Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Viridian]

So let's back up a bit and do a more in-depth analysis of part of the recent bounty of milk we've received. For a long time, the Farrah Abraham lolsuit was seen as something of a footnote in Russhole's lolcow career. The whole thing went down before his thread was created, so there wasn't a lot of documentation to go on. Russhole rarely mentioned it himself by the time his antics started to be archived here. Now though, thanks to Molly Lens and her law firm putting his original complaints on the record in the current lolsuit and @The Great Citracett recovering long thought lost videos, we can see that the Farrah Abraham lolsuit was very much the prototype for the Taylor Swift lolsuits. The direct parallels (and blatant pseudolegalese copypastas) are plain as day to see. Let's go through them!

Parallel #1 - Use of multiple crudely scrawled attraction signs.

Farrah:

Taylor:

Parallel #2 - Writing songs about them, using their names in the titles.

Farrah:

Taylor:

Spoiler: Sidenote: What happened to the Farrah song?

It was reused in an attempt to "woo" another female celebrity, Kylie Jenner. As proof, here are the opening lyrics as shown in Russhole's "Win a Date with Farrah Abraham" video:

The opening lyrics from "Win a Date with Kylie Jenner":

I'd kinda like to meet Kylie Jenner
But I'm scared out of my mind to get her attention

Parallel #3 - Alleging a professor warned him against "wooing" her.

From Greer v. Abraham:

From Greer v. Swift 2:

Parallel #4 - Alleging he lost his job at TraskBritt directly because of his efforts to "woo" her.

From Greer v. Abraham:

From Greer v. Swift 2:

Note that Russhole did not blame Taylor Swift for this particular job loss in Greer v. Swift 1. He added that allegation later when he came up with his delusional conspiracy theory that she was out to ruin his life because her family called him "invasive and troubling" in the response to that lawsuit:

Parallel #5 - Russhole reused the exact same language to sue both Farrah and Taylor.

The "eggshell skull plaintiff" arguments from first and last pages of the initial complaint in Greer v. Abraham:

The "eggshell skull plaintiff" arguments from the first and last pages of the initial complaint in Greer v. Swift 1:

Russhole's claimed "injuries" in Greer v. Abraham:

Russhole's claimed "injuries" in Greer v. Swift 1:

There are other copy and paste instances but this post is long enough as it is. Russhole simply reused his Farrah Abraham lawsuit against a new target after Farrah countersued him and he pissed himself and dropped the suit against her. I wonder if he would have still sued Taylor Swift three times if she had taken a similar tactic with him? He stopped suing Ariana Grande after he was forced to pay attorney's fees, after all.

Spoiler: Other interesting sidenotes.

Ironically, Russhole TWICE described Taylor Swift as a "reasonable celebrity" in Greer v. Abraham:

In Greer v. Swift 1, Russhole claims Taylor Swift first came to his attention in 2014, while he was in college. There's no mention of the story he put in his book "Why I Sued Taylor Swift" of how he was introduced to Taylor's music by his sister while he was in prison following his high school shooting threat:

Note he also claims he was somehow helping her career by writing a shitty song using her song titles as lyrics.

Freudian slip as to Russhole's true intentions at the end of this paragraph:

Russhole confesses repeatedly that the song was 100% not a gift, it was a pitch, an attempt to convince Taylor Swift to hire him to write music for her:

 

[Constellationzero]

He wrote "I'd Kinda Like to Meet Kylie Jenner." "I'm not tryna be creepy."
So, yeah, dipshit took the Kylie song, word for word and swapped out Farrah, or vice-versa.

Hashtag NotADate

Win A Date with Kylie Jenner

This is a little jingle I wrote in the hopes of impressing Kylie Jenner. Produced in Nashville by some talented folks. I wrote the song.

soundcloud.com

 

[theshep]

and that he misrepresents

Where's the disclaimer, Russ?

 

[Drowningman]

Russ is afraid of getting hit with the Vexaitous Litgant: big time as you can tell from his filings.
If he loses that then his "one weapon to crush them all" goes bye bye and he is powerless.
We all know he uses that to try and get his will but still fails.
How much of a chance do you think FREMANTLE will pursue that charge..

 

[DrJonesHat]

Russ is afraid of getting hit with the Vexaitous Litgant: big time as you can tell from his filings.
If he loses that then his "one weapon to crush them all" goes bye bye and he is powerless.
We all know he uses that to try and get his will but still fails.
How much of a chance do you think FREMANTLE will pursue that charge..

That's the problem. If he loses his ability to sue people willy nilly, he might decide that violence is the solution. I hope his parents realize how much shit he brought on himself and wash their hands of him. I dunno if he was coddled, but somewhere along the line he decided no one was allowed to tell him no, and that's the cause of all his problems. He's an adult now. Let him go. He's beyond saving because he doesn't think he needs help.

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

That's the problem. If he loses his ability to sue people willy nilly, he might decide that violence is the solution. I hope his parents realize how much shit he brought on himself and wash their hands of him. I dunno if he was coddled, but somewhere along the line he decided no one was allowed to tell him no, and that's the cause of all his problems. He's an adult now. Let him go. He's beyond saving because he doesn't think he needs help.

As long as they wash their hands of him after Null is awarded court costs.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

That's the problem. If he loses his ability to sue people willy nilly, he might decide that violence is the solution.

He probably fantasies about hurting people but I doubt he would put himself in a situation where he needs to physically confront another person. We're talking about Russ who has nervous breakdowns over court documents. If he was face to face with someone shouting at him he would likely soil his pants.

 

[Dr. Henry Armitage]

I'm attempting to go through the thread from the beginning and make an archive of every screencap, document, video, etc. Hopefully so it can be uploaded and anyone can find whatever they want from the thread easily. I'm at page 60 now.

I noticed a bunch of videos were uploaded to mixtape and lost when that died, but Wayback Machine works to bring them back so they don't get lost again. Also works on his Animoto ones too.

Godspeed you magnificent bastard.

 

[DrJonesHat]

As long as they wash their hands of him after Null is awarded court costs.

Yeah. I hope they're feeling merciful one last time and pay off Null's fees that their insane son racked up because he thinks it's illegal to make fun of him.

I had a thought. Russ is clearly spiraling out of control. I'm worried that if Freemantle gets him slapped with restrictions on filing he might escalate to violence because lawsuits have always been his way of lashing out. Assuming they even care at this point, do Russ's parents have grounds to get a conservatorship over him? He's sued and is about to lose to a major company, and get hit with fees and costs he can't possibly afford. As Freemantle's lawyers established, Russ has a pattern of filing lawsuits in bad faith to try to force female celebrities to pay attention to him/fuck him. He's never going to stop until someone makes him. I think he's established he's at least a danger to himself, if not others given that he's had at least three restraining orders against him.

 

[Miss Misery]

He's already admitted in several filings RECENTLY that his TS filing was a "publicity stunt" among other things. Doesn't that imply that the claims were fraudulent or that they were filed in bad faith? Or does implication not matter?

 

[DrJonesHat]

View attachment 2969660

He's already admitted in several filings RECENTLY that his TS filing was a "publicity stunt" among other things. Doesn't that imply that the claims were fraudulent or that they were filed in bad faith? Or does implication not matter?

He doesn't think they were filed in bad faith, because he doesn't know what bad faith means in a legal context. He thinks filing in good faith means "I think I'm right" so they're in good faith in his mind.

 

[Miami]

He doesn't think they were filed in bad faith, because he doesn't know what bad faith means in a legal context. He thinks filing in good faith means "I think I'm right" so they're in good faith in his mind.

I thought one of the judges explained it to him and in true Russ fashion his brain simply deleted it and replaced it with what he wanted it to mean instead?

 

[Drowningman]

He wouldn't know what bad faith is if it was a truck that hit him 1000 times.

 

[The Great Citracett]

I thought one of the judges explained it to him and in true Russ fashion his brain simply deleted it and replaced it with what he wanted it to mean instead?

They tried to explain it to him in the Ariana trial, but that worked about as well as you'd expect.

 

[RodgerDodger]

As long as they wash their hands of him after Null is awarded court costs.

I hate to be a downer, but it is unlikely Null will see a costs award out of Russhole like he almost certainly will Melinda. Just because Russhole has one almost legitimate question of law involving the copyright claim. Russ is going to lose on that question and lose hard. But it will make any move for fees a steeply uphill battle.

I do have to wonder does Russhole referencing and grossly misrepresenting the Russhole v Joshua Moon etc case in his filing here leave an opening for Null and Skordas to file an amicus brief seeking to correct the record? Which would of course trigger an epic meltdown of spit drool and plights. At the very least it might warrant a letter sent to Russ's nice new Copyright Troll Law team inquiring as to "What the Fuck is their client doing.? Oh and did they happen to notice how he was misrepresenting their endorsements of him in Federal Court?" ("Oh and guys, you might just want to read the ENTIRE Freemantle Filing to comprehend just who and what you've hitched your little red wagon to. Due Diligence! Always do it!")

 

[Miss Misery]

He doesn't think they were filed in bad faith, because he doesn't know what bad faith means in a legal context. He thinks filing in good faith means "I think I'm right" so they're in good faith in his mind.

He admitted he "faked sued" her in a different filing: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/russe...ssell29-a-safer-nevada-pac.30488/post-9707598

6​

 

[moorhen]

Do we think that he lies in his legal filings on purpose or that he’s just twisted the truth in his head to favour him so much that he genuinely believes what he’s writing?

He keeps bringing up that his other suits have nothing to do with the ADA but his lawsuit of Grande revolved entirely around him being discriminated against for his disability. Does he think that doesn’t count because he didn’t ask for accommodations?
Claiming you were treated differently to the point that it had a detrimental effect on your mental health and that it was because you were disabled is like textbook ADA,

Every single suit he’s filled he’s mentioned that he thinks something happened because of his gorked up face. I mean, everything bad that’s ever happened to him in his life he claims has happened because of his permanent gimp mask.

Surely, if they chose to, Molly et al could point this out to the court? They’ve spoken about his pattern of behaviour in his lawsuits, and if there’s one thing Rusty loves more than suing women who don’t give him suck, it’s using his disability as a shield for his terrible, terrible actions.

 

[NaggotFigger]

Do we think that he lies in his legal filings on purpose or that he’s just twisted the truth in his head to favour him so much that he genuinely believes what he’s writing?

Possibly. He lies a lot and twists things into unbelievable babblings that fits his appealings and beliefs. That's what Russhole's women-obsessing fantasies ending up causing him to filling the absolute worst of lolsuits and legal filings with his retarded thoughts and excuses.

He keeps bringing up that his other suits have nothing to do with the ADA but his lawsuit of Grande revolved entirely around him being discriminated against for his disability. Does he think that doesn’t count because he didn’t ask for accommodations?

Because he thinks he's higher than those people he attacked, and refuse to admit about his lolsuits and demands people or companies to feel bad for him. He doesn't give a shit about that and wants everyone to listen to his lolsuits and why they should see him as a special individual with petty reasons why he filed lolsuits.

Every single suit he’s filled he’s mentioned that he thinks something happened because of his gorked up face. I mean, everything bad that’s ever happened to him in his life he claims has happened because of his permanent gimp mask.

That's just a dumb excuse about his ugly face that he keeps bringing up constantly like nothing for every single petty lawsuits ever beside from women rejecting him or excuses that Russ brought up.

Surely, if they chose to, Molly et al could point this out to the court? They’ve spoken about his pattern of behaviour in his lawsuits, and if there’s one thing Rusty loves more than suing women who don’t give him suck, it’s using his disability as a shield for his terrible, terrible actions.

That's what makes his lolsuits laughable to every single courts he went through. The pattern is recognizable, the excuses are petty and the suing are mostly focused on women or big companies or whatever he thinks that he could sue for big money and especially bringing up his disability and what he has to defend himself in a weak way. Classic o' Russhole, never change.

 

[Pee Cola]

Russ is afraid of getting hit with the Vexaitous Litgant: big time as you can tell from his filings.
If he loses that then his "one weapon to crush them all" goes bye bye and he is powerless.

A legal Kiwi could probably confirm/expand on this, but my understanding is that if one court sanctions a plaintiff as a vexatious litigant, it doesn't necessarily exclude said plaintiff from litigating in other courts. There was a discussion about this in the Melinda Scott thread a while back.

 

[Viridian]

Do we think that he lies in his legal filings on purpose or that he’s just twisted the truth in his head to favour him so much that he genuinely believes what he’s writing?

It's hard to say sometimes, because malignant narcissists like Russhole can indeed be seriously delusional in their thinking. As he stated in his filings, he (delusionally) believes he is a good person, and therefore he will absolutely twist situations around in his head to find some way to keep him free of "sin" and make him the eternal victim, even when he's the one committing heinous acts like stalking and threatening women. Everything he does wrong always has to either be a "misunderstanding" or someone else's fault, never his. But he also admits to telling deliberate lies that he knows are lies, like his recent "explanation" for why he offered to go to arbitration and drop his suit if Fremantle/Marathon paid his arbitration fees, then immediately backtracked because that wouldn't force Heidi Klum to give him attention.

He keeps bringing up that his other suits have nothing to do with the ADA but his lawsuit of Grande revolved entirely around him being discriminated against for his disability. Does he think that doesn’t count because he didn’t ask for accommodations?
Claiming you were treated differently to the point that it had a detrimental effect on your mental health and that it was because you were disabled is like textbook ADA,

While he did not specifically cite the ADA in Greer v. Grande, he did cite part of the Utah Code with similar provisions. I also think some of his case citations involved the ADA but I am not 100% sure on that.

He also claims he contacted Ariana's management prior to the meet and greet to "explain his disability", and did say he should've been provided with "accommodations", specifically a "no judging policy". For real, that's what he said:

TL;DR - Russhole thinks the courts should force you to pay him a bunch of money if he subjectively thinks you've ever looked at him funny because that's "judging" and "disability shaming". Even if you haven't actually done anything to him, looking at him weird (if only in his head) is a crime in and of itself!

ETA: Additionally, in Greer v. Walters Russhole threatened to file a federal discrimination lolsuit against the sex worker he ran out the clock with, specifically under provisions of the ADA. Obviously this federal lawsuit never materialized when he was BFTO of small claims court and got slapped with a protective order.