Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peterson's a decent guy with some good ideas on personal responsibility and self-empowerment, but he doesn't know shit about politics, and it bleeds through when it comes to issues where you need to go for the throat. To use a common example - CRT is a fucking non-starter policy wise on both sides of the political aisle; left, right, center, they all hate it, and the only ones who are outright supportive of it are the hard lefties and race grifters. Similarly, the thing about calling out the 2020 fraud for what it is is that pretty much everyone already knows, even if they won't admit it. At this point, even a massive chunk of the Dem hardline believes Trump got robbed (they're much more split on whether or not this was a good thing, of course), to say nothing of the people outside that hardline base that never saw Biden as legitimate.
Yeah, there have some slap fights between him and the Paleocon/Reactionary end of the Right on Twitter that have been interesting in a geopolitisperg kind of way. I've been curious if the "old" Right would start slipping back in as the NeoCons and Establishment Republicans lose the power to gatekeep them out. I feel like I'd need to make an effort post on my views of how the Conservative movement in America is set up to explain, but in short the goal of the "intellectual" wing of American Conservatism has been to gatekeep the more nationalistic and isolationist Paleocons out of the movement, even though most American Conservatives lean in that direction. This was William F Buckley and the National Review did, but their grasp on the base has been weakened by Trump and his populism severely. There's a bit of a void that I think the IDW is attempting to slip into and that's a problem.The Anons I keep up with have been on his ass for going after frogposters. Insert "two retards fighting" picture here, and all that nonsense.
Lindsey serves a significant purpose (he's the messenger and guy who forced himself to read throughacademic literatureman-made horrors beyond my comprehension, and can get ahold of those "Well, I'm not a Trump fan" guys or those who just can't listen to Alex Jones. However, the Hero Syndrome needs to stop.
I would be extremely interested if anyone can glean additional information on this. That said this cigar may just be a cigar. I would not be surprised if Lander was treating staff the same way he would treat those in his lab at MIT only to find out they either couldn't or wouldn't take it.
Peterson has said some good stuff and dome retarded stuff over the years. You know a human beingPeterson has said some stupid shit recently, on Joe Rogan recently he said that the American middle class being destroyed thanks to offshoring to Chyna is good because Chyna now has hundred of thousands of engineers......who are fucking idiots and I'd never buy anything they engineered.
The election was stolen. It's pretty obvious now, Arizona isn't an outlier. Don't try and say "Republicans gerrymander too" when they get slapped down all the time and RINOs exist. Stick to teaching people to clean their rooms and value yourself.
Nigger, just give it up already. The proles won't listen to you, the goddamn President of the United States. What makes you think "community groups" will fare better? Also, throwing more of our money down the toilet. Gee, thanks.The Biden administration will pay community groups to boost trust in COVID vaccines
Even past that, community groups to appeal to Whom? If you're trying to reach the conservative antivaxxers, are you planning to fund conservative groups? Do you think that group is gonna retain much influence when they suddenly flip the narrative?Nigger, just give it up already. The proles won't listen to you, the goddamn President of the United States. What makes you think "community groups" will fare better? Also, throwing more of our money down the toilet. Gee, thanks.![]()
Difficult to say at this time. It's clear that what he is being fired for is a smokescreen though. The problem is that without more information on what the actual reason is we can only speculate.
See below
Peterson is a classic example of someone who is highly educated and intelligent, who believes that their educational intelligence transfers from the fields they understand to every other field. When you're talking about psychology and fields related to that (psych history, social anthropology, behavioural ethics, collective stories and such) he's pretty much on point. He's at his best when he's asking questions on his podcast, even though he can get a bit transcendental. He's at his worst when he's the one answering questions; once he starts talking about politics, he gets a bit out there. The farther he is from his knowledge domain, the more insane he sounds when he's being queried. I certainly wouldn't ask him how to resolve pathfinding in arbitrarily large, multi-dimensional arrays, for instance, but I'd be inclined to trust his answers about the influence and growth of social structures.
Between these two, they cover it in totality. There is a reason I personally try to keep my opinions to the realm of politics. Peterson is a shining example of what happens when an expert in one field thinks it makes them an expert in all fields.Peterson's a decent guy with some good ideas on personal responsibility and self-empowerment, but he doesn't know shit about politics, and it bleeds through when it comes to issues where you need to go for the throat. To use a common example - CRT is a fucking non-starter policy wise on both sides of the political aisle; left, right, center, they all hate it, and the only ones who are outright supportive of it are the hard lefties and race grifters. Similarly, the thing about calling out the 2020 fraud for what it is is that pretty much everyone already knows, even if they won't admit it. At this point, even a massive chunk of the Dem hardline believes Trump got robbed (they're much more split on whether or not this was a good thing, of course), to say nothing of the people outside that hardline base that never saw Biden as legitimate.
So why is it Peterson thinks avoiding it is the better option? He's trying to logic it out, but he's using the wrong frame of mind for it. In his mind, as I understand it, there's a thousand more direct issues you can hammer that are vastly more effective, so locking these seems like a waste. The reason he's wrong is that every one of these is another chink in the armor, and the Biden Administration, starved as it is, cannot afford to let any go unresponded to - and in those responses it will always overreach.
Black people, who have one of the lowest vaccination rates in America.community groups to appeal to Whom?
He's also Canadian. I don't walk into Canadian topics and profess myself an expert or an interested party; Peterson shouldn't waddle into American politics and profess himself an expert or an interested party.Peterson is a shining example of what happens when an expert in one field thinks it makes them an expert in all fields.
Midterms are around the corner and the approval ratings are in the dumps so maybe the plan is to spin a narrative that the Republican Party and Trump are responsible for all the lockdowns and mandates. I think someone earlier predicted this as a possibility. If I recall they said that if the Democratic Party did this the Republican Party wouldn't really know how to react because it makes things more complicated then rightfully blaming the other party for pushing all of this restrictive lockdown policy in the first place.WTF? White House now says they never wanted lockdowns and most of them happened under Drumph.
Republicans could point to the fact that Trump said in the presidential debates that he wanted no more lockdowns and less restrictions. Well Biden for the past year was trying to push restrictions non stop.Midterms are around the corner and the approval ratings are in the dumps so maybe the plan is to spin a narrative that the Republican Party and Trump are responsible for all the lockdowns and mandates. I think someone earlier predicted this as a possibility. If I recall they said that if the Democratic Party did this the Republican Party wouldn't really know how to react because it makes things more complicated then rightfully blaming the other party for pushing all of this restrictive lockdown policy in the first place.
The left pushed the idea that republicans were the ones wanting to defund the police and their adherents ate it up like slop. The party line never has to make sense, it just has to feel good to say.Republicans could point to the fact that Trump said in the presidential debates that he wanted no more lockdowns and less restrictions. Well Biden for the past year was trying to push restrictions non stop.
Just run ads of Democratic Party people forcing children to run wear masks (while they don't) for the past year along with forcing mandates on everything. Just keep it to everything past Jan 20 cause god damn there is enough stuff in here.Midterms are around the corner and the approval ratings are in the dumps so maybe the plan is to spin a narrative that the Republican Party and Trump are responsible for all the lockdowns and mandates. I think someone earlier predicted this as a possibility. If I recall they said that if the Democratic Party did this the Republican Party wouldn't really know how to react because it makes things more complicated then rightfully blaming the other party for pushing all of this restrictive lockdown policy in the first place.
Nah it's more like this..."Everyday reality calls the Biden administration and everyday Biden hangs up the phone."
Gaslighting bastards. But it's not at all surprising.Midterms are around the corner and the approval ratings are in the dumps so maybe the plan is to spin a narrative that the Republican Party and Trump are responsible for all the lockdowns and mandates. I think someone earlier predicted this as a possibility. If I recall they said that if the Democratic Party did this the Republican Party wouldn't really know how to react because it makes things more complicated then rightfully blaming the other party for pushing all of this restrictive lockdown policy in the first place.
Republicans R Real LockdownersTrying to paint the Republicans as the party of lockdowns will work as well as when Democrats tried painting them as the defund the police party.