As a fellow artist, I can sympathize with him. There have been times when I've made pro-globohomo art for furries, when I don't believe it myself. You can't really determine the artist's true beliefs from a single image about it.
But this is an editorial cartoon, so lol. You chose to draw it yourself, the idea coming from you. You could've easily put nuance into an editorial cartoon. Picture's worth a thousand words, after all. Pathetic. And even if you were commissioned for the image, perhaps by the writer of the article (don't know the original article it most likely accompanied so giving the benefit of the doubt), your pinned tweet could've said that, instead of this which I don't even see how it's him backpedalling.
Sorry for reply to old post, still going through the thread.