little", it shits the bed. He has some of the worst understanding of color theory I've seen and his shading is not good either.
I'm going to be honest, even his "best" line and ink work is average. Nothing he has drawn is the type of stuff that would make me stop and take notice, there is nothing awesome or jaw dropping about it. "Middle of the road" is how I can describe his best, which would be fine if at least his writing made up for the shortcomings of his art, but we all know how terrible his stories are as well. Add to that the fact that he is petulant, arrogant, has an unwarranted sense of self-importance and cannot shut up about his political hot takes. What audience would want to support such person?
Furthermore, the crass entitlement with which he expropriate other creator's works and claim it as his own and then becomes litigious about even the slightest similarity found in any tangential piece of media makes sure that no sane creator who values his work would collaborate with him.
It doesn't matter how much he tries to peddle his art, his NFTs or license "his" characters, his actions have ostracized potential audience and professionals in the field. Someone has to be completely ignorant or out of their minds to support him in any way .