- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
Artcow WogglebugLoveProductions / Cynthia Hanson / Cherie Anne Hapney - One Womanchild's Fruitless Quest to Make Her Cockroach Husbando a Household Name
- Thread starter BriarHeart
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
I realize of course @indigoisviolet knows that trailer for that movie has nothing to do with me, or the Wogglebug, or IClone. She's just teasing me. And I know the rest of you are playing along to just get a rise out of me or something. But I'll just ignore it.
UselessPieceOfShit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2021
What? But the title of youtube video says that it's a Wogglebug movie. He is here in this video too.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
You know, I know I'm a johnny-come-lately to this thread, and I'm sure this has all been discussed to death in the preceding 400 pages, but I have to say I found the video "Mr Wogglebug Comes to Visit Me" especially poignant. I was frozen, almost paralyzed, with pity and discomfort throughout its entire runtime.
indigoisviolet
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2022
There's no need to be coy @WogglebugLover while it's true your new film has faults, it's an incredible step up from your other work. Ignore the stupid professional critics giving it 4/10 and the ignorant audience scores; they just don't know about Mr Woggle-Bug enough to understand why this film is so important in the Genoma mythos.
Well... I wasn't expecting this new Mr Woggle-Bug film to be quite so erotic! There's a very beautifully rendered girl-in-white-dress opening scene and then BAMN HARD CUT TO weirdo moth costumed asian fetish porn! I like how you chose to make Lily old enough for this sort of thing, I think that's a much more commercial approach than all that MAP advocacy nonsense in your early work with Sylvie.
I have criticisms, obviously, but don't take them personally. The story itself rushes to get to the good bits and nudity a little bit too quickly. You've obviously seen the 1990s Jeremy Irons film Lolita, too, a little bit too obviously, but you haven't read the book. You can always tell someone who hasn't read the book, they take it all at face value: Lolita is a satire of Baby Burlesque and Nabokov's dire warning about Hollywood sexualising children in movies. Then we have the problem with the strange guy who gives the protagonist his pills: if you are going to set something like this up, you have to follow through with it and explain it satisfactorily. Resorting to "you bring your own interpretation" is really tired and eye-rolling. And I appreciate you've tried to be clever and given yourself a Get Out Of Movie Cliché Jail Free card by making the protagonist an unreliable narrator, but that only stretches so far. In fact it becomes a problem with Lily's behaviour in general: there is a fine line between an audience asking itself "is this scene real?" and realising that there isn't a film if it is not. Fair enough, you gave it a really good go, we can overlook certain things.
I've seen worse and far more pretentious psychological horror films, far worse. The astonishing iClone cgi visuals are pretty enough to keep going the full 90mins even though the audience works out what's going on much, much sooner.
Top job @WogglebugLover am looking forward to your next feature length film now!
Well... I wasn't expecting this new Mr Woggle-Bug film to be quite so erotic! There's a very beautifully rendered girl-in-white-dress opening scene and then BAMN HARD CUT TO weirdo moth costumed asian fetish porn! I like how you chose to make Lily old enough for this sort of thing, I think that's a much more commercial approach than all that MAP advocacy nonsense in your early work with Sylvie.
I have criticisms, obviously, but don't take them personally. The story itself rushes to get to the good bits and nudity a little bit too quickly. You've obviously seen the 1990s Jeremy Irons film Lolita, too, a little bit too obviously, but you haven't read the book. You can always tell someone who hasn't read the book, they take it all at face value: Lolita is a satire of Baby Burlesque and Nabokov's dire warning about Hollywood sexualising children in movies. Then we have the problem with the strange guy who gives the protagonist his pills: if you are going to set something like this up, you have to follow through with it and explain it satisfactorily. Resorting to "you bring your own interpretation" is really tired and eye-rolling. And I appreciate you've tried to be clever and given yourself a Get Out Of Movie Cliché Jail Free card by making the protagonist an unreliable narrator, but that only stretches so far. In fact it becomes a problem with Lily's behaviour in general: there is a fine line between an audience asking itself "is this scene real?" and realising that there isn't a film if it is not. Fair enough, you gave it a really good go, we can overlook certain things.
Really impressively, you keep the physical existence of Mr Woggle-Bug ambiguous. We never quite see him, he stays in the shadows or just out of shot. Is he a metaphor for the protagonist's compulsive rapey behaviour? Is he real and manipulating events in the old house? The closest we get to a full reveal is this...
...and even then it occurs during a scene of extreme tension, so the audience is still left wondering if he is real or not.
Similarly with the protagoinst rewiring the old house: is this literal or another metaphor for him trying to rewire his brain to rid himself of his worst attributes? These elements work. The use of the ringing telephone as the protagonist refusing to listen to himself was also a very nice passing touch. You know your Lynch.
The issues where the film really falters though are with Lily - real or in his mind - coming onto her uncle quite so bluntly. I don't mean in an icky way, either, the theme of incest is present in your earlier works, you handle it well by simply letting it play out. Thing is, there was a better way to do this, in keeping with the mood of the setting. And it's a shame, this has elements of a really great psychological horror movie. The implication that the protagonist molested little girl Lily in the house many years ago and unleashed Mr Woggle-Bug from the seashell who then lurked and grew could have been handled so much better, even as metaphor. As it is the protagonist isn't sympathetic or repentant enough to make us give a shit about him. Of course, ultimately it could all have been in his mind, the girl in the white dress, Lily and her brother, all of it, and he was just a crazy man losing control and killing himself, and that really doesn't help make a satisfying story at all. There is no rewatch value to this film, especially as you can loop all the erotic bits into a webm that fits under 3MB. So I'm told.
...and even then it occurs during a scene of extreme tension, so the audience is still left wondering if he is real or not.
Similarly with the protagoinst rewiring the old house: is this literal or another metaphor for him trying to rewire his brain to rid himself of his worst attributes? These elements work. The use of the ringing telephone as the protagonist refusing to listen to himself was also a very nice passing touch. You know your Lynch.
The issues where the film really falters though are with Lily - real or in his mind - coming onto her uncle quite so bluntly. I don't mean in an icky way, either, the theme of incest is present in your earlier works, you handle it well by simply letting it play out. Thing is, there was a better way to do this, in keeping with the mood of the setting. And it's a shame, this has elements of a really great psychological horror movie. The implication that the protagonist molested little girl Lily in the house many years ago and unleashed Mr Woggle-Bug from the seashell who then lurked and grew could have been handled so much better, even as metaphor. As it is the protagonist isn't sympathetic or repentant enough to make us give a shit about him. Of course, ultimately it could all have been in his mind, the girl in the white dress, Lily and her brother, all of it, and he was just a crazy man losing control and killing himself, and that really doesn't help make a satisfying story at all. There is no rewatch value to this film, especially as you can loop all the erotic bits into a webm that fits under 3MB. So I'm told.
I've seen worse and far more pretentious psychological horror films, far worse. The astonishing iClone cgi visuals are pretty enough to keep going the full 90mins even though the audience works out what's going on much, much sooner.
Top job @WogglebugLover am looking forward to your next feature length film now!
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2020
Oh yeah, that one is the gold mine. It says everything you need a single video to say about Cherie, her self conception, and how she views herself and her relationship with the bug, etc. Its the first video of hers I show to anyone curious about the lore of this cow. The 'talk show' interview one where Ozma shows up to get told off by the Bug Maury Povich style is pretty good too, if less unintentionally sad/fascinating.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2016
Yeah, by coming back here over and over and over like you did for the past 7 years or so.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
What are you talking about? That was DEFINITELY the Wogglebug in that movie. I mean who else would make a movie about him?
But this is all part of her master plan. What's the one guaranteed way to make something successful? Have people talk about it of course. And who talks more about the Wogglebug than us? If she wasn't such a retard I'd say her plan was genius. So that just means somebody else came up with it.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2015
I can't speak for everyone, but I am personally somewhere between 73.28% and 89.65% sure that you are involved with it. Due to your past dishonesty, such as in denying that the Wogglebug and the Frogman are in a loving, same-sex relationship despite that clearly being the case, I cannot take your denial of involvement in Seeds at face value. Can you prove that you aren't involved? Perhaps some sort of documentation from Seeds producers that you are not attached to the project?
Sorry to double post, but I did some digging back through my inbox and found my own CDOI (Certification of Denial of Involvement) from the writer/director of Seeds that he sent out to everyone in 2018. Surely, if you are not involved in the movie as you say (despite that directly contradicting the writer/director's claims! curious!), you have one, too, as everyone got them. I redacted my name, since you've tried to dox people in the past, but as you can see, this is clearly mine, as it's a screenshot from my inbox and is dated mid-2018.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2020
This must be what was leaked to Peter Dinklage.
Something something Wogglebug lol
Aktchally, few lols. This thing is kind of depressing.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
I thought I was following this thread and had a good understanding of what was happening. Thanks for the dunning-kreuger effect.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
Can't argue with that kind of evidence. It's an e-mail sent three years ago. That's proof positive that Seeds is a Wogglebug movie.
Case closed.
UselessPieceOfShit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2021
I usually don't feel sorry for lolcows, but I hope Cynthia was informed about Seeds production.... If not, the director of this movie is kind of a prick. Ouch.
Picklechu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
Seeds being a Wogglebug movie is a twist like Split being a sequel to Unbreakable. Not showing Mr. HM* Wogglebug, TE** directly also reminded me of the Cloverfield monster, as someone else said, which made something that would otherwise be kind of ridiculous threatening. Fantastic work, Cherie! Make more like this!
* Homosexual Male
** Throbbing Erection
* Homosexual Male
** Throbbing Erection
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2016
Cynthia actually deserves whatever coming at her at this point because her absolute refusal to improve as a person. There's so many idiotic life choices you can make before everything comes crashing down.
Tbh, it's a miracle that worse shit hasn't happened to her by now, with her scam involvements and general thick headness.
Tbh, it's a miracle that worse shit hasn't happened to her by now, with her scam involvements and general thick headness.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2020
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2020
I know we are only an hour or two into this poll so far, but this seems like confirmation that most followers on her youtube channel must be trolls because the clear majority are going for the answer that would be by far the funniest to see her interpretation of (as well as being off brand for kids entertainment).
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2014
@WogglebugLover make it like survivor and let us vote who gets killed every week and how. Really draw this out, plz and thank you..
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
Wobblebug wouldn't allow voting, as he is a philosopher king and can do no wrong. Assert dominance over the masses!