Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Useful_Mistake]

Good God that was fast. Haven't even read it yet, but do we have an expected timeframe for the next court-thingey?

For the love of God, what is so hard about reading THREE lines?

According to his own filing, Russhole did in fact propose that agreement, but he had his fingers crossed behind his back so it shouldn't count! Wait, no, he misspoke and didn't mean to say that. Wait, no, he did mean to say that, but only because the mean lady lawyer was laughing at him HOW DARE SHE!

View attachment 2965292

Admitting to a judge that you were outright LYING to opposing counsel as part of "reverse psychology" can't be a good look, right? That has to make it transparent to the judge that Russhole is acting in bad faith here.

He does realize that Fremantle showed that he actually emailed them asking for them to arbitrate, right?

is is the Judge Absolutely required to kick it over to arbitration?

Pretty much.

Given that Russhole has submitted a declaration, could the Defense respond in kind?

They had submitted their own declaration

 

[talk talk talk]

Judging by how poorly written the latest documents are, I fear Russhole has shoved one too many chess pieces up his nose.

Judging by the time of the screenshots he attached to his declaration, he stayed up all night writing this.

Remember--the motion to compel arbitration was filed on Friday. It's only Monday now. I doubt Russhole slept a wink over the weekend. Fueled by narc rage and Colossal Crunch the same way a Beat poet is fueled by Benzedrine and cheap wine, he cranked out this masterpiece.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

 

[DrJonesHat]

So when Freemantle responds. does Russ get a response to that, or can the judge go ahead and rule on the motion?

 

[The Dude]

Russhole's prior lawsuits, court filings, and restraining orders absolutely are germane to the situation at hand, and for various reasons. For one thing, they establish a history of Russhole filing bad faith lawsuits in an effort to use the legal system as a weapon to get his way from others when they tell him "no". They also detail that Russ has a troubling history of behaving in an obsessive, possessive, potentially dangerous manner when a woman has his attention, and he himself has voiced his desire to meet Heidi Klum and present his song to her in an effort to gain her attention to the court. Bringing his prior experiences with the legal system establishes that Russ is a liability and potentially dangerous which justifies AGT's decision to deny him from competing.

It does not matter that Russ "didn't fully understand" what he was agreeing to when he signed his contract to audition. He still agreed to all the terms and conditions on that contract, including arbitration. It was his obligation to read the contract thoroughly in order to understand what he was agreeing to. It just like ignorance of a law does not exempt one from being held accountable under that law.

Finally, it doesn't matter if Russhole "truly believes that he's a good person". It doesn't matter if he believes he's mentally sound and healthy. What matters is if OTHER people believe Russ is a good person or mentally sound, and people will only believe that if reality supports those conclusions. And the reality is that Russ is not a good person, nor is he mentally sound. The way he has behaved for years has made fully evident that he's a shitty person and his mind functions in an abnormal, unhealthy, and flat-out bizarre manner. No normal, rational person behaves the way Russ does, nor do they believe the things he believes. Everyone believes they're a good person. Everyone believes they're the hero in their own story. Sometimes the facts just don't fit with that narrative, and Russ is a clear example of that.

 

[Rasputin's Side Piece]

Wait...he's a "PARALEGAL." And he's "THE BEST." But he didn't understand that he should read the release and associated documents before signing them???

What a flaming, raging JACKASS.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So when Freemantle responds. does Russ get a response to that, or can the judge go ahead and rule on the motion?

The Judge could rule now, if she so chose. But no, Russ won't be able to respond.

 

[Miss Misery]

You literally sued a woman because she wouldn't fuck you after your sex time ran out. To the extent that Hof would consider it unfair, it is hardly relevant. What is relevant however is this restraining order the judge put on you for this lawsuit. I wonder why?

Isn't it highly rumored that Russ wrote that letter from Hof himself? I know it's hearsay from Russell's old boss who was supposedly asked by Rusty to proofread it, but what we've seen of it certainly sounds like it was written by Russell. Not to mention he didn't subpoena Hof in that case... (although was he dead at that point?)

 

[Non-Threatening Niall]

"...they looked for unique acts. Writing a song about a show judge is pretty darn unique"
"He shouldn't have to pay 1k dollars for meeting a pop star that was rather cruel to him and said meeting still gives him nightmares"
"Now onto the meat of the matter"


And the mad bastard has the audacity of saying the arbitration clause seemed written by an unpaid intern. And also, the audacity of saying the Ariana Grande lawsuit is irrelevant when the "meat of the matter" was MUH EQUAL ACCESS TO PLACES OF PUBLIC ENJOYMENT, yet brings up his suit against nool and Kiwi Farms (a website), which has fuck all to do with anything, while heavily implying Zac & Molly omitted it out of malice.

The way that entire document is written kinda reminds me of when Ricky from Trailer Park Boys asks the judge to let him swear in court cos otherwise he wouldn't be able to defend his case.

"It was in all caps in big letters making it hard to read"

Yeah, fucking lost it there

I'm not a burger or a lawyer, but I'm fairly well acquainted with the ADA for... powerlevelly reasons (and no, I'm not physically disabled either, mind). If Pipsqueak sued or appealed or whatever on those grounds, he'd have a slightly less flimsy excuse for an actionable cause against Fremantle under the ADA than the one he has now with The Accommodations.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

. (although was he dead at that point?)

The email is allegedly from 2015. Hof died in 2018

Isn't it highly rumored that Russ wrote that letter from Hof himself? I know it's hearsay from Russell's old boss who was supposedly asked by Rusty to proofread it, but what we've seen of it certainly sounds like it was written by Russell.

It could be written by Russ and signature faked, but until I have concrete proof of that I'll assume Hof wrote it. Not really relevant any way.

 

[Pee Cola]

They had submitted their own declaration
View attachment 2965734

Of course. ngl I'm having a hard time keeping up. It's now obvious to me that Russhole's declaration is intended as a rebuttal to Molly's.

Considering that Molly's declaration was lodged on 4 February, I find this email very interesting:

Note it was sent by Russhole on 4 February 2022 at 11:06pm (presumably Russhole's local time), which suggests this could be his initial reaction to the MCA filing and Molly's declaration (both of which were filed earlier on 4 February).

What's even more interesting is that Russhole apologizes about his earlier emails, implying they were somehow problematic. Despite this, Molly has chosen to omit these emails from her declaration (the most recent email in her declaration being Russhole's meltdown at Zachary on 19 January).

Whilst it's probably no-one's business as to why Molly made the decision to omit these later emails, I might as well speculate anyway. In a word: professionalism. Seeing Russhole's nasty emails won't make the MCA filing any stronger and airing any more of Russhole's dirty laundry than absolutely necessary (and a lot of it was aired in the MCA) would be pointless.

By including this email in his declaration, Russhole has basically tattled on himself, yet he didn't need to.

I might have to step away from the computer for a while.

The Judge could rule now, if she so chose. But no, Russ won't be able to respond.

Am reading this correctly... does this mean Molly could choose to respond to Russhole's declaration and she'd get the final word before the judge makes their ruling?

 

[Non-Threatening Niall]

Isn't it highly rumored that Russ wrote that letter from Hof himself? I know it's hearsay from Russell's old boss who was supposedly asked by Rusty to proofread it, but what we've seen of it certainly sounds like it was written by Russell. Not to mention he didn't subpoena Hof in that case... (although was he dead at that point?)

"Mr HOf (sic) thinks... Signed, Dennis Hof" sounds like a dead giveaway to me.

 

[Andrew Neiman]

Assorted thoughts on Russell's latest literary work:

Russell refers to Zachary Dekel simply as "Zach."

Russell keeps writing figures of money as, for instance, "1K dollars" rather than "$1,000." There are also a few mid-sized typos, such as repeatedly misspelling Zachary Dekel's last name.

Greer is being represented by the Digital Justice Foundation in that appeal because they feel so extremely sorry for the hate Greer has had to deal with.

Greer wears this like a badge of honor. It's so strange to see someone literally boasting about the fact that people feel sorry for him.

I, Russell Greer, declare as follows. 1. I am 30 years old and am employed.

Keeping his place of employment secret is one of the only wise moves Russell has made in years.

I admittedly MISSPOKE by saying if Fremantle paid for my arbitration, I would do that.

With all the bolding and dramatic use of caps in this document, it's only a matter of time until Russell starts switching up the fonts too.

I declare that I was using puffery and I misrepresented my intent.

There are a couple of passages where Russell vigorously talks himself down for some reason -- for instance, where he describes his Ariana Grande lawsuit as "dumb." This is a real break from form for the usually braggadocious Russell. I wonder what's behind it.

It could have been worded better, sure.

I love how Russell veers wildly between pseudo-legalese and this sort of extremely casual phrasing.

 

[The Dude]

Of course. ngl I'm having a hard time keeping up. It's now obvious to me that Russhole's declaration is intended as a rebuttal to Molly's.

Considering that Molly's declaration was lodged on 4 February, I find this email very interesting:

View attachment 2965773View attachment 2965775View attachment 2965776
Note it was sent by Russhole on 4 February 2022 at 11:06pm (presumably Russhole's local time), which suggests this could be his initial reaction to the MCA filing and Molly's declaration (both of which were filed earlier on 4 February).

What's even more interesting is that Russhole apologizes about his earlier emails, implying they were somehow problematic. Despite this, Molly has chosen to omit these emails from her declaration (the most recent email in her declaration being Russhole's meltdown at Zachary on 19 January).

Whilst it's probably no-one's business as to why Molly made the decision to omit these later emails, I might as well speculate anyway. In a word: professionalism. Seeing Russhole's nasty emails won't make the MCA filing any stronger and airing Russhole's dirty laundry would only risk further provocation (at least in theory).

By including this email in his declaration, Russhole has basically tattled on himself, yet he didn't need to.

I might have to step away from the computer for a while.

Except that Russhole DID agree to arbitration. He agreed to it long before he filed for this lawsuit. Russ agreed to arbitration when he signed his contract to audition. It doesn't matter if he didn't understand the clause. It doesn't matter if it was poorly written or in BOLD ALL CAPS that was hard for him to read. That's his problem and no one else's. It was his responsibility and obligation to read the contract thoroughly and understand what he was agreeing to before signing a legally binding contract. What he did or did not agree to in the emails is totally irrelevant.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Except that Russhole DID agree to arbitration. He agreed to it long before he filed for this lawsuit. Russ agreed to arbitration when he signed his contract to audition. It doesn't matter if he didn't understand the clause. It doesn't matter if it was poorly written or in BOLD ALL CAPS that was hard for him to read. That's his problem and no one else's. It was his responsibility and obligation to read the contract thoroughly and understand what he was agreeing to before signing a legally binding contract. What he did or did not agree to in the emails is totally irrelevant.

Right. The contract very plainly says any and all disputes will be resolved via arbitration. Since I'm a native English speaker, I can safely say that "any and all disputes" includes ADA disputes.

He's really hung up that they're holding to his agreement to arbitrate. It doesn't matter what he thought he said, he said he would go to arbitration if Freemantle paid his share of the fee. As you said, he fucking signed a contract of his own free will that said he waived his right to sue for any reason.

 

[Pee Cola]

Except that Russhole DID agree to arbitration [...] What he did or did not agree to in the emails is totally irrelevant.

Yes, true. But I wasn't arguing that point in my post (because there's no argument).

I was just pointing out some classic Russhole behaviour in how he went and made himself look worse by admitting to sending Molly nasty emails, despite the fact Molly never brought any of these emails up in her declaration; the timing of said emails presumably being between 19 Jan 2022 through 4 Feb 2022.

 

[Space Cooter]

The email is allegedly from 2015. Hof died in 2018

It could be written by Russ and signature faked, but until I have concrete proof of that I'll assume Hof wrote it. Not really relevant any way.

Mr Hardin how do you have time to do this analysis AND slaunder an innocent jewess all in the same day?

Thanks as always for this. I'm always impressed by how fast you can pump these out citations and all.

 

[The Dude]

Right. The contract very plainly says any and all disputes will be resolved via arbitration. Since I'm a native English speaker, I can safely say that "any and all disputes" includes ADA disputes.

Either Russhole is lying his ass off here, being willfully obtuse, or he really is so fucking stupid and incompetent that he is incapable of understanding clear, simple English.

@Pee Cola I was addressing Russhole insisting that he "hadn't agreed to arbitration" in his emails and response to the MCA. I was in no way questioning your analysis of the emails. I'm sorry if I made it seem like I was.

 

[Daddy's Little Kitten]

Either Russhole is lying his ass off here, being willfully obtuse, or he really is so fucking stupid and incompetent that he is incapable of understanding clear, simple English.

Yes.

 

[Pee Cola]

Either Russhole is lying his ass off here, being willfully obtuse, or he really is so fucking stupid and incompetent that he is incapable of understanding clear, simple English.

All of the above, plus the fact that (at least in my estimation) he's not a reasonable person.

@Pee Cola I was addressing Russhole insisting that he "hadn't agreed to arbitration" in his emails and response to the MCA. I was in no way questioning your analysis of the emails. I'm sorry if I made it seem like I was.

It's all good. This thread has been moving so fast and trying to absorb it all would be difficult enough at the best of times... but right now there's a torrential downpour of Russhole milk and there isn't a bucket big enough to catch it all.