- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
One of the reasons why I was able to grasp the whole BCI plot aspect of all of this is because I was actually into transhumanism for a very, very long time and am well-acquainted with the implications of it.
The stuff Bannon is talking about here is not science fiction. The tech is in its infancy, as primitive as the Ford Model T is compared to today's cars, but it is rapidly increasing in sophistication. Neuralink can already be used on people, they just haven't done it yet. Gene-editing with CRISPR-Cas9 can alter people's genetic makeup, and even do germline modifications that affect their offspring, and the offspring of their offspring, and so on.
The trouble is, nobody actually knows exactly what to do with any of these things, and that's because organic systems are extremely complex, and experimenting on people is highly unethical.
Want to decipher how to stimulate the brain to generate a HUD in someone's visual field? Good luck. Want to make a superhuman Gattaca Baby? One single gene edit can have many pleiotropic effects downstream that are impossible to simulate or predict.
However, all of these problems are of finite complexity, and one day, they will be able to computationally "solve" organic systems to within a high degree of precision. All bets are off, then. By that point, it wouldn't be out of the question for them to make designer organisms from scratch.
RaTG13 is, without a doubt, a complete forgery that they made to cover up SARS-CoV-2's actual origins. It never actually existed. They just typed it into a BLAST database by hand.
They expect us to believe that RaTG13 sat on a shelf for like six or seven years and no one thought to write a paper on it, despite its obvious similarity to viruses with a high degree of human cell tropism.
The stuff Bannon is talking about here is not science fiction. The tech is in its infancy, as primitive as the Ford Model T is compared to today's cars, but it is rapidly increasing in sophistication. Neuralink can already be used on people, they just haven't done it yet. Gene-editing with CRISPR-Cas9 can alter people's genetic makeup, and even do germline modifications that affect their offspring, and the offspring of their offspring, and so on.
The trouble is, nobody actually knows exactly what to do with any of these things, and that's because organic systems are extremely complex, and experimenting on people is highly unethical.
Want to decipher how to stimulate the brain to generate a HUD in someone's visual field? Good luck. Want to make a superhuman Gattaca Baby? One single gene edit can have many pleiotropic effects downstream that are impossible to simulate or predict.
However, all of these problems are of finite complexity, and one day, they will be able to computationally "solve" organic systems to within a high degree of precision. All bets are off, then. By that point, it wouldn't be out of the question for them to make designer organisms from scratch.
Article below does a better job than yours explaining things imo. One gripe I have with the one you linked is it claims RaTG13 is synthetic when it was isolated from bats in 2013. Also, BLAST only captures what's been sequenced in laboratories and shared, it's possible there are multiple natural links from 2013 to 2019 between RaTG13 and SARS-Cov-2 that simply weren't looked at. Unlikely, but possible.
But we do. In fact Ralph Baric was doing it back in 2015.
Was it?
![]()
RaTG13 is fake
(This is an updated version of my earlier writing, which has just been published at GNEWS: https://gnews.org/192144/ . Unfortunately, the GNEWS version has a few editing errors. So, I am posting...nerdhaspower.weebly.com
RaTG13 is, without a doubt, a complete forgery that they made to cover up SARS-CoV-2's actual origins. It never actually existed. They just typed it into a BLAST database by hand.
They expect us to believe that RaTG13 sat on a shelf for like six or seven years and no one thought to write a paper on it, despite its obvious similarity to viruses with a high degree of human cell tropism.